The biggest lie in SF is that the folks we see on the streets are low income earning San Franciscans that couldn't keep up with rent increases.
I have friends that got priced out of SF. They moved to Vallejo & Concord. NONE downsized to a tent on the sidewalk in the Loin.
There's an L-shaped corridor of San Francisco voters who want criminals to escape, taxpayers to fund street drugs, and our brightest children held back from reaching their full potential.
At some point, we need to have a family meeting about this.
Rumor is that the witness doesn’t want to cooperate.
Public Service Announcement: If you witness a crime and refuse to cooperate, you are allowing the criminal to continue victimizing the rest of us.
If you give away free apartments with NO sobriety requirements (i.e. "Housing First"), the property will get trashed. San Francisco has already paid over $17 MILLION in settlements related to damage at SIP Hotels.
$2,900,000 Tilden Hotel
$5,362,325 Hotel Union Square
If you give away FREE apartments with NO sobriety requirements (aka "Housing First"), the property will get trashed. San Francisco has already paid over $44 MILLION in settlements related to property damage at SIP Hotels.
$19,500,000 Hotel Whitcomb
$3,893,862 Good Hotel
You cannot solve this problem by giving away free housing. The more public housing we create, the more we must spend to manage and maintain those buildings. Even worse, more people from elsewhere come in search of free housing. It’s NOT sustainable.
Dear SF voters,
Unless you want Aaron Peskin as mayor, you need to rank ALL three of the viable moderate candidates (Farrell, Lurie and Breed) and leave Peskin blank.
If you only rank one or two of the candidates, your ballot might get exhausted - allowing Peskin to win.
Thank you to the 75O+ people who packed Portsmouth Square today to help kick off our collective campaign to bring neighborhood voices back to City Hall! This campaign is about uniting the City that we love and raising all ships together.
I’m humbled and grateful for your support.
I was in Hong Kong recently and (unlike SF) had lovely shopping experiences. Retail stores (including high end retailers) had expensive items fully accessible (and, yes, easy to steal). Yet, there is very low retail theft. Why? Because there is high accountability for crime.
Jordan Davis received tax-payer funded gender affirmation surgery. She lives in city-funded permanent housing. Somehow, she has time to attend in-person Board of Supervisors Meetings at 2pm on Tuesdays instead of working.
Given these many benefits, does she express gratitude to
Jordan starts tweeting legal opinions says all the profanity is perfectly fine as long as it doesn't disrupt public meetings, three days after proudly proclaiming she disrupted a public meeting
@SusanDReynolds
@richieSF2016
Due to
@TheCoalitionSF
’s lawsuit, SF can’t stop urban camping until we create 4,000 new shelter beds. But, we can’t create 4,000 new shelter beds because
@TheCoalitionSF
limited Prop C funds for shelter to 10%.
I want a ballot measure to end this Catch-22 of human misery.
The dominant cause of homelessness is inadequate supply of homes.
The dominant solution to homelessness is building lots of homes, both market & subsidized.
Treating mental health/addiction is very important but secondary to housing.
Here are the stats:
Do you really believe that SF progressives lost because of low turnout?
Perhaps, it was their awful candidates and failed ideas - like defund the police, decriminalization, cash welfare for drug tourists, math is racist, and endless identity politics. 🤷♂️
Giving away free apartments with no sobriety requirements (Housing First policies) is correlated to an INCREASE in chronic homelessness.
San Francisco should provide "shelter first" and disallow urban camping.
#EvidencedBasedApproach
.
The flaw in Prop 47 is not simply the $950 threshold. It's also that REPEAT offenses do not result in a felony. For example, there was a woman who committed over 100 thefts from Target.
The Harm Reduction folks don’t seem to understand that the growing opposition to their policies isn’t a collapse in compassion.
It’s just that highly compassionate people have figured out that enablement is the cruelest approach.
The anatomy of a viral “everything in the City is fine; stop complaining” screed:
1) Gaslight residents by claiming that, despite what we can see with our own eyes, the street conditions in San Francisco aren’t so bad.
2) Rebrand the epidemic of severe
@sfchronicle
I grew up with the Chronicle being the newspaper of record for the Bay Area. Now, their reporting reads like something from a George Orwell novel. 💔
San Francisco gives away more FREE apartments to homeless folks than any other city. As a result of this and other incentives, we have MORE homeless and permanently housed people than any other city (per capita). Approximately 50% of homeless in SF are from elsewhere.
New 9th Circuit Court of Appeals definitions:
Involuntary Homeless = have NOT received an offer of temporary shelter from city. Untouchable.
Voluntary Homeless = have received an offer of temporary shelter and rejected it. The city CAN take enforcement action.
It’s NOT a promising solution. We’ve already tried this at full scale in San Francisco. Cash general assistance with NO conditions attracts drug tourists and enables addiction.
That’s why 66% of likely March voters support Prop F (drug screening for cash welfare).
Over $20 MILLION in settlements related to damage at SIP Hotels.
$3,750,000 Kimpton Buchanan
$2,900,000 Tilden Hotel
$5,362,325 Hotel Union Square
$3,367,576 Hotel Vertigo
$4,692,008 Americania Hotel
$ 762,965 Executive Hotel Vintage Court
Profoundly stupid editorial from the SF Chronicle. Particularly following their reporting about how these drug dealers are amassing small fortunes with low risk of prosecution and no risk of deportation.
This summer, the Supreme Court should rule that cities have an absolute right to ban urban camping.
Encampments are unsanitary, cause fires, attract drug tourists, enable addiction, host property crime and violent crime - including sexual assault.
The reasons for eviction include drug use, smoke damage, fire damage, water leakage, hoarding, pests, noise nuisance, non-payment, violent behavior, and harassment of building staff.
Do you still believe we can solve this by giving away free housing?
Did we become so tolerant that we began tolerating foreign drug dealers? Cartel-affiliated drug traffickers should not enjoy sanctuary protections in San Francisco.
Homeless Migration is Real
🧳UCSF asked where person was "last housed", not where are you from
🧳No verification of self-reported answers.
🧳California is home to 12% of the nation's population and has 50% of the nation's unsheltered homeless population.
🧳As of 7/7/23, there
"When people lose their housing, the last thing they’re really able to do is garner the resources to pick up and leave everything they knew behind,”
@MKushel
tells
@sagevanwing
for OPB.
🎧Learn more about
#CAHomelessnessStudy
findings:
#homelessness
Aaron Peskin:
- supported efforts to defund the police
- opposed the Chesa Boudin Recall
- opposed the School Board Recall
- opposed drug screening for cash aid
Rank ALL THREE (Farrell, Lurie, Breed)
Leave Peskin blank
The recent mass shooting in SF occurred at a graffiti supply store () that also sells F The Police pins and SuckaFreeCity backpacks.
Truth is: we are suckers for tolerating a business that glorifies and enables the destruction of our tolerant society.
Fun fact: when meth smoke seeps into drywall, it has to ripped out and disposed as haz mat.
So, if you put a meth addict in a tiny home, the structure gets used once before being destroyed. In an apartment building, you’re looking at interior demolition and reconstruction.
The opposition to streamlining tiny homes for homeless people on the grounds that they’ll become shanty towns is utterly baffling. Like what do you call where they’re living *right now*
10-year high in the number of building fires in San Francisco. Everyone knows it's because of public camping and Housing First policies (placing drug addicts into a free apartment with no sobriety requirements).
@SFFDPIO
End sanctuary protections for drug dealers and deport. We’ll never succeed at building a case and prosecuting each Honduran dealer for distribution.
The FBI didn’t get Al Capone on murder and racketeering. They got him on tax evasion.
Many urban campers are in San Francisco because we don’t prohibit urban camping.
They also like that we offer $687 per month in cash assistance, free harm reduction supplies, lax enforcement of property crime, and the drugs are cheap.
#incentivesmatter
28% of Generation Z have a favorable view of communism - ignorant of the horrifying results when nations DID implement it in the early 20th century.
This is a dismal flunking of historical literacy and economics that high school teachers should have to explain.
We already ran this experiment in San Francisco. Gifting free apartments with no sobriety requirements is financially infeasible, creates a magnet effect on troubled folks from elsewhere, results in property damage, and leaves people to OD and die alone in their rooms.
Housing First is prohibitively expensive, attracts addicts from elsewhere, results in severe property damage, and leaves people to persist in addiction until they overdose and die alone.
At last week’s hearing, Senator Vance said familiar mistruths about homelessness - that substance abuse is root cause & that homeless people should be required to address addiction before receiving housing assistance. I was very glad to respond for the record.
Drug addiction rates are higher in Appalachia, but they have cheaper housing - and therefore fewer homeless than San Francisco.
So what? How are you going to lower the market price of housing in SF to match Appalachia? SF already provides more PSH than any other city. New PSH
#HousingFirst
does NOT work. It simply attracts more homelessness.
SF gives away more permanent housing per capita than any other city. Because of this (and other incentives), we have 5X more people who are either homeless or living in public housing than other local cities.
“The fact is that
#housingfirst
works. It needs no defense. Folks are finding the stability & transformative benefits of home. The work of everyone attending the 2023 Housing CA annual conference is proof of that. We’re doubling down.”
#RichardCho
@hudgov
#HousingsNextChapter
The doctors within the Homeless Industrial Complex (including
@ucsfbhhi
) have done countless small group studies on Harm Reduction and Housing First.
But, I’ve never seen them do research on:
1) the “magnet effect” these policies create on troubled folks from elsewhere.
2)
What is the actual goal of drug testing welfare?
Given that
- Not all 5,000+ SF welfare recipients use drugs
- Not all drug users are welfare recipients
- Not all homeless people are on welfare
Long term treatment, mental health services, & housing > whatever this is
I’m call it
@thecoalitionsf
’s Catch-22:
✅ SF can’t clear encampments unless we have sufficient shelter capacity under Martin v Boise.
❌ We can’t create sufficient shelters because the homeless non-profits advocate for funding Housing First, not shelter.
I blame Supervisor Preston and the Homeless Industrial Complex for the drug crisis in San Francisco. They tax earnings and use the funds to enable drug tourism.
We gave free permanent housing (with no sobriety requirements) to drug addicts.
Smoke from meth/fentanyl got into the drywall ruining it. Folks had a psychotic break & ripped out fixtures. Leaks & spills caused water damage. Hoarding & human waste caused pest infestations. 😲🤯
@auweia1
Why doesn’t anyone ask how those units were damaged so heavily? If you are trying to house the homeless, wouldn’t it be good to prevent heavy damage to units in the first place?
If I had a child who was addicted to drugs, I would rather spend $4,750 per month on urine tests and drug treatment than spend $687 on a monthly allowance with no sobriety or treatment requirement.
You cannot solve Urban Camping by giving away free housing in Marin County. It will simply attract MORE troubled people from elsewhere - making the problem WORSE and ultimately bankrupting the county.
A Marin County supervisor said the hope is to cut the camp’s population of about 90 residents in half within two years and empty it in three.
“The ultimate goal is to get people housed,” supervisor Eric Lucan said.
@StanleyRoberts
In any small town, people would have assisted.
But, near an open-air drug market, it's hard to expect personal risk taking from average citizens. There is no social order to defend.
In practice, UCSF's "Housing First" policies enable drug addiction - creating unsafe, unhealthy, undignified places where people persist in their addiction until they overdose and die alone.
We envision a world in which everyone has a safe place to live, and communities can flourish in health, equity, and dignity.
Help make this vision a reality as our new Policy Director!
Join us:
#PolicyLeadership
#HealthEquity
#HousingAdvocacy
Perfect example of “Incentives Matter”
“San Francisco’s status as a sanctuary city makes it more attractive to the Honduran dealers, some of them said, because it means a lower risk of lengthy jail time and deportation if convicted.”
Public use of drugs and public intoxication have always been crimes. We just stopped enforcement. Our intentions were good, but we failed to consider the incentives and 2nd order outcomes it would create.
The Era of Enablement has been a disaster. Time to turn the car around.
I'm pleading with you as a housing provider - we can't do our jobs without the resident being sober. If you give away free condos with NO sobriety requirement, it results in property damage, pests, nuisance issues, unsustainable & never-ending costs, and overdose deaths.
@MKushel
: “I’m pleading with you as a healthcare provider - we can’t do our jobs without housing… if you try to fix those other things without fixing housing, our hands are really tied behind our backs.”
I’m looking for help with the following data:
1) What day of the month is $687/mo in Cash General Assistance in San Francisco paid out?
2) SF overdose deaths for each day over the past few months.
@adamjohnsonNYC
The anatomy of a viral “everything in the City is fine; stop complaining” screed:
1) Gaslight residents by claiming that, despite what we can see with our own eyes, the street conditions in San Francisco aren’t so bad.
2) Rebrand the epidemic of severe drug addiction as
LA Times just endorsed the re-election of DA George Gascon, a radical pro-criminal, anti-police progressive prosecutor.
How did LA’s “paper of record” devolve into the “breaker of social order”?
In other words, “the Homeless Industrial Complex has a financial incentive to endlessly perpetuate homelessness, not solve it and put themselves out of business.
Drug Consumption Sites are NOT “living rooms” where people “can be human”.
They are DRUG DENS that enable addicts to continue destroying their lives and the lives of their families. These sites are inhumane.
On SF’s Tenderloin center: “The living room area was key. Places people could be human. We heard from a lot of folks this was the only physical space in their lives they could just BE” 💜
@suenlw
at
#AMERSA2023
Imagine that you are a drug addict. Your primary drive is to obtain cash benefits (to buy drugs), do urban camping (to eliminate housing expenses) & feed your addiction full-time. Which Bay Area city would you move to?
I don’t have to say it. You already know the answer.
Kelly doesn’t understand that giving everyone a free apartment is prohibitively expensive, attracts drug tourists, removes incentivizes for independent living, enables addiction, results in property damage, and leaves people to overdose and die alone.
Sweeps don’t work. What does work? Supportive housing. Here’s a new study showing that people placed in supportive housing are significantly more likely to be able to refill & remain adherent to their prescription medications versus a comparison group.
Unpopular opinion: Downtown San Francisco won’t be saved by
@Benioff
.
👎 Advocated for Prop C which increased incentives for drug tourists.
👎 Funds
@ucsfbhhi
that pushes “Housing First”
👎 Allows employees at Salesforce to continue working from home
The cause of yesterday’s fire in Hayes Valley is still under investigation. While there is always a rush to judge what the cause may be, we must allow our investigators to do their jobs. However, I want to address concerns raised by the neighbors about nearby encampments.
It’s a drug epidemic. Do you really believe that we can solve this by giving away free homes with no sobriety requirements?
It’s never going to work. There is inexhaustible demand across the nation for free homes where you be a full-time drug addict.
Moderator
@TracieMGardner
brings it home with this summary: "We *know* that housing works and it's just astounding that it's still being questioned." (2/2)
Many WANT a free apartment with no rules where they can use drugs.
Cities will never solve this problem by granting the wishes of the nation's addicts. They will only make conditions worse by attracting more.
“I get people are frustrated but what they should be is really, really concerned,” says John Brady of
@LivedAdvisers
.
Instead of asking, “How can we force people?”
@annymoliva
suggests asking, "What can we build that people want?”
The San Francisco mayor's race won't be decided on housing policy.
The winner will be the candidate who explains how they will remove incentives and create disincentives for addicts who migrate here, use drugs full-time, camp on our sidewalks, and boost from our stores.
The race for San Francisco mayor is now all about housing.
@AaronPeskin
jumping in gives
@LondonBreed
’s allies exactly the foil they wanted to run a YIMBY-focused campaign
In a preliminary report, a San Francisco nonprofit and USC researchers found that giving unhoused people $750 a month made them less likely to be unsheltered.
This is drug tourism. The incentives in San Francisco (cash assistance, harm reduction, housing first) are well-intended. But, they attract and enable folks from elsewhere who want to live in addiction for free.
Giving the Homeless Industrial Complex more money and more housing facilities will make the problem WORSE, not better.
They want to incentivize drug tourism, not solve it.
Happening now: “The homeless services system is working hard to manage a crisis they didn’t create–and can’t solve–without sustained investments in increasing the supply of deeply
#affordablehousing
,”
@MKushel
tells CA Assembly Committees:
#endhomelessness
There are certain institutions that are unpleasant, but necessary for civil order. It’s a bad idea to tear them down without superior alternatives working at scale. In particular:
▪️Mental Institutions
▪️Prisons
▪️Police
▪️District Attorneys
▪️Penalties for shoplifting
Apparently, we shouldn’t have a SFPD reality show because the public will see:
👮♀️Cops doing heroic & important work. Inspiring some into law enforcement careers.
🦹♂️ Criminals who need accountability.
Much better if they keep us in the dark and feed us 💩
Yes! We deserve to know how much of the “homelessness” we see is actually “drug tourism”.
Former addresses must be verified. Don’t solely rely on self-reported surveys like
@ucsfbhhi
.
“Notably, no one was from San Francisco.” That’s what
@SaraSidnerCNN
reported about drug scenes and camps she visited for
@CNN
’s special last May, “What Happened to San Francisco?”
We need rigorous data analysis and reporting to fully quantify “drug tourism” in our City…
1/3
Giving away free apartments with no sobriety requirements is not economically feasible, creates “magnet effect” on troubled people from elsewhere, and fails to consider the severe toll that treatment-refusing addicts inflict on the property & neighbors.
@GabeFerreiraD3
@mattdorsey
What obviously isn't working is the longtime abysmally failed
#WarOnDrugs
.
Evidence shows it exacerbates drug usage, addiction, overdoses lawlessness and organized violence in our community.
#EndTheWarOnDrugs
and follow the evidence for a safer society.
“Evidence-based policies” and “Data-driven decisions” are doublespeak phrases. The Homeless Industrial Complex use them to deceive the public into believing that their methods are tested and proven using the scientific method.
Alas, they’re not.
@DeanPreston
It’s a wake up call that
@TheCoalitionSF
has been playing us.
✅ We can’t clear encampments unless we have sufficient shelter capacity under Boise v Martin.
❌ We don’t have sufficient shelter capacity because the homeless non-profits advocate for permanent housing, not shelter.
We are thrilled to partner with
@TheOpEdProject
to help align the public narrative with the real challenges our homeless community members are facing.
Meet the team:
Get updates:
#EndHomelessness
#NewNarrative
@LeeHepner
Counterpoint: Driverless cars are far safer than human drivers and will ultimately be able to perfectly coordinate with each other reducing gridlock. Certain bus lines will become obsolete just as those bus lines made certain trolley lines obsolete a century ago.
@alanburradell
$19,500,000 Hotel Whitcomb
$3,750,000 Kimpton Buchanan
$2,900,000 Tilden Hotel
$5,362,325 Hotel Union Square
$3,367,576 Hotel Vertigo
$4,692,008 Americania Hotel
$762,965 Executive Hotel Vintage Court
Total: $40,334,874
If you give away free apartments with no sobriety requirements to drug addicts, they WILL cause severe property damage. This is one of the reasons that “Housing First” is economically infeasible.