Ben Pierce Profile Banner
Ben Pierce Profile
Ben Pierce

@BenFPiercePhD

1,110
Followers
334
Following
263
Media
2,836
Statuses

Health, science, vaccines, research, covid origins. Working in NHS as Head of Data Analytics and Partnerships. All views/opinions are my own.

London
Joined January 2021
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Pinned Tweet
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
2 years
Today the completion of the COVAC Uganda clinical trial was celebrated - the first trial of a self-amplifying RNA vaccine in all of Africa and the first trial of any COVID-19 vaccine candidate in Uganda
@KaleebuPontiano
Pontiano Kaleebu
2 years
Today we had a team meeting where we discussed the successful closure and completion of COVAC Uganda vaccine trial. We reviewed and discussed the progress status and plans of this vaccine technology in the country and world at large.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
3
6
22
4
3
20
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
A mythbusting notice that the #lableak #covidorigins 'theory' is absolutely rubbish. Let me explain as simply as possible, using the most critical data to date. 🧵 1/n
1
160
571
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Such an important point on #covidorigins : if it were a lab leak, Lineage A would have infected people earlier, and anyone within or closer to the WIV. It didn't. 1/7
Tweet media one
55
72
275
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
I'm motivated to speak out on #covidorigins because it's the clearest example, right after vaccines, where #scicomm is losing, with consequences likely to lead to more mistrust in data/research in general. 1/n
24
63
213
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
3 years
@guardian Instead of supporting my 4-year-old watching one of her favourite movies, this article has shown me the light. From now on, we will watch Schindler's List 🤣
1
0
165
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
Almost the 2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣4️⃣ New Year, so here's a Countdown of Top 🔟 Reasons #COVID Was Not Caused By A Lab Leak🧵 #covidorigins #originsofcovid #scicomm
27
52
150
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
"Misinformation and disinformation proved to be the enemy of good public health implementation not only in the United States but also in many countries throughout the world."
14
41
92
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
The WIV is in Wuhan, though Wuhan is larger than London. The WIV is over 10 miles away from the Market, no evidence of WIV staff getting ill, and A didn't magically mutate to B by Dec 2019 without leaving intermediates. That's why a #lableak didn't lead to #SARS2 . [end]
1
8
99
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
There is no chance #SARS2 escaped from a lab. Not only was this virus nearly impossible to engineer in 2019, this virus's epidemiology and genomic signatures in early 2020 make it - not just implausible, but impossible - to have research origins. 13/n
1
15
100
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
9 months
The elusive raccoon dog. A mammal susceptible to #SARS2 , sold live at the Huanan Market by 2019 - could it or other mammals have caused the #COVID outbreak in December 2019? More #covidorigins data indicates that yes, such animals remain the most likely culprit. 1/11
Tweet media one
33
30
96
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
10 months
I'm almost amazed that this is still a discussion really. There isn't any evidence, compelling or otherwise, of a #covidorigins lab leak. It comes down to epi + genomic details of the 2 lineages found in Dec 2019 and early 2020. Nothing about that indicates lab leak, at all.
@florian_krammer
Florian Krammer
10 months
@WashburneAlex @jbkinney I have never been sold on where it comes from. I just don't see any compelling evidence for a lab leak. Sorry. I do, however, see a lot of nutcases that push lab leak and a lot of people who want to sell their books.
13
3
56
34
8
90
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Objectively, this report is the most anti-science document I have ever read. #OriginsofCovid The veracity on WIV workers getting sick? Check out Feith's bogus reply at 1:12:30 - that allegation has no evidence and was drafted to raise interest
@angie_rasmussen
Dr. Angela Rasmussen
1 year
I don't know where to begin about yesterday's Senate report on COVID origins. Besides the vast volume exaggerated or outright fabricated "evidence" & the flagrant display of ineptitude at basic molecular biology, I can't get past this ghastly font choice.
Tweet media one
27
170
533
5
30
88
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Last weekend, I found a copy of the book “Viral” in the library. Screenshots and references to this book are often included in some nasty replies to some of my threads on #COVIDOrigins . So, what does this book say? 🧵1/23
Tweet media one
7
30
88
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
It's November 2023, what do we know about #COVIDOrigins ? How strong is the evidence of a zoonotic spillover? Here, I'll sum up all the research and point out what some nefarious players are up to. 1/15
23
59
83
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
Claims that Proximal Origins was written to silence debate on #covidorigins , despite it clearly stating "More scientific data could swing the balance of evidence to favor one hypothesis over another."? So much for silencing. 🧵1/n
24
13
80
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Nearly 1 year on, if only #covidorigins #lableak supporters would read @MichaelWorobey et al’s Science 2022 paper, in full. How does it stand up against its critics? A 🧵. 1/20
44
27
80
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
A #lableak of A would require mutation to B, prior to Dec 2019, yet no evidence of #COVID19 before then exists. If A and B were equally present in Dec 2019: getting B 12 times in a row has likelihood of 1 in 4,096 (probability = 0.000244). B spilled over first. 3/n
1
3
77
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
Important: had a #lableak occurred, intermediates between A and B in humans that arose before late Jan 2020 would be "the" 💥 key evidence. And yet: there is no evidence of early A/B intermediates in people. 5/n
Tweet media one
1
3
73
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
Richard Ebright has never, not once, presented a rational hypothesis for a #covidorigins #lableak . I have threads with dozens of articles supporting zoonotic spillover. He has thrown insults at me and others. He has added nothing to any discussion anywhere. Get well, Richard. 👍
Tweet media one
7
10
68
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
It took but 3 min to exemplify why the new Rubio #COVIDOrigins "report" is a watered down Muddy Waters. On pg 63, "experts in the field" cannot find a project's finding. It took 0.2 sec to find the paper , grant 31770175. This is not difficult. (1/4)
Tweet media one
21
15
66
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
Based on analysis of these 148 samples from Hubei not analysed in 2022, there are several interesting, similar findings: ➡️ no A/B intermediates ➡️ B arose earlier than A ➡️ mean tMRCA of early Dec 2019 ➡️ Rooting of lineages growth stems from Wuhan strains There's more. 10/n
1
3
66
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
People became ill in Wuhan in December 2019. Samples were sequenced, and 2 #SARS2 lineages were found (A and B). However, the first 12 were lineage B. 2/n
Tweet media one
1
2
66
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
Several studies, not just Pekar 2022, show B arising first in people, then A some weeks later - - with no intermediates, all based on the timing. 6/n
Tweet media one
1
3
66
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
➡️ presence of D614G mutation ➡️ similar pathogenicity of A and B D614G found so early (Jan 2020) counters any "pre-adaptation" argument. The virus facilitated better human transmission with this mutation. 11/n
1
3
64
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
What's next is critical: some sequences were indeed omitted from Pekar 2022 for quality reasons. Claims that these are crucial intermediates is rubbish: none of these 20 are prior to 23 Jan 2020 (most are from Feb 2020). 7/n
1
1
63
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
Recent analysis of non-recombinant regions support animal origins, as does recent analyses of the Market environment samples. 14/n
Tweet media one
1
5
63
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
Yet A precedes B, doesn't it. The Market 2-spillover theory is simple: A and B arose in animals, and B spilled over first. Any A/B intermediates might remain in animals, though these were gone by 31 Dec 2019, which is why no live Market animals were sampled. 4/n
1
2
62
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Despite reviewing mountains of emails and hearing hours of testimony about Fauci and the Proximal Origins #covidorigins paper, @COVIDSelect missed an actual cover-up. Thanks to @mstandaert for his excellent insights. A 🧵. This gets wild. 1/n
19
21
62
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
And similar pathogenicity of A and B is key. If they had different pathogenicity trajectories, one might argue that perhaps A was a quick burner and faded before B came to prominence. Not the case: A remained and spread very well. 12/n
1
2
61
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Lab leakers love emails to attack people because when the #SARS2 sequence becomes the focus of discussion, well... Experts know it was impossible to engineer in 2019. Wonderful🧵, from @wanderer_jasnah , who knows CoVs. Enjoy this expert insight, and unroll. 👇 #CovidOrigins
@wanderer_jasnah
Jasnah Kholin - 8964 - ACAB
1 year
okay, here we go. so as i've said numerous times, DEFUSE could not have given us SARSCoV2 b/c: 1) there is no evidence that WIV had a viable progenitor sequence (something very clearly stated in the ODNI report) 2) it was not funded, i.e. the grant proposal went nowhere
39
91
315
10
15
58
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
An unpublished study analysed 125 samples from a hospital in Wuhan, not uploaded to GISAID and therefore unavailable for inclusion in Pekar 2022 and other studies. A further 42 are from Hubei, 23 of which were not included in Pekar 2022. 9/n
1
2
60
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
I'm shocked by anyone claiming that @K_G_Andersen has not explained the zoonotic spillover theory for #covidorigins . He's done it. He does not need to do it again and again. 👉
@RVAwonk
Caroline Orr Bueno, Ph.D
1 year
It’s…. not disinformation to tell him how to communicate information more effectively. If the “other side” has persuasive, easy to understand narratives, you aren’t going to combat that by pointing to scientific articles and congressional testimony.
22
11
126
22
7
57
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
Last month, this sad reply guy sent me what he called the "best evidence" of a #covidorigins lab leak - the June 2023 Times article that: ❌️named an index case as someone who graduated in April 2019 ❌️but got their name wrong ❌️was debunked by the ODNI report 2 weeks later
Tweet media one
11
7
59
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
But were there any other sequences that were not available for analysis? The answer is yes. 8/n
1
1
55
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
A sad day in American history. Anyone from this subcommittee is welcome to publish an article on a "cover-up", using US intel (oh, wait). Just remember that it's spelled "genera", not "genre". Let's see how many scientists step up to help for the next pandemic.🤦 #CovidOrigins
@COVIDSelect
Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic
1 year
🚨SUBPOENA ALERT🚨 @COVIDSelect announces its FIRST subpoena for “Proximal Origins” author Kristian Andersen’s private communications with the paper's co-authors & related info on COVID-19 origins. We are following the breadcrumbs of a COVID cover-up straight to the source!
Tweet media one
572
1K
3K
27
12
52
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Many thanks to @K_G_Andersen and Bob Garry for their patient and direct answers today at @COVIDSelect . At that ridiculous closing statement, we should all grin as we may. #covidorigins #science #SARS2 #COVID ー19
12
9
53
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Astonishingly misleading podcast from @thetimes on #covidorigins . Claims of uncovering already available info through FOI, unrelated SARS1 work (Mojiang again..) incapable of generating #SARS2 , "weak" zoonotic evidence, and a hotspot of care for early cases next to the WIV? 1/2
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
17
21
50
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
If you don't trust this, you are stuck with a theory that WIV researchers isolated/engineered a new virus, inserted a noncanonical FCS (PRRA) and an RBD, without any knowledge of binding affinities to human ACE2, and passaged this in humanised mice. All in 2018-2019. 5/n
5
9
50
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
This site is terrific in filling my feed with posts from those that claim facts are missing from Quammen's nytime article on #covidorigins and that PO authors are bullies, without giving any examples of either, yet somehow are just fine with this guy.
Tweet media one
15
9
51
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
Not only do virologists strongly dispute this theory, I don't know of ANY wet lab researcher that believes this. It's also exceptionally challenging/costly to do whole genome sequencing, let alone culturing. 6/n
17
2
49
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
If you don't, you are banking on all of WIV, PO authors, virologists, epidemiologists, and each evolutionary biologist coming to a secret agreement to cover up the LL theory. (Please...just try keeping a secret amongst 5 friends.) 9/n
7
4
49
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
So much vitriol against scientists on here - but, serious question, does a scientific critique, focusing on the content of the Proximal Origins paper (paper, not authors) even exist? #covidorigins
26
9
47
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
Proximal Origins authors have given hours of interviews/explanations and even congressional testimonies, yet are still attacked, professionally and personally. Strange, because the paper is inconsequential. It really is, because you can't prove a negative. 7/n
7
3
45
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
9 months
What an awful article. Andersen doubted himself as US Intel indicated #lableak evidence exists (yet none has been found). #covidorigins Disparate: Ladapo lied as he omitted evidence that disproved his desired outcome. That's not insincere, that's fraudulent.
12
12
44
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Allegation that Ben Hu, Yu Ping & Yan Zhu fell ill in 2019: this comes from a blog. The US has not yet declassified anything. Ben Hu published a paper 1 month later. And Yu Ping was in Beijing in 2019. This image was taken on 15 Jan 2020, with Ben present. #CovidOrigins
Tweet media one
27
12
47
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
2 years
What utter nonsense. Malone confuses RNA with protein and Ab production. RNA is detected as a control (for PPIB, NOT spike) for 60d. Vaccine RNA levels decrease in LN from 37d (Fig 7B). Ab (NOT spike) levels for vaxxed is as high (NOT higher) as patients with severe COVID.
2
9
45
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
2 years
@paimadhu I have said this elsewhere, but the misinformation is right in front of you - on the poster promoting this video. There are exactly ZERO injectable vaccines for children with 1.5mL doses.
1
4
45
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
5 months
Some #scicomm : I have seen the statement “75% of emerging pathogens are zoonotic” several times in media articles during the pandemic, often related to #covidorigins . My Q: where did this stat come from? If true, where does the other 25% originate? An explainer🧵 1/n
2
13
41
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
It's become exceptionally obvious to know who hasn't read or at least understood Proximal Origins. #covidorigins
@NateSilver538
Nate Silver
6 months
There's a special place in hell for people who engage in scientific misconduct, are also huge assholes about it on Twitter, and then are shamless enough to complain that *they're* the victims somehow.
222
183
3K
10
2
41
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
An excellent summary of why we will be even more unprepared for the next pandemic: experts that stepped up to protect and inform on public health are attacked daily by people who have benefited from those contributions. Thanks @K_G_Andersen .
1
9
40
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
This #OriginofCovid report confirms that no virologist was on the investigative team: the FCS is *not* a con to zoonotic spillover origins. And what was that about recombination happens only between similar viruses? 📢
@axios
Axios
1 year
The pandemic appeared to originate from a lab accident, based on biosafety issues in the epicenter in Wuhan and factors observed in the nature and early spread of the virus, per a 302-page Senate report obtained by Axios.
479
392
970
8
6
42
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
If this crew is so happy to publish private messages, they should reveal the source(s) who wrongly identified 3 early career WIV researchers allegedly infected by #SARS2 in Fall 2019 and accused as starting the pandemic. And then apologise for that. #covidorigins
Tweet media one
13
8
40
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
1/ Several details and nuances to the #CovidOrigins / #OriginsofCovid debate: here's a mega-🧵with all the info you need. 👇
5
16
39
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
It is NOT any virologist's duty to teach us all about the basics of their field. It's right in front of us; it just requires some reading. 📚 #scicomm is a 2-way street: looking forward to it running more smoothly. 13/n
3
1
40
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
3 years
Really instructive critique of the UK's recent report falsely declaring that structural racism is not prevalent - focusing on health of ethnic minorities 👇 @bmj_latest @Azeem_Majeed @MohammadRazai @aneezesmail
0
18
38
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
Importantly, the first identified furin cleavage site found in this coronavirus family, comes from samples taken in 2016 and 2017. This further shows how much is unknown about the animal virosphere. Animal sampling and analyses can't keep up with zoonosis. #covidorigins 1/2
6
8
38
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
10 months
New #covidorigins mythbuster: at 25min, George Gao states that maybe they "should have looked at the other"... Sudworth hears the word "side" and even adds [of the river] i.e. the WIV. That is NOT what George said. How do I know? Because he told me 1/2
10
4
35
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
Taking a break a bit from this site, but should return after the holidays. Take care. 👋[end]
7
0
36
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
4 months
I ♥️ #science and want researchers to be properly represented – and this isn’t happening with the ongoing #misinformation on #covidorigins . A🧵on #originsofcovid #virology theories. 1/n
9
9
39
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
9 months
I have a #covidorigins #lableak joke but there's no evidence for it.
Tweet media one
8
7
38
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
And then? Read more on the wildlife trade in China until the end of 2019. Read more on recombination. Read more on how better nature is than us in creating viruses. Read about the incredible efforts researchers needed to identify animal hosts of other viruses. 12/n
3
2
37
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
5 months
Wow, super interesting #covidorigins
Tweet media one
@SaskiaPopescu
Dr. Saskia Popescu
5 months
The Origin and Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expert Survey | ⁦ @GCRInstitute
39
35
117
18
8
37
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
The wildlife trade is a lucrative enterprise in China, and there are some interesting facts behind those vendors in the SW corner of the Market
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Despite reviewing mountains of emails and hearing hours of testimony about Fauci and the Proximal Origins #covidorigins paper, @COVIDSelect missed an actual cover-up. Thanks to @mstandaert for his excellent insights. A 🧵. This gets wild. 1/n
19
21
62
3
4
37
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
In full support of #science , Kristian Andersen and Bob Garry tomorrow. Best of luck to them in receiving 900+ questions about Fauci. @COVIDSelect (They could have added that Lineage B spread prior to Lineage A.) #covidorigins
14
7
35
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
We don't need another pandemic, and entertaining the lab leak nonsense gets us nowhere. New research shows terrifically high risk of spillover of sarbecoviruses from bats -> livestock/wild mammals -> humans: central and southern China. #covidorigins
Tweet media one
@muymaps
Renata Muylaert
8 months
🦠 New Research Alert! Using drivers and transmission pathways to identify SARS-like coronavirus spillover risk hotspots🌍 Where are the hotspots of landscape change, human exposure and host distribution in different scenarios?👇 #Coronavirus #PandemicPrevention #OneHealth 1/5
Tweet media one
5
22
51
16
16
36
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
The largest unknown here is the vast wildlife trade in SE Asia (but more insights below). A recent paper shows that some inlets are as far as Africa.
3
3
36
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
🔟 Bat progenitors found in South Asia are far from Wuhan yet are of relatively same distance for SARS1 origins: 🦇 ➡️ market animals ➡️ humans
Tweet media one
5
2
36
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
Multiple papers, theses and unpublished works, clarify how the WIV was not researching the progenitor to #SARS2 . Want a summary of this? Just check out the book Viral, authored and touted by lab leakers. It says that same: no known #SARS2 progenitor. 2/n
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Last weekend, I found a copy of the book “Viral” in the library. Screenshots and references to this book are often included in some nasty replies to some of my threads on #COVIDOrigins . So, what does this book say? 🧵1/23
Tweet media one
7
30
88
10
3
36
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
@threadreaderapp unroll please, because everyone needs to read why researchers and virologists are not to blame for this awful pandemic 👍
1
0
36
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
5 months
This virus had infected one of 161 pangolins smuggled from Southeast Asia into China in 2018–2019, which supports the hypothesis that many mammals were infected by bat viruses in SE Asia by 2019. #covidorigins
8
6
36
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
What about unpublished papers? One was rejected in 2018 and summarises parts of genomes from samples on record until 2016. These sequences were released in 2022. None are #SARS2 progenitors. I'm sharing this Figure again as @edwardcholmes has already shared it. 4/n
Tweet media one
4
3
34
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
4 months
💥Elucidating explanation of *the* main #originsofcovid conundrum: the rooting methodology of #SARS2 . Thanks to Flo Débarre and Zach Hansel: an explanation of the flaws for rooting on Lineage A. #scicomm 1/n
Tweet media one
8
12
34
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
The % of non-bat animal virome that has been sampled is miniscule, yet it's really not challenging to find CGGCGG in natural CoV sequences. It pops up twice here in a hedgehog sample. #covidorigins #SARS2 #covid #virology
Tweet media one
12
5
34
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
2 years
More nonsense calling for virologists to defend themselves, otherwise they caused +18 million deaths. No evidence of RE signature in SARS-COV-2, nor any evidence or plausibility of its glycosylation pattern being lab-engineered. Enough with this nonsense.
Tweet media one
21
4
35
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
The LL theory is fun, it's exciting, but it's also easy. It's also calling many of these individuals liars: particularly when it comes to serological tests for WIV staff, PO authors with their assessment of the implausible engineering of #SARS2 , and wet market authors. 10/n
5
2
34
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
Genetic analysis of Huanan Seafood Market samples confirm origins are from southern China/Asia
Tweet media one
4
1
35
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
3 months
Ebright's and Nickels's attacks are reprehensible. Hoping this can be sorted, for those attacked, the research community, as well as students.
@NewsfromScience
News from Science
3 months
A dozen #COVID19 scientists have filed a formal complaint with Rutgers University alleging that two faculty members violated the university’s policies by posting “provably false” comments that are often defamatory and that could incite harm against them.
107
177
520
25
1
35
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
9️⃣ No intermediate reservoir host(s) were found becausre Market animals were cleared out on 31 Dec 2019.
5
2
34
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
7 months
These guys blocked me because they could not provide any rational approach to synthesize #SARS2 by 2019. In fact, even after 4 yrs, we haven't seen any possible methodology behind a #lableak #covidorigins . Also, the following papers wouldn't make any sense. 1/10 🧵
Tweet media one
1
7
33
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
3 years
@ENirenberg Vaccinating children for rubella is done for only this reason.
4
1
34
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
Anyway, a #scicomm summary; important facts remain ➡️Lineage B cases were the first 12 sequenced ➡️ #SARS2 was not preadapted (D614G came early) ➡️Known cases (B then A) clustered around Market ➡️No A/B intermediates until 2020 ➡️No recorded research or cases at WIV [end]
6
6
34
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
Several wildlife farms were liquidated upon urgent orders, possibly on 31 Dec 2019, leaving no chance to sample suspected hosts. I look forward to learning more about why/how the Market was cleared - more coming soon.
1
2
34
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
US Intel on #CovidOrigins is out. Astoundingly hollow of any #lableak evidence, or even indication of evidence. Any apologies to WIV researchers, virologists, or to those of us that have defended their activities? 🦗🦗🦗
Tweet media one
14
9
33
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
Or skip the book. The WIV isolated only three strains of SARS-related viruses, each of which is published: Nature [2013, 593(7477):535-538], the Journal of Virology [2016, 90(6), 3253-3256] and PLoS Pathogens [2017, 13(11):e1006698]. 3/n
6
1
32
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
4 months
It’s nearly March 2024. We must know more on the origins of #SARS2 , right? Good news: we do! A 🧵on #covidorigins #originsofcovid 1/n
14
9
32
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
I post on this stuff because I saw (and felt) the attacks on vaccine researchers. The same has happened for virologists. It's ad nauseum attacks on people, devoid of actually reading any papers and looking at data, and it's nonsense. Some examples: 12/15
2
4
32
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
One of the biggest misconceptions is that Market animals were sampled, when exactly 0 were, and that much sampling has been done, when it hasn't.
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Relatively little animal sampling has been carried out during the pandemic in Hubei. More from @mstandaert on this point here: , about which Chinese researchers cannot speak: 17/n
1
2
15
4
0
33
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
To have found 1 (and other positive reads), days after the market was cleared of animals and cleaned, is amazing and indicative of just how much virus was scattered about. 6/7
7
3
32
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
Very interesting study, showing how mutations arise randomly upon long serial passage of #SARS2 . What's interesting to me is that it again shows how unstable the FCS is - it's scrambled in all lines, even without immune pressure. 1/3
17
9
31
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
8⃣ The Market was not a superspreader. Worobey 2022 explicitly explains 2 sets of evidence: the lack of social media check-ins and the presence of Lineage A at the Market.
7
0
31
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
3 months
It's hard to hear lab leakers complain about being silenced b/c of their nonstop conspiratorial screaming over 4 yrs. Here's Sachs, the leader of The Lancet's #COVID Commission, again with a misleading account of all we "know". #OriginsofCOVID
23
4
30
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
I have written loads on the 2 lineages. Three possibilities could be considered to derive them, had a LL occurred:
2
0
30
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Bizarre how those lung ground glass opacities cleared up so well by Jan 2020. #CovidOrigins Perhaps they didn't fall ill with Covid in Fall 2019.
Tweet media one
@Ayjchan
Alina Chan
1 year
It's difficult to understand why "we may never know" #OriginOfCovid when leaks suggest US has detailed intel on sick Wuhan scientists in fall 2019. @joshrogin told @bariweiss these scientists worked with bat coronaviruses, lost sense of smell and had lung ground glass opacities.
43
99
527
18
5
29
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
6 months
Also, a human-driven superspreader event that strangely leaves more positive samples in the SW corner, where wildlife were located, would be nonsense.
6
0
30
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
11 months
Have problems with the wet market theory? Don't blame it on ascertainment bias, as this is covered in the papers themselves, or sampling bias. 11/n
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Despite reviewing mountains of emails and hearing hours of testimony about Fauci and the Proximal Origins #covidorigins paper, @COVIDSelect missed an actual cover-up. Thanks to @mstandaert for his excellent insights. A 🧵. This gets wild. 1/n
19
21
62
10
2
29
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
8 months
I have never been funded, directly or indirectly, for any of my #covidorigins #scicomm . Why do I do it? It interests me. Who do I do it for? Me. If anyone is interested and gets to learn anything, or wants a civil discussion, super!
@EpiEllie
Dr Ellie Murray, ScD
8 months
Someone asked me today how i funded my science communication and, hahahahha yeah, no. There is no funding for any of this.
5
45
321
5
4
29
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Much of the problem in #covidorigins is the perception that there are holes in the PO and Market data that must be defended against the onslaught of nonexistent LL evidence.
Tweet media one
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
Last weekend, I found a copy of the book “Viral” in the library. Screenshots and references to this book are often included in some nasty replies to some of my threads on #COVIDOrigins . So, what does this book say? 🧵1/23
Tweet media one
7
30
88
22
3
27
@BenFPiercePhD
Ben Pierce
1 year
And there is much more to come from animal sampling: let’s be patient. There's certainly better tactics than spurring distrust of researchers in this area. [end]
12
1
28