اللهم ارنا الحق حقا وارزقنا اتباعه وارنا الباطل باطلا وارزقنا اجتنابه| افضل الصلاة واتم التسليم على سيدنا محمد خاتم الانبياء والمرسلين| احب الصالحين ولست منهم
al-Barbahārī (d. 329) says in Sharḥ-us-Sunnah:
"If you hear a man saying, 'Speak about Tawḥīd', and 'Explain Tawḥīd to me', then know that he's a Khārijī Muʿtazilī."
No other sect emphasis on TAWHEED as salafis does
And even on Al wala wal bara
No one warns against shirk , democracy, biddah , kufr festivals as salafis does
Is this Shirk? None of your pseudo conditions for Istighāthah are present in it, and ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb approved of it.
رضي الله عنه.
Translation:
al-Ḥāfiẓ ibn Ḥajr al-ʿAsqalānī authenticates it.
@Halabi101
@AMajeedHD
So, why were they doing "tawassul" to Allah thru his uncle [someone below the prophet (saw)] & not thru the prophet (saw)?
Could it be because the prophet (saw) had died & can't hear anything from them to do "tawassul" to Allah for them like when he used to when he was alive? 🤔
@salafiarab
This is the same book as the first picture:
2nd picture: al-Fawzan says a Christian remaining upon Christianity is better than him becoming a Sufi.
4th picture: al-Fawzan says Allah has a left hand, in addition to having two right hands.
Very clear and simple Aqeedah, indeed.
It's good to know that no one was able to answer my question. You can stop attributing your beliefs to the Salaf now because they're free from you.
Question 2: Who from the Sahābah knew the 3 conditions for Istighātha (alive, present, able)?
P.S. Your answer should be a name.
A Salafī's Ramadān to-do list:
- Say "Jahmī" 100 times
- Ask children, "Where is Allāh?"
- Begin Suhūr after the first [Fajr] Adhān
- Pray only 8 Rak'āt of Tarāwīh
- Takfīr after Maghrib only
Let's see what your Shaykh-ul-Islām has to say about prostrating to an idol.
"Otherwise, if he found himself prostrating in front of an idol but did not intend in his heart to prostrate to it, rather he intended in his heart to prostrate to Allāh, it would not be considered...
Enjoy:
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.”
Musnad Aḥmad 18449
Sahīh acording to an-Nawawī رحمه الله.
As usual, a fabricated narration. Observe how no one will utter a word on a fabricated narration just cause it satisfies their desires. But the moment you quote an authentic narration on this matter, you have to face the worst of slanders.
First of all, Muḥammad bin al-Ḥasan (may Allāh have mercy on him) was al-Imām al-Shāfiʿī's (may Allāh have mercy on him) teacher. And al-Imām al-Shāfiʿī's (may Allāh have mercy on him) was al-Imām Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal's (may Allāh have mercy on him) teacher.
@Ismailalashari
Muhammad bin Hasan the zindiq was a Mawla, not from the tribe of Shayban. The Banu Shayban were Ahl al-Hadith, among them Imam Ahmad (according to one view), Ibn Abi Asim and many more. Your imam Abu Hanifa the Murji was called to tawbah two times from Kufr.
@Maya07445605
I'm not sure why you're surprised, considering your cult is known for distorting book translations:
My recommendation would be to learn Arabic so you don't end up getting scammed by distorted book translations.
@abdul_now
I did a quick search for it on Shamela, and I found my part right after yours. That's because the publisher combined them together (pictures 1-3). I didn't know that. I apologize.
But at-Tirmidhi does mention my part after hadith
#2735
, and you guys never mention it (picture 4).
According to Shamela, it's only found in one book: Naqḍ al-Dārimī ʿAlā al-Marīsī.
That book has issues, and it can't be attributed to its author:
Its chain is disconnected and its copyist is unknown.
inauthentic hadith?
based on what? based on your salafi ulama grading?
bro stop the copium you are such an embarrassment, putting those emoticons wouldn’t do a refutation, ya zindiq mujassim.
@athararchive
Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūtī's رحمه الله era suffered from homosexuality, so he wrote books encouraging men to marry women by making them inclined to female attraction.
One of the books he taught were written by an Ashari scholar (al-Juwayni). Why is he teaching books written by "Ahlul bid'ah"? Mind you, this is the same scholar whom ibn Uthaymeen said he wanted to deny Istiwa, then brings a fabricated narration against him (al-Hamathani story).
“Imam of the west” is an exaggeration but if anyone deserves it, it would be AbdulRahman Hassan. Out of all the duaat brought up in the west, ARH is exceptional.
Incredible work rate as well, may Allah bless and preserve him. Ameen
Asrar Rashid (zindeeq) and AMJ (khariji) can
He also says:
"If you hear a man saying, 'so-and-so is an anthropomorphist', and 'so-and-so is speaking about anthropomorphism', then accuse him and know that he's a Jahmī."
This is a present to Wahhābīs who accuse the Ashāʿirah of anthropomorphism and negation, respectively.
Lastly, he says:
"Or [if you hear a man saying], 'so-and-so is a Jabrī', or 'so-and-so is speaking about Jabr', or 'so-and-so is speaking about justice', then know that he's a Qadarī."
This is a present to to Wahhābīs who who accuse the Ashāʿirah of being Jabrīyyah.
@salafiarab
This is the same book as the first picture:
2nd picture: al-Fawzan says a Christian remaining upon Christianity is better than him becoming a Sufi.
4th picture: al-Fawzan says Allah has a left hand, in addition to having two right hands.
Very clear and simple Aqeedah, indeed.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
رمضان مبارك
I will be away for the duration of Ramadān.
I'll try to be more active when I'm back, so expect some threads (and not just individual scans).
See you guys after Ramadān, inshā'Allāh.
في امان الله
2. Manāqib al-Shāfiʿī by al-Bayhaqī
"Innovations are of two types:
1. Misguided: What is innovated and opposes the Qurʾān, Sunnah, a narration, or consensus.
2. Non-blameworthy: A good innovation that doesn't oppose any of the above."
innovation, it aligns with the Sunnah, meaning it has its basis in the Sunnah. Therefore, it is termed linguistic innovation, not legal innovation, due to its conformity with the Sunnah."
He then quotes it from al-Madkhal to further explain what al-Imam al-Shāfiʿī meant by it.
This particular narration is weak as it has ʿAbd Allāh bin Muḥammad al-ʿAṭashī in its chain, whose narrator status (i.e., trustworthy, honest, weak, etc.) is unknown. al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī mentioned him in his Tārīkh, but he didn't mention anything about his narrator status.
People slandered Shaykh Ramadan al-Bouti رحمه الله yet he passed away whilst teaching The Qur’an and became a Martyr! Indeed what a beautiful end he was blessed with!
Lastly, if the explanation of what al-Imam al-Shāfiʿī meant by his classification of innovation isn't convincing, then why did he have all these "innovations"?
رضي الله عن امامنا الشافعي والحمد لله رب العالمين.
1. Ḥilyat al-Awliyāʾ by Abū Naʿīm al-Aṣbahānī
"Innovation is of two types: Praiseworthy and blameworthy. Whatever agrees with the Sunnah is praiseworthy, and whatever opposes the Sunnah is blameworthy."
@Lubnanix
al-Bukhari actually never said, "I didn't say our pronunciation of the Quran is created". This story is from a narration that a Salafi scholar (الجديع) admitted is weak.
Therefore, al-Bukhari believed that our pronunciation of the Quran is created, and so did Muslim.
There is a long chronological gap between its first narrator and the copyist, the extent of which we do not know (!)
Two main verifications exist of the book:
The verification of al-Shawāmī (1) and al-Faqī (2).
@alhilaliii
Stop committing the red herring fallacy.
We all know who he's referring to.
He mentioned "in our time".
He was a contemporary of MIAW's gang.
al-Dhahabī (d. 748) says in Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ:
"79 - Isḥāq ibn Rāhawayh"
"He heard from ibn al-Mubārak, but he did not continue narrating from him because he was a beginner [in seeking knowledge] and did not master taking knowledge from him."
Classic quote.
There is an emphasis on "without a kayf". The kayf is negated, not unknown.
Since the kayf is negated, it doesn't make sense to compare the attribute of yad to our yad because ours is physical and His isn't.
Enough distorting the Salaf's speech.
“‘Tashbih’ is to compare your hand with Allah’s hand, or to compare your hearing with Allah’s”
“But to affirm Allah’s hand or hearing or sight without a kayf (modality), this is not Tashbih”
📚Jami’ Tirmidhi 662
3. al-Madkhal Ilā ʿIlm al-Sunan by al-Bayhaqī
This narration has the same wording and chain as the previous narration (2), rendering it also authentic.
@Mohammed228753
1. We don't believe the book can be authentically attributed to its author.
2. Even if it can, its author isn't a Ḥujjah for us.
I only quoted it to show the irony of Wahhābīs who conveniently don't quote the part in my first tweet, and only the part in my second tweet.
@ZuhayrsMurid
Allah also said:
43:81
قُلْ إِن كَانَ لِلرَّحْمَـٰنِ وَلَدٌۭ فَأَنَا۠ أَوَّلُ ٱلْعَـٰبِدِينَ ٨١
Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “If the Most Compassionate ˹really˺ had offspring, I would be the first worshipper.”
— Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran
Enough double standards.
Abū Sulaymān al-Jūzjānī and Muʿallī bin Manṣūr al-Rāzī (may Allāh have mercy on them) said neither al-Imām Abū Ḥanīfah nor any of his companions (may Allāh have mercy on them) said the Qurʾān was created.
The Muḥaqqiq of Tārīkh Baghdād said: "Its chain is authentic."
To those people who were slandering the Shahīd Dr. Muhammad Sa'īd Ramadān al-Būtī رحمه الله تعالى:
This brother translated a few videos of Dr. 'Abd al-Qādir al-Husayn حظفه الله (a student of his) about him into English. I will start sharing them here.
Ash-Shaykh Mujeer al-Khateeb had told us that when the Syrian Revolution started, he stood up on the Jum’uah pulpit of Damascus and read the hadith:
من كان يؤمن بالله واليوم الآخر، فليقل خيرًا أو ليصمت
After quoting it in Darʾ Taʿāruḍ al-ʿAql wa al-Naql, he says:
"al-Bayhaqī narrated this statement, or something similar, with his authentic chain in al-Madkhal."
...disbelief. Such an action could be permissible if he was among polytheists whom he feared for his life, so he outwardly complied with them in action while intending in his heart the prostration to Allāh."
Majmūʿ Fatāwā ibn Taymīyyah 14/120
This evil devil innovator, Sufi deviant Didu, is taking blessings from his Sufi shaykh. Blessings are from Allah alone! Sufism is not Islam!
The one who said Mount Uhud is a sahabi. Will anyone with intellect refer to this fool for a fatwa ?
@ibnGhariba
Can't read?
"This is a present to Wahhābīs who accuse the Ashāʿirah of anthropomorphism and negation, respectively."
How many times do we hear your cult saying this to us?
شبهوا ثم عطلوا.
What al-Barbahārī said applies to that. Therefore, according to him, you're also Jahmī.
What ibn Rajab meant by praiseworthy innovation being linguistic and not legal:
According to him, since blameworthy innovation is what is meant in Sharīʿah and praiseworthy innovation doesn't contradict the Sunnah, then it's not considered an innovation. Hence, it's linguistic.
(1) The first copy of the book was found in 735, and its Sanad is as follows:
ibn al-Aḥnaf -> Isḥāq al-Qarrāb (d. 429) -> Abū Bakr al-Muzakkī -> al-Sarrām -> al-Dārimī (d. 280)
There's a 306-year gap between the death of al-Qarrāb and the appearance of the book's first copy.
For the first narrator in the chain to carry the book and deliver it to the copyist, he must've died when he was over 321 years old! No biography can be found of the copyist, so he's unknown.
(2) The verification of al-Faqī has the same chain as al-Shawāmī's verification (1).
After quoting it from Ḥilyat al-Awliyāʾ, ibn Rajab says:
"What al-Imām al-Shāfiʿī meant by what we mentioned earlier is that blameworthy innovation is that which lacks a basis in Sharīʿah. In the context of Sharīʿah, this is what is meant by innovation. As for praiseworthy
Below that highlighted text, which I just quoted, he says that some Muslim scholars and Ahl-ul Kitāb scholars did something similar to that with a group of polytheists until they called them to Islām and they become Muslim because of them (the scholars).
Were they pagans too?
لم أر شخصا أكثر كذبا من هذا الرجل. ألا يخشى الله الذي فوقه؟
قَالَ أَبُو عَبْدِ اللَّهِ: " حَرَكَاتُهُمْ وَأَصْوَاتُهُمْ وَاكْتِسَابُهُمْ وَكِتَابَتُهُمْ مَخْلُوقَةٌ، فَأَمَّا الْقُرْآنُ الْمَتْلُوُّ الْمُبَيَّنُ الْمُثَبَّتُ فِي الْمُصْحَفِ الْمَسْطُورُ الْمَكْتُوبُ الْمُوعَى
ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī (d. 852) in Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb quotes Muḥammad ibn Mūsa (d. 421), who is one of the teachers of al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī (d. 463), as shown above (see post 8 in this thread)
@athararchive
Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūtī's رحمه الله era suffered from homosexuality, so he wrote books encouraging men to marry women by making them inclined to female attraction.
In one print of the book, its verifier (al-Almaʿī) says the following about that saying:
"I have not come across anyone attributing it to ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak or Isḥāq ibn Rāhawayh."
Why does he mention Isḥāq ibn Rāhawayh?
@AftabAh85783385
@sixkills_
It's historically accurate. That guy has no idea what he's talking about.
There's nothing wrong with it, by the way. They just want to invent mistakes for our scholars because they're upset that their Fawzān isn't one.
Therefore, you are claiming that your Imām (Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal, may Allāh have mercy on him) studied under an Imām (al-Shāfiʿī, may Allāh have mercy on him) who studied under a "Zindīq", which means he was indirectly taught by a "Zindīq".
Are you fine with that?
Well, here's its chain of narrators, as found in Naqḍ al-Dārimī ʿAlā al-Marīsī:
Isḥāq ibn Rāhawayh -> ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak
Does Isḥāq ibn Rāhawayh narrate from ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak? Let's see what the books of Rijāl have to say about that.
"...Abū al-Naṣr Muḥammad bin al-Ḥasan bin Sulaymān al-Simsār(2) narrated to us, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad bin Ibrāhīm bin Khālid al-Harawī(3) narrated to us...
(2) I have searched extensively in the sources at my disposal and have not found a biography that could be considered
Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn al-Ṣafadī (d. 764) says in al-Wāfī bil-Wafīyyāt:
"1842 - ((ibn Rāhawayh))"
"He heard from ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak around the year 170-something, but he stopped narrating from him because he did not master taking knowledge from him as he should have."
al-Jurdānī says: “And among them (al-Nawawī's Karamāt) is that he was from Aṣḥāb al-Khuṭwah (lit: people of the footsteps— refers to those given the ability to walk huge distances in a short time). He used to go to Makkah at night, perform Ṭawāf and come back (in one night).”
al-Shabrakhītī writes in his Sharḥ of al-Arba'īn al-Nawawiyyah: “It has been found in a collection written in the handwriting of al-Imām al-Dhahabī that the doorman of al-Rawāḥiyyah said: al-Imām al-Nawawī went out at night, so I followed him, and the door opened without a key.
Lastly, the fact that the author of that book's quote (ʿUthmān ibn Saʿīd al-Dārimī) was a Muḥaddith (ḥadīth scholar) and didn't know that ibn Rāhawayh stopped narrating from ibn al-Mubārak casts further doubt on the book's authenticity.
al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī (d. 463) in Tārīkh Baghdād narrates from his teacher (d. 421):
"Muḥammad ibn Mūsa said: Isḥāq ibn Rāhawayh heard from ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak when he was young, and then he stopped narrating from him due to his youthfulness."