Never in the years since the Cold War has the United States looked less like a leader of the world and more like the head of a faction — reduced to defending its preferred side against increasingly aligned adversaries, I write in
@nytopinion
:
In my estimation, the Four Seasons Total Landscaping incident is the most hilarious thing ever to happen in human history — so hilarious that we are unable to comprehend it right now. In three days, we will all just break out in laughter for 12 hours straight.
If any Democrats still think it makes sense to fruitlessly embargo the island of Cuba into submission until the end of time, in order to gain an insufficient number of votes in a red state, could you please explain why?
As a Jew in America, I resent the implication that Jews in America are unsafe and that they must rely upon a foreign government, rather than their own, to make them safe.
“Were there no Israel, there wouldn’t be a Jew in the world that is safe,” Biden says at the White House Hanukkah party as he reaffirms support for Israel against its war against Hamas.
"I'll never apologize for the United States of America, ever. I don't care what the facts are." — Vice President George H.W. Bush in 1988, after the United States shot down an Iranian passenger airplane, Iran Air 655, killing all 290 civilians on board.
As I revisit the George W. Bush administration for a piece, I can only marvel at how, in the Trump years, some people managed to claim that Bush was some kind of upholder of a “rules-based international order.”
Jake Sullivan on State of the Union this morning:
Israel has to abide by the rules of war.
Q: Is Israel abiding by the rules of war?
I'm not going to judge whether Israel is abiding by the rules of war.
Biden: “Next week, I will be the first president to visit the Middle East since 9/11 without U.S. troops engaged in a combat mission there.” Hard to see how this is not misleading, unless he is removing U.S. troops from Iraq, Syria, and Yemen within days.
It's a danger to democracy that presidents are not prosecuted while in office but can be prosecuted out of office. To incentivize the peaceful transfer of power, the norm should be consistent in both phases — and better for presidents to be prosecutable all the time.
Tony Blair says the United States withdrew from Afghanistan "in obedience to an imbecilic political slogan about ending 'the forever wars.'" I call it the most productive foreign-policy slogan in a generation.
It’s long past time for an honest debate about these issues. Blaming
@IlhanMN
for saying the same things in substance as supporters of the Netanyahu government do, only with the normative signs reversed, makes clear how far we are from an honest debate.
Was it anti-Semitic when Bret Stephens said “it is a scandal, it seems to me, if we fail to live up to the promise of our American citizenship to do all we can to assure the survival of the Jewish state and the Jewish people”?
@IlhanMN
The "centrists" will not coalesce to stop Bernie for the same reason that centrist policies have failed: centrism is not a substantive politics but rather the tactical pursuit of power.
5.5 million people have fled
#Venezuela
since 2015 (6.6 million have fled Syria). The once-booming country with the world’s largest oil reserves has been ravaged by Maduro’s brutality and gross mismanagement.
Elliott Abrams just experienced his own worst nightmare today. He was questioned about his abysmal track record by a woman of color who came to this country as a refugee, who wears a hijab, and doesn't respect the blob's rules about never holding foreign policy elites accountable
The U.S. is unilaterally claiming that Security Council resolution 2728 is non-binding and therefore has no impact on its policy or the legality of Israel’s continued war. This is not so obvious… 🧵
There is no "rules-based order" that the United States upholds and China threatens. It is simply not so. And it is dangerous to flatter one's own (often rule-breaking) power as consensual and demonize the other's as antithetical to world order.
“I want to be very clear about something,” says Secretary of State Antony Blinken. “Our purpose is not to contain China, to hold it back, to keep it down. It is to uphold this rules-based order that China is posing a challenge to.”
Schumer and AOC’s courageous floor speeches show how significantly the Israel-Palestine debate has shifted among Democrats. Thousands of lives, and possibly the future of our democracy, depend on Biden listening.
My new piece in
@newrepublic
The American people would react in the same way if some other power kept a “military presence” of thousands of troops in the United States and struck targets against the wishes of the U.S. government.
Glenn, he held back military assistance to Ukraine to force a political favor against Biden. He twice ordered the withdrawal of US forces from Syria, ceding territory to Russia & Iran. He refused to blame or call out Russia for 2016 election interference, Navalny poisoning 1/
How depressing that on the 19th anniversary of the war in Afghanistan, the war received no attention besides a passing reference. Three-quarters of Americans want our troops to come home. Ending the war should be a priority, even a source of national unity when we need one most.
I have deep concerns about the $7.5 trillion trajectory of U.S. military spending over the next decade. At some point, all of us, regardless of party, must ask the simple question — how much is enough?
NATO “expansion will leave [Ukraine] wedged between an Alliance it can probably never enter, and Russia.” — Richard Holbrooke, Sept. 1994, advocating NATO expansion despite the price for Ukraine
Eighty years ago, the United States made a tragic decision to pursue global supremacy. The project has outlived its purpose, immobilizing American statecraft and producing endless war. My thoughts in
@nytopinion
:
The Afghanistan war has become endless not because US leaders thought they could win—they didn’t, the Afghanistan Papers reveal—but because they have normalized war. Since the 1990s, war has become routine and peace seems strange,
@samuelmoyn
and I write:
For the first time in history, large numbers of Americans are demanding an end to endless war. But it won’t happen unless the United States stops trying to dominate the world by force. My thoughts in
@nytopinion
:
A few weeks ago, Joe Biden declared: "The idea that over 100,000 forces would invade another country—since World War II, nothing like that has happened."
20 years ago, America invaded Iraq. And Ukraine is paying a price today. My thoughts in
@guardian
:
Officials now call for overwhelming displays of force against Americans with the same knee-jerk zeal once reserved for faraway peoples. Two decades of continual war, coiled in the national psyche, have sprung back onto the homeland.
It's time for Americans to recover their critical faculties when they hear "NATO," a military alliance that cements European division, bombs the Middle East, and risks great-power war of which Americans should want no part. My thoughts in
@nytopinion
:
Note the final comment: "This is my only opportunity during this process to raise an objection and to be heard." As if he had a special entitlement to be "heard," after the American people (himself included) had already voted and the states had certified the vote.
BRET BAIER: I want to pin you down on what you're trying to do. Are you trying to say that Trump will be president after January 20?
JOSH HAWLEY: Well, that depends on what happens on Wednesday
BAIER: No it doesn't
(Trump in fact lost an election!)
The Taliban insurgency has been steadily gaining for years. The recent lull in American casualties was due to the U.S. agreement to withdraw. Sustainable? Biden’s choice was to escalate a failing war or end it.
What makes the Afghanistan situation so frustrating is that the US & its allies had reached something of an equilibrium at a low sustainable cost. It wasn’t peace or military victory, but it was infinitely preferable to the strategic & human catastrophe that is unfolding.
The
@nytimes
really should change this headline. With troops on the ground in Iraq and Syria, drones striking Afghanistan and Somalia, and much else, it is misleading and harmful to state as a fact that the United States is not at war.
We may face a general election between two candidates who each falsely claim to have opposed the Iraq war. I think this fact signifies something beyond troubling candidates: American society has decided the Iraq war was a disaster but has not begun to debate why.
Biden on MSNBC last night said of his vote for the Iraq War, "I didn't believe he had those nuclear weapons. I didn't believe he had those weapons of mass destruction."
He said his vote was for inspectors to prove they didn't have WMDs.
This isn't backed by our reporting.
“The senator has also vowed to get congressional authorization for any new military conflicts. If he honors that promise, it would effectively make U.S. military interventions highly unlikely during his presidency.”
I think the pro-war shift in Democratic opinion is an effect of opposition to Trump, but it is troubling nonetheless. This is why the media needs strong anti-war voices, not the same discredited crowd that encouraged decades of violence and now claim to be bulwarks of democracy.
True, Afghanistan is not Vietnam: the Afghanistan war has gone on much longer than the Vietnam war, which U.S. leaders at least managed to end within a decade of realizing that the mission was wrong and victory impossible.
#Afghanistan
isn’t
#Vietnam
. It isn’t even Iraq. George W. Bush did not lie America into this war. The “revelations” in The Washington Post are only new to people who have forgotten front page news from a few years ago, writes Fred Kagan for
@AEIdeas
.
I am in solidarity with brave Russians who have protested and spoken against this war. I hope more do. But should ordinary Russians be viewed as guilty, and thus deserving of punishment, if they do not risk life and limb to protest a war they had no part in launching? I hope not.
The CDC budget is 1.5% of the military budget. This is the nearly inevitable result of a foreign policy that prizes armed dominance above all else — and it is the opposite of a sane internationalism for the 21st century.
The CDC’s budget is 1.5% of the defense budget. We should double it.
We have underfunded our public health system for decades, directly leading to the mismanagement of the COVID-19 crisis. We need to step up and support our doctors + scientists so they can save lives.
By advocating or staying silent about an assassination of an Iranian nuclear scientist, many defenders of the "rules-based liberal international order" are proving what maxim they live by: "When you're powerful, they let you do it. You can do anything."
I hunted terrorists. I know a thing or two about dismantling dangerous organizations. We can dismantle cartel and human smuggling networks by treating them the same way we treated the Taliban and al Qaeda.
Blinken said earlier: “We are determined to get a ceasefire that brings the hostages home and to get it now, and the only reason that that wouldn’t be achieved is because of Hamas.” What Blinken said is not accurate.
BREAKING: Netanyahu told Blinken during their meeting today he won't accept a deal that will include ending the war. He said if Hamas doesn't drop this demand there will be no deal and Israel will invade Rafah, per Israeli and U.S. officials
"Bernie recognizes that the Pentagon is the largest institutional emitter of greenhouse gases in the world and that the US spends $81b annually to protect oil supplies and transport routes. We are uniquely positioned to lead the planet in a wholesale shift away from militarism."
"Instead of accepting that the world’s countries will spend $1.5 trillion annually on weapons of destruction, Bernie will convene global leaders to redirect our priorities to confront our shared enemy: climate change."
How did the Sanders campaign slide this veiled endorsement into the Washington Post?
"Sanders's vision would represent a stark departure from the platform Democrats have embraced since the end of the Cold War."
The United States has swiftly moved from "engagement" with China — a theory of slow-moving, non-coerced regime change — to the containment of China, passing over the alternative of mutual coexistence.
Bafflingly
@PeteButtigieg
is on TV arguing that the U.S. military — which emits more greenhouse gases than any other institution on the planet — is a major part of the solution to climate change. He doesn’t mean by downsizing it.
Discontent is brewing inside the Democratic Party over foreign policy, and
@IlhanMN
is only the beginning.
@tparsi
and me on the way forward in the
@guardian
:
“If Sanders wins the nomination and his financial support from service members translates into votes, it would represent a significant shift from 2016, when active-duty personnel were twice as likely to choose Trump over Hillary Clinton.”
I am scandalized by the presence of the U.S. military in the streets and the air. But I can't help but think that some people are scandalized because they assume it's their birthright as Americans for the military to bomb people over there without ever coming here.
Now would be a good time to stop spending a trillion dollars per year chasing the illusion of global military domination, and instead act cooperatively to take on real threats like pandemic disease and climate change:
Elliott Abrams was convicted for illegally withholding information from Congress. He supported selling arms to a government that committed mass murder. These are facts. And more evidence still of the looney center represented by Max “Think of Our Indian Wars” Boot.
Disgraceful ad hominem attacks by
@IlhanMN
on my
@CFR_org
colleague Elliott Abrams. She doesn't seem to realize he is a leading advocate of human rights and democracy--not a promoter of genocide! More evidence of the loony left I caution Democrats about:
As endless war comes home, it is the death knell for George W. Bush’s entire argument for the war on terror: “We will fight them over there so we do not have to face them in the United States of America.”
You don’t get to lose a war and expect the result to look like you won it. Yet some in Washington are denying reality, calling for still more war and blaming Biden for their failure. To move forward, we must accept defeat. My thoughts in
@PostOpinions
:
NATO should not move Ukraine closer toward membership in the alliance.
Ahead of next week's summit, read the open letter I've signed along with 60 colleagues, representing a broad spectrum of foreign policy experts, published in
@politico
.
To attract international support for Ukraine, it would be far better to admit past errors frankly than to ask countries to collude in memory-holing the obvious.
Rep. Lee cast the lone vote against the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force. She warned: "We must be careful not to embark on an open-ended war with neither an exit strategy nor a focused target."
The bill passed 420-1. The 1 was right.
The 2001
#AUMF
gave any president the power to wage war anywhere, at any time, for any reason.
America's culture of endless war has harmed too many. It's past time we take a hard look at our ongoing military operations & authorizations to
#StopEndlessWar
.
This is the clearest presidential statement in recent years that emphasizes the need to limit the intensity of U.S.-China rivalry and cooperate to address climate change, pandemics, and nuclear proliferation.
Premature and irresponsible to call for arming a Ukrainian insurgency that does not yet even exist. Who would we be arming? To what end? With what consequences? Have we learned nothing from recent missions that made wars only longer and deadlier?
For Biden to give a NATO-like security guarantee to Saudi Arabia — committing the United States to go to war in defense of the kingdom — would be strategically and morally perverse.
In the age of Trump, American politics has taken on the qualities of American wars. Endless war has not merely come home; endless war increasingly is home. My thoughts in
@NewYorker
:
The Biden team is doing a bang-up job delivering on progressive foreign policy priorities like locking into a cold war with China and considering a pledge to go to war on behalf of Saudi Arabia.
Biden's "defense of democracy" in Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan is not delivering. His approach intensifies conflicts without resolving them, while entangling the United States within them. And it's playing into Trump's hands. My thoughts in
@TheAtlantic
:
“They learned that from the Iraq war crew.”
@chrislhayes
is searing on how the invasion, and the lack of accountability ever since, has damaged American politics:
May there be accountability for those who have spent the Trump years fretting about “isolationism” and decrying non-existent troop withdrawals, while the administration was escalating existing wars and provoking new wars.
A whole new direction for Seinfeldisms. “Have you ever noticed that the top 1% owns 40% of the wealth?” “What’s the deal with all this capital accumulation?”
Has anyone else noticed that “I am not a scientist” is the new cliche prelude for lobbyists & fossil fuel interests to slip in climate denial pseudoscience on live television?
Here are some examples:
If the Biden administration believes the United States is not at war, then it should support the repeal of every Congressional authorization of war, including the 2001 authorization that provides the basis for ongoing U.S. military operations in approximately nine countries.
Obama, 2016: "The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-NATO country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do...This is an example of where we have to be very clear about what our core interests are and what we are willing to go to war for."
Anderson Cooper's guest tonight, former Israeli intelligence chief:
"The noncombatant population in the Gaza strip is really a nonexistent term because all of the Gazans voted for Hamas, and as we have seen on 7th of October most of the population in the Gaza strip are Hamas."
This is not how international politics works. Other states do not share American policymakers’ benign view of their own intentions. Would the United States look kindly on Russia or China arming Mexico or threatening to form a military alliance with Mexico?
Putin is only threatened by NATO if he plans to attack a NATO country. NATO has never attacked the USSR or Russia and never will. And Putin of course knows that.
American isolationism:
*Did not exist before WWII (when the US conquered a continent and took colonies).
*Did not exist before 9/11 (when the US pursued global military dominance).
*Is not happening now (when endless wars are hardly ending).
To believe otherwise is dangerous.
American isolationism:
* Did not work before WWII.
* Did not work before 9/11.
* Will not work now.
When it comes to fighting ISIS it's a bad idea to outsource American national security to Russia, Iran, and Turkey.
To believe otherwise is very dangerous.
Liberal democracy and international order are truly in danger if Bill Kristol, and other advocates of wars of aggression, continue to be taken seriously. There are few greater dangers to peace, prosperity, democracy, and climate in the 21st century than their mindless militarism.
75 years of a US-led liberal international order, based on a US forward presence and backed by US might, with regional and bilateral alliances and relatively free trade, has enabled remarkable peace and prosperity. But let’s go back to the 1920’s and 30’s!
Trump and the establishment are one in assuming that the United States must seek military supremacy across the world — in all regions, at all costs, for all time. In the
@newrepublic
, I say no:
It wasn't enough for Former Defense Secretary Mattis to spin through the revolving door to rejoin the board of General Dynamics. He also had to hawk a book while dancing around saying anything of significance. Civic duty is in short supply.
I don’t think the guy who served under Trump and then refused to quit when Charlottesville happened and then when he eventually did quit and wrote a book, refused to criticize Trump, gets to ‘mock’ Trump now *after* Trump attacks him.
For decades, U.S. officials have widely recognized that enlarging NATO, especially to Ukraine, ran at least some risk of putting the United States on a collision course with Russia. Below are some quotations that I didn't have room to include in my piece.
The utter absurdity of BHL who has to stand on tiptoes to make his sorry ass look taller than the Kurdish people he is getting himself photographed with:
The Democratic Party “is giving the American people a choice they do not want and then threatening them with the end of democracy if they do not take it.”
In the latest of his endless columns advocating endless war,
@MaxBoot
complains that my response to him was "endlessly retweeted." I checked: that tweet currently has 12 retweets. Poor Max. If only the war in Afghanistan had lasted a mere 12 years.
The White House should think about what Biden’s line conveys to the world: that when the United States commits aggression, it isn’t wrong or doesn’t matter; that only Europe has a history; that supporting Ukraine is mere power politics, not principled opposition to aggression.
“That Lee isn’t on Biden’s list, while someone like former national security adviser Susan E. Rice is, speaks volumes about the hold the pro-intervention, pro-endless war national security establishment continues to exert over much of our politics.”
American politics is awash in scandals, but some scandals don't scandalize. I keep thinking back to the U.S.-supplied GBU-12 Paveway II bomb that Saudi Arabia dropped last year on a school bus in Yemen, killing 40 young boys.
The debate said all it needed to say about foreign policy. Who could watch it and think the United States is the indispensable nation that must dominate the world by force?
Russia's aggression may tempt the United States to try to remain the leading protector of Europe even as it counters China. But the European awakening opens up a far better option: transition to a Europe-led European defense. My thoughts in
@PostOutlook
:
I am reminded of George F. Kennan's remarks on NATO expansion in 1998: "Of course there is going to be a bad reaction from Russia, and then [advocates of NATO expansion] will say that we always told you that is how the Russians are."
This is incredibly disappointing language from
@RepAdamSmith
-- who is saying that those of us who believe that the Pentagon budget should be reduced to a mere *$600 billion* are "extremists."
"If China sent special operations forces or used lethal drone strikes in a half-dozen African or Asian countries to combat potential anti-Chinese terrorism, Washington would lose its mind. That's American exceptionalism," says
@llumpe
in
@FinancialTimes
: