NZE is the only country in the world with high vax, good death data and vax happening before and not in parallel with covid
It saw no excess in the<60, which is not attributable to covid
This de facto kills any claim of high vax deaths made elsewhere, let me explain⤵️
For the record: The only reliable infection data in the world based on random sample (ONS / UK) univocally shows that the Imperial estimate for the IFR of covid of 1% back in 2020 WAS BANG ON
(and not "20 times over estimated" as claimed here)
Imperial College London scared the world into locking down with death projections based on fatality estimates that the latest data suggest are up to 20 times higher than the reality.
What is fascinating about New Zealand is that it is such a "clean case" with (a) no covid until 2022 (b) high vaccination as of 2021
It is also therefore a great case to see if there is a "death spike" when vaccinations happened mid 2021 among the <60
Result? No top line signal
This chart of monthly deaths by causes in Germany will create quite a stir: Deaths due to the heart in 20-22 increase/decrease with covid deaths
Two implications
1) Many deaths "due to heart" were likely "due to covid"
2)) Vaccines cannot be a major cause of heart-related deaths
The 2022 death data for England and Wales is now complete
What stands out is that deaths excl covid are fully in line with those expected from
- Population evolution expected by ONS
- Historic trends of mortality rates by age
But covid is not the only factor as you will see⤵️
My thread on why New Zealand "demonstrates" that vaccines cannot be the source of huge deaths due to vaccines created quite a stir
Some seem to have a hard time to believe it and come up with quite some hand-waving to say it's wrong
Let me summarize all my checks here
Let me summarize the "totality of the evidence"
There are loads of studies which are inherently inconclusive because vaccination and covid happened at the same time in that country
In the only country where vaccination happened before covid, there was a heart disease deficit
Given the totality of evidence the covid mRNA jab is likely THE primary driver of an increase in heart attacks and cardiac arrests until proven otherwise. Those not accepting this are either wilfully blind, financially conflicted or lack a conscience
Interesting data came out today from Denmark, where
@SSI_dk
released cumulative covid deaths "for covid" (according to death register) by age bracket under a FOIR
How does this compare with Sweden? Well it is 3 times lower ... almost across the age board
A QUICK WALK THROUGH
Just in
From the great 🇩🇰 registries - among the best in the World - pandemic total mortality *from* COVID-19, by age group, provided by
@SSI_dk
to
@brianweichardt
following a FOIA request.
The official number of 🇩🇰 COVID-19 deaths is 8385; deaths FROM COVID-19: 3861 (46%)
🧵
ONS updated its infection estimates and it's higher than many expected
This has implications
/ # of infections ~ 200% pop
/ % Pop infected >>95% pop
/ >>90% of infections are now reinfections
/ Protection from infection is high but maybe not as high as thought
Details below ⤵️
Your analysis does not address the confounder with covid
On the contrary, the only country in the world with sequential vax and covid (New Zealand) showed NO signal due to vax
Until you find an issue with the NZE data, that country's data invalidates your conclusion
There was a press interview with health officials in China which delivered quite some interesting information on China's wave
If you consider that these figures are correct, it shows that the level of hospitalization is far higher than anything we experienced in Europe
1/
This has deep implications because the New Zealand case "trumps" any other analysis, purely on grounds of logic
So unless someone finds an error in the analysis of the New Zealand mortality data, the matter is essentially settled, ie there is no signal of major vax mortality
6/
This tweet is a masterpiece of "writing to effect"
The statements on LC made by this Lab attracted much attention
Let go through them by adding the figs as they are known from the UK, the ONLY place in the world with a clue on its infx and potential LC
Hint: There is much spin
Dangerous garbage being presented “science writing”. Two *actual* facts surrounding
#COVID
infection:
1. Your risk of
#LongCOVID
, a currently incurable chronic illness, after surviving an acute COVID infection currently sits conservatively at ~6-7%
2. Your risk of LC increases 1/
I have now read several times this morning the assertion that BA.5 is significantly more severe than previous Omicron strains
So far, I fail to see any evidence of higher severity
Here a quick summary on BA5 ⤵️
The Telegraph relays a study which highlights concerning continued excess based on 2020, 2021 and 2022 estimates per
@OurWorldInData
and suggest vaccines as cause
That study fails to mention that
- covid explains largely that excess
- 2023 saw a clear reduction across the board
This may not be widely known but one German regional state has been doing the equivalent of the ONS survey since early 2023
Approx 1% of the pop gets infected every week ie
/ Infections are 50-100x higher than cases
/ Very roughly, it means a reinfection every 1.5-2.5 year
@GLBouchez
@MR_officiel
Monsieur Bouchez, je découvre avec effroi l'affirmation que "le vaccin n'a pas permis d'être où nous en sommes"
Est-ce calomnier et attaquer votre parti de de dire que ce tweet de Monsieur Blanchard verse dans de l'antivax primaire?
J'ose espérer que non
Wow. The randomized infection survey in Rheinland-Pfalz (with a sample size as big as that of the new UK survey for a pop of only 4m) showed a huge increase in incidence, from an already high 2,600 to 3,800 this week
This figure is now high absolutely speaking ...
1/2
Bergamo happened 4 years ago and one question I often see coming back is
"why was Bergamo hit but Rome not?"
"Why not eastern Europe?"
The overall answer is unfortunately rather simple: Ties to Wuhan and bad luck
1/
Right to have closed schools in retrospect?
59% say right
29% say wrong
in this UK poll
I must admit that I was not expecting such a clear cut opinion (which holds across political lines)
In hindsight, do you think it was right or wrong to close schools during the COVID‑19 pandemic?
All Britons
Right to do so: 59%
Wrong to do so: 29%
Con voters
Right to do so: 47%
Wrong to do so: 41%
Lab voters
Right to do so: 72%
Wrong to do so: 20%
This chart will invariably create a stir but there you go
As ONS also has deaths by age bands, I mapped them against infections deduced from ONS positivity to determine IFR by variant
Result? The accumulated immunity does not seem to have had an impact on IFR in the 0-12s yet⤵️
Just for clarity, I think it's vital to check for signals of covid vaccine induced deaths simply because there is risk eg
- intrinsic risk of novelty (of mRNA vaccines) even if the biology looks safe
- the appalling transparency record of pharma when things go wrong
1/
I see more and more often the narrative "vaccines are good at protecting against severe disease but not against infection / transmission"
May I remind everybody that a large part of the high (90%) efficacy against severe disease comes from the protection against infection?
1/
I think this chart will create quite a stir
It shows beyond doubt that England+Wales did NOT see significant and largely unexplained excess in S1 2023 as depicted by mortality analyses based on death registrations
On the contrary, excess was largely explained by covid
THREAD⤵️
Yet in the only country in the world where the events vaccination and covid were sequential (New Zealand), mortality shows
- no immediate impact of vaccination
- any excess after vaccination completely in line with what I suppose 100s of doctors felt as involving covid
5/
This is a fascinating study about masks because it yields "hard" figures
4.5k people were randomly assigned to a control & mask wearing group for 14d
During this period of high (~5% weekly) infection incidence, masks in public spaces reduced the infection risk by 15-40%
1/
Incredible study 🇳🇴
RCT of surgical masks for reducing respiratory infections
Wearing a mask for 14d reduced onset of symptoms of respiratory infection (OR 0.71, 0.58-0.87)
Absolute risk difference of ~3%
What does this mean?
1/🧵
Covid in 🇧🇪: Help me out
/ Omicron could be dominant by the end of the month
/ It evades 2 doses transmission
/ Boosters seems to give transmission protection
... and we are not making a huge call for boosters and some vax centers close over the Christmas period?
Just for clarity: No top line does not mean no death or harms due to vaccines : These are well established and will certainly have affected NZ as well
What it does mean though is that it invalidates the idea that vaccines led to significant deaths (say "in the 100s") in NZ
Why am I writing this? Because I see a lot of eminent professors (incl from Stanford, Harvard,etc.) essentially wasting their and everybody's time trying to spin analyses which, at the core, are actually adding nothing, scientifically speaking
7/
I remember this interview of Anders Tegnell back in April 2020
To this day, I have not seen the information that he used to make the decision for Sweden to not close like all other countries while knowing that Imperial had put an IFR of 1%
1/6
Purely on logical grounds, if the aim of a scientist is to make scientific progress on the topic of vax mortality, the only analysis that will achieve this is to find a signal in New Zealand
Until then, the conclusion is "there is no signal"
8/
Interesting development: The Netherlands health authorities will no longer report covid deaths
So the only measure of covid deaths as of 2023 will be the dutch stats office, who needs unfortunately 4 months to consolidate the data (there are rules to be observed)
1/
Elk nadeel heeft zijn voordeel: Nu hoef ik nooit meer berichtgevingen in de media over het totaal aantal coronadoden te corrigeren. Het werkelijk aantal ligt altijd al ~dubbel zo hoog (46k) dan het bij GGD-en gemelde, door RIVM gerapporteerde aantal (23k).
Germany sees a strong resurgence of covid since quite some weeks now
What is interesting is that it seems that the eastern part of the country is now significantly more affected than the western part
Covid in Sweden: The ascent continues and beds occupied "with covid" are now at 80% of those at the peak of the BA.1/2 wave
This sudden growth continues to puzzles me ...
Also let's see how this will weigh on admissions / deaths "FOR" covid (there is a bit of a lag)
Let me make this very concrete: IF you see any analysis outside of New Zealand with a claim of big vax mortality signal, you can literally share the next tweet (almost) without knowing the context sentence and kill the argument
9/
However, any analysis done outside of New Zealand in countries with good death data and high vaccination will invariably have seen overlapping covid and vaccine
This basically "kills" any signal of high vaccine deaths that someone may find (I couldn't but let's be open)
2/
Forget the 100% level, that's just me choosing a moment to calibrate all indicators
But in absolute terms, admissions (note: "for covid") look to be at an all time high in Finland: not 2023, over the whole pandemic ...
Fortunately, cases seems to peak but still ...
Germany has stopped producing testing data but has quite an elaborate surveillance data (ARS) with 50k covid tests per week spread over age bands and Bundesländer
According to this sample, the positivity rate has never been as high among the 80+
Surprising, to say the least
Sorry, I just killed my thread on the Danish study on impact of covid on immune system
I just realize that the set-up "infected" "uninfected" (used as control) de facto assumes that only 40% of the 50+ got infected in 2022 which looks extremely low (UK was almost 100%)
SAMRC /
@MRCza
released estimated and expected deaths by narrow-ish age bands for South Africa
This is what excess mortality looks like when you age standardize to a European Population
The waves of Spain and England + Wales in Spring 2020 look like bumps in comparison
1/2
Covid in 🇧🇪: May I present? My screensaver for the weekend!
Cases? -20% on a week
Admissions? now clearly down
Weather? Sunshine
I declare today a good day!
I was always intrigued by what led Sweden to follow its path at the beginning of the pandemic and never really came to analyse it
So I shared this and got lots of superb material! It allowed me to develop a clearer picture of what happened back then not only SE but overall⤵️
I remember this interview of Anders Tegnell back in April 2020
To this day, I have not seen the information that he used to make the decision for Sweden to not close like all other countries while knowing that Imperial had put an IFR of 1%
1/6
News go through the 🇧🇪 press this morning that 31% of the hospitalizations were fully vaccinated at the beginning of August
Repeat after me
➡️This is proof that VACCINES ARE HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
➡️We would have ALMOST 6X MORE HOSPITALIZATION WITHOUT VACCINES at the moment
And the analysis I did here adds more water to the mill that the reason for the unexplained excess deaths lies mainly with the issues faced by the NHS (and not vaccines or delayed treatment)
END
On "excess and vaccines", BMJ issued this clarification
It is technically correct: The paper did not mention vaccine as possible cause
That link was made by The Telegraph which simply quoted the opinion of a scientist independently of the paper and used itas title
But
The Dutch health authority
@rivm
has been systematically and MASSIVELY (40-70%) underreporting covid deaths for the whole of the pandemic
I am honestly at a loss as to why
a) nothing changed in 2 years
b) there is not even a warning of a big issue on its page with death data
And just to prevent some obvious attempts at twisting the New Zealand data, here a few additional things
Trends to determine expected deaths need to include population development and mortality gains, forget any "average of x years of deaths"
END
Why? Because, at the end of the day, any signal will come from either spikes of deaths at the moment of vax or increasing levels of deaths after vax
And outside New Zealand, this will invariably find an equally valid explanation with covid (and possibly other reasons)
3/
In this
@unherd
column,
@SunetraGupta
asks the Q: "how wrong was I to suggest that average IFR was 0.05-0.10% back in 2020?"
The answer is
- "By a factor of 5-10 for DNK" (per official data)
- "By a factor 5-25 overall" if UK is anything to go by
It's quite simple really ⤵️
For suggesting that the average IFR of Covid-19 might be between 0.01% and 0.05% in 2020, I was mocked by large sections of the media. But was this fair? |
@SunetraGupta
What the New Zealand data shows is no top-level impact on mortality from vaccines
So this invalidates those claims (which still regularly occur) that there are "massive deaths from covid vaccines"
END
Well I am back and the first thing I need to do is to debunk this fake news title by
@lalibrebe
...
No, 50% of the admissions in New York are not <5yo
50% of all CHILDREN admissions are under 5yo
(as it is actually written in the
@AFP
press release)
When I saw this study claiming that LC was no more prevalent in covid positive than negative, my immediate reaction was "isn't its CI too wide for measuring anything relevant given that LC is a 1%-ish factor?"
Turns out the answer is yes, ie the study is useless by design
1/3
Theres a study doing the rounds which basically shows that Long COVID is statistically no more likely in COVID positive than COVID negative people.
The study is decent but I think being misrepresented somewhat. A few thoughts.
@SusanMichie
@VictimOfMaths
The data on the same dashboard by ONS
This is also the source now used for the UK on Our World in Data
Here the data for the UK
2022: 5,688
2021: 5,142
2020: 1,697
There were fantasy estimates circulating about covid's deadliness being actually "not that high"
The province of Bergamo saw excess deaths equivalent to 0.45% of its population in March 2020
Not "% of infections": % of TOTAL POP
Not "over the pandemic": in ONE MONTH
The gold standard for an ED analysis is doing it using age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) which I did, using narrow age bands
When you compare these with the historic trend, you see that indeed, there is no real major excess deaths in 2022 not explanable by covid
2/
When I shared a chart on South Africa yesterday which showed how the covid waves were almost as hard for the <65 as for 65+, someone mentioned "same with Bulgaria"
I forgot that I had a full tool for every EUROSTAT country so I just plugged Bulgaria in there
Wow, Indeed
1/3
In order to see this, I looked at deaths vs. expected and covid for the 0-44 and smoothed the data on 5 week averages
What comes through is that the unexplained excess deaths always come in combination with covid waves in 2020 and 2021 ...
7/
I was wondering if it was a hoax as I didn't hear anything but it is now official: The ONS infection survey is back and will run from Nov 23 to Mar 24 with 200k participants
Boosters in 🇧🇪: There is some movement but we lost a month in the booster campaign of the 65-84
Surprising? Not really when it's not headline news, and top of comunication agenda by PM and MPs
(FWIW: BBC provides an update on boosters every day during its main news bulletins)
Covid in 🇧🇪: rather good news on a grey morning
As I was more or less sure yesterday, the growth rate (R) seems to decrease again (except in Brussels)
1/2
So everything points at the pressures on the NHS as being the trigger for these unexpected excess deaths
This adds more elements to something which is being widely suspected, among others recently by
@ActuaryByDay
10/
Analysis by
@LCP_Actuaries
for
@Independent
shows that the crisis in A&E can be linked to more than 15,000 deaths in the last six months.
Up to 500 patients a week are dying because of long waits for emergency care.
Covid in 🇧🇪: Flanders is well beyond the peak and R is now negative (hurray!)
Wallonia seems also to have passed a peak and Brussels may be about to do so too
1/N
Through its infection and Long Covid survey, ONS provides everything needed for ballpark estimates on the current situation for the 16-64
Risk of developing condition end 2023
Overall: ~1.5%
Severe: ~0.3%
% of pop with condition end 2023
Overall ~3%
Severe ~0.5%
Details below
So the story is a bit more complex than put in the press:
/ Compared to pre-pandemic years, there is little excess deaths unexplainable by covid
/ But this is the result of quite some excess deaths among the youth and lower than expected deaths among the older generations
11/
A content-free article in
@bmj_company
nicely spun by
@TheTelegraph__
led to a spike in "excess deaths caused by vaccines?" narratives
Just a quick reminder that the New Zealand data in fact clinches the topic: Vaccines cannot be a major cause of excess
My thread on why New Zealand "demonstrates" that vaccines cannot be the source of huge deaths due to vaccines created quite a stir
Some seem to have a hard time to believe it and come up with quite some hand-waving to say it's wrong
Let me summarize all my checks here
So, at best, the value added to "the science" of any such analysis is
"we did an analysis and we were not able to be conclude either way"
So progress is zero ...
4/
As I show below, any claim of major vaccine mortality is invalidated by the New Zealand data
I hadn't realized that New Zealand had released its death by cause data so I had a deeper look
The result is even fewer signs of vaccine mortality but a few things requiring analysis ⤵️
NZE is the only country in the world with high vax, good death data and vax happening before and not in parallel with covid
It saw no excess in the<60, which is not attributable to covid
This de facto kills any claim of high vax deaths made elsewhere, let me explain⤵️
WARNING:
@moderna_tx
misuses here the study by
@StatCan_eng
The study does not provide with the risk of developing LC by infx but by REPORTED infx
The study explicitly suspects huge underestimation of infxs
From UK data, the total prevalence of LC is about 3% (not 30-40%)
Your risk of
#LongCOVID
rises with each additional infection.
A recent study has shown that by their third COVID infection, patients have a 40% chance of developing Long COVID symptoms.
Learn more about the threat of Long COVID:
Germany updated its deaths by causes
/ The spikes of circulatory deaths continue to be in sync with covid
/ Many deaths due to covid are likely to not be diagnosed as such
(for every 3 death for covid, there are 2 additional deaths where covid is officially only "contributary")
What's the value to lockdown vs. a voluntary approach?
The Swedish approach allowed for some circulation which is reflected in the "long-tail" of deaths in wave 1
Apply this to Belgium, and it would have seen 60% more deaths
Conclusion: Lockdowns reduce deaths of a wave by 40%
On the topic of under-reporting of Covid deaths: Switzerland
Its Stats Office updated its monthly deaths by main cause up to end 2022: As in Germany, clearly there are some circulatory deaths which were "for covid"
Not only that ...
1/3
Something seems to be have suddenly changed a few days ago in Denmark as both cases and admissions now show strong growth (from fortunately a low base)
1/3
Covid in 🇫🇷: Among the metropoles I follow, Paris is now completely off-the-charts
a) Incidence of 3,600 (= 1 in 30 tested positive last week)
b) Admissions at the peak level of Autumn 2020
Of course, Paris cumulates a strong delta wave with an Omicron wave but still ...
One could now look at these figures of the <44 and think that the reason for these excess deaths could be vaccine related
Well, it does absolutely not match the pattern ... while covid DOES match the pattern
6/
@paix_tolerance1
Yes, I heard about that theory. It has one snag: It doens't even have a leg to stand on as it matches no pattern
Don't get me wrong: I will continue to follow those who believe that theory but not bother until someone comes with something serious
1/
London provides more encouraging news after England released its weekly report on ICU figures (up to 3/1)
Cases seem to have hit a high and admissions seem to track them at 40-50% of Delta
ICU remains essentially decoupled from admissions
Fingers crossed that this continues!
Let me finish with this chart which summarizes in many ways the pandemic quite well
All was fine and then in April 2020 all hell broke loose
(and everyone can project his/her favorite as to why this happened :-)
END
Why are there reports in the press about very high excess deaths in E+W? Because most of these reports compare with some historic data (say 2019 or 2015-2019)
As you see, this underestimates deaths from demographic evolution (green dots) and hence overestimate excess deaths
1/
Two days ago, I got struck by this chart shared by
@TracyBethHoeg
which showed a massive spike in deaths among 25-44 year-old in Florida
And I think I know why: This is caused by covid and probably when there was a collapse / overload of the healthcare system
Thread ⤵️
And what of this concerning signal of increased all-cause mortality in 25-44 year olds which seems to correspond with initial vaccine/college mandates.
If this were covid, why would there only be one spike like this?
The Great Barrington declaration has been hammering since the start that governments should have simply shielded populations at risk and provided some proposals for this
I always wondered so I plugged some numbers on it
Result? The strategy is unrealistically risky⤵️
It will take decades, but the only way to gradually restore trust in the scientific community is to first come clean about the misguided, disastrous and unscientific covid policies that too many scientists supported.
Interestingly, Portugal has seen a rebound of covid since a few weeks
Why do I find this interesting? Because it shows that covid (at least still) has the capacity to come through in summer conditions
1/2
A quick update on Italy: Unsurprisingly, it also saw a covid wave in December but it seems to be over the peak now
What is interesting, is that it saw a first peak in October and then another one in December
1/
while, in 2022, after another spike in Jan-Feb (when Omicron entered the arena), the excess deaths then suddenly jumped up as of April ...
/ when the recent issues with the NHS started
/ at a moment when these age bands were not elligible for any new boosters
8/
If we look at incidences from surveys and more or less systematic tests available over the pandemic, 4,000 is a level not seen since mid 2022
The fact that the incidence in Rheinland-Pfalz is accelerating is not a sign of a peak soon
hmm...
2/2
I only realize now this high profile study done early on in the pandemic putting covid IFR at 0.17% (cf. below)
Interestingly, for reasons I don't understand
- It did not share the figure for the US which was at 0.35%
- it did get its 70+ estimate wrong by a factor of 3
THREAD
@rdmorris
Hey Bob,
Here's a link to the final version of the peer-reviewed paper, published in the International Journal of Epidemiology. Thanks for publicizing it! It is already one of the most highly cited seroprevalence studies of the covid era.
Jay
Germany released its monthly deaths by cause stats up to October 2022
This highlights
- a significant covid spike in October (remember, admissions were almost at all time highs back time)
- a continued trend of circulatory deaths actually likely to be caused by covid
1/
There is one aspect which I don't see integrated in intra-year excess death analyses
Despite what you see , there is no excess in Germany in Fall 2021
The pandemic led to a shift of the seasonal peak and this has deep implications on what are excess deaths
Let me explain⤵️
England and Germany have periodic randomized infection surveys which allows to estimate the average duration between infections
By inferring the missing data (more below), it looks as if the duration has remained roughly unchanged over the last year in England, at ~1.5 years
Just for clarity: Vaccines do have side effects and led to admissions and deaths and need to be scrutinized
But there is no signal that links them to systematic heart disease excess
END
Also my analysis shows that schools are a key vector of transmission at the moment in Belgium and we probably need to look at ways to reduce this
But can we please stop talking about motors? Nobody (and certainly not kids!) is deliberately spreading the virus, we are all victims
@VPrasadMDMPH
"Noone has developed a method to separate admissions with from those for"
Just for the record
🇧🇪
🇩🇰
🏴
🇸🇪
🇨🇭
all have such a method
Not only that, in all these countries, the ratio "for" to "with" has remained constant since Omicron (~50-70% in function of the country)
So first, what is my demonstration: it is quite simple
NZE is the only country where covid happened after vaccination yet there are no spike of death signal in the <60 in 2021
Here is the explanation in more details
1/
NZE is the only country in the world with high vax, good death data and vax happening before and not in parallel with covid
It saw no excess in the<60, which is not attributable to covid
This de facto kills any claim of high vax deaths made elsewhere, let me explain⤵️
2) On the pandemic dynamic: Despite the very high estimates of infection from ONS estimates (200%), the “variant soup” period seems to have seen notoriously fewer infections
We may be seeing covid losing some of its steam: I hope that we will see this confirmed in 2023!
END
Yesterday, I looked at the relative evolution of IFR by age bands over time based on the England and Wales ONS data
The absolute figures show one additional striking thing
Except for the 0-11, every age band now has a much lower death risk than the age band below it
1/4
Weekly look at admissions growth rate in Western Europe
The feeling I got from Belgium's and England's data earlier this week seems to get confirmed: This wave does not seem to be going as strong as the previous ones
That would be good news!