I am profoundly saddened to learn that many of our Economics colleagues are the victims of sexual harassment. Possibly there are multiple women who are victims of the same men, senior figures in the profession. This is unacceptable.
I report, with great sadness, the passing of Paul David. A fabulous scholar of economic history and the economics of technology, he lit up Stanford for six decades.
We economists owe gratitude to
@jenniferdoleac
and others for centering the issue of sexual abuse in our profession. The recent allegations are very grave. Enquiry needed.
Errors in three management areas.
1) Taking a firm private can reduce short-termism (e.g. Porter, 1992). Taking a firm private with a capital structure that compels short-termism, no. It might force you to make panicky cost-cutting choices.
Ed Prescott, a fabulous macroeconomist, wrote an oligopoly model with Mike Visscher. First game theory IO competition model used empirically. RIP Ed, and thanks.
Just attended the talk by Ederer et al. on toxic speech in EJMR at the NBER summer institute.
@florianederer
@paulgp
with discussion from
@ce_tucker
. Heartbreaking. EJMR toxicity violates any standard of human decency or basic commitment to open science. MUST FIX THIS. /1
Some journalists and pundits got yesterday's antitrust court ruling in the merger of Penguin (etc.) and Simon and Schuster pretty wrong. I add here a simple "what actually happened" thread.
I have a task for a Cornell senior person. Dean of the B-School, Football Coach, somebody known to students. (The Pres. did her bit yesterday.) You have a crisis of antisemitic hate and threats of violence. So here's the plan, which takes courage and leadership: /1
Joe Dimaggio came to Princeton to shoot a Mr. Coffee commercial back when I was a grad student. They got the University to open an Econ Dept office window, unplug everything inside. For lights
Whose? that faculty most frequently in her office and working. Easy guess, right? /1
3) A platform can only have one reputation (Bresnahan et al. 2012). Trying to be "free speech" to wingnuts and "safe" to advertisers, no. The former spook the latter. The louder you are, the more your platform's multiple constituencies are in the same information space.
2) Basic platform economics (e.g. Rosse 1970) tells you whom to pay and who shoul pay you. Fees to those who bring others to your platform, no. They might leave, at which point positive feedback is not your friend.
Much discussion of a Court's decision not to grant a Preliminary Injunction to the FTC in the Meta - Within merger. I have no inside info, but 1) There is nothing novel in the Court's opinion. 2) I have a very different take on what role Economics might have played here. 1/7
I am extremely impressed with the bravery of women who have written variants of "he did this to me too" this week. Also very impressed with the efforts of
@jenniferdoleac
to ally with survivors. Are there other powerful effective allies? I want to amplify these voices.
Competition with network effects: the platform with installed base prefers to block interoperability, the fledgling platform prefers to create it. Application to twitter's and rivals' policies today, obvious ....
What can we do to improve this? Some things are obvious. Those of us who are senior and established can speak up in support. We can take some of the heat from the trolls who will accuse survivors and their allies of accusing in bad faith, too.
Twitter brings many foolish defenses of toxic speech on EJMR since
@florianederer
@paulgp
and
@DataKyle
's useful paper about racist, sexist, rape-threatening, (other) violence-threatening and many more toxic, harmful to economists, posts. /1
It appears that there may be a substantial number of (typically junior) women with complaints about the same (typically senior) men. The power imbalances inherent in academic life make it difficult for one person to complain, either to officials at their university or publicly.
@kearney_melissa
A few regrade requests are reasonable. Most are expressions of entitlement. The latter are bad for faculty and awful for parafaculty. Need to filter.
Ohh, and the most important thing. Aviv Nevo is not afraid of antitrust enforcement action and he is very analytically demanding. We could get some good cases from
@FTC
. 4/3
The NYTimes has an impressively bad hatchet-job obit of Bob Lucas, who was a terrific economic scientist, not a political hack.
@1954swilliamson
suggests they could have interviewed someone who knew Bob. OR, ...
Why say the problem is
@DataColada
finding errors in the research, and not that there were errors in the research? NYT journalists lean to reporting spin, e.g. negative headlines "harm ... her field of study." Science and spin are not friends. /2 of 2
This is _not_ an abandonment of the oddly named "consumer welfare standard" because it is the authors not the readers of books who were harmed. That standard includes monopsony power cases like this one.
Other things are less obvious. The constraints are real -- academics is full of power imbalances, and University (and probably govt. and other research shop) administrations are ineffective at prevention and protection.
I congratulated both
@EU_Competition
and
@ProfFionasm
on her appointment. Stand by that. Now there is all this nonsense mischaracterizing her antitrust experience and approach while weirdly throwing the transnational EU project under the bus. Nonsense.
With two goals, neither of which is to defend the current state of our profession, this thread discusses some of the existing structures for getting relief.
Anonymous ombuds can be powerful. If you have been victimized by some creep, they can take your info -- anonymously -- and take action if and when there are multiple complaints. etc.
I am admiring of
@PikaGoldin
for wisdom, focus, brilliance, and most of all persistence and courage.
Heroines don't just do terrific research, they (still) fight for basic research resources. We benefit. /n
Thus it is not an ideological breakthrough for USDOJ Antitrust. It is a well-litigated routine merger case. Respondents really hoped the Court would be confused about monoposony, but, like most reasonably smart people, not confused.
If your harasser is an NBER affiliate or presents papers or discusses at conferences of either organization, consider these routes. If the harassment occurs at conferences or is linked to co-authorship, all the more so.
Super useful thread from
@conlon_chris
on _actual_allegations in FTC/Amazon. Reveals, if doesn't say, that 90% of tweets and reporting about the case are nonsense.
#econtwitter
should take a look at the (heavily redacted)
@FTC
Amazon complaint that came out recently.
Given past experience, this case will likely not be resolved for 3-20 years.
Not everything is visible -- but I'll give my best guesses below.. 1/
Economists see any contradictions between elements of a case much more quickly than attorneys. We have different definitions of analytic, in my considerable experience. The narrow market definition and the potential entrant arguments tripped over each other. Boom. 6/7
Why those two organizations? 1) The two most important conference sponsors are the NBER and the AEA. 2) The most important pre-prints are the NBER yellow covers, and the AEA is one of the most important publishers.
Many got to Level 0 about Twitter:
Level 0 platform economics: don't get in a box where you limit how many ads folks can see on an ad-supported product.
Level 1: platform rule changes can have unpredictable fx. e.g. blocking API can change demand for other services.
1/3
The momentary literal powerlessness of
@Pikagoldin
isn't just a metaphor for the deeply embedded sexism (and racism) of academic life. It's an example. That women scholars' work was "less important" showed up in less petty ways, too; systemic and ubiquitous./2
Calling on all men [mean that literally this time] of goodwill in Economics to join here.
@jenniferdoleac
@JustinWolfers
and others they cite are good sources.
Economics is in something of a
#metoo
moment, with a number of women coming forward (and naming names) with some very disturbing revelations of sexual harassment and sexual misconduct by senior male economists. See
@jenniferdoleac
's timeline for a blow-by-blow of each revelation.
Thread with the facts from
@jenniferdoleac
about an actual case and false claims about that case. Important because the misogynists are turning to disinformation.
False and defamatory claims about the AEA DeAngelo investigation are being circulated online by anonymous accounts.
If our institutions aren’t going to protect us, we have to protect ourselves. Time to set the record straight.
When Nazis were slaughtering them, Jews found safe haven in the UK and US. Tomorrow, we must block the "day of rage" and make synagogues save havens for fellowship and prayer.
I also wrote very critically of the obit and have a different response than
@wwwojtekk
and
@GuthmannR
Reporters, like others in the political system, have simply forgotten that there is anything but advocacy and ideology. Cover the science? Doesn't exist! Cover the spin!
That was my reaction too - if you can't write an obituary for Robert Lucas that discusses (even critically!) intellectual merits of his work rather than making it about ideology, you have no business writing about economics because you're just a hack.
The constraint set is part of the optimization. I would very much like to hear practical, i.e., not just wishing away the constraints, proposals for further improvement in our culture and climate.
DOJ just won a monopsony antitrust merger suit: Penguin-Simon bookseller merger bad for highest-paid authors. PGA-LIV golf tour merger likely bad for highest-paid golfers. Enforcement action?
Everyone should be able to participate in our profession without experiencing harassment. Speaking in favor of EJMR's broadcasting of harassment of Economists is _is_ an attack on open science in Economics. Cut it out./4
Stanford has put up a lovely obituary for Vic Fuchs, who died, almost 100, over the weekend. It is pretty obvious why we admire him -- brilliance, niceness, cutting humor (try those two at once...) and focus on the biggest issues.
It was the age of "don't take a man's job" and, better _intentioned_ I guess, "don't work on women's issues, you'll be seen as a lightweight." Well,
@PikaGoldin
sure as hell worked on "women's issues," to our great benefit./3
Congratulations
@PikaGoldin
. Attention to the most important questions, sustained effort in the archives and the data, brilliant insight.
A great Economics Nobel.
BREAKING NEWS
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the 2023 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel to Claudia Goldin “for having advanced our understanding of women’s labour market outcomes.”
#NobelPrize
@NateHMiller
Many good ideas here. The hard part of
@NateHMiller
request is capturing the game theory revolution, which was influential on but not geared toward empirical work. (I was its only customer for a while so I learned this the hard way.)
Can we win in the large, holding back this rising tide of antisemitism? I don't know. But if nobody stands up in solidarity and moral courage, you will lose Cornell and we will lose America. /9
The broke single moms of West Virginia who scrubbed floors and oversaw homework don't have time for twitter, so I speak for them. Appalling abandonment of public university purpose and of WV citizens.
@sarahwcooley
@jenniferdoleac
1. Keep a list.
2. Say no when the list gets over the limit you established at the start of the academic year.
3. Tell your chair how long your list is.
4. If teaching and research are only before 9 am and after 5 pm, shorten your list.
The big deal here was the narrow market definition -- it includes Steven King (a witness) but not a no name rookie novelist. The government tends to win if it can prove a narrow market.
What? Narrow market definition bad for plaintiff? The FTC had to show that Meta, an important VR firm, was a likely entrant into "VR dedicated fitness apps." That's hard. Potential entrant arguments are harder to prove than current-competitor arguments. 4/7
In academia, the whole profession is the "workplace". Harassing women or POC in a "job market rumors" website presents the same problems as a flyer posted in the coffee room at work. Just louder and broader trash and harassment./3
The harm to competition alleged here was that fees paid to book authors would fall. More narrowly, the big fees paid to authors who have a brand name would fall. The court found a substantial likelihood of that harm from the merger.
... since cross-platform links create interoperability. Preferences results first noted by Rich Gilbert, nontechnical means to create interoperability first noted by Bresnahan-Greenstein.
Equality for women in Economics is having a good week. IZA fellows push back against an appalling leadership appointment. AEA improves (there was headroom) ombuds procedures and complaint procedures, adds prohibition on retaliation to Harassment and Discrimination policy, and /1
Tim Besley, Torsten Persson, & Guido Tabellini awarded the BBVA Foundation Frontiers of Knowledge award -- Political Economy in the big leagues! (? en La Liga?)
Anonymously posting a flyer in the workplace attacking a co-worker them based on their race or gender is harassment. Ditto for an anonymous flyer attacking all women or all POC as a class. People in that class should have the right to go to work without reading that trash. /2
The government's case was quite economic on this point. Publishing houses tend to compete head to head to sign big name authors. I haven't reviewed all the economics evidence (some is redacted) but "this is way too narrow" seems like a losing argument.
If you’re a macroeconomist, I know women who are working to coordinate victims/witnesses to report bad behavior, and have received messages offering to corroborate reports if particular victims come forward. The stories I’m hearing from that field are terrible; I’m so sorry.
There is no adequate response to this horror. A prayer?
God bless and keep the state of Israel and turn, once again, your face toward your chosen people
There is also zero information in the Court's observing that the FTC's economist undertook a very lame analysis [not a literal quote] while nonetheless accepting his narrow market definition. That market definition, "VR dedicated fitness apps" is what sank the FTC's case. 3/7
(Rich) Prof. Gino sues Harvard and Data Colada
@datacolada
(Rich) Prof. Tessier-Lavigne sics lawyers on cub (freshman) reporter
@tab_delete
.
One more reason to have sharp divisions between the academic and the profitable.
The opinion is excruciating careful to be conventional and break zero new ground. There is zero new ground in the Court's observation that a merger between a market participant and an entrant can harm competition 2/7
Normally I don't much like that market definition is suc a big part of antitrust, but this narrow one seemed to accurately capture a market reality about the workings of competition in the industry at hand.
BLS is one of the premier statistical agencies in the world. Revisions happen, especially to higher-frequency data, because not all businesses can respond quickly. Revisions are not evidence of corruption.
@JoanneSpetz
Victor Fuch's death marks a huge loss to Economics and to humanity. Y'all economists, please honor his memory by writing about something really important.
@MarioNawfal
Interesting.
Our algorithm tries to optimize time spent on X, so links don’t get as much attention, because there is less time spent if people click away.
Best thing is to post content in long form on this platform.
Ask the Kosher eatery in the Center for Jewish Living to open for you. Walk to it, alone, for a meal. The campus cops and the NY State Police will freak out. Walk there, alone. The cops are at your destination already. Ask them to be discrete. /2
The tricky bit of game theory (I was its only customer for a while) is figuring out how to apply it. The most obvious point here is that TrumpLand is a powerful continuation game that might make everyone cooperate, but/1
I'm not an expert on game theory, but those who are may have a field day of figuring out the prisoner's dilemma created by the interplay of the GA and DOJ indictments.
So now economic statistics become another reality denied by republicans, like free and fair elections in the US. Why? Economy is pretty good right now; parallel to Biden won the election. Bunch of fantasists in the GOP.
I agree with both of you
@dougmelamed
and
@Sherman1890
. The CW standard is, in economic theory language, that market power lowers output whether monopoly or monopsony. But that doesn't mean empirical evidence must be Ps and Qs.
@Sherman1890
Focusing on output and price is a mistake because it invites thinking they have to be measured. CW does not require a court to measure either. It requires the court to determine the effect of the conduct on market conditions (market power) from which those effects can be presumed