Free-market monetary guy who has lucid moments. Director Emeritus of
@CatoCMFA
. I promise not to waste our time by saying things you expect me to say.
Kidding aside, I've now read
@nntaleb
's paper in its entirety. And it is not just poor. It is almost 100% baloney: sloppy or made-up history, sloppier history of thought, deplorable economics, and fatuous statistics.
I would be happy to publicly debate
@GaryGensler
, Gary Gorton, or anyone else who claims that history proves that private currencies aren't viable without heavy handed regulation, if even then. Heck, I'd happily debate several of them at once!
The Five Stages of Inflation Grief:
(1) Hooray, inflation is dead!
(2) OK, it isn't dead, but it's not the Fed's fault, and it's temporary.
(3) So it's not temporary, but raising rates will crash the economy.
(4) Let's try price controls.
(5) Fed, please crash the economy!
I do not buy lottery tickets, play the horses, or relish bungie jumping. And I’m not planning to invest in Bitcoin ETF’s. But I’ll be damned if I put up with bureaucrats and law professors denying me the ability to decide for myself whether any of these things is worth doing.
I was very disappointed to see the SEC approve exchange-traded Bitcoin products for retail investors. Everyday investors will be harmed, crypto will be brought closer to the core of our financial system - and for what?
This is idiotically reductionist. For starters, the gold standard wasn’t to blame for any pre-1914 U.S. crisis: had it been the problem, Canada, which shared the very sane gold dollar, would have experienced concurrent crises. It didn’t. 1/
NOW - ECB chief Lagarde says she does not like to see a new period of "free banking" due to cryptocurrencies.
Central bank digital currencies (CBDC) are required to maintain the role of central banks.
It's remarkable that many can't understand that a currency isn't doomed simply because it looses a bit more than 2% of its value every year, as if it couldn't do so forever. The fallacy is so common that it deserves a name. I hereby christen it the "melting ice cube" fallacy.
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but just as recent inflation hasn't all been the Fed's fault, today's decline, dependent as it is on the oil market, is no proof that the Fed is getting back on track. Real proof of that will consist of a much-lower 3rd quarter (NGDP) growth rate.
Thread: The hard thing about being a market-oriented monetary and financial reg. policy guy is the very thick accretion of myths that have developed around the field, starting in ancient times.
On Friday I'm off to visit Cordoba and Granada, with the intent of deciding to make one of them my next home. I look forward to seeing a lot more of my European twitter friends once I do. ¡Deséame suerte!
This is absolutely priceless. And probably the most frightening clip you'll ever watch on the people in charge of the US economy.
Jared Bernstein is literally the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, the main agency advising Biden on economic policy
This is one of the more absurd threads I've seen recently (and that's saying plenty!). The suggestion that the dollar's troubles stem from a "crypto attack," or that such an attack could possibly endanger it, is sheer fantasy--as bad as the hoariest anti-bank conspiracy theories.
I can't stress this enough: the crypto attack on the dollar is not strictly a "pump and dump" or a "grift." It's an ideologically-driven attack on the legitimacy of fiat currency, the
@federalreserve
, and the incumbent financial system. It is the sequel to the January 6th attack.
Milei is discussing Malthus and endogenous growth theory, fer crissakes! If that’s talking “pseudoscientific nonsense of the highest degree,” it sure beats the utter economic illiteracy of either Peronists or certain recent U.S. presidents.
Following the 1619 project discussion here on Twitter, I'm struck by the snarky tone of the project's editor, even in exchanges with polite (if perhaps mistaken) critics who are also professionals. Besides setting a terrible example, it hardly inspires confidence in the project.
Thread: I don't think I've been at all coy when it comes explaining why I doubt that Bitcoin will ever become a generally-accepted and widely-used medium for everyday payments, that is, "money." Misunderstood; but not coy.
Still, for
@allenf32
's sake I will sum-up my view here.
Yes, hackers find it convenient these days to request ransom payment in Bitcoin, just as kidnappers and blackmailers for a century asked for payment in Federal Reserve notes. We don't condemn the Fed for the last fact. Why condemn Bitcoin for the first?
MADURO: "A message to Javier Milei... You were put in Argentina to destroy the rule of law, destroy the State, destroy all social and labor rights, destroy the national economy and to colonize Argentina and deliver it on its knees to US imperialism... you are a fatal mistake"
Thread: It's dangerous to say that
@paulkrugman
has outdone himself. But his recent attack on those of us who have done serious research on free banking, he at least matches his previous lows.
Perhaps the most extraordinary letters in my trove is one of the last from Milton Friedman, with whom I corresponded often. It is so because that great man felt it necessary to apologize for taking so long to write! How many would have bothered to write at all?
Even a year’s worth of Spanish is enough to realize that Mr. Adler is dishonest: Milei’s crackdown is exclusively concerns protesters who block traffic: “They can protest on the sidewalk,” says his minister of security.
Nope. Central banks can "outprint" any amount of technological innovation. Works that say that the coming this-or-that tech innovation is "bound" to bring falling prices (and there have been several such) reveal a very poor understanding of how fiat monetary systems work.
@GeorgeSelgin
My belief is we are going to experience broader scale deflation because of ai powered automation dropping the cost of labor; wide spread usage of solar and wind for energy production dropping cost of energy; GMO yeasts to produce animal proteins dropping cost of food. Etc
Thread: 3 wrong theories of bank money creation: (1) An ordinary bank must wait for reserves (deposits) to come its way in order to make loans; if they seem to maintain an 5% reserve ratio, then they can only lend 95% or deposits received.
Thank you,
@nic__carter
, for taking this principled stand! Your voice is important, and I hope others will be persuaded by it to reach the same conclusions.
The Austrian cycle theory would command much more respect than it does today were it not for amateur Austrians' tendency to attribute every boom to easy money and to predict 100 "inevitable" crashes for every actual crash.
Bitcoin appears to be a decentralized Ponzi scheme not a decentralized currency. People don’t spend it because they want it to go up. The dollar works because of inflation. It keeps velocity up like hot potato. If you want to store value silver gold and land. Because it’s
Except it ignores several important studies questioning earlier (especially pre-1930) business-cycle data, all of which tend to reduce the incidence and duration of earlier cycles. 1/
Face it: this, not any interest denationalization of money, is what drives most participation in the Bitcoin market today. It’s more Tupperware and Amway than Mises and Hayek.
Year is 2025
Bitcoin is trading at $230k
You are a multi millionaire
You have retired your parents
Married to a beautiful wife with 2 kids.
You have it all.
Be consistent and Believe in yourself
coz I know you can make it happen.
In crypto you can turn $1000 to $1M
Can someone who understands money explain this to me:
- the USD was backed by gold, then oil, then economic growth;
- If there is no growth & the US government keeps printing...
- what prevents hyperinflation?
Actually, any monetary or macro economist worth his salt can answer Hoppe's question, which mainly succeeds in displaying his utter ignorance of monetary theory and hstory.
The spectacle of Bitcoin fans celebrating the prospective granting of legal tender status to it by El Salvador's authoritarian President (he only just extended his executive authority over the country's central bank) must have F.A. Hayek rolling in his grave! 1/2
I don't suppose it would help to point out to that Cato has long been in the forefront of the fight against qualified immunity. No: smashing windows is just too darn fun.
If MMTs ever admit that real resource constraints are binding, its game over: they'll have to quit claiming that the government is one big untapped cornucopia. And if they do that, their fan base will melt away like a lump of sugar that's just had hot water poured on it.
Rising prices? Greed explains it! Falling prices? Greed explains that, too! Prices don’t change? Greed yet again!
Thank goodness for this powerful theory: otherwise we’d have to fall back on…thinking.
For God’s sake! Tight labor markets don’t “cause” of inflation. Nor does unemployment cure it. Instead, tight labor markets and inflation are common consequences excessive _spending_. The solution, therefore, is less spending, not more unemployment! 1/2
2. As the effects of supply shocks have subsided, tighter labor markets, and the resulting rises in nominal wages, have become relatively more important sources of the remaining inflation in many countries. What happens in labor markets will largely determine the cost of the
Actually, any economist might consider that a "tricky question." Do higher prices reflect increased scarcity? Well, that beats not letting them rise and creating shortages. Would lower prices fail to reflect relevant external costs? In that case also, higher is better. 1/2
Biden's nom Dr. Omarova isn’t sure whether higher gas prices are bad for Americans, calling it a “tricky question” & showing a shockingly out-of-touch perspective. Someone who wants to bankrupt oil & gas businesses is unfit to serve the American people hurting from rising prices.
I just heard the terrible news that
@sghorwitz
, who fought a long and valiant battle with lymphoma, kept not only a brave but a happy face on through much of the ordeal, and almost won, has passed away. He was a fine economist and teacher, and a good fella. Rest In Peace, Steve.
- The CB causes hyperinflation.
- The CB encourages banks, big ones especially, to engage in risky behavior.
- The CB monopolizes currency provision and otherwise suppresses currency competition and financial innovation.
Educational opportunity! What do central banks do?
- The CB is a bank for the government.
- CB is a bank for private banks.
- CB serves as “lender of last resort,” fending off financial crises by lending when nobody else can.
- CB sets monetary policy, primarily interest rates.
I'm planning a conference for everyone under 30 who doesn't believe that either BTC or MMT offers the key to economic salvation.
I'm thinking of having it in my 650 square foot DC apartment. Might have to borrow a chair.
To question the New Deal's success at promoting recovery from the Great Depression today is to risk being denounced as a revisionist "New Deal Denialist." Yet this supposedly "revisionist" view has been held by many of that depression's outstanding historians. 1/n
French election rivals Marine Le Pen and Emmanuel Macron come to blows over the far-right leader's policy to ban the wearing of the headscarf in public
Celebrating my 64th at Rancho la Puerta yesterday, where I'm dedicating the week to not caring for once what he Fed is up too! (No, I did not eat the whole thing!)
Well, it took a little longer than I had originally planned, but here is my (longish) essay defending the oh-so passé claim that banks are savings-investment intermediaries against the très chic view that they fund their loans with keystrokes:
Every young economist needs to decide: Do I wish to belong to some particular movement or school of thought, or do I just want to be a good economist?
If you don’t think so, it’s probably because you made the wrong choice.
Some personal news: I've just handed the reins of the
@CatoCMFA
to my dear friend and fellow monetary policy expert
@norbertjmichel
. I'll be staying on as Director Emeritus and Senior Fellow. Please help me welcome Norbert to the fold where he really belongs.
I'm proud to have
@NickSzabo4
refer to me (elsewhere) as a Bitcoin OG. Had I only had an inkling back then of the revolution he and his colleagues were plotting!
Dr. Selgin was on the mailing list with Wei Dai and myself where in 1998 cryptocurrency (bit gold, and a bit later b-money) was invented. His description of free banking was very inspirational and informative.
Blinded by hatred for Milton Friedman, and by his zeal to get others to hate him, Kurt Anderson has painted a grotesque caricature of the man and his economics. Alas, it is no longer possible to add "unworthy of the New York Times."
Mr. Taleb may call me "emotional" all he likes. The fact remains that, epistemologically speaking, his absorbing-barrier based "proof" that bitcoins are "worth exactly 0" is on all fours with August Magnan's 1934 demonstration that bumblebees can't possibly fly.
Man can this guy lie! The law only says that employers can _contract_ with their employees to pay in stuff other than (rapidly depreciating) pesos, and that they must honor such contractual commitments.
OK, my first thread on misconceptions about the history of bank-issued paper currency, motivated by claims that history shows that the private market can't be entrusted with supplying currency of any sort, including digital currency. Here I deal w/ antebellum U.S. experience.
When a knock comes on your door at 3AM, and your greatest fear is that it’s someone from Microsoft trying to sell you a new app, you badly need a refresher course in political philosophy.
@NapoleonBonabot
Corporations being tyrannical is worse, because we literally have no say in who runs them. At least with politicians they have to at least put up a facade of listening to the people
More Talebaloney: Having asserted that bitcoin "is" worth zero, he writes that, because bitcoins yield no dividend, "_if_ we expect that, at any point in the future, the value will be zero when miners are extinct, the technology becomes obsolete,...
BTC fans who expect the USD to collapse must forgive me for doubting it: goldbugs have been repeating this prediction for as long as I can remember, and the USD is more popular today than ever.
Sound familiar?
In short, I say, that if anyone is a "fascist," its
@DaveTroy
himself. And I can declare, confidently, that unlike him I do not fling that word around. Shame on him and on all those who foolishly "liked" his silly and irresponsible thread.
In a competition for "most stupid inflation theory" for which, goodness knows, there's no lack of strong contenders, my money's on the Greedflation hypothesis.
I can attest to this: In '73 I worked at a supermarket doing almost nothing but changing the little stickers on goods so shoppers would know precisely how rapidly their moral standards were decaying.
As long as people don't realize or don't care that
#Bitcoin
has no actual value, and continue to buy it anyway, its price can continue to rise. But eventually those who don't care will start caring, and those who don't understand will figure it out. By then it's too late to sell.
Found the perfect little tapas joint in Cordova, off the beaten path, but evidently popular with the locals. I am one of those rare Americans with a weakness for morcilla!
This
@Noahpinion
assessment of the New Deal is as one-sided as any of those he complains about. Saying that the NRA "helped avert damaging inflation" is just one instance of this. More like "compounded the damage from fallen aggregate demand by forcing up prices and wage rates"?
I'm afraid that
@GaryGensler
's understanding of the history of private (paper) currencies is informed more by central banks' self-serving rationalizations of their monopoly privileges than by the actual historical record. It is the sort of history found in mediocre textbooks.
A goal of popular writing in economics should be to give readers the impression, not only that they understand something, but that, given a few more minutes, they'd have figured it out themselves. If your readers can't help thinking that you must be a genius, you've blown it.
Were I able to convey but a single lesson about monetary policy to all my conservative and free market friends, it would be this: that central bankers, being central planners, are as capable of erring on the side of overly-tight money as they are of erring the other way.
Even Orwell could be foolish. Here he supposes that economic competition is like a single once-and-for-all footrace with fixed entrants, instead of a never-ending contest any firm might enter at any time.
George Orwell reviewing Hayek’s Road to Serfdom in 1944:
“The trouble with competitions is that somebody wins them. Professor Hayek denies that free capitalism necessarily leads to monopoly, but in practice that is where it has led.”
After my experience advising Lithuania (1990-91), I advise taking anything the IMF says on radical currency reform w/ a grain of salt. IMF officials opposed the currency board plan Kurt Schuler and I prepared (the first for any post-Soviet republic). 1/
Every time a bank run happens, it gets shoe-horned into the Diamond-Dybvig theory. In truth, runs that actually fit that theory are as rare as hens’ teeth. And the runs on SVB certainly isn’t one of them! 1/2
Early (premature) thoughts on the Silicon Valley Bank collapse.
It looks like a classic Diamond-Dybvig bank run, when each customer withdraws their money because they want to get their funds out while there's still money in the vault.
It isn’t a question of regulation or no regulation: the relevant choice is regulation via contract enforcement and the play of open competition OR piling-on industry-specific statutes that often end-up catering to the very
interests whose abuses they are meant to check.
How, exactly, is enterprise “free”? How are markets “free”? Without any regulations they reduce people’s freedoms not enhance them. In my new book I show why and provide another way to think about building a fairer, freer, and more just society. The Road to Freedom, out now.
To add to my previous thread: that we had banking "crises after crises" in the 19th century U.S. had precious little to do with genuinely "free" banking, and everything to do with misguided U.S. government regulations. All monetary historians worth their salt know this.
NOW - ECB chief Lagarde says she does not like to see a new period of "free banking" due to cryptocurrencies.
Central bank digital currencies (CBDC) are required to maintain the role of central banks.
Instead, stupid U.S. banking and currency laws made it uniquely crisis-prone during that era. This is common knowledge among U.S. economic and monetary historians. 2/
Selgin's BTC valuation lemma:
"A theory that predicts that something that actually commands a positive market price is fundamentally or "really" worth 0, without specifying the time frame within which this "true" value will assert itself, is itself worth 0."
It was a stupid idea in 1776, when Adam Smith offered what is still the best explanation of the advantages of fractional-reserve banking, and it’s still stupid—as is the phony legal history its proponents rely on.
El profesor Jesús Huerta de Soto, máximo referente vivo de la Escuela de Economia Austriaca y el Libertarismo de habla hispana asegura estar asesorando a
@JMilei
.
"Estamos asesorándole de cerca especialmente sobre la necesidad de establecer una reserva del 100% en su proceso de
Taleb is admittedly no "imbecile" (an adjective he himself likes to assign to all who criticize him). But he's a lot more bombast and a lot less brilliance than his many devotees seem to realize, and the time for exposing this reality is long overdue.
Personally, I find the spectacle abhorrent. And I sincerely hope some of those now celebrating will reconsider, and that upon having done so, they will instead _publicly condemn_ articles 7 and 13 of Bukele's new law.
MMT's say I'm a hired-gun opponent of government intervention in money. Gold bugs and bitcoiners say that, if I ever championed the cause of monetary freedom, I'm now an apologist for monetary central planning.
Might it be that I just say what my research leads me to believe?
When it comes to making the case that Bitcoin qualifies as "money," Bitcoiners will try anything--anything, that is, except consulting economists' standard definition of the term!
A smug MMTer (is that redundant?) imagines that he is much smarter than Böhm-Bawerk, who is silly enough to suppose that banks serve as savings-investment intermediaries.
In fact everything Böhm-Bawerk says in the quoted passages is perfectly reasonable. 1/
Böhm-Bawerk, a prominent Austrian economist, notes that, whereas we myopic people see "saving" simply as not spending, a sharp-eyed person like him sees the rest of the story: banks lend out deposits
He concludes that buying more wines will lead to fewer railroads being built.