Reminder!
The
#FarRight
and
#Islamists
are one and the same.
Both WANT authoritarian rule based on exteme religious beliefs.
Both WANT to limit human rights and will attempt to attain that goal by ANY means necessary.
BOTH are also a THREAT to UK national security.
#Fact
@darrengrimes_
Give me Gary, a decent person over some failed journalist and person of "Dubious" virtue who's affectionately known as "Crafty" anybday of the week.
Jealous that you aren't on a credible news channel, Dazza?
@darrengrimes_
@GBNewsSpin
You don't, Darren.
If GB News actually complied with Ofcom's guidelines, then they wouldn't be penalised to begin with.
Simple stuff. 👍
@SamanthaTaghoy
Yet, despite your claims of "survival," you're supporting a party that has put MORE vulnerable people at risk (especially disabled people) than any other government in our lifetimes.
I think you've been hoodwinked somehow.
#BlockLaurenceFox
, the washed-up actor, racist and crap dad, blocked me ages ago. But that didn't stop me from returning the favour in kind. 👍
The more people act, the less money he makes from this platform.
So what are you waiting for?
@MartinDaubney
The problem with far right grifters.
Most are anti democratic, most voters are not.
Most are anti immigration. Most voters are not.
Most are pro "Tax Avoidance." and pro "Black Economy". Most voters are not.
Most are pro pollution and intolerant bigots. Most voters are not.
@LozzaFox
Panicking, are you somewhat, Larry?
This is what happens when those you bully, belittle, and oppress decide to stand up to you.
If you don't like this backlash, there's TWO things you can do...
1) Stop being intolerant or 2) Leave Twitter.
Your choice.
@i_iratus
Hi Bear,
Like others here, I'm sick to death of people abusing
@x
to spread deliberate misinformation and trying to monetise their verified accounts through it.
Is there a way of holding such people to account so that their money is stopped or their verification is removed?
@BrentLeeSDCIC
Sadly, I don't know of any solicitors. But given he's been threatening to sue anyone who has the cajones to oppose him. Then it's high time he got a taste of his own medicine. 👍
@Miss_Snuffy
Valid criticism?
I though you lot LOVED free speech.
So don't be a snowflake and play the victim (as conservatives often do) whenever people use their right of free expression to call you out.
@GBNEWS
Given that America is a Republic, then why should they attend the coronation of a British king?
After all... It was a British king who motivated their independence to begin with.
@JimMFelton
@dr_strangerman
Given that Trump incited violence which is NOT protected under the US 1A and is illegal, then Twitter MUST remove him from the platform post haste because I've seen people banned for less than this.
I'll post the link associated with this screenshot in due course.
@fIoat
@I_amMukhtar
@Mattybartlett5
Anyone who hides behind their own or anyone else's children in an attempt to deflect criticism needs safeguarding issues raised against them.
Quite common among the far-right resorting to this.
@darrengrimes_
I don't think people here call you "Divisive" but rather other things like "Wanker", "Crafty" and I think, "Cont".
Hard to tell with the cataracts. 🤣
@Bootstrapkook
@LGBwiththeT
The reason why people like Rowling "Donate" to charity is because they're doing it to avoid taxation.
It does not absolve her of any bad behaviour.
So cope "Dr".
@danwootton
Simple...
It's utter rubbish, Dan.
Nothing more than a conspiracy theory spouted out by dishonest people, criminal grifters, and the poorly educated.
@darrengrimes_
Thatcher would personally see you as a potential child corrupting pervert. Especially as it was HER government that brought in Section 28.
Somebody at Tufton Street needs to give a history lesson on that someday. 👍
@danwootton
You produce enough methane from any given orifice of yours that could affect the Ozone layer several times over and not took any seps to address it.
So an environmentalist you are not.
@darrengrimes_
To be honest, a so-called "fighting age man" (whatever that means) hasn't been called out chasing after GB News staffers and somehow kept their job in the process.
So,
@WelshSpur07
's comment is fair and justifiable. 👍
@GBNewsSpin
I'm wondering if GB News' "Reach" is the few milliseconds of people flicking through their tellys in order to get to Babestation and having to pass through them?
@annietrev
@JohnnyMercerUK
@mercer_felicity
They're both public figures who are also under public scrutiny. Plus, "Serving your country" (whatever that means) should not be used as a shield from criticism.
I don't see an issue.
@EssexPR
It's not actually a "News" channel but more of a lowbrow comedy network where alcoholics, the unemployable and angry loners have access to an echo chamber.
You do know that your audience isn't what normal people would describe as "intellectual"?
@JuliaHB1
I don't see any "hate" in Jonathan's accurate summing up.
If Kate wishes to put her cards on the table and prove her doubters wrong, then what's stopping her?
Oh...
Public discourse = Public scrutiny.
@DarrenReform
@Socket1Sophie
Oh dear, Darren...
May that remark haunt you and Reform for the next 53 hours.
Have you ever heard the phrase "The Internet NEVER forgets"?
If you haven't, then you do now, mate. 👍
@TiceRichard
Trying to shut down someone's right to free speech are we, Dickie?
Plus, for a libel writ to succeed, I understand that you need to have a pretty "Clean" reputation to instigate one.
Why does Frances needlessly bother you?
@TomGiffard
Er Tom.
@GBNEWS
ISN'T banned in the
@SeneddWales
as you can still access it there via online steaming.
If you object to this, you can always resign and let a HONEST person take your place.
@jessgill03
You support a racist and antisemite like Nigel Farage, Jill?
A little reminder as to what happened to those people nearly 80 years ago...
They lost! 🤣
@brexitblog_info
There's nothing to lose except...
Your rights, your civil liberties, higher taxation, less accountability via heavy deregulation, and more state surveillance.
There's no finer example of "Wolves in Sheep's clothing" than
@reformparty_uk
@Dominiquetaegon
If you claim to have MH issues, then perhaps consider staying off social media until they're resolved.
Oh, if you can not handle your PUBLIC statements being held to public scrutiny, then perhaps don't make inappropriate comments.
@I_amMukhtar
holds the higher ground here.
@Paulalondonnews
@darrengrimes_
The good thing is... That no matter where she speaks, she's guaranteed to better inform the public and reach a very BIG audience through her stunts...
Unlike you and the other hacks at
@GBNEWS
🤣
@CamillaTominey
@Femi_Sorry
was right...
"Pile Ons" are a breach of X's ToS as this could come under "Targeted Harrasment".
As a respected "Journalist" you should publicly discourage such behaviour wherever possible.
@danwootton
Dan Bottom says "What"?
Didn't you defend a certain "Crafty" colleague who sexually harrased a staffer and kept their job due to your intervention?
@Ofcom
I knew this would be the case all along as no doubt NONE of the complainants could prove that there was a code breach and that simply being "Offended" dosent constitute as one.
@Nigel_Farage
At least she's a QUALIFIED journalist who writes for an established media platform. Whereas you're slumming it on a channel that got fewer viewers than a Welsh dubbed episode of Paw Patrol. 🤣
@GBNews23653867
The fact that David targeted a 17 year old who (for the moment) is legally entitled to anonymity, then no amount of phoney apologies from him will dissuade people from thinking he's "Not Outside Normal Courtyard Exercise".
He probably knew that, too, before his attack.