So simple and melodic, who wouldn't want to learn German? Well, if you wouldn't,
@SuhBetty
and I have you covered with the English version of our
@SWP_IntSecurity
#STAND
Comment on a Trump II presidency & expectations for US nuclear assurances in the Indo-Pacific.
Australia, Japan and South Korea are not worried about US nuclear assurances under a Trump presidency. In their SWP Comment,
@liviuhorovitz
and
@SuhBetty
@SWP_IntSecurity
explain why this is the case and what it means for Europe.
If frightening the bejesus out of people leads to more thinking, fine, but the evidence from Russia’s war against Ukraine does not support these conjectures. While
@FRHoffmann1
bottom line is probably correct, I’d wager the Russia problem is about recklessness, not resolve. [1/9]
In this thread, I will explain why we are much closer to war with 🇷🇺 than most people realize and why our time window for rearmament is shorter than many believe. In my opinion, we have at best 2-3 years to re-establish deterrence vis-à-vis 🇷🇺. Here's why 👇 1/20
Neither strategic ambiguity (Western troops may eventually fight in Ukraine) nor clear red lines (never, never, never, I promise) involve free meals - despite the many claims to the contrary here on Twitter. A few observations with my cold morning coffee☕️ & some questions❓.1/10
Bottom line: Yes, NATO must credibly deny Russia the ability to seize significant territory or attack critical infrastructure. But not because of a gap in resolve, but because once again betting that Putin "can't be that crazy" seems like a very dangerous proposition. [9/9]
Meine zwei Cent im Gespräch mit
@BelojaKatja
von
@ZDFheute
zu der Idee eines europäischen Nukleararsenals: Es wäre vielleicht smarter, sich mehr Gedanken über konventionelle Mängel zu machen und nukleare Märchen erst einmal zu vertagen.
Bottom line: Either I'm missing something (which is likely, not only because of cold coffee), or this is (once again) useless European bickering & tinkering instead of dropping useless posturing & annoying public lamenting, and pushing together for a more palatable outcome.10/10
Professional update: Happy to start a research position
@SWPBerlin
, working again on
#nuclearpolicy
. Fewer dusty archives, more policy engagement - win some, lose some 🤣. Looking forward to learning from a great team
@SWP_IntSecurity
!
But it’s not all roses🌹! Most experts agreed Russia could not take Ukraine. The empirical test shows that Russia indeed cannot take Ukraine. But Putin decided to do try nonetheless. Hence, Moscow is not more resolved than NATO. It is merely significantly more reckless! [7/9]
Recklessness looks scarier up close than it does from a distance. It would be Eastern Europeans lands that Putin would try to invade. No, he’d probably not be able to keep them forever. But even when he’d fail & NATO would succeed, who wants their cities bombed to rubble? [8/9]
Russia’s nuclear innuendo probably led to Western salami-tactics – slower and fewer deliveries – but nobody folded. Assuming Ukraine is worth more to Russia than Estonia & Estonia worth more to West than Ukraine, why should we expect such tactics to work against NATO? [4/9]
There is no evidence that the ongoing war taught Moscow that the West lacks resolve. Yes, the war revealed stakes & contradictions. No, the West did not run for the hills: It provided military & financial assistance to Ukraine & imposed sanctions against Russia. [3/9]
Conventional & nuclear de-escalation strikes & aggressive sanctuarization failed in the war against Ukraine. No reason to believe it would work against NATO. Yes, it's been discussed, both in Russia & abroad. Yes, Russia may try them. No, it's not what keeps me up at night. [2/9]
Our updated nuclear chronology is now online🎉! Throughout 2022, with
@annac_arndt
, we traced Russia’s🇷🇺 nuclear rhetoric💣 & the reactions of the West. Thanks to all
@SWPBerlin
& especially within
@SWP_IntSecurity
#STAND
who helped! Hopefully useful. []
Some counterfactuals: If we’re that un-resolved, why did this not happen already? Why not threaten nuclear Armageddon today & subjugate all of Europe? And can military capabilities replace such a complete lack of resolve? Would we even fight? BOTH force AND resolve needed. [6/9]
German red lines are understandable. But: Once you draw them, you need to make damn sure you win fair & square within their boundaries. Taurus, whatever, but the West is NOT giving Ukraine enough to put it in a position to obtain a compromise the West itself would like.9/10
Russia’s attempts to “sanctuarize” annexed Ukrainian provinces did not work – Kyiv ignored them & Washington (even Beijing) pushed back. If this failed where hopes of taking back territory were small, why would they succeed where NATO certainly has conventional superiority? [5/9]
Done!🤓 Our updated chronology of Russian🇷🇺nuclear rhetoric is online - your one-stop-shop📕 to find out who said what when. Thanks to
@MarthaStolze
, the colleagues
@SWP_IntSecurity
&
@SWPBerlin
and our
#STAND
team. Grateful if you can retweet & spread the word!
Nuclear rhetoric tracker: A new version of our
#STAND
chronology of
#nuclear
threats is out.
@liviuhorovitz
&
@MarthaStolze
have been tracing&coding all developments between Feb&June '23. It now covers 1.5 years of nuclear rhetoric in🇷🇺‘s war against🇺🇦! 👀
Even moderately credible ambiguity is likely to create domestic expectations and pressures that tie the hands of leaders and make it more likely that the "ambiguous" outcome will ultimately occur. That's why you'd use it in the first place to put pressure on the adversary.2/10
In the real world, everyone seems to be acting accordingly:
Nuclear France wants ambiguity, even if its conventional capabilities give little plausibility to direct intervention.
Non-nuclear Germany wants red lines, though it's unclear why it has to draw them so clumsily.6/10
Theory out, cluelessness in: From the shadow of their nuclear submarines, the French can play hardball. But they cannot & will not play alone. How did anyone in Paris think Germans & others would join in ambiguity, shielded only by the extended US nuclear deterrent? Beats me.8/10
Deutsche Kommentatoren & Politiker sehen Atomwaffen als Wundermittel für Sicherheitsprobleme - Bombe basteln & alles paletti, strategische Herausforderungen vergessen, weiterschlafen.
@ClaudMajor
& ich versuchen hier, dieser Weihnachtsgeschichte mit etwas Humor zu begegnen.
Immer wieder ruft ein Kolumnist nach der deutschen Atombombe.
Aber Wiederholung macht es nicht richtiger.
Deshalb erklären
@liviuhorovitz
& ich hier 👇 warum eine deutsche Atombombe eine teure, gefährliche und antieuropäische Fehlentscheidung wäre.
The Russian leadership, as it has done since February 2022, quickly utters nuclear deterrent threats: If the West sends troops to Ukraine, Putin knows he'd lose, so he promises to escalate the crisis to the nuclear level and use long-range assets to attack Western territory.7/10
Faced with ambiguity, the opponent is uncertain whether victory in the theater will attract a more powerful force - so it's reasonable to keep some forces in reserve & consider some compromise to avoid potential defeat at the hands of the superior intervener - or so the hope.3/10
Red lines are not magic either: You may be signaling that you want to fight below a certain threshold, but that ties your hands with your audience and tells your opponent that if they go above that line (assuming they can), you fold.5/10
But the adversary is not passive. It now has a huge incentive to remove (some of) the ambiguity in order to untie the other side's domestic hands, reduce the likelihood of the unwanted event, and gain freedom of movement to settle the theater dispute on its own terms.4/10
Nothing to read with your Monday morning coffee? Elias Götz & I, we’re thrilled that
@jststs
published our article on why, during ‘91-‘92, George H.W. Bush officials wanted NATO enlargement. Some free copies here , but let me know if this does not work. 1/5
@FRHoffmann1
Thank you for the original post. It literally kept me up at night, and there's nothing better than that in terms of intellectual engagement!
President Reagan “would not have had the intellect, the mental and physical stamina or the managerial ability to take real charge in a real crisis,” the UK envoy to the US wrote in November 1988. “We are lucky to have been at peace.” Wondering what diplomats report today.
#POTUS
Telling many relatives & friends in Romania 🇷🇴 that it’s all going to be all right - for them - is made way, way easier by NATO membership. Thanks to those Central & Eastern Europeans leaders who were “obsessed” and “neurotic” about the bear 🐻 in the 1990s!
@FRHoffmann1
@DasErste
Welcome to my world: I have a list of "archival research projects to do in retirement to hopefully better understand what was going on when I was (moderately) young :)."
Twitter's on fire re the NATO-no-enlargement-promises & I am a bit confused. Is IR anarchic & states pursue interests? Or is this lovey-dovey LaLa-land, with good guys never breaking promises? And with broken promises causing broken hearts, which leads to eternal conflict? 1/x
Moskau redet viel über Atomwaffen, nie da gewesene Konsequenzen & blitzschnelle Vergeltungsschläge. Aber was sagt der Kreml genau & wie hat der Westen geantwortet?
@annac_arndt
& ich, wir haben ein
@SWP_IntSecurity
#STAND
Arbeitspapier dazu geschrieben 👉
The “Russia's nuclear threats” discussion is polarized between insomniacs and heroes. Here are my 2 cents for my 5 readers. My bottom line: No, we will not die today or tomorrow. Yes, we might, in fact, die later. A thread 🧵 to aid your good mood this Monday. 1/13
Glad to see this out! Thanks to
@ProfOnderco
for the collaboration & to the folks
@WarOnTheRocks
for the great suggestions & for helping 'translate' our rather geeky prose for less dorky readers 🤓. Hope all seven of you out there have fun reading it 😅.
Want to better underSTAND our increasingly complex security environment? We are thrilled to welcome our new team in the “Strategic Threat Analysis and Nuclear (Dis-)Order” (STAND) project.
Ein “Atomkrieg” ist unwahrscheinlich - ob Deutschland der
#Ukraine
100
#Marder
schickt oder nicht. Meine bescheidenen zwei Cent: Beide Seiten dieser Debatte würden sich - und uns allen - ein Gefallen tun, wenn sie diese Nuklearkulisse weniger bemühen würden. 1/3
After Trump’s “whatever the hell they want” fire & fury comments, it’s been Nuclear Bingo Week in Germany: Politicians from left to right shared views, so here is a quick review - my comments at the end. Bottom line: The devil👿 is in the details. 1/15
Unsere 100-seitige Nuklear-Chronologie war lang - auch mit ganz viel 🍷 oder 🍻. Darum haben
@annac_arndt
& ich auf 4 Seiten zusammengefasst, was wir gelernt haben. Die kann man gut mit nur einem 🍹 oder 🍸 lesen.
Was bezweckt 🇷🇺Moskau mit seinen
#Nukleardrohungen
?
Eine Analyse von knapp 100 nuklearbezogenen Aussagen & Handlungen (📖) legt eine dreigleisige Strategie nahe, so
@liviuhorovitz
&
@annac_arndt
von
#STAND
in ihrem SWP-Aktuell 👉
Everybody should of course learn German🇩🇪 - I hear it's totally an easy language🤓. But if you lack those few days needed, here 👇 we translated the graph & the key data points from our recent working paper on nuclear escalation dynamics in the war against Ukraine.
How did the
#nuclear
escalation dynamics between Russia and the West evolve during the first two months of the war against Ukraine?
Here is a visualisation from the new working paper (in German) of our
#STAND
team by
@annac_arndt
&
@liviuhorovitz
.👉 (1/6)
Here my not-cold-but-not-piping-hot take on nuclear policy in Germany’s🇩🇪 National Security Strategy: A strong statement on nuclear deterrence, but otherwise not too bold. Drafters should still be complimented for the compromise within the complicated German machinery.1/15
Wer nach der Weihnachtsgans noch mehr Argumente gegen eine deutsche Bombe braucht, wird auch hier gut bedient - aus einer anderen Denkrichtung, aber mit ähnlicher Bottom Line.
1/ Markus Kaim
@SWPBerlin
plädiert im
@derspiegel
für deutsche Atomwaffen, mit denen Berlin "Nukleargarantien für Staaten Mittelosteuropas" geben kann. Kaim überhöht Vorteile und ignoriert Kosten und Risiken eines solchen Schritts. Einige Anmerkungen: 2/
Fascinating indeed that Macron continuously reiterates - and specifies ("partially European"). Before all of Berlin again argues Paris should replace Washington's nuclear guarantees, I'd immodestly suggest reading what
@lydiawachs
& I found last year . 1/2
One point to add to
@Mathieu_Droin
excellent summary, responding to a question about the European dimension of the French nuclear deterrent
@EmmanuelMacron
stated “our vital interests are partially European, and it does give us a special responsibility”
Have you considered the possibility that, as unfortunate as this might be, international politics might not function according to your theory of action? 😱
@jana_puglierin
@ConStelz
„Es tut mir so leid, ich wäre Ihnen enorm verbunden, wenn ich das Memo fertig schreiben könnte. Es erklärt für den Kanzler wie wir einem Nuklearschlag entgehen können. Ich befürchte die Situation ist dramatisch - ihre große Hilfe könnte Millionen das Leben retten. Gar die Welt!“
Tweets by political scientists & think tankers suggest an inverse correlation between the quality of scholarship and posted photos of meals. I hereby wish to reinforce this inverse correlation & wish you all Happy New Years!
By popular demand, here is our attempt at
#STAND
to keep you updated on what goes into our nuclear ☢️ rhetoric chronology in Russia’s war against Ukraine in between the formal releases every 6 months. 👇
As our STAND colleagues
@liviuhorovitz
&
@MarthaStolze
update their chronology of nuclear threats in Russia’s war against Ukraine (), we’ll share here the newest developments – so that you don’t have to wait until the next update is out.(1/7) 👇👇
@FRHoffmann1
I couldn't agree more with this post🤓. Although our different paths do lead to somewhat different policies NATO should privilege - assuming no endless resources😀: Your path goes more towards strategic deterrence. Mine is more toward defense at the edge of the Western realm.
I learned a lot & would highly recommend this program - especially to political scientists interested in more than just summarizing historians‘ work and calling that „case studies“ 😋.
Are optimists like me underestimating the danger of nuclear escalation? What if
@DrRadchenko
is right? If Putin thinks “losing” means regime change, will he use nuclear weapons? I’m also not sure & I spent fewer years studying 🤓, but here are my two (or 11) optimistic cents.1/11
Consider, for example, the article
@CampbellCraig1
and I wrote a few years ago for
@jststs
, titled juicily "MAD, not Marx: Khrushchev and the nuclear revolution." The article was about, you guessed it, the Cuban Missile Crisis. Here's the link: .
To all of us reading this in the warmth of our cozy and free lives, may we somehow find such strength of character and courage as this mother of two if the time comes.
A woman burst onto Russia’s main live evening newscast today with a sign that says:
“Stop the war
Don’t believe propaganda
They’re lying to you”
And chanting: “Stop the war! No to war!”
What a day! Between the most explicit Biden Administration statement to date on why alliances are crucial for our way of life & the Putin regime murdering its main political opponent, hopefully more folks got the hang of what’s at stake.
#MSC2024
Ja im Grundsatz, nur "reine Phantasie" klingt nach Denkverbot, was illusorischen Vorschlägen Tür & Tor öffnet. Viel sinnvoller ist eine ernsthafte Auseinandersetzung mit Möglichkeiten, Kosten & Grenzen der europäischen Nuklearoptionen, um die US Alternative besser zu verstehen.
Deutsche Nuklearbewaffnung derzeit kontraproduktiv, richtig.
Aber die "europäischen Ansätze" ("Ausweitung der französischen und britischen Nuklearrolle, oder in einem europäischen Projekt") sind reine Fantasie, Abschreckungswert gegenüber Russland gleich null.
Really?
@lufthansa
is cancelling flights literally minutes before departure & you’ve got thousands of people stranded with little kids in some airport before the holidays. And you folks have the audacity to express wishes? Great PR! Almost as good as your services!
Only in academia is one beyond thrilled about an email that has an unknown R2 saying that the product of two years of toiling "needs some more work but potentially quite publishable" 🤓.
One of the first non-zoom meetings I’m attending after, literally, years. No turning off the camera or listening while jogging at these ones 🤣, but actually meeting people in person pays for it all.
Me confused: Yes, Western officials made promises. Yes, they broke them. Because they could & because situation had changed. Why are we so surprised? Because our “good guys" are always nice? I don’t remember taking this IR class... but who knows!? 5/x
Many thanks from us at
#STAND
@SWP_IntSecurity
to twitterless Emmanuelle Maitre from
@FRS_org
for engaging with the research of
@lydiawachs
and I on France🇫🇷 & Euro deterrence! Her piece expertly details Paris' views - definitely worth brushing up on your language skills.
Un « parapluie nucléaire » français : A propos du rapport de la SWP.
Retrouvez l’article d’Emmanuelle Maître, chargée de recherche à la Fondation pour la recherche stratégique (
@FRS_org
), sur le
#LeRubicon
@M__Verbruggen
Turn off the news, take a long bath, and watch West Wing. All seasons, one season a day. By the time you’re done, the flu will have magically disappeared. I’ve got experimental data on this, even though only with an N of one.
This “defending” business is hard work! Not sure whether I am so tired because of the great discussion or the countless subsequent drinks? I guess both are necessary conditions ;))
Diese Aussagen müssen empirisch getestet werden! Wer hat Interesse zu überprüfen ob
@annac_arndt
doch zu nett ist & dabei mit uns (
@lydiawachs
,
@_jonasschneider
,
@ClaudMajor
& ich) zusammen zu arbeiten? Wer weiss, vieleicht sind wir noch nerdiger als sie uns beschreibt? 🤓🤣
Me more confused: Yes, the Russian government is unhappy that influence in Eastern Europe is curtailed by NATO membership. But are “bad relations” a consequence of “broken promises?” Why? Would Putin be "nicer" if Kremlin influence stretched to the German border? 6/x
"Intelligence sources had proved remarkably effective in detecting the presence of chemical weapons," Shultz told Thatcher 30 years ago. "The real problem was not detection, bu the lack of willingness on the part of Governments to condemn the use of such weapons."
#archives
I'm pretty sure I can compete for the slowest-book-review-writer title. But I finally managed to say something about
@jeffreyaengel
's excellent book "When the World Seemed New" in
@coldwarhistoryj
- my political-scientist-take here
Our
#STAND
@SWP_IntSecurity
team will "thread" regularly on all things
#nuclear
, deterrence & European threat environment - here our first installment. We'll try to highlight 🇩🇪German nuclear news & other outSTANDing items🤓.
„Russland wäre bereit […] weiter zu eskalieren, mit dem Einsatz von Nuklearwaffen als maximale Stufe.“
Hat
@JohannesVarwick
mit Putin telefoniert? Wie „weiß“ er das? Wo ist die wissenschaftliche Grundlage solcher Aussagen? Bin für Kröte 🐸 schlucken & Nuklearstrategie lesen.
„Wir müssen unseren moralischen Kompass mit den realpolitischen Möglichkeiten abgleichen. Dabei werden wir manche Kröte schlucken müssen, aber besser ist als ein
eskalierender Krieg“. Interview in der Südwest-Presse u.a. 👇
When Putin said nuclear “precedent,” he did not say the US used nukes, so we can do it too; instead, he said the Americans bad guys did such things, implying that the good Russians would never do the same. Which says little about what Putin will do - but a threat this is not.
We remember this. We didn't forget. The West claims to bring freedom and democracy to other countries but it's the exact opposite of the truth. The unipolar world is anti-democratic by its very nature. It is a lie. They used nuclear weapons, creating a precedent. They flattened
Vielleicht bin ich ein geborener Optimist, aber meine Prognose für
@JoernKiessler
bei
@WDRaktuell
ist, dass die USA auch unter Trump die erweiterte nukleare Abschreckung nicht aufgibt. Auf eine empirische Überprüfung würde ich aber gerne verzichten 😂.
You cannot simultaneously eat ice cream and think about war. We call on
@benandjerrys
to abstain from writing about war and work on the ice cream. This way, the world might at least have another moderately delicious cold sugary dessert, instead of another bit of gibberish.
You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war.
We call on President Biden to de-escalate tensions and work for peace rather than prepare for war.
Sending thousands more US troops to Europe in response to Russia’s threats against Ukraine only fans the flame of war.
Final confusion: Yes, liberal Russian elites told Western partners enlargement was making their life harder. But would they have prevailed in domestic contest if only NATO would not have expanded? Really? 7/END []
Given available scholarship, it’s rather saucy to claim that Western leaders did not dangle promises to Soviet leaders not to expand NATO to get them to accept German unified within NATO. And yes, promises are promises - they are not treaties. 2/x []
Four days to eat chocolate & hunt eggs? We're afraid you'll finally get through all those tabs, so here is more to read from us
@SWP_IntSecurity
#STAND
.
An excellent essay for your weekend cappuccino - with very small two cents from me and much smarter thoughts from wiser folks. Goes well with a drink 🥃 too🤓.
Can French and British nuclear weapons protect Europe from Russia? The prospect of American extended nuclear deterrence crumbling under a second Trump presidency pushes alarmed Europeans to explore new security paradigms. My
@WSJ
Review cover essay.
Wir suchen eine Forschungsassistenz (d/m/w)! Sie haben Ihr Studium der Politik-, Wirtschafts- oder Sozialwissenschaften absolviert und bringen weitreichende Kenntnisse im Bereich Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik mit? Bewerben Sie sich bis 03.09.!
👇
Great to be
@Hertie_Security
to discuss new research on nuclear policy - no better way (for dorks 🤓) to spend a gorgeous summer day! Hence, a big thank you for the invitation.
Western policymakers were worried about impact on Russia & sought to attenuate the blow, but (a) decided intra-Western dynamics were more important & (b) assessed that their NATO decision would not determine the future of relations with Russia. 4/x []
Our nuclear "must reads" this week here
@STAND
@SWP_IntSecurity
. Or you could enjoy the summer sun at the lake. Or, even better, read the pieces on our list while enjoying the summer sun at the lake 🤓.
🇫🇮Finland & 🇸🇪Sweden’s requests to join NATO, 🇩🇪Germany’s role in a changed global order, 🇷🇺Russia’s tactical nuclear weapons & 🇺🇸US SLCM debate: our
#STAND
team's regular thread on recent news and analyses to
#underSTAND
#nuclear
#deterrence
and
#threats
(no endorsement).(1/8)
Oh, I see I have exactly 500 followers now. Poor souls. Nukes & archives, what could be more boring! I surely need to move from deterrence to acquisition, otherwise I'll need another 200+ years to crack the 10k 🤣.
Our dialogue on strategic risk reduction starts today.
A core group of NATO allies & partners will gather with senior non-governmental experts, to critically engage with strategic risk in the current international security environment.
Find out more ⬇️
We here
@SWP_IntSecurity
#STAND
suggest you close those hundreds of browser tabs from last year and replace them with our list. Who knows, maybe you'll read some of them too? The year is new, ambitions are high & our suggestions are, of course, outSTANDing 😀.
Our first
#STAND
newsletter this year! European nuclear deterrence, new developments in Russia and China, as well as 2 scholarly pieces on Germany & nuclear policy in our regular weekly newsletter on recent news & analyses to
#underSTAND
#nuclear
#deterrence
&
#threats
. (1/9)
Interested in
#nuclear
issues,
#deterrence
, and the role of
#NATO
in these fields?
Do apply to the 4th Early-Career Nuclear Strategists' Workshop
It is in Rome, in presence, in July!!
A big thank you to
@JimGoldgeier
,
@ALanoszka
,
@e_sarotte
& Andrea Chiampan for thoughtful & insightful reviews! Grateful to the editors for the opportunity to take part in this
@jststs
special issue.
But Russia is playing with fire. Nuclear signalling should be a last-resort means of indicating high stakes. Given the weekly we-nuke-you-we-nuke-you-not, it might be hard to differentiate what is real & what is not down the line. I’m an optimist, but I get it if you’re not.11/11
President Putin's announcement about tactical
#nuclear
weapons to be stationed in Belarus is "another attempt to frighten the West" said our researcher
@liviuhorovitz
on
@DeutscheWelle
. Click here for the full interview 👉⏯️
Dark and grey outside, sitting by the fireside, a goblet with Glühwein in hand, or two or three goblets, and, obviously, our
#STAND
nuclear policy reading list. May the
#Weihnachtsmann
bring interesting presents!
@ABaerbock
& nuclear disarmament; 🇺🇸US-🇷🇺Russia dialogue; command & control satellites; European Strategic Autonomy; 🇺🇸US Sole Purpose debate: our
#STAND
team's regular thread on recent news and analyses to
#underSTAND
#nuclear
#deterrence
and
#threats
(no endorsement). (1/8)
Want to know what the US government thought about Central Europe at the beginning of the 1990s? And why the Bush41 Administration considered expanding NATO? Shameless self-promotion of contribution [] to a volume edited by
@DanSHamilton
& Kristina Spohr
Honest question: Any evidence that slashing scientific cooperation & isolating the citizenry in a totalitarian state in other ways can affect the outcome? I am all for sanctions & pressure, but I thought that the Cold War lesson on this was pretty clear. What am I missing?
Unsere zwei Pfennige zu den Herausforderungen der Nuklearen Ordnung. Und ich, am stottern, als ich gefragt werde, was meine Mutter über meine neue Beschäftigung denkt 🤓. Zum Glück retten
@ClaudMajor
@lydiawachs
und
@_jonasschneider
doch den Tag 😀.
Geostrategische Veränderungen und die verschärfte globale Sicherheitslage stellen Deutschland vor neue Herausforderungen. Das STAND Team
@SWP_IntSecurity
diskutiert über die aktuelle Bedrohungslage und die nukleare Ordnung im neuen SWP-Podcast.
👉
For those brave & stubborn enough to face the wave of security articles this week, let us pile a few more onto your stack/tabs - the best ones, we promise! Oh, if you’re hoping your browser will crash & save you, yeah, you are not alone 🥳.
🇺🇦Ukraine crisis, NATO’s next Strategic Concept, 🇺🇸US Nuclear Posture Review, 🇯🇵Japan & US missiles, and a 📺videocast on nuclear doctrine & law: our
#STAND
team's regular thread on recent news and analyses to
#underSTAND
#nuclear
#deterrence
and
#threats
(no endorsement). (1/8)