davidtuller Profile
davidtuller

@davidtuller1

10,331
Followers
2,119
Following
50
Media
9,027
Statuses

Senior Fellow in Public Health and Journalism, Center for Global Public Health, UC Berkeley. My academic position is largely funded by donations from patients.

San Francisco, California
Joined September 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
Maeve O'Neill died at 27 in October, 2021. Her death certificate cites ME. An inquest into the circumstances and the actions--or inactions--of the NHS in Devon should take place this year. Here's my account of what happened.
67
587
1K
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
Jeff @ManvBrain , since I'm one of the "loudest" voices in the PACE debate, as you write in NY Mag, it's curious that you didn't seek to talk with me about the issue before describing my work. Your piece really misrepresented my work, based solely on PACE authors' bogus claims.1/
22
234
851
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
The Dutch CBT Long Covid study failed to report its one objective results--actigraphy. Now we know why. In correspondence, the authors acknowledge actigraphy had null results. It's pretty deceptive not publishing results that call your conclusions into question?1/
25
223
740
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 months
I spoke earlier today with The Guardian's George Monbiot about his recent scathing column on a "national scandal"--the longstanding mistreatment of those with the illness (or cluster of illnesses) currently known as ME/CFS. Thanks @GeorgeMonbiot !
39
240
591
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
10 months
This study is complete crap--the authors failed to report that their one objective measure, actigraphy, yielded null results. This is research misconduct, in my view, or arguably worse.
@PaulGarnerWoof
Paul Garner
10 months
RCT shows CBT effective for severe fatigue with the post covid condition. Impressive effect sizes. Hans Knoop "many patients were initially skeptical that therapy would help and said they had physical problems, but afterwards they were surprisingly positive". #longcovid #MECFS
Tweet media one
4
11
39
13
138
496
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
10 months
In light of the just-published nonsense in a Scandinavian journal from the CBT/GET ideological brigades--calling themselves the "Oslo Chronic Fatigue Consortium"--I thought I'd re-post this interview I did with Yale's star immunobiologist Akiko Iwasaki:
7
138
427
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
It's a big problem when journalists write articles that distort the science in order to present the biased views of a group with predetermined views. Even worse when the journalists dismiss all legitimate criticism as hostile rantings.
9
67
420
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
4 years
The NICE draft guidance for ME/CFS rejects graded exercise therapy, the Lightning Process, and CBT when presented as a cure or a treatment for the illness itself rather than as supportive care:
21
129
394
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
You write that I "found fault with its [PACE's] protocol." This is a misrepresentation. Had they followed their protocol, they would have shown zero or minimal results in their subjective outcomes. I found fault with the fact that they DID NOT ADHERE TO THEIR OWN PROTOCOL.4/
3
39
393
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
5 months
Some thoughts about @GeorgeMonbiot 's excellent Guardian column this week. It's good to see he's called out leading GET/CBT fabulists and fanatics like Professor Sharpe and Sir Simon and noted how this whole mess has been a massive systemic failure.
14
114
379
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
In PACE, outcome thresholds for the two key variables--physical function and fatigue--were lower than entry criteria. This was not reported in papers. So patients could be "recovered" on these measures at baseline. This is research misconduct in my view, and arguably fraudulent.
@PaulGlasziou
Paul Glasziou
1 year
Free access link to the JNNP paper is here - . Box below is the 8 anomalies in the NICE CFS/ME guideline process
Tweet media one
22
9
17
11
93
370
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
7 months
In 2016, Professor Esther Crawley of Bristol University announced with great fanfare the launch of FITNET-NHS, a trial of online CBT for adolescents with ME/CFS. The first reported outcome results--on cost-effectiveness--are disastrous. Oops!
16
119
362
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
More than 100 scientists, clinicians, academics, etc., have signed a letter urging immediate publication of the new NICE ME/CFS guidelines. Some powerful people would prefer to "disappear" the document.
39
130
361
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
6 months
How many more of these will happen before this gets solved??
@guustweet
Guus
6 months
The little spot I made for Lauren. It’s over the top and funny (the bananas are an inside joke). This colour green was one of her favourite colours. Just like pastel pink for the 🌸. I showed it to her and she loved it, she liked the aesthetic. #DagLieveLauren #ReMEmberLauren
Tweet media one
32
52
1K
14
65
362
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
5 months
It is truly the emperor-has-no-clothes at the highest levels of British medicine/academic/journalism. A huge disgrace for all around. Sharpe, Wesseley, White, etc have a lot to answer for. The PACE trial is fraudulent.
@GeorgeMonbiot
George Monbiot
5 months
All this requires further investigation. The injustices done to patients with ME/CFS are compound and multiple. It's not just individual clinicians in the frame, but universities and departments, insurance companies, government and media. Great wrongs have been done.
79
537
2K
7
113
359
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
You don't mention that in PACE, all their objective outcomes had disastrous results. On average, no one got back to work, no one got off benefits, no one was more fit, and any improvements in walking ability were clinically insignificant. 8/
1
42
352
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
I'm never sure what to do on ME Awareness Day. It's a day for patients to make their voices heard, so usually I stay out of the way. This year I'm posting a haunting video made by my friend @AnilvanderZee :
12
100
350
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
10 months
More of the same old ridiculous nonsense from the so-called "Oslo Chronic Fatigue Consortium"--a bunch of self-important "experts" who know they have lost control of the narrative:
13
118
351
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
The data proved what everyone knew--that they weakened their protocol measures in ways that generated much more attractive outcomes. They then attempted to hide this by slandering patients and accusing them of being anti-science. This was also disgraceful.7/
1
35
348
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
In PACE, 13% of the participants were "recovered" on the primary outcome of physical function AT BASELINE, when they were simultaneously defined as "disabled" enough to enter the trial. This is of course absurd. You can't be recovered and disabled simultaneously on a measure. 13/
3
44
342
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
You also write that I criticized their definition of "recovery" as being "weak." That's also a misrepresentation. I criticized them for WEAKENING ALL FOUR OUTCOMES THAT CONSTITUTED RECOVERY IN PACE, then refusing to provide the data about what the findings would have been.5/
1
21
339
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
Professor Sharpe, who has blocked me, has tweeted this: "I agree. GET should not have fixed increments. And patients need to be able to make informed choices." That is of course NOT how GET is described in PACE. GET has fixed increments by their own definition. Now he says no.
39
54
331
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
Why has NICE buckled under to anti-science bullies from the Royal Colleges? What's the point of an evidence-based review if physicians get to toss it if it doesn't correspond to their biases? Why does NICE exist?
6
114
334
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
The New Republic attributes long Covid to "psychosocial distress," says more women report having it because "in a patriarchal world, women face more adversity and have less control over their lives.” Hm. Some thoughts on this problematic article:
35
77
323
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
Can someone please slap a warning label on this University of Warwick study that promotes an exercise program for long Covid patients but does not include information about PEM in the consent and participant information forms? What's up with that?
15
89
322
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
You failed to mention Virology Blog's open letter to The Lancet, which I organized, that was signed by more than 100 scientists, physicians, academics, from around the world denouncing the trial and calling for an independent investigation. 10/
1
26
322
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
I appreciate that you referred to me as an academic. Other stories have called me an "activist"/"campaigner" but ignored my academic credentials. But you did not mention I'm in public health--not hieroglyphics, Finnish literature, or physics.2/
2
10
317
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
This was one reason I decided to keep going. I found it hard to take the same cabal of CBT/GET zealots making the exact same arguments about LC just as their arguments were being taken apart in the ME, CFS and ME/CFS worlds.
@cstroeckw
Christoph Ströck
1 year
@IppoAng It is horrible to see the LC community go through the same BS the mecfs community has been going through for over a century without anyone outside this community ever learning from it.
4
24
184
12
72
318
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
10 months
The PACE trial was arguably fraudulent, since participants were able to meet outcome thresholds at baseline. The authors didn't disclose that 13% had already met the outcome for "physical function" at baseline. I'm not a lawyer, but that is research misconduct and maybe worse.
@resiapretorius
Resia Pretorius
10 months
What an ignorant and disrespectful statement: “‘May not indicate bodily disease”. ALL disease starts with definite pathophysiology. Opinions are not scientific. Perhaps they need reminding: The PACE trial was a methodological and ethical disaster.
30
149
606
9
70
319
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
When patients wanted to see the original data per the protocol outcome measures, they refused and called them "vexatious." This was disgraceful. They lost in court and QMUL was ordered to turn over the data.6/
1
17
319
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
9 months
Dutch investigators have published yet another piece of crap, this one focused on "psychosomatic therapy" for "persistent somatic symptoms." Awful results--but investigators call the treatment "promising." Huh??
10
82
318
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
Given the attention to the PACE trial over Professor Sharpe's bizarre attack on the Guardian's @GeorgeMonbiot , I am reposting the 2018 letter to the Lancet signed by 100+ experts, 10 members of Parliament, and 70+ patient groups. Horton ignored it.
8
119
312
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
You failed to mention the published reanalysis of PACE's findings (I was a co-author), which found that per the protocol measures, they had null "recovery" and only marginal results for "improvement"--well within what would be expected from bias alone. 11/
1
28
314
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
@GeorgeMonbiot @profmsharpe Professor Sharpe, PACE is over. It cannot be rehabilitated. The flaws and data manipulation are out there for everyone to see. You have had a nice long ride where you were able to effectively dismiss all critics as harassers. That time is past. Accept it.
7
50
308
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
The decision by @NICEComms not to publish its own ME/CFS guidelines has drawn international concern, as is clear from the list of 100+ scientists, clinicians, academics, etc., who signed this letter urging immediate publication.
12
121
308
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
In academia, the discipline matters. Omitting that I have public health training obscures my expertise in dealing with public health issues, such as epidemiology. (I'm not an epidemiologist but studied it in the course of obtaining my degrees.) 3/
1
10
304
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
So when will the PACE trial finally be retracted? Will a legitimate investigation of what happened and how get underway? Will ME/CFS patients finally get decent research into their condition? Will Professor Sharpe stop trying to rehabilitate PACE with long COVID? Stay tuned!
5
67
306
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
Thanks to all!! Berkeley's crowdfunding effort has reached its goal!- I am, as usual, very touched by the support and look forward to continuing my work!
20
45
304
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
@edyong209 this is what I've experienced for the last few years writing about ME/CFS. It is heartbreaking. The neglect of this patient population has been profound.
12
64
301
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
The PACE authors then claimed that their own objective measures were not objective after all. This is absurd. No one forced them to choose these objective measures. It is not proper science to completely disavow your own objective measures once the fail to prove your point.9/
1
19
298
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
Of course! The idea that millions of people around the world want nothing more than to lie in bed for years and perform their hypothesized "sick role" for weird psychological reasons is pretty bizarre.
@KCSteckel
Colleen Steckel
3 years
@StenHelmfrid @NMacFa Exactly. I think we can't make that point often enough. Important 2 recognize that some psychologizing #MyalgicE promote the idea that patients are motivated to stay ill. For all those I know w/ this devastating disease that is a ridiculous idea. We want to return to living.
4
11
82
13
64
285
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
10 months
It's ridiculous. They say that it's time for a new approach. But that "new approach" is the old CBT/GET approach that's been available for decades. They have nothing new to say.
@AnilvanderZee
Anil van der Zee ©
10 months
Some of the authors are part of the COFFI consortium that Ruud Raijmakers wants to work together with to study #pwME , #longCOVID , #lyme & #qfever for @ZonMw . Yes, it's biomed research but these folks have not contributed to progress. The opposite really. I say hell no to COFFI!
4
16
108
11
61
292
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
@ManvBrain Many patients have tried them!!! And had serious relapses. Really, you need to talk to some actual patients and find out how frequently these treatments--which are really the same treatment with different emphases--lead to paralytic relapses.
3
14
291
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
Since @GeorgeMonbiot has renewed focus on PACE, I'm reposting a 2015 blog about how the PACE team violated the Declaration of Helsinki by not disclosing their insurance industry ties to trial participants. Their responses to this were ridiculous:
9
108
289
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
More nonsense at this upcoming "biopsychosocial" conference in Finland on long Covid, with Professor Sharpe and other members of the GET/CBT/"amydala retraining" ideological brigades.
18
78
286
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
10 months
There's no point in responding to him in any event. He and his buddies in the CBT/GET ideological brigades are impervious to reality. They ignore the fact that this is not a new 'holistic' approach but the discredited approach promoted in the debunked PACE trial.
@NickyProctor
NickyProctor
10 months
@MECFSNews @PaulGarnerWoof @TomKindlon @davidtuller1 @david_f_marks This is a great paper that explains a lot about the vested interests of @PaulGarnerWoof & others who continue to spout the ‘It’s All In Your Head’ nonsense! @david_f_marks
1
12
70
13
39
286
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 months
My interview with @GeorgeMonbiot has had 2500 views since I posted it two days ago. I'm going to post an edited transcript later, but for now here's the video again:
6
96
286
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
I have a lot more thoughts on the piece but for now will leave it at this. It's very well-written and you express sympathy for patients and so on. But you have taken the framing from those who believe PACE and related studies can be called proper science--when they stink.24/
14
10
281
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
Had you bothered to contact me, I would have tried to explain this to you. Better than that, you should have watched Bruce Levin's presentation slamming PACE: "How NOT to conduct a clinical trial." Dr Levin is a top biostatistician at Columbia (since retired). 17/
2
20
281
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
7 months
I'll also point out that I trashed the PACE trial in a 15,000-word investigation long before I began crowdfunding. I was very, very happy to call PACE bullshit for free. The 100+ experts who signed this letter agree:
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
7 months
Zachary, if you're going to mention my crowdfunding, you should mention that the lead PACE authors had close ties to disability insurers, advising them that CBT/GET worked. They did not disclose this to trial participants. PACE is research misconduct and a piece of crap.
7
43
242
6
83
282
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
He read PACE at my request and thought it was an atrocious piece of research. He publicly called it "the height of clinical trial amateurism." Was he bamboozled by me or by patients?? I suggest you watch it if you want to learn why PACE is crap 18/
5
34
279
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
Dutch team offers "dog-ate-my-data" excuses for failing to provide null objective findings in CBT-for-long-Covid study, claiming level of physical activity is completely irrelevant in assessing fatigue:
11
75
274
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
5 months
My only question is if it's too early to call it the greatest medical scandal of the millenium???
@GeorgeMonbiot
George Monbiot
5 months
It’s the greatest medical scandal of the 21st Century. Intransigent doctors and gullible journalists have made the lives of ME/CFS patients a living hell. A massive and shocking story in this week’s column.
369
2K
5K
9
47
272
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
Paul, have you spoken with PACE participants? They would tell you that they might have increased their walking but they cut back on other activities, so they ended up NOT doing more. The PACE trial was a great example of egregious research misconduct--a real scam.
@PaulGarnerWoof
Paul Garner
2 years
Graded exercise therapy in the PACE trial, was reflexive, individualised and negotiated. "The common chosen exercise was walking” Lancet 2011. It’s often represented by activist groups as something else. Useful and sensible approach once people have established their baseline
Tweet media one
2
2
4
8
36
270
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
You could also have talked to my epidemiology colleagues at Berkeley, who also read PACE at my request and were shocked by its awfulness. At Berkeley, it has been put to its best use as a case study of terrible research in graduate epi seminars. 19/
1
26
266
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
No. If patients suffer from post-exertional malaise or post-exertional symptom exacerbation--a common long Covid symptom--graded exercise therapy is clearly contra-indicated. It is important to get this right. Your suggestion risks harming many patients.
@WmHaseltine
William Haseltine
2 years
While there are treatments for Long Covid, it’s not a one-size-fits all. Treatment plans are as varied and individualized as the symptoms of Long Covid. The best treatment is a holistic approach. Get all your Long Covid questions answered with The Fami...
Tweet media one
59
4
16
11
50
267
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
You seem to think the two are synonyms--at least, that's how you treat the terms in the article. Since "chronic fatigue" is not a disease but a symptom, every single sentence that includes this phrase as if it were a disease is inaccurate and should frankly be corrected.23/
2
18
263
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
Hans Knoop, 2014: "Fatigue is generally associated with low physical activity in patients with various chronic medical conditions." Knoop, 2023: There is no relationship between fatigue and physical activity so we decided not to report physical activity results in ReCOVer trial.
14
46
264
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
In short, your take on PACE is completely off the mark and anti-scientific. You have justified the position taken by a group of researchers whose work is so riven with flaws and missteps that it is shocking anyone ever took it seriously as a credible piece of work.20/
1
11
262
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
Amazingly, the claim is that objective results from actigraphy do not reflect subjective findings and are therefore, it seems, unreliable and not woth publishing. This is Knoop's pattern. Seems to me like a form of research misconduct. 2/
4
22
263
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
5 months
GET doesn't help kids with ME/CFS, according to the latest study from Professor Crawley, Bristol U's methodologically and ethically challenged grant magnet. Is her 'reign of error' finally coming to an end?
10
96
264
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
In the UK, I have been dismissed as the crazy, out-of-control American "activist" harassing eminences like Professor Micheal Sharpe. The truth about PACE is harder to ignore when Guardian columnist @GeorgeMonbiot makes the case:
9
48
261
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
Norway's research ethics authorities have rejected the proposed Lightning Process study by an LP practitioner as a kind of "inside job" that would not provide trustworthy information. Great decision!
15
66
261
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
A speaker at a recent CDC online gathering recommended CBT and "very gradual" GET for ME/CFS patients. Isn't it yet clear that these terms are toxic in this context and should not be used?
20
57
258
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
@awgaffney It might be a good idea to examine studies that arguably qualify as research misconduct--with rampant outcome-swapping (PACE) and hidden data (this one) before touting them as evidence that rehabilitation works for these patients with ME and long Covid. 1/
5
31
261
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
Apparently Alice had a successful tube-feeding today at the lower incline.
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
I've just heard that the hospital has now finally agreed to begin tube-feeding her at a 5% incline.
3
17
156
8
33
257
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry finally publishes a smart rapid response to that primal whine from GET/CBT true-believers about the new NICE guidelines for ME/CFS:
11
84
260
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
Instead, you simply repeated the PACE authors' ridiculous argument that their results were "solid." You wrote: "While some patients had already improved with regard to some symptoms before the study began, none had fully recovered." This is a laughable statement.12/
1
12
258
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
This month marks the seventh anniversary of the launch of my efforts to debunk the misleading and deceptive (i.e fraudulent?) PACE Trial:
17
44
257
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
The PACE authors failure to disclose this overlap, which resulted from their decision to abandon their protocol, seems to me to constitute serious research misconduct by any definition, and is arguably fraudulent. In any event, it is not "science." 15/
1
14
256
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 months
Responding to anything Prof Garner says about the fraudulent PACE trial is a waste of time. The PACE team lowered outcome thresholds so participants could be "recovered" at baseline for physical recovery--and then hid those results. That's research misconduct.
9
67
258
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
8 months
In survey, Dutch patients say GET and CBT were "the worst" approach to treating/managing ME/CFS--even though the leading GET/CBT clinic reached out to its patients to respond to the questionnaire.
7
86
256
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
4 years
Thanks @PaulGarnerWoof for inviting me to talk to a small online group today about long-Covid in relation to the failings of the PACE trial--published by @TheLancet even though 13% of participants met a key outcome threshold at baseline--a bizarre statistical anomaly.
13
56
254
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
10 months
Hans Knoop, the lead author, claimed in a commentary in The Lancet that PACE participants met a "strict criterion for recovery." This was a lie when he wrote it in 2011, and it remains a lie a dozen years later. Yet this false claim has never been corrected. It's a disgrace.
@PaulGarnerWoof
Paul Garner
10 months
RCT shows CBT effective for severe fatigue with the post covid condition. Impressive effect sizes. Hans Knoop "many patients were initially skeptical that therapy would help and said they had physical problems, but afterwards they were surprisingly positive". #longcovid #MECFS
Tweet media one
4
11
39
5
70
255
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
That nonsensical and paradoxical analysis should have prevented ANY of the PACE papers from being published--certainly the 2011 Lancet paper and the 2013 "recovery" paper in Psychological Medicine. But journals didn't notice or care about this egregious flaw. 14/
2
17
254
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
Very disturbing that NICE has capitulated to anti-scientific campaigners.
@b_m_hughes
Brian Hughes
3 years
Absolutely incoherent. The #MECFS guidelines are "rigorous", produced "to the letter", but because (some) MDs unhappy, they're "paused". Impossible to adjust guidelines without diluting them. How is that good for patients? What is NICE for exactly?
42
209
599
6
89
251
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
More about that Dutch study of CBT for long Covid that had null results for physical activity--but the investigators decided not to mention that in the trial paper and push the positive subjective outcomes.
7
89
250
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 months
What the hell is going on with the @cochranecollab review for exercise and ME/CFS? This project has been dragging on for years. Cochrane's lack of urgency in getting this done is really inexcusable and hard to understand except as giving the finger to desperate patients.
12
66
251
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
Hey @awgaffney , are you aware that the authors did not report their one objective finding--a null result for actigraphy at the end of therapy. So you're ok with the fact that they chose not to report objective data that sheds doubt on the subjective reports? Interesting!
@awgaffney
Adam W Gaffney
1 year
A multi-center randomized trial found benefit from cognitive behavioral therapy on severe fatigue among mostly non-hospitalized Long COVID patients through 6 months; evidence for benefit on some secondary outcomes also, e.g. concentration problems.
22
13
30
3
36
251
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
3 years
Fauci: "We already know that people who get breakthrough infections and don’t go on to get advanced disease requiring hospitalization, they too are susceptible to long COVID...You’re not exempt from long COVID if you get a breakthrough infection.”
5
80
246
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
10 months
This week, @PutrinoLab and @VirusesImmunity published an important study in Nature reporting differences in multiple immune-related blood parameters between those with and without long Covid. Dr Putrino and I recently spoke about the findings:
7
80
247
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
1 year
This unbelievably crummy paper shows the lengths some will go to try to prove that "psychiatric" disorders are causing "CFS" and fibromyalgia. This paper absolutely reeks of desperation to find even the tiniest hint of a smidgen of a link.
26
47
245
@davidtuller1
davidtuller
2 years
To back up your argument you have cited several other studies "have reinforced the finding that GET and CBT are effective for treating chronic fatigue." All of these studies are also seriously flawed and "reinforce the finding" only to those who don't understand study design. 21/
2
14
246