@clhubes
Love makes a family. "Having a child" is a convenient expression, but it shows how short sighted procreation is. We're only children for a couple of decades, and are adults three times as long. Creating a new person has an 80-year impact on planet and people.
Many, including some climate scientists, say reducing births would be too slow to prevent 2ºC. Maybe so, but they suggest planting trees, which also takes a long time for results. We should be breeding less and planting more. Clearcutting established forests needs to stop.
Antinatalist symbol by Jenglot Hitam of Indonesia in collaboration with Shaxul of France. Breaking the circle of life by not procreating. Public domain graphic.
A wave of media exposure for VHEMT has generated responses both positive & negative. One phrase used so many times I expect to see it trending is “You first,” suggesting I end my life if I want humans to go extinct. We are advocating for non-procreation, & we have gone first. 1/2
Sunday 'Best of The Great Simplification Clips' -Ecologist Bill Rees describing why ecological overshoot is THE fundamental issue that underpins all other issues:
Many suffer from effects of overpopulation without realizing that’s the cause. Directing hostility at an idea and anyone who expresses it reveals profound dissatisfaction with life. If there were fewer of us, we might better care for each other’s emotional well being. 2/2
@hkaspurrr
Many are saying "supply and demand," which is true, but the fact that our increasing population creates the demand rarely gets blamed. Supply can't keep up: US increases by one million plus 600K legal immigration per year. If we weren't breeding so much, we'd have less demand.
"Curbing the growth of our human population is a side effect. Though a potent one. It could dramatically reduce demand for food, transportation, electricity, buildings, goods, and all the rest, thereby reducing
#emissions
."
@let_left
@Nihilistboy2
Your reasons for sentencing someone to life benefit you, not the offspring. The question antinatalists ask: is it ethical to create someone who will have to make their way in world for 80 years, surely suffering at times, just so we can enjoy their childhood? Seems exploitative.
@ECOWARRIORSS
Obviously we don't need militaries. If we worked for peace we could phase them out. However, when people are making billions off war, they don't mind spending millions creating them.
We are still hoping for an honest
#populationconversation
at the
#UNWaterConference
.
In a new report, in about 7 years, humanity will be demanding 40% more water than the Earth can supply. All actions matter.
#SDG6
@drseanmullen
"...international collaboration, would be key to preventing an extinction-level event." Well alrighty then. We already have a United Nations. Let's get busy. As soon as we get done blowing each other up, that is.
Today is Earth Overshoot Day – the date when we (all of humanity) have used more from nature than our planet can renew in the entire year. How will you
#MoveTheDate
?
@Survival
@PopnMatters
Overpopulation has always been the biggest threat to indigenous peoples. The Amazon is being destroyed because there are so many people wanting what's there, or will be there as soon as the forests and the people who live there are wiped out.
@ECOWARRIORSS
One must ignore a lot of reality to imagine a bright future today. Any one of several signs should be enough to wake a thinking person to the dire condition of Earth's biosphere. Loss of insects is just one, sufficient example.
Portland, Oregon: street fair on Hawthorne Blvd August 28th 11AM to 5PM will include a VHEMT information booth. New feature offers fun photo opportunities.
New book dares to identify overpopulation and says green energy can't replace fossil fuels at the level of energy we use. Two forbidden truths in one work.
An Inconvenient Apocalypse: Environmental Collapse, Climate Crisis, and the Fate of Humanity
Amplification of the NYT article about VHEMT continues. Unfortunately, judging by the number of tweets telling me to "go first" people aren't actually reading it. Just reading the sub-headline should be enough.
@Winston_Frazer
Natalist cultural conditioning prevents people from understanding that death isn't the only way populations can be reduced. In fact it's not the best way. We are suggesting that people think before they co-create a new human, & if they really think about it, they probably won't.
The hypocrisy really gets me. I could go in at 21, saying, "I can't conceive", and they would try and help me. And I wouldn’t need more of a reason than "I want children".
Why do we believe women when they say they do want children but not when they don’t? 😩
Family gatherings at Thanksgiving offer good opportunities to agree not to exchange gifts this holiday season. "I have everything I need and all I want for Christmas is for everyone to have a good time." Save landfill space.
@EliotJacobson
"The World Bank has warned that the Indian subcontinent is getting too hot, and many swathes will become uninhabitable." In other words, millions will die & hundreds of millions will try to move to cooler areas. They won't be welcomed, as people are trying to support themselves.
Portlander
@lesuknight
has made a lot of people angry. He is the leader of the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement and has led a decades-long effort to convince humans to stop breeding in order to save life on our planet.
Learn more on today's episode:
@SaraAzizi511
On twitter the number of people thinking we mean increasing deaths can be depressing, but the comments with the NYT article are way encouraging. So many people agree and express an understanding of our situation that it more than makes up for the"you first" echoing down the feed.
Ignoring human population pressures while focusing on consumption lacks class consciousness. More than half of humanity is struggling to increase their consumption, just to survive. With fewer of us being born, we might better care for existing members of our human family.
@Race2Extinct
There are few examples of non-human animals being cruel, which requires intent. Humans, on the other hand, are cruel to each other, to wildlife, and to domesticated animals. Kurt Vonnegut gave this as a reason for us to voluntarily go extinct.
Chris Packham concludes: "I’m not saying to don’t have children, that’s not the answer, clearly. I’m saying to you, recognize that this is the biggest problem that our species has ever had, and you’re part of that...
VHEMT will be hosting an information table at the annual Pubic Interest Environmental Law Conference at the University of Oregon School of Law this weekend. It’ll be in-person for the first time in three years.
@VigilantFox
@elonmusk
Start with myself? Of course I've started with myself, 50 years ago. After nearly a dozen offspring, maybe you could go next, my friend. Snip, snip.
We are suggesting people stop co-creating more new humans than they already have, not suggesting they kill themselves.
Human population concerns get branded as "ecofascist” & racist, while repro-fascism runs rampant around the world. Full reproductive freedom doesn’t exist anywhere: control ranges from inconvenient to violent and deadly. Let’s work together for everyone’s right to not procreate.
@Kimbdayle
Not to put too fine a point on this, but wouldn't the egg have to be fertilized to make menstruation an abortion? I know you're right that it flushes out an egg most cycles, and often the egg is fertilized if having unprotected sex, but not always.
@BFryback
I hear ya. I've been stretching my fuel out by igniting 4,000 tiny fires per minute in my driveway. Then I ignite around 12,000 per minute as I propel myself about in a fragile metal box at potentially fatal speeds for no apparent reason. Life is good, but could be cheaper.
"Sustainable" in this case means "replacement level fertility," a virtually useless statistic when population momentum continues growth. It's used for confusing fact pop is increasing. Actual growth is rarely given beside it. WSJ supports capitalist pyramid scheme, naturally.
@MarkCranfield_
Very hard times are likely, which is why I wonder why so few advocate for responsible procreative choice, and for the reproductive health services needed for everyone to avoid creating more of us to suffer in the future. Seems to be a mental blind spot.
Barriers to vasectomy in the UK "places the burden back on women."
Our UK vasectomy lead speaks to
@elle_hunt
@GraziaUK
on the gendered divide in access to contraception:
@Karmageddon67
Back when overpopulation was accepted as obvious, Paul Neuman and Joanne Woodward made a radio ad saying something like, when someone tells you they have a right to have as many children as they want, ask them about our right to breathe clean air and drink clean water.
To celebrate this year's
#DayoftheGirl
, we dedicate this week to raising girls' voices in decision-making spaces.
Because every girl deserves the right to decide her own future. 💪✨
#endchildmarriage
#DayoftheGirl
@sandlwise01
Malthus was right that we would procreate to the point of famine. There are twice as many people experiencing moderate to severe food insecurity than the entire population of humanity when he wrote his essay. Millions are actually starving to death.
The number of women of reproductive age who wish to avoid pregnancy but who aren't using any modern form of
#birthcontrol
is currently around 270 million & may remain this high in 2030 due to rapid
#populationgrowth
and slow progress in improving access.
Planet of the Humans dares to include relieving human population pressures as an important strategy for providing energy to everyone. Pointing out that there are far more people on Earth than we can adequately care for generates incredible reactions.
The Q&A about the ethics of procreation is rather disappointing, but the comments reveal a profound awareness of Earth's situation. They provide a far better ethical analysis of the question. Few reference antinatalism, just state it.
There are certainly worrying trends for the future. As we do our best to ameliorate conditions in whatever way we feel is best, precautionary principle guides us to refrain from creating another of us who will impact the biosphere and will be impacted by it as situation worsens.
@OPB
We are encroaching on wildlife habitat, converting it to human habitat. The fewer of us the better. In Portland, if we increase our population, eventually we'll need to build a third reservoir at Bull Run, with serious ecological impact.
@Race2Extinct
@LovingVeg
I adapted this from the popular circle chart which says "not having another child." Objections to multiplying procreation by 5.7 for the carbon legacy have some validity, so instead of 58.6 tons, one could use 10.28 tons in wealthy regions, 16.5 in US. Still the biggest savings.
@99blackbaloons
In theory, super predators in the past have evolved faster than their prey, and ate them into extinction. The predator then went extinct. In our case, we'll eat just about anything into extinction, so it'll take a while longer.
I saw this pop up many times and finally watched. This guy really has a handle on it, and we in the over-industrialized world need to take it to heart.
@_DylanHamilton_
@NohBodhi
@lifewithsommer
But not enough resources for the rest of Earth's biosphere. Wildlife habitat restoration is diminished by human habitat: wherever we live, not much else lives.
Corporate greed is Moderna giving its CEO a $923 million golden parachute & handing out $360 million in stock options to 2 top executives after receiving $2.5 billion from U.S. taxpayers to develop its COVID vaccine & refusing to share it with the world. We must end this greed.
@Karmageddon67
@DianaUrge
's comment embodies the short term thinking of most couples who procreate. "Having children" ignores the 60 years they might live as adults. Everyone of any age eats, and agriculture is at least 1/3 of emissions.
@MichelleNash45
@hoovlet
@AmericanAnthro
@eweissunburied
Many, if not most, of our difficulties today are the result of scientists downplaying reality to avoid being marginalized or offending funders. And by movements catering to misconceptions for appeal: "Stop at two offspring, just replace yourselves." No population growth: 2+2=2.
@SustPopAus
Higher population density requires more restrictions on freedoms to maintain civil society. The bathroom principle: 1 user = no rules. 2 users = agreements. 3 users = set rules. 4 users = strict rules with enforcement. 5 users = conflicts likely. Bar more users: go away.
@extinctsymbol
The report's advice for biodiversity:
1) More plant-based diets.
2) Protect more natural areas.
3) Eco-friendly farming practices.
4) Reverse human population growth.
OK, I added that last one.
@Goplaynow157958
@elonmusk
Antinatalism opposes bringing new people into existence where they will suffer. They aren't suffering in non-existence and should be allowed to stay there. This philosophy doesn't include killing existing people.
@PopulationIC
"when you use the term overpopulation, you're looking at the fertility rate of women." No, we're looking at carrying capacity and overshoot, which we've been in since 1970. We're now 75% over the carrying capacity for our species. "Overpopulation" seems an appropriate term.
@GothicXRose90
It's looking rather likely, but by not co-creating a new human, you're making a huge difference in their non-existent life. I really feel sorry for children born today.
Professor Patricia MacCormack's book _The Ahuman Manifesto_ released today in Cambridge, UK. It "advocates embracing human extinction." “The manifesto simply asks that humans no longer reproduce." Congratulations! I'm still working on the VHEMT book.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” ~Gandhi
History of population awareness advocacy follows a reversed progression: first we win, then they ignore us, then they fight us. Maybe we'll get laughed at -- better than being vilified.
Many people enjoyed having their photo with dino and dodo yesterday. Visitors were 95% in agreement & lots of bumper stickers & T-shirts went away with them. Overpopulation awareness is far more prevalent than it might seem publicly, as accusations of the usual maintains silence.
@kilmerj
When God commanded that the population was two. We have fulfilled our duty and now it's time to think about the end times. "Blessed are the barren and the breasts which never gave suck."
@simian_warthog
Human population is not leveling out. Capitalism's pronatalist propagandists drone on about TFR plummeting below "replacement" so we can't provide for retirees. Below 2.1 TFR takes decades to reach ZPG. Lower rate times huge base of past fecundity.
How to empower girls and women? Besides not oppressing them, I mean. Education is the common safe answer, but reproductive health services is number one. Then educational, financial, and other opportunities become more likely.
This is critical for protecting human rights: the right of a woman not to be forced to carry an unwanted fetus to term, and the right of an unwanted fetus to not be born, becoming an unwanted child.
⏳ On Feb 28 the U.S. Senate is going to vote on the Women’s Health Protection Act, federal legislation that will protect the right to abortion. We need YOUR help to pass
#WHPA
.
Tell your Senators to
#ActforAbortionAccess
and vote YES on
#WHPA
:
@rat_liker
@JeffOrstad
@Devin_Eskew
@fox12oregon
Those who refuse evacuation orders? I'm not sure if that's a crime. In some situations, law enforcement assumes anyone in an evacuation zone is a looter. No physical possession is worth a human life.
The devastation in Gaza is unconscionable. We must urge an immediate ceasefire. The killing of Palestinians and Israelis must end. We must also take a hard look at nearly $4 billion a year in military aid to Israel. It is illegal for U.S. aid to support human rights violations.
you’re one of our species, and your children and your grandchildren are part of that species. The problems that they’re going to have will be far greater than yours, so if you do care about them, you have to act now. You might be watching this program and thinking we’re doomed...
1/3 Atlantic gives a thorough review of Covid-19 in US. Human population pressures implicated. “Our species has relentlessly expanded into previously wild spaces. Through intensive agriculture, habitat destruction, and rising temperatures, we have uprooted the planet’s animals,
Canal Plus, a French TV show, presented the benefits of staying childfree, or not adding another of us, in a six minute segment.
@alexandra_paul
, Dan Kamman, and I were featured. English auto translation of French dubbing helps in understanding dialog.
#WorldHumanitarianDay
A good day to consider humanitarian efforts to enable everyone the freedom to enjoy their basic human right to not co-create as many new people as they wish. Each human not created will never suffer or die, and will leave more resources for existing people.
@Pop_Stop_2100
@SirAbegao
By not creating another resident of Portugal, you two are preserving four hectares of potential wildlife habitat for 79 years. If you choose to not create two, double that. congratulations!
@GothicXRose90
It's not our fault we're incompatible with the biosphere. I blame evolution. But you're right, we need to go extinct: voluntarily phasing out.