@jus_opinions
@KeeperTimeGeras
@dhxjzbzb
@smegmaboy9999
@ChaosCharza
"Yeah, bro, when they show an underage anime girl's boobs on screen it's fucking disgusting and pedophilic, but when toriyama does the exact same it's just a joke, notwithstanding that in both cases a young-looking anime girl was sexualized" This is what you sound like.
@jus_opinions
@KeeperTimeGeras
@dhxjzbzb
@smegmaboy9999
@ChaosCharza
If you use dragon ball reaction images, you are supporting dragon ball as a concept, and considering everything that was portrayed in the image you replied to, that would make you a hypocrite, because you are a fan of a series that sexualized lolis, which you supposedly hate.
@dhxjzbzb
@smegmaboy9999
@ChaosCharza
Nobody is saying it isn't weird, but weird just means unusual, not immoral or illegal. If no real minor is being involved, just let them be weird.
@ConnorRadcliff1
@YurieAkko
Is someone forcing you to install that mod? No? Then it's clearly OPTIONAL, meaning it does not affect canon, for the love of GOD
@heknowsitsayin
@Gelzazz
Zoomers need their media to have every single character turn to the camera and say "KIDS, <thing> I am about to do is problematic, Don't try this at home!"
@BOMW_666
@KeareShinei
If you believe that something in the fiction you look at sexualizes minors, but you continue to consume it, then either sexualization of minors doesn't bother you, or you recognize it doesn't actually sexualize minors and you are a hypocrite virtue signaling for internet clout.
@BrittanyXVenti
Do you also believe that playing violent video games encourages committing violent acts in real life, because the "victims" in the games look like humans?
@SquawkyAtan
@Doze_Tree
@MaxKriegerVG
The dude is literally pointing out how you shouldn't label someone's sexuality off of how they look and you somehow manage to take offense from that???
@Krerart
There's nothing wrong with wanting representation in games, but stating that EVERY single artist has to take part of that movement is basically telling artists that they are not allowed to make art the way they want to, which is against artistic freedom. Good on him.
@bookdotjpeg
@Dippysoulss
@revosten
if shipping nonsensical ships is okay because they don't affect canon, then why would portraying a masculing woman as feminine affect canon either???
@BloodyKharn
@VirusZeke
Does violent fiction condone real life violence? Are you a murderer if you kill a civilian in Grand Theft Auto?
Try thinking logically for a second.
@ShounenLife
@Weird_Green_Guy
shadman referenced real people, at that point it becomes CSAM. The whole reason lolicon content is defensible is that it is NOT based off of real people.
@PodemosBailairr
@BZUltiverse
@puritysin
@Mixgull3000
Do you unironically believe that if directors removed all the blood and gory scenes of people getting murdered that people would still go watch the movies? You could literally just imply that the killings happened off screen but no one does that for a reason.
@ProZD
Schrodinger's Callout: If I criticize something I don't like without recieving backlash, I will stand by my criticism. However, if I do get any pushback, I will claim I was merely joking.
@Eliotthemaste
@DannyBo45117566
@kurokaze907
@khit_khat_kat
If you kill people in video games that means you made a choice to do so because you have a desire for fictional violence. That doesn't automatically mean you have a desire for Real violence, though. Now apply that logic to lolicon, please.
@Eliotthemaste
@DannyBo45117566
@kurokaze907
@khit_khat_kat
AS I SAID, that would mean the millions of people on this earth secretly have an incest fetish, if your claim were true.
CNC is consensual non-consent, so basically rape play.
My point to the coping mechanism argument was about REAL PEOPLE.
@Eliotthemaste
@DannyBo45117566
@kurokaze907
@khit_khat_kat
Being a loli/shotacon means you are into lolis or shotas, that doesn't mean you are into real people. Are furries zoophiles? Does Baldur's Gate 3 condone bestiality because you can fuck a fictional bear in it? Because that game is MASSIVELY popular.