Why do we study Ancient Greece? To expand our shared knowledge of the past or for personal enrichment? Is research a primary or secondary aim? Today,
@theo_nash
of
@UMich
revisits 1930s Oxford to see how rival views of scholarship were keenly thrashed out:
'A Song of Ice and Fire', the 21st century narrative saga, survives only partially; a prose recension covers the first half in great detail, as does an audio-visual one for roughly the same extent; after this we have only the audio-visual in an epitomated and much corrupted form.
Weird English conditionals: 'I'll be in town tomorrow if you'd like to grab coffee'. Being in town is not in fact dependent on the correspondent's desire for coffee.
I don't honestly know how to process this. Is there any reason now to doubt that we'll get complete scrolls soon enough? Papyrology — if that's even the right word for this — could once again revolutionise Classics.
Ten months ago, we launched the Vesuvius Challenge to solve the ancient problem of the Herculaneum Papyri, a library of scrolls that were flash-fried by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD.
Today we are overjoyed to announce that our crazy project has succeeded. After 2000
I've seen the tablets in Athens and Heraklion before, but before I knew anything about it; today I really saw Linear B for the first time. Still not over how a) small, and b) three-dimensional and real the signs are.
Between the Old Hittite and New Hittite recensions of the Laws, the penalty for biting off a man's nose increases 30x. This may be a scribal error, but I prefer to think people got very tired of noses being bitten off and getting upping the penalty in hopes it would finally end.
The Vulgate is, no doubt, the widest-read Latin text historically, and now almost completely missing from modern curricula. It is both accessible and familiar (if decreasingly so): a much better starting point than Caesar.
No, "critical race theory, post colonial theory, psychoanalytic approaches and queer theory" won't teach you anything about Greek literature. You're just committed to the fallacy of anachronism.
A quirk of English development: 'ominous' and 'auspicious' are both etymologically neutral, for omens and auspices may be either good or ill; but each has taken one province for itself and excluded the other.
There was once at Harvard a conference that asked 'What is Philology?'. A colleague inquired of Shackelton Bailey whether he would attend: 'No,' responded Shackleton, 'I already know what it is. I shall be in my office, doing it.'
The English word 'fart' derives from an onomatopoeic Proto-Indo-European root *perd — so some guy 6000 years ago heard a fart and we've been using his impression to describe them ever since.
A remarkable survival of Persian usage: Ionia was already Yauna in the Behistun inscription. Just as the Romans called all Hellenes Greeks after the first tribe they met, so too the Persians called them all Ionians.
The use of cuttlefish ink for writing in the Aegean is evidenced as far back as the Middle Minoan III period: two cups found at Knossos bear inked inscriptions on their interiors.
Modern Greek καλαμάρι ("squid") derives from Medieval Greek καλαμάρι(ο)ν ("pen," "pen case," "inkwell," "squid"), from Ancient Greek κάλαμος ("reed [pen]"). 🦑🖊
καλαμάριον is given as a gloss for τευθίς ("squid") in the scholia to Oppian.
The Pevensie children begin 'The Lion, the Witch, and the Warbdrobe' in London. This was obviously a real place, so how does it make sense to deny Narnia? Why include London at all if the other places were fiction? It makes more sense to argue all were real.
@DimitriNakassis
@e_pe_me_ri
Odysseus is described as being blown off course near Maleas, see Hom. Od. 9.80. This was obviously a real place, so how does it make sense for you guys to deny other locations? Why include Maleas at all if the other places were fiction? It makes more sense to argue all were real.
Tiryns, a coastal site, was the first centre on the Argolid to be fortified in Mycenaean times. Later expansions included extensive use of corbelling in passageways and the famous galleries. The same principle still holds up the nearby tholos tomb, later used for olive pressing.
Multimedia: Athena striding forward to fight a giant, both in monumental sculpture from the Old Temple on the Acropolis and on a fairly quotidian oil jar.
I've read this sort of essay written by undergraduates: they're clever enough to make an argument, but can't see that their ignorance of the source material defeats them.
Yesterday, after delays due to both COVID and last month's strike, I finally completed my PhD qualifying examinations (with just a bit of help from these two).
Grad school bound: I'm excited to say that this September I'll be headed stateside to pursue a PhD at the University of Michigan's Interdepartmental Program in Classical Art and Archaeology.
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis claims that the way we experience the world is based on the language we speak. Since there are no first-person verb forms recorded in Linear B, we can therefore posit that the Mycenaeans had no sense of self.
The Mycenaean cemetery at Dendra is famous for its wealth of finds — not only does it have the only known unlooted tholos, but multiple horse burials were found (left in situ), and chamber tomb 6 yielded the only full set of Mycenaean armour, now on display in Nafplio.
People tend to think of ancient sculpture as colorless, but they were often vibrantly painted. Join
@harvartmuseums
to learn how scientific analysis can help reconstruct original colors on works of art. Tuesday, 9/21, 12:30pm:
Classicists are generally required to learn Ancient Greek (and indeed Latin) to a much higher level than anyone else studying a language for purely academic reasons.
My wife: 'Why on earth is a ten cent coin called a dime here?'
Me: 'Well if you think of the PIE word for ten, *dekm, it's really quite easy to remember...'
The Chronicles of Narnia are strewn with Turkic references, but nobody really knows why: CS Lewis did not speak Turkish, nor did he ever visit the country
For
@EngelsbergIdeas
, I wrote about the mystery that has preoccupied me for years
Rare evidence for a Mycenaean sport much resembling modern tennis.
(From the Preface of Vermeule and Karageorgis 1982, Mycenaean Pictorial Vase Painting.)
MY V 659, a record of women receiving bedding at Mycenae; among the names are Alexandra (a-re-ka-sa-da-ra) and Theodora (te-o-do-ra), still in fashion over 3000 years later.
academics who speak and read multiple languages are so obsessed with saying u can’t engage with ideas properly without speaking and reading multiple languages. funny
The beach at Voidokilia — between the 'Cave of Nestor' on one headland and a tholos tomb on the other, the feeling of being at the Homeric 'Sandy Pylos', ἐπὶ θινὶ θαλάσσης, is quite impossible to shake.
It takes almost no training to recognize all but one word here, and the grammar is transparent except at the end. We always use Beowulf as our standard example of Old English, but that does a disservice to the real continuity of the language.
Look familiar? This is an Old English version of the Romulus and Remus myth! The runes read: Rōmwalus and Rēomwalus, twēgen gebrōðera: fēdde hīe wylf in Rōmeceastre, ēðle unnēah: Romulus and Remus, twin brothers, a wolf fed them in Rome, far from home.
Mild disappointment in reading the new edition of Tolkien's letters: OCR (presumably) has done a number on Latin and Greek, and no one at Harper Collins has the wit to correct. So we read nolo efiscopari, δημοχρατία, sub specie aeternitaris, etc.
Latin 'cum' more typically comes before its noun, and the Romans weren't quite sure why it acted differently with personal pronouns. Cicero had a theory, of course: good Romans say nobiscum because cum nobis comes squirmingly close to cunno bis, 'twice in the cunt'.
In Spanish and Portuguese it's 'para ti' (to you) but 'contigo' (with you), not *con ti.
Why this '-go' part?
It's a remnant of Latin 'cum', the ancestor of 'con':
it was 'tēcum' ("you-with"), not *cum tē.
This became 'tigo', but later a pleonastic 'con' was added.
Here's more: