i was pitched many times
each time sam’s strategy was “we need to know by tomorrow” which is code for “no diligence”
first pass was 2018 seed, i thought alameda seemed bad r/r
conflict of alameda and FTX, and 4x low float nothing-coins, were massive red flags in later rounds
anon you are in the middle of the largest wealth transfer since the invention of property
and the development of the most hardcore software ever written
we’re not all going to make it
but if you do it right, you can make it
aptos token distribution scheme is among the worst designs i’ve ever seen, and i’ve seen a lot
foundation 67.5%
team 19%
investors 13.5%
the only way coins get into “the community” (lol) is through arbitrary foundation distributions.
anon meritocracy with zero regard for legacy institutional certificates, genetics, or lifestyle,
is what i signed up for.
if you don’t believe it or don’t get it, i don’t have time to explain it to you, sorry
searching for anons, protocol designers, etherscan lurkers, deep crypto schizos, game theorists, dao builders, fanatics and degens to join the polychain investment team
DMs are open
if we are relatively rapidly moving toward ~all online content being AI-generated, interestingly internet content 1995-2025 is the seed for all content forever, as training on data from post-2025 will be mostly recursively training on output generated from data from 1995-2025
interestingly a *core* pillar of the entire banking crisis is a simple accounting trick where held-to-maturity (HTM) debt is not marked based on the liquid trading price, and is instead held on the books as if it hasn’t lost value
this basic trick is hiding billions in losses
anon there is a lot of noise, a lot of people talking without saying much
faster and faster “news” cycles
don’t lose the plot
we are replacing the global financial system with software that nobody controls
haters claim the crypto ideology is caused by financial incentive due to bitcoin holdings
eg
@balajis
has been hardcore in his worldview since i became friends with him ten years ago
people’s beliefs don’t stem from their investments; their investments stem from their beliefs
place your bet with gigabrain algorithmic-money coders who invented the fastest growth assets of all time… or with unelected bureaucrats creating the largest debt bubble in human history
your choice anon
“crypto protocols are a way to organize huge, huge masses of people through basic incentive systems that are grassroots and bottom up rather than top down. it’s way bigger and heavier and more complicated than people think.” (cont.)
crypto is not about “payments” like paypal/venmo/zelle are
crypto is about “money”: the socially constructed imaginary opt-in system we use to define and legitimize who owns what
crypto is not about splitting a dinner bill
it redefines the logic of global resource distribution
crypto is genuinely subversive
because of its technical properties it cannot be neatly captured by existing establishment interests
if it truly works, it will alter the *core* global systems of money and power
it was always going to be a fight
many “tech” people don’t understand crypto because they use an old lens
crypto is a financial renaissance, not a mobile app
even more than a technology, it’s a new social reality
crypto is not about Daily Active Users
“no use case” yet $1T+ value and 100m+ holders
think of the best you ever felt, in your entire life
using chemical, neuro, and genomic technology, that could be your default state. there is no physical reason it’s not possible
there should be 1000x more people working on this
in the collective public imagination, crypto oscillates between the future technologically unified global financial system and the largest scam in human history
how can the narrative seemingly alternate between these two extremes, and do it every 2 years?
in the next year the investment of the decade will emerge
it will be in crypto
anon, will you have the courage to bid?
legends are made in the shadowlands
things like school, church, news, teach you how to think and what to think about
most of us have been subject to a way deeper brainwash than we realize
there is massive alpha in opting out of thought control and creating your own reality
private key management started as a bitcoin investment toy and ends with sovereign internet-based identity, reputation & credit systems, and universal login. all with ecommerce payments built in
financial nihilism:
money isn’t real
“instrinsic value” is a boomer scam
if a watch can be worth $1m so can my picture of a monkey, unironically
work has nothing to do with value
capitalism is jungle-level survival of the fittest with extra steps
we are rapidly entering a world of infinite algorithmically-generated and hyper-personalized music/television/books/videogames/pornography/doomscroll
will be very hard for “real life” experiences to compete with this feedback loop
the real lesson of the matrix is dont unplug
we can acquire more crypto users by converting them ideologically. this was the primary method for the first decade
but now to 10x the userbase again, we need to build products that appeal to pragmatists that have no interest in ideology…
in crypto nearly 100% of value accrues to start-ups and outsiders, not existing establishment interests
value capture in AI technologies will be primarily by incumbants. there will be valuable startups, but for example even openai realized they needed to align with legacy tech
crypto is a vortex for the world’s capital
i’ve watched it happen at the very front lines for over 10 years
at this point i’m not sure anything could change my mind… it is simply inevitable
just like we went from copy-paste altcoins to sophisticated general use code execution platforms
we will go from 10k pfp bubbles to sophisticated cross-platform portable internet identities
i think in 5 years none of these will be the most used self-custody wallet
i also think long term people will think of these products more like portals/browsers/appstores/identities than “wallets”
So many MetaMask competitors.
Rainbow, Coinbase Wallet, Phantom, Argent, Exodus, Guarda, Backpack, Status, Brave, ZenGo, OKX Wallet, Trust, Family, Easy, and more.
What's the best?
western film peaked around the year 2000. since then it’s remixes, parody, ironic references, endless sequels and obviously-corporate soulless bullshit
we need a renaissance of outsider art with independent funding
in a post-AI post-solidity world, complex and iterative software can be monetized directly with its own code. no need for human operators, legal entities, or bank accounts
this will play out in unpredictable ways with bigger consequences than anyone understands today
crypto long game redefines property ownership from patchwork geographically-specific heterogeneous databases, to a globally unified software system
the nation state loses its ability to control money supply and interest rates, and is replaced with market-based competing monies..
so the entire supply is controlled by a bureaucracy which will grant the coins one-by-one. it’s also proof of stake so new coins cannot be earned by actors outside this distribution method
i would love to hear an explanation from any person who thinks this design is good
when we make video game items (1) cross-platform, and (2) traded on open non-proprietary secondary markets, the amount of money people will spend directly in primary markets on digital items will increase by 100x at least …
in the same way that content discovery is moving from search (google) to AI curation (tiktok), so will ecommerce.
amazon is search. over the next couple years ecommerce will transition to AI curation
if you are working on this DM me
neurotech wave is coming
conversational AI abstracts away the need for a traditional hardware interface
surgical implants & headsets both having research breakthroughs
culture is moving towards accepting altered states of consciousness and literally living online
society is slowly realizing psychadelic chemical technology should be placed in a completely separate category than simple “drugs” like antidepressants, opiates, benzos, and amphetamines
we should be giving independent chemists & psychonauts millions to explore novel compounds
a world of 25 chains needs 300 bridges
this is why we need generalizable bridge protocols, not more bespoke 1-to-1 bridges
long term, cross-chain protocols like
@axelarcore
and
@anomanetwork
could be even more important than underlying chains
every decentralized chain derives its security solely from its market cap
to get people to hold the coin, they must believe it will go up in value
designing coins that are good for speculators is not some scam. it is at the very core of designing a scalable blockchain
it is wild that with autonomous incentive protocols, once you release it into the wild, it is genuinely impossible to predict or control long term outcomes
this is because these systems control humans, not machines
still struggle to wrap my head around this
They called it Medicine’s Best Kept Secret — at UCSF today.
You have probably seen ultrasound images of babies, but if you arrange an array of ultrasound transducers to focus to a point, they can manipulate cells and membranes like a magnifying glass focusing sunlight to a
most modern dopamine is “fake” dopamine
human-designed synthetic reward mechanisms hijack our evolutionary hardware and convince us our behavior is supporting our reproductive function
but they are generally misaligned with reproductive fitness
feels like most people believe what their peer group believes, and what the news says, more than they believe their own lived experience
multiply this effect to civilization scale and it’s clear why it’s relatively easy to brainwash huge groups of people
long term, this “fun & maybe profit” business model will replace the advertising business model for many online platforms. replace ads with cryptofinancial incentives and games
over time, “play-to-earn” cryptoeconomics will generalize to replace many labor structures
scale a workforce with a software protocol instead of HR
scale a society with a software protocol instead of a state
@danielpsegundo
most people are already in some mix of videogame/“likes”/chemtech/sugar/egirl/netflix replacing the neurochemical feedback loop that is designed for successful reproduction
algorithmically-generated & personalized takes it to a sort of singularity
solution to fermi paradox
the feeling that crypto is all sort of “fake” or made-up or based solely on collective delusion, is really a reflection of the feeling that our current systems are equally made-up and fake. this collective make-believe is core to humanity’s ability to function at global scale
i want to learn more about state-of-the-art-tech-enabled longevity, well-being, and nootropics. what is your stack, what do you swear by? dm if you prefer
“so is crypto just a huge scam?”
“or is it the *only thing* that’s NOT a scam??”
we rip back and forth between these two versions of reality over and over and it’s why this is the most volatile asset class in human history
stockholm syndrome for the legacy system
implicit in every anti-crypto thesis is the belief that fiat money and traditional market structures are efficient, fair, and benefit regular people
instead of either paying for a product, or investing for a return, many good models in crypto are a combination
users come both for the product/experience, and a chance they’ll make money. this is how eg constitution dao can raise money so quickly. it’s both.
software has facilitated unimaginable human coordination. it has replaced brokers & distributors with marketplaces & networks
now AI will replace many other types of human labor & business
eventually many will wrongly turn against sam
dont lose the plot. this is all inevitable
there will be scary moments as we move towards AGI-level systems, and significant disruptions, but the upsides can be so amazing that it’s well worth overcoming the great challenges to get there.
following my conference talk today on synthetic consciousness and paradise engineering, if you want to travel down a deep rabbit hole on transhumanism, here’s the master list of
@webmasterdave
essays. have fun :)
gm! We’re excited to announce that we’ve closed our $22M seed round led by
@polychain
, and with participation from
@1kxnetwork
,
@etherealvc
,
@hack_vc
, and many other amazing funds and angels!
ppl sometimes say crypto feels PvP
“wealth transfer to hackers”
“dump on followers”
you think the tradfi global economy is fair, we all work together, and only good guys win?
crypto is also net positive sum game since it’s growing. but everything on earth is PvP (h/t
@niraj
)
many will say “happiness is relative” meaning no matter how positive/negative our brain state, it eventually becomes normalized. i disagree
people have nerve damage or crippling depression which never becomes normal
anecdotally we all know ppl permanently above/below the mean
amped to see my long time friend tekin launch
@daofive
. we will finally see the fund-as-dao experiment run in a principled way that shares profit with not solely LPs, but founders too
stumbled across a 2019 presentation i gave at
@danboneh
’s cryptocurrency course. interesting to see a time capsule of that era, and that most of the foundational ideas still apply:
property ownership, legal contracts, governments, and money are all human-created social concepts
they are sociological, not scientific
crypto technologies disrupt these foundational social constructs, and replace them with equally “imagined” constructs
i am thinking hard about designing new systems to create original cinema and support independent artists. i am hopeful that others with crypto wealth will work on this with me
“once you stick around a little bit, you realize you're part of this insanely complicated machine that nobody is in charge of, and software that nobody controls is governing everyone's incentives. it's this unstoppable vortex that you've been sucked into.”
the mt gox bitcoins have been trapped in a kafka-esque japanese bankrupcy procedure for so long that i dont even remember how many coins i had on there anymore
we often understand programmable incentive protocols abstractly, but it’s wild to think about its effect narrowly on your own life. you are one of the actors being manipulated by the software system
quote is from a recent podcast:
“that’s when you start to realize that protocol incentives are guiding your *personal* behavior. it’s sort of like, wow, how did i really get here? and you realize that a protocol that's running autonomous software is creating incentives that lead to *you* being here.”
data is the primary asset to make a good AI model. big tech companies have a natural oligopoly on data
plus these companies already have distribution. AI models can be seamlessly integrated into existing legacy tech products that already have a billion+ users
feels like a product that is google search augmented by AI-based “I Feel Lucky” to take you straight to the exact content you’re looking for, could genuinely be meaningfully better, and end up replacing google search
we need a dozen iterations of “lobby dao” that crowdfunds government education of crypto
does anyone have a mechanism for this where contributors could end up making money on their contribution?
for example constitutionDAO did this well through the $people token
@RaymondDurk
launch FTT, SRM, OXY and MAPS with low float, keep vast majority on balance sheet, do the market making to set their price, then mark-to-market internal books. eazy money
it’s impossible to reach distributed global consensus in a system if validators can only attest to OFAC-compliant chaintips in the US and only CCP-compliant chaintips in China
Wake up, Neo. neutrality is the only option
one of these chains has a future. the other, does not
@ercwl
the irony is that the stated goal of SEC regs is to protect investors, but as a result of compliance we have significantly worse designs for retail investors than we did 5 years ago (eg ethereum, cosmos, tezos)
feels like a product that is google search augmented by AI-based “I Feel Lucky” to take you straight to the exact content you’re looking for, could genuinely be meaningfully better, and end up replacing google search
in the long run the L1s launched separate from an existing chain, and L2s launched around one specific chain, converge to both being sovereign chains which compete for application developers, app users, and speculators
the difference is mostly bridge UX
majority in either PoS or PoW can arbitrarily freeze funds
only difference is majority is defined by stake instead of hashrate (both of which can be bought)
does he know how PoW works?
(reading swift headlines) so shareholder governed financial cooperatives can just delete member funds arbitrarily, based on the desires of the largest stakeholders? incredible. my tokenholder governed Proof of Stake system will fix this