6/ The reality is that housing in the cities is so expensive because the urban Bobos πππ πππππππ ππ πππ πππ ππ. In the language of microeconomics, which YIMBYs seem to have a hard time understanding: the demand curve for rent in London is inelastic.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CES) are two different publications. We cannot use descriptions about how the CES works to disprove the CPI. The tweet is going viral due to data illiteracy and partisanship.
ANOTHER CHART YIMBYs DONβT WANT YOU TO SEE. π¨
In markets where increased supply drives down price you can π¬ππ π’π π’π§ ππ‘π ππππ. Here is the oil price when the fracking revolution increased production. You do not see these dynamics in the housing market data. π
PSA: you canβt find *causality* by lagging X and fitting it to a non-lagged Y, i.e., Granger causality β causality.
Thanks for coming to my Time Series Econometrics TED talk.
I used US data to highlight US specific effect of fracking. To fit a full supply-demand graph you can use global data. To capture the causality you can lag global production and fit with a lag to prices.
In supply-demand-price markets you CAN fit the data. Not in housing.
@philippilk
Whatβs the counterfactual for home prices when you observe in *observational* data a positive correlation between the construction and home price time series?
@MorlockP
Bro you mixed up the CPI and CES and called the CPI itself, βCPI-likeβπππ This has nothing to do with
@besttrousers
place of work π
1) the community note pinned to one of your last tweets already does a good job of explaining why your position is misleading (see attached). I.e., your argument hinges on the assumption that supply increases in housing are not leading to price decreases.
2) Some other evidence:
I get good engagement on here. Thereβs smart thoughtful people. But on the housing issue you do not get good, well-argued engagement.
@jahokovi
if you have an argument about the chart SPELL IT OUT. Seriously.
THE CHART YIMBY KIDS DONβT WANT YOU TO SEE:
House prices and new construction are POSITIVELY correlated. I.e. when there is more supply prices are rising and when there is less they are falling. The OPPOSITE of the YIMBY argument. π π€ͺ
my opponent: *puts a straight flush down on the table*
me, having gone all in on a pair of sevens: the Bayesian priors are pretty damning. I can explain, but I shouldnβt have toβthe probability youβd have a straight flush is vanishingly low.
Spent the last hour drilling into my head the derivation of the asymptotic distribution of the MLE estimator β someone plz tell me I will use this again in the future π«
Lots could be going on in the data thoβ¦ seems very possible thereβs a lot of selection going on, i.e., ppl less inclined to start families sort into denser areas
Idk any work out there that seriously investigates this relationship, but Iβd be interested to see if there is!
A new book on the way by economist
@bryan_caplan
is called "Build, Baby, Build." He argues the panacea to housing shortages is to toss out zoning rules and build vertically.
That would be a disaster since very dense vertical cities are associated with ultra-low fertility. A π§΅.
For decades, this curve summed up the mainstream understanding of inequality within a country.
However, recently, this curve has been the source of a fierce debate.
Here's the breakdown:
@cameron_pfiffer
Mostly agree, though recent advances in the literature on synthetic estimators seem somewhat promising, I.e. synthetic diff-in-diff or matrix completion
Flip 300 fair coins, in a grid with 3 rows and 100 columns. For each
π·π·
ππ
in the resulting pattern of heads (π·) and tails (π), Alice gets a point. For each
π·π
π·π
Bob gets a point (example in next tweet). Who is more likely to end up with the most points, Alice or Bob?
@lymanstoneky
Most papers Iβve read have found that new construction has local spatial effects on prices i.e. prices decrease in closer vicinity to construction. For example:
Help me make sense of this.
@pedrohcgs
A lot of people in these replies seem to prefer a 2-monitor setup. But letβs not forget that thereβs likely a lot of self-selection going on here! (Get the ultra wide π)
This encapsulates the problem with YIMBYs. They donβt actually understand supply and demand graphs. The demand curve is based on preferences. If people are willing to pay extortionate amounts for e.g. rent, the market will take very high prices even with no increase in demand.
@philippilk
it's not fair to accuse someone of not providing evidence when your "evidence" is the correlation between two time series in *aggregate* *observational* data.
And no, fitting a lag of building permits to home prices does not find causality.
@t848m0
You make a claim, you provide evidence. If you ever get that through your head you might start doing work thatβs worth a twopence. Then you might publish under your own name and not hide. Likelihood of this happening: 2% or so Iβd say.
NEWS: The U.S. Treasury Department today issued new guidance on how a $7,500 EV tax credit can be used as a point-of-sale rebate starting in January.
Starting Jan. 1, consumers can transfer the credits to a car dealer, effectively lowering the vehicleβs purchase price:
@KAErdmann
@Econoboi
@DrCameronMurray
Murray had an interesting intro with his historical anecdotes (e.g., the diary of Darwin), but I think he incorrectly frames the discussion from the get-go. YIMBYs obviously know that housing can be expensive without regulations!
40 years ago, a typical single-family home in Greater Boston sold for $79.4kβabout 4.5X a Boston Public School teacherβs salary. Today, that home would go for nearly 11X what that teacher makes now. We must bring down costs, which means we need more supplyβplain-old Econ 101.
The Maui wildfires uncovered a clear truth, which is we have too many short-term rentals owned by too many individuals on the mainland. Our people deserve housing in Hawaiβi, especially those most affected by the worst disaster in our stateβs history.
Our Economics for Everyone website is live, and free! Please spread the word!Β
Sign up for updates on the site--we are looking for HS and college students/schools!Β
More content coming soon; our trailer is up now, which leads with: is college worth it?
VIOLENT CRIME
Dem-run states have 2 times (!) lower incarceration rates.
Yet rates of violent crime are similar (or slightly lower) than Rep-run states.
Caging millions of people did not "solve" violence. Shocker! π§΅
I was struggling with learning the matrix completion estimator from Athey et al., but I stumbled upon this very helpful vid from
@causalinf
. If it helped me, Iβm sure it could help you!
#EconTwitter