Lit Prof
@Penn
. Studying the wax & wane of cultural power. *Future of Decline* (2022) on the Anglo ebb. *Cold War Victorians* (2025) on peak UK novels/US films.
In a sea of great books about the political economy of US or UK decline, offers a brief comparative analysis. Culture matters: myths & beliefs are the hard news story. Optimism after MAGA: the US can still avoid UK-style superpower nostalgia.
Teaching a course on great novellas Spring 23. Melville, Mann, Tolstoy, RLS, Kafka, Mansfield, Morrison, Kanafani, Ozick, O. Butler, CM Machado, Lu Xun, H. DeWitt.
@mervatim
says N Ginzburg. Who else should I include/consider? (Critical takes on the novella also welcome)
I want to teach a class on "Critical Debate." Why do (good) arguments about cultural objects matter? How do positions evolve/deepen, once staked? Units on crisp, consequential, classic debates over a single poem, novel, song/symphony, film, painting, tv show. Suggestions? Tnx
Everything I wanted my students to know about Holden Caulfield they learned from reading Willa Cather’s “Paul’s Case.” 50 years earlier, 230 pages shorter, subtler, and more devastating.
"By Other Means: The Cold War and U.S. Empire in Asia"
This symposium organized by
@YoonSunLee2
and Kent Puckett, with talks from
@paulnadal_
, Kelly Rich, Karl Britto, Penny Fielding, and others, will be open for zoom participants via this link.
After the West: Conrad and Nabokov in Long-Wave Literary History
I tried these ideas out on a panel with Colleen Lye, Monica Popescu, and
@OtherwiseMiami
in 2012 (!). Thanks to them and the dozens of other colleagues who helped me hone this over 10 yrs!
The alarming consequence of a right-wing and woke-phobic counteroffensive on higher ed. It’s Desantisism on a national scale.
It makes cravenly opportunistic use of anti-anti-semitism to wage an unnecessary culture war.
Threats to academic freedom at Penn reached alarming new heights today. Unelected trustees with no academic expertise are attempting a hostile takeover of the core academic functions of the University of Pennsylvania. 🧵 Philly Inquirer has the story:
If you or someone you know likes audiobooks, brevity, and the idea that mainstream media talk about US decline is crazily contradictory, DM me for a free copy of *The Future of Decline,* just released on Audible. I have a bunch of promo codes!
PHL colleagues and friends, please come join us Thursday afternoon and evening for refreshments and for a lively discussion of new books, of art and the everyday, of culture in times of crisis and decline
I should have made clear that this teaching idea came directly from listening to
@MEASeybold
talk to G Graff about not letting literary studies become ornamental arts within higher Ed; fight the deskilling of our students and ourselves in the classroom too
I want to teach a class on "Critical Debate." Why do (good) arguments about cultural objects matter? How do positions evolve/deepen, once staked? Units on crisp, consequential, classic debates over a single poem, novel, song/symphony, film, painting, tv show. Suggestions? Tnx
Couldn’t wait for tomorrow’s drive to listen to this far-reaching concluding trilogy. Grateful to
@MEASeybold
@becimay
@BruceRobbins6
for taking my framing of decline seriously. But also just wowed by the way…
Was once happy that I managed to say what’s wrong with mainstream and academic accounts of American Decline in under 30k words. This is better. Thanks
@hujane
Debt matters. So do novels. So does sharp, searching work like this, showing us that novels reflect and reimagine real social problems. I see my students of all kinds now experiencing what once only the most vulnerable did: futurelessness gnawing at their future.
Gerald Graff’s stories from The Bad Old Days of High Theory & The Good Ole Days of Public Ed,
@jde2022
defends historicism, I ask Arnold & Twain to make nice,
@_ryanruby_
becomes a critic for the healthcare, & Wash U’s Ctr For The Literary Arts w/ Danielle Dutton &
@ProfInfante
.
This terrific essay moves quickly and strikes sharply at a whole set of questions about the kinds of novels that academic critics want to digest, and the kinds they don't. Plus a provocative thesis about why we like to store postmodernism safely in the history bin. Check it out!
So many people helped me with this essay that took, ahem, several years to publish: Emily Hyde, Jim English,
@jde2022
,
@kinohin
, Gordon Hutner, and especially Reader 2 who really hated it 🙃
John Merrick's review captures what was best about Eagleton way back in the days of *Exiles and Emigres* and shows us Eagleton returning to a key point 50 years later... 1/
The five literary critics surveyed in Terry Eagleton’s “Critical Revolutionaries” were united by their shared sense of a degraded culture. But only Raymond Williams identified capitalism as the culprit.
Seconding this rec. of the episode featuring
@hinesaj
and his book — listening back now has me still thinking about what’s the salvage ratio for close reading (and/vs. New Crit), ie what is its democratic/socially critical potential in classrooms now
@MEASeybold
connects dots very skillfully in this series; "ponzi austerity" gains conceptual depth from
@yanisvaroufakis
while
@V21collective
and
@cnewf
convincingly link context (deskilling/defunding of humanities work) to the content of so many recent critical/method debates.
Fascinating if rough indicator of declining faith in the future of the west. Probably tracks the material facts of economic dynamism shifting out of its historical western core. Even more suggestive is to pair this analysis with another recent Burn-Murdoch chart....1/2
NEW: analysis of millions of books published over the centuries suggests western society is shifting away from a culture of progress, and towards one of caution, worry and risk-aversion.
I think this is one of the most important challenges facing us today.
With a plug for THE FUTURE OF DECLINE, from
@stanfordpress
: "It’s a cool short book with an x-ray spaceman on the cover. You should read it." Yes. Yes, you should.
PHL colleagues and friends, please come join us Thursday afternoon and evening for refreshments and for a lively discussion of new books, of art and the everyday, of culture in times of crisis and decline
This piece is aimed against declinism in the UK/US, which tells uneasy voters that American or British global supremacy were birthright & destiny, that to accept the rise of other powers is a failure of national mettle.
@dbessner
@EdwardGLuce
@martadassu
Great review of a weirdly compelling novel and this line about spectrality is so right; the thin description of Alex cuts against sumptuous interiority, suburban realism (Cheever, Updike) and trauma math but it’s 1/
@hujane
@bookforum
“This kind of aggressively spectral heroine—thin in more ways than one—seems increasingly a mainstay of contemporary Anglophone fiction.”
BAM.
@alexandermillen
is indeed smart & stylish; it's a brilliant historical reading of Gissing's style. Check it out! (V. proud to be associated w/ Alex, along w/
@EmilySteinlight
and Paul Saint-Amour -- thanks, Dan!) Another up-and-coming close reader for you and
@johannawinant
!
A smart, stylish essay on the politics of style from
@alexandermillen
in the latest MLQ. Jamesonian, Esty-ian—a Penn grad, I'll eat my shoe if he's not a student of
@jde2022
2/ …that Matt brings his own frames — ponzi austerity, new crit, para-acad crit, new media/platforms for crit, method wars, Chicago fight— all together w/a fierce address to the pedagogy of cruelty. Puts the humane back into the humanities, calls bs on Ed tech neolib austerity.
More excellent reflections on T.S. Eliot
@becimay
: "...the availability of *The Waste Land* as a model has made it possible for poets ever since 1922 to demand more of their readers than they would have dreamt of doing before."
@QuigleyMM
The family business melodrama, from Dynasty & Dallas to Succession, Empire, and Yellowstone.
The long arc from primetime to streaming, Reaganomics to What Reaganomics has wrought. All expertly analyzed by Michael Szalay
@ProfGirl
@MEASeybold
My PS: the neolib scrapping of higher ed rages in the UK and US, the two nations whose political culture of lost greatness is most entrenched. It takes shape as toxic nostalgia for "free" markets, ignoring a worthy history of state investment in research and other public goods
Yes. What a laser like piece by Szalay on Succession. "Succession and prestige TV generally portray reactionary politics in idiosyncratically personal and ultimately humanizing registers as a function of their commitment to treating families that way."
This Janen Ganesh piece is great. But I would say that it precisely is imperial nostalgia that London elites over-identify with US destiny (that's how the baton pass was managed at Bretton Woods). Likewise US elites over-identify with British icons of crown and empire.
44-day Truss means PM passes quickly from young Boomer Bojo to elder Millennial Sunak. If King Charles and Joe Biden were to yield in the next couple of years, their titles too could go right to Millennials Prince William and Pete Buttigieg (both b. 1982). Gen X Leapfrog!
Great reflections from
@pjmaciak
on Justified; on how the new version does/n’t work as rust belt odyssey to the old Bible Belt Iliad. “The drama of Justified was never about Givens as a fish out of water; it was about drowning in your own past.”
Original recipe JUSTIFIED isn't experimenting with form or inventing new prestige categories. It's just executing nearly note-perfect genre television. I hope its (fine!) reboot — and my essay here — will encourage people to go back and watch.
The whole episode and the line of inquiry set by
@MEASeybold
reminds of why I always go back to Raymond Williams salvaging by dialectical reversal the romantic anticapitalisms of C19 conservatives in *Culture and Society*
@V21collective
@cnewf
@isanchezprado
@DrDuncanBell
Tenants of elite institutions who view their societies or apex civilizations as collapsing often start thinking big. They have the most to lose. Big History (Jared Diamond) and macrosociology (Arrighi) in the US looking back. Longtermism in the UK looking forward.
If the American political mainstream does not pull out of its nostalgic tailspin soon, we will fall prey to the same affliction that has bedeviled the United Kingdom, a professor writes.
Declinism's Hot Summer. Starting point: facing pages of the NY Times op-ed on August 7th.
@fstockman
on the fall of US prestige in Africa; R Seymour on the crash of UK hope after Bojo's exit;
@willmacaskill
on the necessity to save civilization. How do these 3 relate? 1/
What the UK and the US have in common despite all the differences: ex-superpowers who have used the rhetoric of decline and the nostalgia for greatness as a running smokescreen / anti-Keynesian pretext to pour wealth and income growth into the upper 10%
New CBO report: The poorest *half* of America -- ~150 million people -- hold only *2 percent* of the country's total wealth
Wealth of top 10 percent has grown markedly since 1989
That tiny little line at the bottom of this chart is half the country
Charles III was born – like so many recent US leaders (Biden, Trump, Bush) – in the 1940s. Their worldviews are all forged in old ideas of Anglo-American power. What if he joins Biden in voluntary self-retirement in 2023 to inspire generational change?
@EdwardGLuce
@AyoCaesar
@SimonDuring
@JimEnglishPenn
has really interesting reflections on audio book delivery of novels, having taught a couple of experimental seminars with and about audio books.
@dan_sinykin
Great essay about an indelible show (and its potential disappearance in the current corporate streaming climate). 100% agree that Patel and Lawler deserve Emmys.
For
@slate
’s year in review, I wrote about STATION ELEVEN, the best show I saw this year. Possibly the best show I’ve ever seen. Watch it with the people you love right now.
Yes. MAGA decline rhetoric is fully weaponized at this point. One key to disarming this story about America ("failing nation") is for mainstream moderates and liberals to unplug their own under-recognized, deeply-rooted nostalgia for American greatness in the old postWWII sense
Yes. True for US supremacy, too: “...'decline' is not a neutral characterization of economic and geopolitical changes. It implies something avoidable and regrettable, whereas these developments have been inevitable — and, in the case of the end of the British Empire, desirable"
"Of course, the U.K. no longer commands the raw power of a century ago. But “decline” is not a neutral characterization of economic and geopolitical changes. It implies something avoidable..." Guy Ortolano on the "tired cliche" of Britain's decline.
So spectral that it pops the novel into a gimmick zone that I wondered a) if we were headed for a Sixth Sense stunt and b) if Cline lost the chance to do more with labors evanescence invisibility per
@anniemcclanahan
‘s question. Anyway great stuff
@hujane
!
@DrDuncanBell
Climate, covid, and authoritarianism at global scale all push the mind to think of historical experience in epic, geological, or even cosmic terms. But this has happened before: H.G. Wells’s *Outline of History* after its author witnessed the cataclysms of WWI, e.g.
6/ In this summer of swirling rhetoric about declinism in the UK and US, Merrick's point, via Eagleton, via Raymond Williams, is crucial: "Culture is important, for Williams and Eagleton alike, because in its best moments, it helps prefigure the new world to be built."
This is a tremendously important article, grounded in meticulous archival research, that will change how we use the terms "human capital," "neoliberalism," and the "model minority," which are more often bandied about than historically situated.
Here's why Americans need to pay attention to UK events/history. Toxic nostalgia for greatness blocks the modernization of national identity and underwrites ancient policy (on regulation, climate, defense). Let's leave the 80s mantra -- Look Backward and Deregulate! -- behind.
Clear take on US future as leading not dominant power. US thinkers need to tell a new story: the end of unipolarity is a real chance to make US more functional, prosperous & democratic. Generational project for those born after 1975.
@QuincyInst
@stephenwertheim
In today's
@nytimes
I argue - even if BRICS didn't do much more than expand, it would challenge US primacy in significant ways by undercutting three tools Washington uses for global domination.
But this is not a bad thing - it's an opportunity for America!
3 "...insisting that the question is open whilst refusing the blackmail of American exceptionalism would itself be a step in the right direction." Yes!
The spirit of NLR — not its content — would reinvigorate US intellectual life at the current dead zone where culture meets politics. Not far-fetched for left-center elites to insist on a humane, inclusive, and democratic version of US history.
"the suggestion that a curriculum drawn from 1970s cultural studies and back issues of the New Left Review can offer an antidote to Maga ideology is far-fetched".
@adam_tooze
on Esty's 'The Future of Decline'
Guy Ortolano get this just right: "rather than offering a worldly understanding of worldly events, declinists fixate on a single country’s supposed errors."
@DEHEdgerton
@chakrabortty
I argue the same about US declinists in a chapter "Against Declinism"
@foxxphelan
Perfect. A short classic text and a consequential debate with clear lines of demarcation. I can't wait to get into this with students. Thanks, Jim.
9/ But conservatives often, confusingly, paint their opponents as "declinists" who have forsaken greatness, accepted mediocrity, embraced shrinkage. Kwasi Karteng in today's Financial Times: “We do not have to appease the voices of decline.”
Grateful for this sharply framed review from
@adam_tooze
. Lots to debate , esp. the underlying reasons that US elites can't relinquish the language of great power rivalry fueling economic war with China. It is not inevitable that the US conduct itself as eternal solo hegemon.
8/ Declinism is fundamentally conservative. It believes that the UK and the US were once more truly themselves at some point in the past (1870? 1950?) than they are now.
Yes -- a fascinating way to bring form and debt together! Everyone should read. And thanks, Jenn, for the apt ref. *Unseasonable Youth*.
@JenLouiseWilson
@OUPAcademic
This is _fantastic_.
"What makes student loan borrowers in recent fiction unique, and uniquely literary, is that they often complain of having been betrayed by narrative itself."
@pjmaciak
Since 2002, Walt Goggins is the electric ascetic criminal Jesus of villains, magnetic resolver of red state / lost cause historical spectral value - converted to blue state spectator value, transvaluing drugs guns racism and money from LA to Harlan
5/ Decline is an actual, material process -- largely economic. Cultural and social factors feed into it, military and political consequences follow from it. It is mostly beyond the will of citizens, states, policy makers, media analysts, intellectuals.
Alarmism over national decline in the U.S. is corrosive. But so is blithe optimism about endless U.S. supremacy. Mainstream writers on American decline split the reading public between panic and complacency; neither makes historical sense.
"The crisis of the American mind these days is looking at a Chinese future and a British past, and feeling a sort of moral panic,"
@Penn
's Jed Esty tells the
@FT
's
@jemimajoanna
.
3/ How does the analysis of declinism in the UK compare to its analysis in the US? Are the right and left speaking in parallel or divergent ways about national decline (as a matter of fact) and declinism (as rhetoric or belief)?
@fotoole
@chakrabortty
...in which Burn-Murdoch notes how much lower partisan trust is in the US than the UK. US media gives daily contradictory signals about western progress, blaring alarms of lost dynamism while preening about US supremacy. No wonder trust is low!
It always blows my mind how much wider the partisan trust gap is for US media compared to the UK 🤯
Most British media is trusted (or distrusted) about equally by supporters of both major parties. That’s true of virtually no US media org.
Deeply corrosive for US society.
@samhaselby
Yes social experience + econ conditions. But these don't exclude culture. What you see as neoliberal elite culture skirmishes (as the welfare state dies) are also ways of fighting back vs. the very real (economic) effects of rightwing narratives that weaponize identity/belonging
@J30607610
@mervatim
maybe "Godliness" from the latter. I think it's a great Weberian "work ethic" fiction and good for thinking about hypercapitalism's (religious, settler colonial) history
1/ It is a superb essay, worth reading. Tooze argues that younger Americans defecting from exceptionalism. Wish I was as confident as Tooze that Gen Z has learned to ignore the stale yet mesmerizing idea that America is somehow not itself without absolute global supremacy!
Superb essay by
@adam_tooze
on the different modes of Anglo-American decline, touching on the failures of the British left and the hubris of the American policy elite.
Remember: decline is relative; domestic- and external decline are not always linked.
@LKonstan
I think *Bras Cubas* is a proto-modernist novel. Here is Roberto Schwarz: “The volubility undoes the rule of the clock, of conventionally sequential chains of events, of the ordering that is indispensable to active existence, but it does so in vain, for...
@DouthatNYT
works hard to bring Tolkien and Fleming into view via classic anti-secular cultural criticism but it's hard to hold the moral linchpins (good ol conservatism, clown-villain progressivism) in place when the former now keeps dissolving into 1/
2/ ...
@conor
is proposing a clean abdication for KCIII -- and if Prince William and Pete Buttigieg (both born 1982) are in the line of succession, then there can be a clean leap over GenX. (But of course Liz Truss is GenX so uh...hurrah!)
@hannahrosewoods
@chakrabortty
@mervatim
Ha! that series comes up often when I try to get my students to come up with homemade answers to lit crit questions about horror, suspense, etc