38,000 have signed our petition.
We need a GREAT grid upgrade. Pylons are not cheap. Instead:
1. Integrated offshore grid.
2. Upgrade the existing grid.
3. HVDC undergrounding.
All three: better/cheaper/more popular
Here are just 3 of the ancient oaks that
@nationalgriduk
seeks to destroy in its Norwich to Tilbury pylons plan. (And think of the outrage over Sycamore Gap)
They are a haven for a colossal 2,300 wildlife species
1.8million trees at risk in total.
We are sad, shocked and upset by the felling of the
#SycamoreGap
oak tree. But, here in East Anglia,
@nationalgriduk
wants to fell countless trees and hedgerows, NEEDLESSLY (there's a better alternative: offshore grid).
This one is just one at risk.
1/
Those who want an offshore grid:
- 27,000 people
- 14 MPs in East Anglia (4 more in Lincs)
- three county councils
- all affected district councils; over 400 parish councils
- wildlife
Those who want the Norwich to Tilbury pylons:
-
@nationalgriduk
This beautiful, ancient oak tree will be chopped down for the pylons. Yet
@nationalgriduk
claims its project is green. And ignores that an integrated offshore grid is in fact better for the environment because it reduces infrastructure by 50%.
Thank you, Ralph Fiennes, for this excellent video and support for the campaign for an offshore grid.
@nationalgrid
: an integrated offshore grid IS the cheaper way to go because it reduces overall infrastructure required (by 50%). Stop being an ostrich.
All at risk. And much, much more, along a 180km swathe of Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex countryside. Thousands and thousands of trees and hedgerows will be destroyed.
Please sign the petition:
Our press statement.
If
@Keir_Starmer
wants a fight, he can have one.
We're up for it.
We want cheaper & better solutions. Not solutions imposed by bullies.
Quite right
@AdrianRamsay
Nothing nimby about wanting the BEST solution rather than National Grid's favourite.
Offshore grid, HVDC undergrounding & upgrading existing grid all cheaper & better than pylons. Pylons = last resort 🦕
We think this means that National Grid will have to go back to the drawing board and review their plans altogether..
East Anglia pylons: Study to explore offshore route feasibility
Dr Poulter: “The energy experts have told the Select Committee what we have known locally all along - that an offshore grid would be a cheaper, quicker and more effective way of transmitting the energy supply produced from offshore wind.”
@DrDanPoulter
Paywalled article but how cool is this bit which we can read?!: "Sightings of two protected bird species have soared on an Essex island after overhead power lines were buried underground...."
Community 'benefits' or 'sweeteners' are not the answer to speed up infrastructure. If
@UKLabour
@Ed_Miliband
would actually return emails, we could explain why a North Sea grid is better, faster and cheaper
@RachelReevesMP
Exceptional 'ostrichism' from
@StarkClimate
&
@energygovuk
in this piece. The East Anglia Study by
@neso_energy
showed HVDC undergrounding is cheaper than pylons!
They must read Hiorns report. Grid in E Anglia has capacity til 2034 so why obsess over 2030?
@JamesCartlidgeMP
Exactly this: Ed Miliband to roll out pylons despite official report showing burying cables can be cheaper. (Obviously we have raised this with
@Ed_Miliband
several times)
(Thanks
@jcartlidgemp
)
@PylonsEAnglia
We don't want your POUNDS FOR PYLONS,
@Jeremy_Hunt
. They are a dinosaur technology! You should be looking to the future with an integrated offshore grid in the North Sea. It would save consumers £2bn & send a signal to wind farm developers that we welcome them.
Nearly 35,000 have signed our petition.
We need a best in class grid!
1. Integrated offshore grid.
2. Upgrade the existing grid. We need a 'FERC order 1920' like the USA which requires this.
3. HVDC undergrounding.
All three: better/cheaper
Pounds for pylons are meant to bribe people to accept infrastructure.
@BBCLookEast
says, "In fact we couldn't find a single person in favour of the plans."
@Jeremy_Hunt
@ClaireCoutinho
Full story here in due course, clip on tweet below
Pounds for pylons, our reaction:
We are insulted that the government thinks it can buy us off with bribes for a bad project which uses dinosaur technology. If the man from the ministry comes bearing beads for the natives, he will be given short shrift.
1/
A huge thank you to all our helpers and supporters for everything you've done to man our tables at National Grid's drop-in events.
One month of consultation left. Let's keep spreading the word.
Summing up: We campaign FOR an integrated offshore grid for the N Sea which saves £2bn and AGAINST the damaging, unplanned, piecemeal & pylons approach.
We must all reject
@nationalgrid
's half-baked 'offshore' option.
#GreatGridShambles
Today, at noon,
@nationalgrid
's third 'consultation' kicks off. Really, what is the point of these exercises? National Grid ignores 28,000 people, the region's MPs and all the councils.
We have hired more consultants to add to our legal team.
1/
So many events along the pylons route, so many concerned people. And this collage only shows the past few weeks, since CONsultation 3 began. Opposition is stronger & angrier than ever.
There is a better way.
@energygovuk
@ClaireCoutinho
@bernardjenkin
@jcartlidgemp
National Grid's propaganda shows continue. This was another one during working hours (11-4) which cut out loads of people who wanted to attend. Only 3 parking spaces. And not on the route of the pylons. Top work
@nationalgriduk
. What's wrong with village halls with parking?
Busy four weeks. Our supporters have been at the
@nationalgrid
drop-ins, going door-to-door distributing 100,000 leaflets & at our marches.
Everyone agrees: the cheaper & environmentally better (50% less infrastructure) strategic offshore grid is the solution. Not pylons.
Britain must indeed overhaul the way it approves infrastructure. With the grid, following Treasury Green Book would be a great start. Listening to stakeholders would be another. And presenting alternatives another.
1/
You'll have heard us going on (and on) about the benefits of an offshore grid. Sadly,
@ofgem
has ignored us. Now, however, a report from
@ofgem
shows (surprise!) the benefits of offshore integration.
@SEAScampaign
70 years on
@nationalgriduk
is still using the same technology to trash 180km of East Anglian heritage & habitats. Even though there is a better & cheaper option: INTEGRATED OFFSHORE GRID.
Happy birthday for you means ruining nature, lives and livelihoods for us.
⚡ The
#Supergrid
: Britain’s high voltage transmission network. First switched on 70 years ago, this network of pylons and cables has powered the country ever since, helping to drive socioeconomic progress and enabling reliable access to
#electricity
for the nation.
🤔 Find out
Those who want an alternative to East Anglian pylons (offshore grid or HVDC underground):
- 32,000 people who signed the petition
- the region's MPs
- 3 county councils
- the region's district councils
- large numbers of parish councils
Those who want pylons:
@nationalgriduk
National Grid is choosing to trash this, when a strategic offshore grid for the East of England offers the following:
- £2bn cheaper than unplanned piecemeal & pylons approach
- societal and environmental benefits
- system and operation benefits including resilience
What is this hypocrisy
@ClaireCoutinho
? You have denied 14 of our region's MPs a meeting about sub-sea cables but you are going to meet one in Scotland?
Stop throwing the East of England under a bus with the refusal to build an offshore grid
@Jamie4North
Quite. Because they are deemed to be ugly so £500m is being spent on removing pylons.
Meanwhile, beautiful East Anglia is considered the ugly sister gets ugly new ones proposed when there are better alternatives
@PylonsEAnglia
It was BUCKETING with rain last night but loads of you turned up to walk through countryside affected by the pylons, to a pub which will be blighted, where we were met by
@bernardjenkin
and
@pritipatel
New on Twitter... Essex Suffolk Norfolk Pylons.
#peoplevspylons
Calling for a strategic offshore grid for the East of England instead of the damaging piecemeal/radial approach. Offshore grid: better for consumers, communities & countryside. Save this from 50-metre high pylons
38,000 have signed our petition.
We need a GREAT grid upgrade.
1. Integrated offshore grid.
2. Upgrade the existing grid.
3. HVDC undergrounding.
All three: better/cheaper/more popular
Remember...the project is proposed by
@nationalgrid
. It's not a benevolent state-owned entity with our interests at heart. Its SHAREHOLDERS are its interests. Our heritage, landscapes & habitats are being destroyed for SHAREHOLDERS.
N Sea wind power: good. Transmit it better!
It’s just a pylon, they say. What’s the fuss, they say. I’ve been visiting parts of the 180km route and at each stage it is frankly terrifying the damage and chaos caused by this project, incl the number of trees & hedges at risk There are better and cheaper ways
@PylonsEAnglia
National Grid....! Get it right.
The end date of your consultation is 26th July 2024. Not Friday 29 June, which doesn't even exist.
Maybe your construction year of 2031 is incorrect, too. Highly likely, we think.
@nationalgriduk
Trashing Essex, Suffolk, Norfolk and Lincolnshire, too.
And that £12k is nothing. People are taking hits of £200,000-£300,000, having mortgages refused and losing buyers.
NET ZERO - As expected Ed Miliband’s PYLON MANIA, will saturate the North & North East.
Where land is cheap, no one listens to them anyway & they won’t care that their already cheap houses are devalued by £12,000 because they live next to one.
How’s that for punching down 🤡
When are you going to take action
@ofgem
? You are supposed to ensure that the BEST option is adopted. In this case there are even two CHEAPER options which communities prefer.
Those who want an alternative to East Anglian pylons (offshore grid or HVDC underground):
- 32,000 people who signed the petition
- the region's MPs
- 3 county councils
- the region's district councils
- large numbers of parish councils
Those who want pylons:
@nationalgriduk
HVDC undergrounding in Germany.
A mere fraction of the horrific destruction of AC undergrounding (which needs a swathe up to 220m wide) & far less destructive than pylon construction.
Cheaper, too.
Pylons are for dinosaurs🦕🦖. We have alternatives.
Huge thank you to all our supporters for all they have done during the 8 week consultation, despite summer holiday & harvest season. 26,500 signatures; 100k leaflets distributed; 1,100 survey responses; loads of press coverage; 3 walks & a photo shoot. OFFSHORE GRID NEEDED!!
Constable, Ravilious, Munnings et al painted East Anglia because it's beautiful. So why is there a £500m fund to remove pylons in 'beautiful' areas but we are going to see 180km of new 50m high pylons dumped on us?
We need a strategic offshore grid.
Stunning East Anglia:
This is a disgusting way to treat people. Decision-making should be balanced.
And if
@Keir_Starmer
@RachelReevesMP
@UKLabour
actually took the time to listen, they might discover there are better alternatives.
Offshore grid; HVDC undergrounding; existing grid upgrade.
Wow,
@Keir_Starmer
.
You need to involve communities, not treat them with utter disrespect. Treat them as stakeholders. Consult on options, don’t present done deals. You might even find we have better alternatives.
Shocked by this approach to your electorate
Falling about laughing...
@nationalgrid
seeks a 'collaborative & consultative process' to develop an energy plan. NG has ignored MP's, Councils, 23,000 signatures & a legal opinion saying it will come back with Pylons 2 in a consultation v soon!
You could easily swap East Coast of England in this article on East Coast US.
We need an offshore grid, particularly given the anticipated offshore wind growth
National Grid is going to have great fun trying to dig a 120 metre wide trench here for its cables (the undergrounded section of the pylons project).
@nationalgriduk
@bernardjenkin
It seems that
@Keir_Starmer
is picking a big fight. There are campaign groups across the country with better alternatives to pylons. 35,000 support our campaign alone - we want an offshore grid.
@PylonsEAnglia
Starmer wants to make enemies of us all. Does he really understand the facts?it is impossible to contact candidates until after the election.
If
@nationalgridUk
was serious about this upgrade, they'd stop offering each wind farm a separate connection point miles inland, and create an offshore grid. Power generated in North Sea: keep it sub-sea til needed (London)
There’s no
#energytransition
without a massive upgrade to the transmission system. Carl Trowell, President of Strategic Infrastructure, spoke to
@SkyNews
about the need for new infrastructure along the UK’s East Coast. The electricity transmission system of today wasn’t built
To support this growth,
@TheCrownEstate
will have to ensure coordination offshore. The piecemeal/radial approach cannot be allowed to continue. It's more expensive & more damaging.
An offshore grid would be better for wind farm developers, too.
People seem to think pylons gently parachute in from the sky and it's just our view we're worried about. In fact it is a monumental construction project.
2028 pylon construction, on A1124HalsteadRd,would cause HGV numbers to increase to 495 per 12hr day, 7days pw.Other construction vehicles plus 350 pd. Total increase 79%. Roads already too busy, with damaged surfaces.
@SteveReedMP
@PylonsEAnglia
@NikkiMaguire22
@ReynliR31271
It's not just oak (and other trees) and hedgerows at risk. Meadows, too
Pyramidal orchid, Fordham
(Coincidentally this is also where
@nationalgriduk
wants to plonk 2 pylons, a works compound & a sealing end compound on a load of archaeology. Way to go, NG!)
Thank you
@BBCr4today
for covering the pylons issue (again). Note that
@nationalgriduk
told you they assessed alternatives. That's not true. They explore pylons alternatives only. A half-offshore option was part-assessed later. But the point is that...
1/
Essex pylon corridor compensation plan 'insulting'
Some brilliant interviews in here with affected residents - setting out the impact of the pylons proposal.
OFFSHORE GRID: BETTER FASTER CHEAPER
It would seem that
@Keir_Starmer
@UKLabour
@RachelReevesMP
want to make an enemy of this 700 year old oak (and many other ancient oaks and 1.8million trees in total in the way) to build pylons instead of a better, cheaper & more popular offshore grid.
#offshoregrid
@horton_official
Possibly the most pathetic journalist tweet ever?
We work with all parties and have talked to Conservatives, Labour, Green, Lib Dem and reform.
We're not political. We want the best solution.
So do we want policy set by National Grid, a PLC with primary responsibility to its shareholders?! Most alarming this coziness between NG, DESNZ officials and Ofgem. Note Ofgem refusing our calls for it to enforce MANDATORY Treasury Green Book guidance:
Nonsense
@Keir_Starmer
. Pylons should be the LAST resort. You're maybe not aware of an offshore grid, HVDC undergrounding and upgrading the existing grid, all of which are cheaper for consumers & better for the environment:
@thetimes
@MaxKendix
Dear
@ofgem
. We're very bored of you not scrutinising
@nationalgriduk
's Norwich to Tilbury pylons proposal and showing zero interest in better alternatives. We feel like we're doing your job for you. So we're sending you an invoice for your time. With thanks.
1/
This is nonsense.
The review is to look at HVDC undergrounding (as chosen in Germany instead of pylons). It is cheaper than pylons.
“Experts” are still going on about AC undergrounding.
They need to read ESO Anglia Study.
Or talk to us 🤷♀️
@PylonsEAnglia
@james4ssuffolk
He is also ignoring three reports which showed that an integrated offshore grid saves consumers money (£2bn in the North Sea alone).
And evidence from the US which shows it is cheaper to upgrade the existing infrastructure than to build new.
Not going very well for
@Ed_Miliband
🔴 Ed Miliband to roll out pylons despite official report showing burying cables can be cheaper
Campaigners accuse the Energy Secretary of pursuing ‘dogmatic’ agenda and warn of ‘pitchfork battles’ with rural communities
@ClaireCoutinho
@RishiSunak
Wow. So you value the natural world on your doorstep but are happy to ignore the offshore grid solution that saves the whole of East Anglia's natural world from pylons AND reduces everyone's bills by £2bn?
National Grid
#pylons
plan threatens 195 public rights of way (PRoW) in
#Essex
- 300 yr old Oak tree 'Henry' stands where 2 of those PRoW meet. Henry & Beech & Oak trees nearby to be destroyed by NG & PRoW to have 165ft pylons towering over. Save Henry:
Some the people that
@Keir_Starmer
wants to make
#enemies
of, at a coffee morning in Faulkbourne, Essex today - talking about offshore grids and HVDC undergrounding
#offshoregrid
better, cheaper, popular
@EofELabour
All this is silly.
@Keir_Starmer
&
@Ed_Miliband
could have their grid upgrade in East Anglia if they stopped behaving like children and sat down to discuss the perfectly workable, cheap and popular alternatives to pylons,
Would help a great deal if
@ofgem
did its job, too
1.
Pylons are not paid for by taxes.
Seriously
@Keir_Starmer
. You should know this. And you should know about HVDC undergrounding, offshore grids and upgrading existing grid using grid enhancing tech. And that pylons are NOT cheap. 1/
@nickgutteridge
Brilliant interview by one of our supporters: ‘I lived under a pylon and it was hell – now I’m battling to stop it happening again’
(Offshore grid: better, faster, cheaper...)
Or.
How about insisting on Treasury Green Book (it is MANDATORY) to ensure that decisions are made properly? Some evidence in decision-making wouldn't go amiss
@Ed_Miliband
@guardian
.
Radical?! Since when was bribing people radical?!
Radical would be the integrated offshore grid which you know is cheaper, better and faster. It would signal to wind farm developers that we're open for business and allow us to compete with our continental counterparts.
These are the most radical plans to update our electricity grid since the 1950s.
Households will now get a slice of the benefits of new infrastructure – up to £10,000 off energy bills over 10 years.
World mental health day.
Our supporters have told us how traumatic the pylons proposal is and how it is causing mental health issues and sleepless nights.
Let's do things a better way. People should not have to go through this.
Some of the stories:
Amazing news: UK's Bird 'superhighway' may become first World Heritage Site of its kind ()
So there is no way that 180km of power lines across East Anglia should be allowed when bird deaths are known to occur in strikes with wires 1/
Pylon wars! Locals 'absolutely devastated' at plans for 87-MILE pylon highway stretching from Grimsby to Essex that tower over homes - but will YOU be affected?
Pylons are to be plonked in the middle of some of the best farmland of the country, reducing food prodution. Another great reason for an integrated offshore grid: reduce land take by transmission infrastructure.
213hectares fewer would be lost to landing points, too.
🔵 The question of how to innovate needs to be asked from the very early stages of every project
🔵 Innovation should start by looking at customer needs and working backward
Ben Wilson and Kerry Baldwin from
@IQ_Capital_Fund
on innovative approaches to driving progress towards
Dear
@ofgem
We keep writing to your CEO, Jonathan Brearley. We need
@ofgem
to fully scrutinise the pylon proposals and to look properly at alternatives. The Treasury Green Book must be followed. The best option for everyone must be selected. Don't just take NG's word!
Here's a solution... build an integrated offshore grid to speed up connections and provide for long term growth
Chief executive of Octopus Energy Greg Jackson has called on the UK government to overhaul its electricity grid
@g__j
When will
@NationalGrid
stop telling journalists (
@EvanHD
in this case) that undergrounding is 5-10x more expensive than pylons?
Firstly, pylons are NOT cheap.
Secondly, HVDC undergrounding is cheaper than pylons.
1/
We've been told by
@nationalgrid
since LAST SUMMER that offshore is not possible, too expensive & not permitted by policy. All rubbish.
And now we find out that the sister company
@NationalGridESO
was working on some excellent coordinated offshore options LAST SUMMER.
1/
The
@nationalgrid
drop-in events for 'Norwich to Tilbury' pylons have started. Appalling how often we are hearing people saying there's no point engaging because NG has ignored them for the past two consultations.
Thanks
@alexburghart
for attending this one today.
The petition has been flying up in numbers in recent days and has just passed 30,000!
Thank you and keep sharing! It's remarkable how after two years and two National Grid consultations people still aren't aware about the proposal.
Like East Anglia, Lincolnshire is being dumped on to feed the power needs of London. Like East Anglia, Lincolnshire needs a North Sea integrated offshore grid. £2bn saving for consumers, better for the environment.