happy to say my book, Language Machines: AI Between Cognition and Culture is now forthcoming from
@UMinnPress
in the Posthumanities series bc of the wonderful
@noctambulate
- on bookshelves early 2025
I don’t think there is a “humanities crisis” as such - there is instead a crisis of knowledge in general, in which the question of what counts as real knowledge has neither theory nor funding to back it, and focus lands on “applied research” 1/
Plato always makes it seem like everyone came away dazzled and transformed, but i have a feeling Gorgias and them often were just like "well there's 6 hours of my life i can't get back"
produce and fund knowledge at all. this is a social crisis and national crisis, in which "the humanities" operates as a fetish object for extremely poor culture-war thinking - nothing more 3/
the humanities have almost no "applied" stuff to offer, on their own - but everyone who has little on that front is suffering from admin and funding neglect and even hostility, not just lit scholars. the real crisis is far, far worse - it's about a collective lack of will to 2/
for the record i dngaf about Gay or any university president but i keep seeing this idea out there that presidents are hired for "scholarly excellence" and i just... is anyone serious about this? we all, like, know what their actual job is, right?
I’ve been thinking a bit lately about my “pitch” for mathematics. It boils down to something like: it’s extremely cool that we can make progress in understanding *concepts* themselves. Something interesting about this—nearly the same pitch works for many of the humanities.
universities are becoming consultant/cop hybrids that enclose and control your kid for 80k/year while canceling the promise to educate them liberally. the fully Administrative University is a reactionary institution clothed in DEI rhetoric that ends at the lowest bar, speech
Critics of colleges are seeing "the unstoppable force of years’ worth of self-righteous rhetoric and pseudo-radical posturing meets the immovable object of students who took them at their word,"
@Tyler_A_Harper
writes:
Columbia hybrid to Zoom, NYU's business-school plaza cleared - the university is finally a safe space, and all we had to give up was any notion that a campus is a the place where knowledge and democracy intersect.
people who drive 150k trucks and wear carharts w no smudges on them are part of a class outside both legislative and discursive democratic norms and attached to a vision of pure exec authority - they are not rural but rep wealth that they imagine untethered from the body politic
@katrosenfield
Thanks! To me that’s the far more interesting question the book could have asked: how has rural identity became a political force entirely untethered from actual rural residence or geographically rural areas? That seems deeply important and would illuminate a lot politically.
it's funny that the tack against the poststructuralists has moved from "they're mystics who say nonsense and believe in nothing" to "they're all-powerful institutional lords who have dictated the constraints of policy and discourse"
Much of my academic training is in intellectual history.
So to understand the ideas about group identity that have become powerful so quickly, I did a TON of reading.
Here's the true story of the origins of "woke"—and how it explains many themes of today's left.
A loooong 🧵.
put it this way: if the "applied" versions of much social science went away, it would probably be a net win for humanity. if the humanities went away, it would incrementally damage our collective critical abilities, but nothing would really happen as a result. the crisis 4/
Dep. Commissioner Daughtry says he found "a book on terrorism" at Columbia. (The book is not a how-to book, but a history written by a renowned British historian.)
should not be sought where a weak node, if removed, would make almost no difference - if you think the humanities is the problem but aren't paying attention to the broader data/knowledge crisis, including the replication scandal, you've lost the plot End/
i wrote for
@GlobeIdeas
about the wild misperception that universities are "left-wing." in reality, universities have swung sharply rightward with the rest of our society 1/
When I say stuff like this, sometimes others accuse me of presenting an overly romantic view of the uneducated masses. A lot of regular folks are, after all, ignorant idiots.
Well, let me tell you all about a group of highly educated people we call "academics" . . .
i'm an expert in this area and this is an important area of research in the development of modern science and the way we interpret it as humans, as well as how we formed our current notion of ecology. "garbage in, garbage out" applies to congress more than the humanities
UPDATE: the Chicago Manual of Style has banned all citations. if you cite anything *at all* a guy from the press will come to your home and beat you up while screaming about original thought. i'm excited for the this long-overdue change.
this reminds me of Michael Denning's notion of the "university-hospital city" - part of a larger real-estate wealth-parking organization that converges with the end of fundamental research and the rise of "applied science," a national risk from any angle
for
@nytimes
i wrote about the situation at WVU.
@OnlyMyya
has covered the losses to students beautifully and
@DrLisaCorrigan
has shown the plan for higher ed. i focus on the "educational gerrymandering" of this despicable proposal 1/
@slucy
@jjoque
i think the point is that it's far over-applied, not that all of it is bad; also i seem to remember software and capital interests killing some 800 people last year
happy to say that "Surplus Data" is forthcoming as a special issue of Critical Inquiry, co-edited w/
@JeffreyKirkwood
, Orit Halpern, and Patrick Jagoda: Co-authored piece, "Indexical AI," with
@b____j_____
Watch people react when they don’t expect art, this is why Hegel put it in the category of “absolute spirit,” you can see these people just freeze as they’re transported into divine sadness
In which a dean critiques my article and says “this is definitely not how it works!” only to have a tenured historian at his own institution point out that they’re doing a cluster hire which does the exact thing I accuse them of doing. But don’t worry it’s “spread-sheet based.”
Join us in Berlin for a conference on “Semiotic Machines” co-hosted by the ZfL and the Digital Theory Lab on May 29-31, with a scorching lineup. Drop by!
Clarence Thomas threatened to quit SCOTUS unless he could get rich, so Republican politicians arranged for billionaires to start inundating him with money and gifts in exchange for his continued service. He gladly accepted the trade-off.
my cybernetics course is featured on NYU publicity here, you can see both the general approach and my LLM exercise with photos from a few weeks ago in lecture:
since people are learning this term: cluster hiring, among other practices, is a kind of final nail in "faculty governance" which shifts the forward legacy of shaping research to administrators instead of members of actual fields. this is a far more pressing issue than "DEI"
i wrote a feature for Jacobin, now out from the paywall, about Chomsky's linguistics, his politics, and the need for a cultural theory of automated language in the new era of AI. come for the Big Lebowksi, stay bc you're mad at my take on Taylor Swift and universal grammar
ChatGPT feeds on language, outputting texts that reinforce the basic assumptions of our culture. The rise of AI forces the Left to take a hard look at the politics of language and the linguistics of Noam Chomsky.
The funniest part about this is that this is not how purveyors of luxury goods act. When we say the university is using a customer-service model we should specify that it’s the fast-fashion one, not like the Wüsthof one
Every quantitative metric universities lean on to assess performance – whether of students (grades) or faculty (evaluations) – is negatively correlated with learning. Studies continue to bear this out, and yet colleges keep doubling down on what is basically alchemy for admins.
Tom Cotton is a world-class asshole who regularly pushes back the frontier of asshole, but the people who think we exist at a high point of political threats and violence perplex me. There were assassinations, church bombings, students shot on college campuses in the 60s/70s.
was delighted to speak with
@Tyler_A_Harper
for this article on "disabling technologies." the marketing strategy is to sell disempowerment as liberation and empowerment. AI is an algorithmic screen that changes the playing field of our cognitive-cultural abilities
"Even if your personalized dating concierge is not here yet, the sales pitch for them has already arrived, and that sales pitch is almost as dangerous as the technology itself: AI will teach you how to be a human,"
@Tyler_A_Harper
writes:
on March 30/31, join the Digital Theory Lab on Zoom or in person for showcase conversation and doubleheader between Hayles and Deacon, two of the most important thinkers about what is happening in AI of our generation. register here:
The Daily Beast just ruined my day. They claimed Jamaal Bowman wrote his 9.11 conspiracy theories in blank verse - getting me really excited - and then it turned out he clearly wrote them in *free verse,* which is way less funny
"Somebody is radicalizing out students" Deputy Commissioner of Operations Kaz spoke after NYU and New School raid this morning, "we will find out who that is". Chief of Patrol John Chell showed literature found inside the New School 'Gaza Solidarity Encampment' after it was
Every time this argument comes up I get this response that’s like “lol academia is so liberal” and I’m begging ppl to be serious about institutions versus personal beliefs. I agree that the problem is the pipeline (we couldn’t find a conservative candidate in any 1/
@ajbauer
Sure that’s fair — I’m mainly thinking of the humanities. I agree with
@leifweatherby
in general that the applied social sciences are functionally conservative.
A friend and I had a disagreement over how to interpret a message from ChatGPT. But then I wondered: what determines the *correct* interpretation if there's no authorial intent?
this is one of the best reviews i've read in some time, really capturing the depth and the "materialism" of Daston's new book, while pointing out that it sidesteps the problem of modeling, which is outside her terminological focus but squarely inside the problem she's addressing
beyond punishment the main way we've absorbed this crisis, still widening, is *procedurally* - the question of *what we know* - the picture of the world that a huge cluster of sciences claims is true - has not been adjusted, no epistemological reckoning has happened. it must
The biggest ongoing scandal in academia ought to be that it turned out in mid-2010s that 50% of studies in Psych were failing to replicate--but nobody's career has been penalized. Not a single demotion over the mass-fraud; instead much Bushesque "heckuva job Brownie" promotions.
when someone tells you they can model something like "honesty" you could, i don't know, NOT pay them a top-3 salary at Harvard University, you really can make that choice
re-upping my ChatGPT/ideology piece as we see this Gemini thing roll out. there are several places where "ideology" can be produced in these systems: training data, human-feedback learning, and filters (hard-coding). Gemini appears to be a hard-coding issue (i have no special 1/n
i seriously feel a bit of sympathy for Thomas here, i watch so many George-W-Bush-ass intellectuals call in favors owed to their dads and then act like they hit a triple
people in the culture industry including all academics are stuck in college the way stereotypically small-town people are stuck in the glory days of high school
BREAKING: Penn asked the Philadelphia Police Department to immediately help disband the College Green encampment — and the PPD declined to do so until Penn proves that the situation is more dangerous.
From
@diamywang
:
we're SO back. you've heard of the digital humanities, the environmental humanities, even the medical humanities - now get ready for the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE HUMANITIES
the central epistemological divide of our time is those who think AI is/isn't intelligent and those who know its significance lies in its unprecedented manipulation of representation systems
for
@thedailybeast
i wrote about "Tesla Syndrome," where digital upgrades make even simple things worse. i argue owners are winning a virtually invisible class war against CEOs; wealth is destroying even the minimal promise of market capitalism