Λεόφιλος Profile Banner
Λεόφιλος Profile
Λεόφιλος

@Leophilius

998
Followers
948
Following
1,074
Media
23,292
Statuses

Autist || Atheist || Marxist || Autodidact Cosmologist || Natural Philosopher 📚 Metaphysics of Science and Foundations of Physics ✴️ Corn fed and Hawkeye bred.

∫ -∞–∞ |ψ (x, t)|² dx = 1
Joined July 2013
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Pinned Tweet
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
“The Universe just is, and that's all.” – Carl Sagan *image is the first deep field image of the James Webb Space Trlescope
Tweet media one
4
1
37
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
8 months
Jordan Peterson is not a philosopher. He is, however, a blithering idiot.
67
18
293
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
@skatie420 “Is an act pious because the gods decree it? Or do the gods decree it because it is pious?”
0
5
278
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
8 months
1.) Arguments *are* evidence. They are reason-giving with respect to claims (they offer support for claims). 2.) Weak or poor evidence is still evidence. Evidence isn't defined as being necessarily strong. 3.) Positions that are false can still have evidence in their favor.
46
18
121
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 months
Theists *really* do not like how powerful the argument from evil is.
77
3
96
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Tweet media one
0
4
94
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
8 months
Sean Carroll is brilliant.
Tweet media one
27
10
82
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
4 years
You're so fractally wrong on the definition of socialism that you're at level potato. Socialism is the socio-economic ideology in which the means of production, distribution, and exchange are socially owned and democratically controlled by the working class. Far from fascism.
@OsSully
The Ghost of Truth
4 years
@herosnvrdie69 @EricDJuly Socialism: dictatorial power, suppression of opposition and regimentation of society and economy Fascism: dictatorial power, suppression of opposition and regimentation of society and economy Wikipedia readers: these are opposites
54
8
124
2
4
58
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
@RFupdates You'd think a Ph.D. philosopher with the rigor of Dr. Craig would know that a proposition doesn't need to be proven to be more probably true than not, or to be accepted as true. In fact, Dr. Craig makes *this exact* point when defending many of his own arguments.
7
0
69
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
@WKCosmo ??? 4.54B 13.78B Where's the similarity?
11
0
62
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 month
Holy fuck can atheists PLEASE open up an epistemology book and read the words with your eyes and understand them with your brain EVERYONE HAS BELIEFS THAT'S NOT A DIRTY WORD.
11
8
66
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
With every day of this week that passes, I grow more and more disconcerted over how uncharitable, unintellectual, and unlearned most online atheists actually are. I'm frightened.
105
0
65
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
9 months
This makes no sense. Empathy is a particular feeling. It tells us nothing about what we ought or ought not do. The reduction of morality to simple biological traits doesn't work, and it's starting to get annoying seeing people do it. Like, is metaethics really that hard?
@paulogia0
Paulogia
9 months
Empathy is sufficient ontology for morality.
117
41
326
28
1
58
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
7 months
Attacking the fact that these are complex and difficult-to-understand subjects and we're doing our best to wade through it all to find truth isn't the own you think it is.
@CapturingChrist
Capturing Christianity
7 months
💀
Tweet media one
191
17
234
11
3
56
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
Consciousness is physical. Morality is a socio-cultural construct. Universals are concepts. Mental causation doesn't exist. Abstract objects don't exist. Everything is physical or consists in the physical.
@monism_idealism
Monistic Idealism
1 year
Tweet media one
8
17
100
29
4
56
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Mmmmmmm.
Tweet media one
1
7
52
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
This one right now.
Tweet media one
@EmiliaClarkeTM
Emilia Clarke™
3 years
What's your favourite picture of Emilia? 📸
30
19
323
0
2
48
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
8 months
It's fascinating to me how many so-called “skeptics” have no idea what evidence is, or apparently what it means to be a theist or an atheist. Being considerate to theism does not a theist make.
8
5
47
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
A lacktheist went to university, studied philosophy, and abandoned lacktheism. I'm using this as support for my contention that atheists versed in philosophy overwhelmingly reject lacktheism.
@BissetteHunter
HunterWonders
3 years
@CosmicSkeptic finally gets it! Welcome! He’s always been my favorite atheist youtuber 🥺💚
27
19
185
3
5
44
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
8 years
@realDonaldTrump I just ate lunch, where is world hunger? I just flew on a plane, where is gravity?
0
2
42
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
If you're not following Kareem you're really missing out. His threads on statistics/data science are very informative.
@kareem_carr
🔥Kareem Carr | Statistician 🔥
1 year
WHY do we divide by n-1 when computing the sample variance? I've never seen this way of explaining this concept anywhere else. Read on if you want a completely new way of looking at this.
Tweet media one
174
1K
9K
0
3
42
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 months
Many theists I know are critical thinkers. Being religious or theistic does not require some suspension of reason or rationality. Atheists and non-theists, stop assuming yourselves intellectually superior to theists.
@AtheistPhoenix
Phoenix Atheist
2 months
Do you religious people think differently and therefore do not understand critical thinking; or is it all basic parental indoctrination and wilful ignorance?
164
22
266
9
2
43
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
“Atheism” and “agnosticism” deal with two different doxastic attitudes. They're not–and have never been–synonymous. Atheists disbelieve the proposition “gods exist”. Agnostics merely suspend judgement about the proposition.
Tweet media one
14
5
41
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
8 years
America deserves better than xenophobia, than racism, than bigotry and discrimination. America deserves better than Donald Trump. #RNCinCLE
3
31
35
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
Except it isn't a disorder. Same-sex attraction exists in most mammal species, humans included.
@TDisputations
Thomistic Disputations
1 year
The best way to refer to "homosexuals" is as persons with same sex attraction disorder (SSAD). The second best way is as sodomites.
33
35
359
50
2
39
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
If atheists took atheism as a position and presented rigorous philosophical argumentation in favor of its truth, along the lines of Oppy, Draper, or Mackie. Instead we get “YoU aIn't GoT nO evIdEnCe, reLiGiOn iS PoIsoN”.
@holykoolaid
Thomas Westbrook
3 years
What are some ways we can improve the dialogue between atheists and theists?
144
5
101
5
4
35
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
4 months
Has anybody heard of leading Christian philosopher, Jordan Peterson?
27
2
37
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
@ScottFishman @prageru Yes, a thing fundamental to the basic operation of cells isn't natural. Jesus, you people are fucking dumbasses.
0
0
34
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
@SarahSurgey1 No. “Borcestershire” would be pronounced “boar-STER-sure”. You mean to say “boucester”, which could be pronounced as “booster”.
5
0
32
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Behold!
Tweet media one
1
5
32
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
9 months
Naturalism simpliciter may not, but I would contend that naturalism & evolution does. -Predation. -Extinction. -Natural disasters. All would predict suffering in living organisms.
@CapturingChrist
Capturing Christianity
9 months
Quick reminder that Naturalism doesn't predict suffering.
100
3
94
6
2
31
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
5 months
No. Our current physical theories are fine-tuned. Largely because they're incomplete. Reality itself is not fine-tuned. For anything.
@Philip_Goff
Philip Goff
5 months
According to our current best physics the universe is fine-tuned for life. It's astonishing how many people feel able to deny the science on this.
194
17
228
9
0
32
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
Science does not show that. In fact, it shows it's genetically impossible.
@erichovind
Eric Hovind
1 year
Science shows that all humans came from one man and one woman. Yet, the world calls Christians crazy when we say that God has given them a name; Adam and Eve.
200
44
303
4
1
31
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
9 months
Is there a gas leak in his house? I feel like there might be a gas leak in his house, because this is prime ridiculousness.
@CapturingChrist
Capturing Christianity
9 months
Btw, the existence of philosophy is evidence against atheism. A mindless foundation doesn’t predict deep thinking.
225
40
450
13
4
29
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
This is a claim, not an argument.
@wendelltalks
Wendell
1 year
If naturalism was true, we would have zero foundation to trust our own thoughts.
70
11
165
6
2
25
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
1
0
25
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
It blows my mind the number of individuals who hold a Ph.D in physics thinking this qualifies them as an expert in all topics everywhere, ever. Stop. You should know when to recognize the limits of your expertise, and when you need to defer to people smarter than you.
2
0
28
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
That's... what a belief is...
@WrldOfPaleoAnth
World of Paleoanthropology
2 years
Tweet media one
4
25
120
3
3
28
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
This is like saying that adults need to seriously consider if they're on Santa's naughty list this year.
@TDisputations
Thomistic Disputations
1 year
A lot of atheists need to stop for a moment and seriously ask: “Have I sinned in a way that has ruptured my relationship with God?”
229
19
299
5
1
27
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
This is what it looks like when you don't understand categorical logic or the concept of contrariety. All transwomen are women, but not all women are transwomen. Compare: All black women are women, but not all women are black women. “All A's are P, but not all P's are A”.
Tweet media one
9
2
24
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
@CapturingChrist Also, what does it mean for something to be “broadly logically impossible”? Either something is logically impossible, or it isn't.
3
0
25
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
Anybody getting any degree in any field of the natural sciences should be required to take a philosophy of science course.
@IBJIYONGI
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
1 year
My controversial physics and astronomy opinion is that if you have a PhD in either of these subjects and haven’t taken both general relativity and quantum mechanics, your education is incomplete. They’re literally the fundamental theories of the universe. You should know them.
63
34
565
1
4
24
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
4 years
I have a quantum mechanics joke, but I don't know where it is.
@ScientistMel
ScientistMel on bluesky and countersocial
4 years
I have a chemistry joke, but I can only tell it periodically...
39
18
117
4
0
24
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
4 years
This is me. I've hurt myself, I've hurt others; I've often thought myself unattractive, unintelligent, lazy, worthless, annoying, and unbearable. I've tried to take my own life thrice. Failed twice. But I'm starting to like me. I do like me, I like what I am becoming.
Tweet media one
9
0
23
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
9 months
Myself? My family? My friends? Why do these people say the dumbest shit with such confidence?
@robkoons
robkoons
9 months
The saddest thing about being an atheist is that you have no one to be thankful to.
487
7
99
4
0
25
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
Dear Lord this is really, really bad.
Tweet media one
8
1
22
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
I can infallibly know that: A bachelor is an unmarried man. Every object is identical with itself. 2+2=4.
@theosib2
Dr Theosib, CPU expert
1 year
@alancolquhoun1 Truth can never be known infallibly.
4
0
0
9
0
23
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
Yes. Consent is the sole determiner of one's freedom to sex with another. There is no situation or scenario under which any human is owed sex, or owes somebody else sex. Marriage does not obligate you to somebody else's body for your own pleasure, under any circumstances.
@TDisputations
Thomistic Disputations
1 year
@realjeremycubas @SecularOutpost My issue with the modern definition is that it propagates the idea that a right to sex is based solely on consent. So, unmarried people can have a right to sex, and a spouse can remove the right to sex.
39
0
23
5
1
23
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
@Matt_Dillahunty No, they didn't create matter from nothing.
1
0
19
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
@AngelaBelcamino Here's a better question: Why do humans have to pay for things which directly facilitate their survival?
2
3
22
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
8 months
This is what racism looks like.
5
1
22
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Very good thread which acknowledges some of the reasons I think New Atheists™ are so bothered by philosophy.
1
3
22
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
4 years
I never in my life thought I'd hear somebody actually claim that a peer-reviewed journal is “opinion”. I was further surprised when they doubled down on it.
8
2
22
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
Some people's understanding of the history of science is very, very poor. I gave my response to one such instance from “Mr. B” of Red Pen Logic on FaceBook.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
9
1
21
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Hi, I'm an atheist and God does not exist.
@TMMackz
The Creator Unknown
3 years
@BenefactrChurch @TheTweetOfRhea I don’t think I’ve ever met an atheist who positively believes there are no gods & I know hundreds of them. If I’m remembering right, he just didn’t like the label or the connotations, as if his desires are somehow relevant to what is or isn’t true. I know he knows better.
29
0
0
4
0
22
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
This is really funny and empirically inaccurate as all the data shows that conspiracism and dogmatism are higher amongst conservatives.
@TDisputations
Thomistic Disputations
1 year
Atheists and conspiracy theorists are similar in that their egos can really get tied up with the ideology. They think of themselves as being uniquely intelligent for having separated from the rest of the “sheeple.”
41
13
92
1
3
20
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Atheist Republic was literally a bigoted organization which harassed religious people.
@NewStoicTim
Tim, the Bad Stoic 🏛️
3 years
Atheist Republic finally is suspended!
6
2
18
3
1
21
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
11 years
@iLikeGirlsDaily I rarely think about sex. There's more important things.
38
7
19
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
5 months
This is what happens when you herpity derpity your way through philosophy.
@skdh
Sabine Hossenfelder
5 months
@makikaa12 @Philip_Goff "physicalism" is a word that people on twitter use to say they don't understand physics
64
5
36
2
2
21
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
@alecriiley @bodyaudy Holy God please read some epistemology, both of you.
2
0
20
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Ope.
Tweet media one
1
5
19
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
When she isn't made up and reveals her natural beauty. ☺️☺️☺️👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾
Tweet media one
@EmiliaClarkeTM
Emilia Clarke™
3 years
What is Emilia's SUPERIOR look? 👀
22
3
97
0
0
21
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
4 months
@sygarte I like how you're conflating these men's conservatism with their atheism. Also, neither Boghossian nor Silverman are even remotely close to philosophers. You're looking for people like Paul Draper or Graham Oppy, or even Alex Malpass.
1
1
19
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
If only atheists studied semantics, they might understand why defining a position as not a position is really fucking stupid. 😒😒😒
@Captain_DadPool
CaptainDadPool
2 years
I’ve upset a lot of Christians in my time, but for some reason defining atheism as “a lack in the belief of God” has them all reading dictionaries and studying semantics and I’m pretty proud of that.
26
8
220
0
2
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
You were corrected by two professional historians on the matter. You made an erroneous claim which was corrected and have refused to correct yourself this far. Why do atheists–who scream about intellectuality–refuse to ever correct their dubious understandings of Christianity?
@godless_mom
🇨🇦Courtney Heard (she/her)
3 years
Today I learned facts are an attack.
10
3
37
1
1
20
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 months
@thesaviorweneed That's not an objection, though. And the force of the logical argument from evil is certainly logical, not emotional. The problem isn't an emotional problem in the argument, it's a logical problem.
4
0
20
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
@michaeljknowles You think this is as intellectual as atheism gets? Would you be willing to defend theism versus atheism in a formal debate? I'll challenge @michaeljknowles to a debate on the topic “Does God Exist?” or “Is Atheism Intellectual?” I don't expect a response.
4
1
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
New Atheists don't know how to successfully run the argument from evil or the argument from hiddenness. This is where part of the desire to redefine “atheism” comes from; their inability to rationally defend the belief that gods do not exist.
@lizjackson111
Liz Jackson Withorn
2 years
“Lack-theism” suggests there aren’t good arguments for atheism; proponents seem hesitant to take a stand & try to discharge the burden of proof. A better idea: say you don’t believe in God because of the problem of evil or hiddenness. This is a much more respectable position.
76
13
122
3
2
19
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
6 years
Nancy Pelosi is a corporate neoliberal in the model of Hillary Clinton. She will not work to end Citizens United, she will not work toward meaningful campaign finance reform, and she will not work toward a single-payer, universal healthcare system.
@IlhanMN
Ilhan Omar
6 years
Leader Pelosi understands the value of uplifting and advancing all the voices with our caucus. That’s why, I am excited to vote to return the gavel to her in January & get to work on behalf of the American people 💪🏽 #Newmajority
107
93
955
1
8
17
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
Atheists stop saying Christmas is pagan and start presenting a meaningful defense of the argument from evil challenge
12
0
19
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
Are we just slapping labels on ourselves, now? I'm an astrophysicist. And a cosmologist. And a metaphysician. And a philosopher of science.
@TheTweetOfRhea
𝓡𝓱𝓮𝓪 𝓝𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮
2 years
As a logician, I will never understand how any adult could be fooled into believing in anything supernatural like God.
309
99
984
2
3
19
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
@CapturingChrist What's the contradiction?
3
0
19
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
Here's some online atheists engaging discharitably.... ....on the post that I made about online atheists engaging discharitably. You can't make this shit up. Doing the meme in the meme is peak moron.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
5
0
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
Precognition ≠ predetermination. God's *knowledge* of future events does not imply that God *intended* for those events, specifically, to happen.
@GodsNotReal_
God Is Not Real
1 year
Often times I say "atheism is not an assertion," and believers think they've cornered me when they say "Your name is GOD IS NOT REAL!" My response is that I claim a specific God (capital G) does not exist, and have no claim for all gods (lower case g). This graphic explains.
Tweet media one
98
50
347
14
0
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
There's no such thing as “the founder of transgenderism”. “Transgenderism” isn't a thing. There's been transgender people for thousands of years. This is like saying there's a “founder of the Jews”, or a “founder of blacks”.
@TDisputations
Thomistic Disputations
1 year
This focus on the founder of transgenderism seems like a distraction from the key problems at best, a genetic fallacy at worst.
8
1
33
3
0
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
The lack of literally any meaningful understanding of even basic concepts in philosophy by new atheists is really starting to make it very difficult to have meaningful, charitable, and honest discussions with them. It's actually really, really bad. Like REALLY bad.
8
2
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
4 months
I am 100% sure that 2 + 2 = 4 under the current axioms of mathematics.
@Philip_Goff
Philip Goff
4 months
It's unhinged dogmatism to be 99.9999 sure of anything. Discuss.
249
19
276
5
0
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
In reading the comments to this solid question by Jackson, a common response is “it's easier to defend”, or “I want to keep the burden of proof on the theist”. This is very revealing as to the reasons they misuse the term “atheism” as “lack of belief”: Intellectual laziness.
@JacksonWheat1
Jackson Wheat
3 years
I don’t know why so many atheists want to say they simply “lack belief in the existence of gods.” I think there is a good case to be made for strong atheism, and that we should be forward in saying “I believe gods do not exist.”
180
25
333
6
0
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
“I'm mad that people don't like my barbaric, antiquated, and highly traditionalistic beliefs that lead to the authoritative regimentation of society in ways that opress other demographics, so now I need to bitch about those people to my followers to stroke my fragile ego”.
@TDisputations
Thomistic Disputations
1 year
The first people to be against bullying are also the first people to name call. “Bigot, misogynist, incel,” etc.
8
5
82
1
0
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
All of the physics relevant to our everyday lives is completely known. – Sean Carroll
11
1
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
This is still up? It hasn't been deleted yet? Wow.
@TheTweetOfRhea
𝓡𝓱𝓮𝓪 𝓝𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮
2 years
Praying for an individual without their consent is similar to rape.
212
12
114
1
0
17
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
I really wanted to plug my stream from earlier today, where we discussed teleological arguments, and I think we covered quite a bit of ground on the subject, in terms of defenses and objections. I highly encourage all those interested to check it out.
2
5
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
I don't know how one suspends judgement on the proposition “God exists” whilst also believing (a judgement) the proposition “God exists”. Do people think at all anymore?
@evilsteveve
Steve Morgan
1 year
An agnostic theist is a person who believes in God but is honest enough to admit they don't know really know for sure.
4
1
12
6
1
18
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
10 months
If this were the case, natural theology should be able to reproduce all of sciences advances without needing to turn to science. Natural theology cannot do that.
@CapturingChrist
Capturing Christianity
10 months
Here's a hill I'm willing to die on: Science and Natural Theology use identical epistemological methods.
19
4
54
4
0
17
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
6 years
How often does that thing see mud?
1
1
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
The comments on Jackson's tweet here make explicitly clear that atheism is not synonymous with intellectuality, skepticism, or critical thought.
@JacksonWheat1
Jackson Wheat
1 year
My fellow atheists, I am once again asking you to make good arguments against theism that don’t involve “but where did God come from?”
421
25
317
3
0
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
4 years
My debate on @Agree2disagre11 with @CatzConspiracy was... interesting, if anything. Found out that I was debating a flat-Earther who didn't believe in space but argued that space is expanding. Overall 10/10 would go back on.
7
2
17
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
1.) Atheism fits better with my priors and background beliefs. 2.) Atheism fits better with the world we observe. 3. God concepts are ill-defined and largely culturally based.
@Sacrilegious_D
⚛️Sacrilegious➖Discourse📍
3 years
What are your top 3 reasons you are an #atheist ?
179
10
64
3
1
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
@SocStonks @TIA_Lucas20520 That's literally what it means to believe something. To believe something is to accept it as true. I don't know why people act like belief is a dirty word; it's almost as if people don't know anything about epistemology.
5
1
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Remember, New Atheists™ have to share a single brain cell between them, so it all depends on who's day it is to have it. Yes, I know I'm being mean. Yes, it's facetious. No, I don't care if it hurts feelings.
@philipmuller
Philip Müller
3 years
Did part of the online atheist community collectively decide to start this month off with an avalanche of trash memes and takes or something? What is going onnnn?!?
5
3
30
5
5
17
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
That there is/are no god(s).
@evilsteveve
Steve Morgan
1 year
What propositions does atheism make that can be evaluated as true or false?
14
0
4
4
0
17
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
@_counterpoints_ It looks like somebody tried to take a bite out of a very hard, frozen piece of chocolate.
0
0
13
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
This is why atheists seriously need to read on epistemology. I *am* certain that Elvis Presley is not the current President of the United States. Certitude is a measure of an agent's confidence in some proposition; it isn't a measure of the truth of said proposition.
@erichovind
Eric Hovind
1 year
Elvis Presley DESTROYS Atheist!👏😂
107
34
141
8
0
15
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
About the Tour vs. Farina debate: James Tour did what James Tour does. Incessant caterwauling about how WE'RE CLUELESS AND YOU DONT UNDERSTAND IT without providing argumentation. He also consistently interrupted Dave. Dave, however, saw fit to verbally attack the audience.
6
1
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
8 years
Tweet media one
0
3
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
Be sure to tune into to @seanmcarroll on @Aron_Ra 's channel at 4PM, CST. They're discussing the origin of the Universe and the existence of the soul.
@Aron_Ra
Aron Ra
3 years
Today we're getting some clarification on the eternity of the universe and the impossibility of the human soul.
9
16
84
1
4
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
1 year
New haul.
Tweet media one
5
0
15
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
3 years
I think it's time to make the announcement. THIS FRIDAY I will be debating none other than Kent Hovind on Big Bang cosmology vs. Biblical cosmology, on @truth_standing 's channel. Show up and give me some love in the chat!
5
2
16
@Leophilius
Λεόφιλος
2 years
Forgive any ignorance in this question, but it's been bugging me for a few days and I can't find any answers by Googling. So, @WKCosmo , @StartsWithABang , @seanmcarroll , @skdh , @NickLucid - Is the Higgs mechanism a fundamental interaction, or can it be considered one?
10
6
17