GenerativeAI is going to a giant rug pull for tech in 2024. The ROI is not as high, use cases are not as straightforward, and customers are not paying up for gimmicky features in enterprise SaaS. Yes - there is value but the run-up in mag7 due to GenAI is overdone.
> 32 y/o
> Minimum 8y out of law school based on age
> TC $550K on the Cravath scale
Your guy either works for Wachtell, is lying, or you’re just making shit up. I’ll take the latter.
Dirty little secret in tech: Management teams only know how to add headcount. Ask execs to scale with existing HC and they have no clue how to be more efficient. Huge talent gap! Zero creativity, unwillingness to take risk, & victim attitude. Many people will get replaced in ‘24
An experienced practitioner staring at a spreadsheet for 15 minutes can come up with better insights than a team of phd data scientists + $300k data lake.
@eastdakota
@Austen
Cloudflare Comms Department: Let stay off social media until come up with a thoughtful reply to the video. We need to do damage control to maintain our
@repvue
score and repair our reputation with sales candidates.
Matthew Prince:
PE exists to show software companies the art of the possible. If a scaled software company can’t hit 40% EBIT margins with minimal dilution, it ain’t worth owning and management needs to be replaced with real operators
A decade of ZIRP and an explosion in the number of software companies was a recipe for disaster. Too many companies + not enough good executives to run them. Software cos are full of slick talking professional managers that have no idea what it takes to grow a small tech company.
1. 1200 unicorns
2. VC and growth PE funds that need to show DPI asap
3. Low-growth PE buyouts with high debt servicing costs
4. No IPOs in the last 2.5 years
5. High multiple Covid software deals with no path forward
The next 2.5 years in software investing:
Great work by
@JaredSleeper
and his team. Another explanation is structural:
1. SaaS budgets are tapped out & need to get profitable
2. IT budgets grow in line with GDP ~2-3% & pandemic pulled forward demand
3. Software is ~20% of any IT budget & sw grew faster than other costs
The new hyper-growth for software is 20%. Markets will punish software until they hit Rule of 40+. 20% NTM growth + 20% FCF margin with minimal SBC. Sw companies need to change their cost structure to attract a new set of LT investors. Transform or get picked off by PE in 2025!
Really nice visualization of the current state of Software from the Jefferies TMT desk tonight:
"The definition of what “high growth” is continues to be redefined across Software. As can be seen in the chart below across the 105 Software companies we track, we’re now at the
Terrible GTM ideas that only worked in a ZIRP environment:
1. CROs with marketing reporting into them
2. Large CS HC & hoping CS will close expansion deals
3. BDRs in SMB & Mid-market
4. Large digital advertising spend
5. Spammy Marketo campaigns
6. 27 yr old enterprise sellers
After 3-4 years into hold periods, software PE firms are realizing the chronic GTM execution issues are actually product management issues. No easy fix out there!
Software sales compensation is skyrocketing and sales productivity is still poor. I don’t know how investors can expect high FCF margins when 80% of software company’s cost structure is personnel & people costs are up 30-40% since 2020. Run it for cash & growth rate gets slammed
**banker shows you a random company and you decide to lean in**
IC memo: “We have been tracking this company’s progress for the past five years as part of our market work…”
It is only a matter of time before CFOs start to question the benefits of public cloud. CEO have long touted the cloud for the cachet of being considered digital-forward. When a company’s capex is now 100% opex, CFOs will need sharpen their pencils in a downturn and push back.
Tech sales quota attainment is at ~35% compared to historical industry average 65-70%. One observation is there is too much sales capacity. While true, the root cause is most tech sellers don’t want to work that hard anymore. Too many sellers want to “take orders” & make $250k+
Very difficult for software companies to improve sales efficiency if every medicore sales rep needs to be paid $250k-$300k. Sales compensation ballooned in a race to build GTM while productivity went down. Only 40% of reps hitting quota tells you there is too much capacity!
Software companies don’t die from competition. It usually self inflected. Some of more popular missteps
1. Rolling out new, complicated pricing
2. Botching an on-prem to SaaS transition
3. Failed product “rewrite”
4. Underinvest in good UX
5. Costly + long implementation times
Every software PE investor is scrambling to fix leadership issues in product mgmt, product marketing, and demand generation. All functions ignored during the ZIRP era when demand was strong
Dua Lipa asks Tim Cook hard hitting question in this podcast. Topic includes deceleration of iPhone in china, competition from Huawei Mate 60, and moving supply chains to India, and Taiwan risks from china $AAPL
Seeing a lot of software companies with “delayed renewals”. Retention game is getting harder every quarter. Assuming auto-renew without any reselling is a ZIRP phenomenon. Watch renewal rates in 2H2024 👀
@patrick_oshag
1980: Here is 8% of the company 💰
2023: 3rd rate SaaS founder offering 4th employee hire 0.1% equity for pre-revenue, pre-PMF company 🤷♂️
SMB is still buying software. Average sales cycles are decreasing. No formalized budget process approvals or sophisticated procurement department to block ~$25k purchases. $HUBS is not out-executing $CRM rather fewer blockers + lower risk of no decision on deals. Enterprise is 💀
Making the math work for a software take-private
Paying ~8.5m NTM Rev and selling for ~35x NTM uFCF upon exit
Taking revenue growth from ~35% to ~15%
Increasing FCF margin from ~1% to 25%
$AMZN AWS culture is causing its decline. 125k employees told to act like CEOs/owners. Leaders have their own agenda and want to do things their way. It makes it impossible to run and scale the business with a coherent strategy. Wait for the HBR case study!
Growth software may appear to be rebounding but looking under the surface tells a different story. Market demand from new customers is very weak. Companies are growing by harvesting existing customers base. After 2+ yrs of heavy upsell/expansion, this well will eventually run dry