There’s something mean and almost contemptuous about expecting people in their 80s and 90s to adjust to closure of familiar services like banks, train ticket offices etc and adjusting to digital banking and e-commerce.
Advocacy point - If you think your opponent has said something stupid, respond with caution; don’t go in studs up like Theresa Coffey.
That’ll avoid the risk of you looking monumentally stupid yourself
To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!
Brain: this is getting serious
Small part of my brain (8 year old): Come on, close the courts. Works off forever. Make a fort in front of tv.
Brain: and then you’ll have no income
oh
Kwasi Kwatang once rudely pushed in front of me in a queue for a bacon roll at a wedding.
I’d like not to be small minded about this but. Dish served cold.
If LinkedIn had existed when I started work I’d probably have run a mile and chosen another profession
How have we - barristers and solicitors - embraced this grandstanding, self-obsessing, triumphalist, deranged, massively inappropriate, navel gazing form of bragging? 🤮
The maddening thing it that this is a brilliant address from Boris Johnson. How you can be blessed with such talent and also let down by so many craven weaknesses.
You've probably read a lot about John McCain. You probably think you know the story about what happened to him when he was captured as a POW. But I urge you to read this by David Foster Wallace. Just read it.
Barristers behaving badly:
I’ve not read criticism of counsel like this before in a judgment, or such a clear expression of professional standards
Thanks to
@Ali__B
for pointing out this interesting Canadian case
A must read for lawyers - Court scolds counsel for disruptive behaviour including eye rolling, head shaking, grunting, snickering, guffawing and loud muttering. China Yantai Friction Co. Ltd. v Novalex Inc., 2024 ONSC 608 at paras. 20 - 27
#lawtwitter
So far this year, I've received emails titled
"URGENT"
"Very Urgent"
"Extremely Urgent"
"Very, very urgent"
Only a matter of time before someone tries Urgenter. Or Urgentest
It wasn’t so long ago barristers weren’t allowed to market themselves, to the extent that having a business card was misconduct.
Looking at the posts on LinkedIn crowing about cross examining and court wins, part of me thinks it would have been better if wed kept quiet
Another reason to love the
@BarristerSecret
book: referencing Hanlon's Razor, which in my experience applies to about 90% of cases;
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Farewell old friend. Shockingly expensive at the time. Rarely used over 25 years (I hadn’t appreciated virtually all cases heard in private). Happily it’s found a new home with one of our pupils.
“What cuts in spending, what taxes would you raise, to follow Europe’s fiscal rules?”
@afneil
asks the SNP’s David Linden about financial changes the Scottish government would need to make to meet EU rules
#andrewneilshow
David Sherborne KC reads out Prince Harry's statement.
"The court has found that Mirror group's principle board directors, their legal department, senior executives & editors, such as Piers Morgan, clearly knew about or were involved in these illegal activities.."
Theory:
You can carbon date the age of the barrister by how they refer in court to: “my client” (over 50), “my side” (40 and over), “my team” (under 40), first name terms (under 35)
@paulhunter62
I’ve just spent the morning explaining internet banking and while its straightforward if you’re used to it, it’s not easy if you struggle with technology. It’s depressing that this is how the world is going
Progress:
1999: Pick up papers. Read papers, advise.
2019: Open first of 15 emails. Print off dozen attachments in the first email. Start on the second email. Realise I missed an attachment from the first. Printer jams. Put head in printer. Start again. Printer jams
The basic rule is:
Email w. Word document = feel free to amend.
Email w. PDF document = if you even think about correcting my grammar one more time, I will hunt you down and beat you to death with a thesaurus
Listen to Michelle Mone try to explain that her *family* has not made tens of millions of pounds. It’s just her *husband* who has made tens of millions of pounds
I just misread enclosed as behold and it strikes me life would be a lot better if emails said "Behold my skeleton argument"/ "Behold my client's views"/ "Behold thy typos"
Every single skeleton argument, case summary and position statement would be improved by following these rules
In fact, Orwell's rules should be grafted onto PD27A
I’ve always written tooth fairy letters for my children. Years and years of little notes saying thank you for the tooth and don’t spend all the money on sweets.
Wrote one today which could be the last one.
And now I have a lump in my throat
"It was definitely the wrong thing to do. But at the time I felt it was the honourable and right thing to do."
The Duke of York speaks to
#Newsnight
about his links to Jeffrey Epstein and his decision to stay with him
WATCH TONIGHT 21:00
@BBCTwo
@maitlis
A quick tip:
How to turn off unnecessary track changes that show formatting changes, leaving only substantive changes:
Review| Mark-up Options| untick 'Formatting'
Watching Trump’s counsel at the impeachment is like that dream where your QC doesn’t arrive at court. And you’ve not read the papers. And the Supreme Court clerk says they’ve been waiting for you for 20 minutes.
Five year old daughter says she can’t breathe, temperature soars. Advised by 111 to drive to A&E. Frantically try to keep her from falling asleep. Told to mask up and go to “coronavirus pod”.
And... she’s ok. Just a cold.
Emotional rollercoaster doesn’t even begin to cover it
Fascinating insights from a 1958 book on barristers
"...it is difficult for a Common Lawyer to understand... why anyone should want to go to the Divorce or Criminal Bars. So much of the work there is sordid or monotonous or both..."
"A fact-finding hearing is not free-standing litigation...It is not to be allowed to become an opportunity for the parties to air their grievances. Nor is it a chance for parents to seek the court's validation of their perception of what went wrong in their relationship" (K v K)
Significant case on fact finding hearings in children cases: K v K [2022] EWCA Civ 468; reviews Re HN
§§ 67 to 70 in particular - Addresses misunderstanding about court's role: only list FFH where 'strictly necessary' to determine application.
It was an honour being a Queen's Counsel, even if only for six months.
I can now look forward to 30 years in the future when people will say 'he's so old, he started out as a QC'
Many thanks for all of your kind messages following the QC announcement
In particular to the solicitors who have instructed me, my colleagues and clerks
@1kbwChambers
and everyone who helped in my application
Per Slade (not LJ), Merry Xmas Everybody
It’s always an honour to be instructed as a private FDR judge, and it’s a great satisfaction when my indication leads to settlement. Today was the sixth in a row in 2021.
@DavidMuttering
@john_self
Peter Cook, in response to David Frost inviting him to dinner with Prince Andrew and Fergie:
“Hang on, I'll just check my diary. Oh dear, I find I'm watching television that night”
Having a name that ends with an x, and occasionally typing the same key twice by mistake, means I sign off emails
"Dear Judge... Skeleton argument attached, Regards, Alex x"
You basically spend 12 months having a pupil master crossing out the adjectives in your skeleton, so that you can spend the rest of your career emailing documents to solicitors who then add them all back in.
As part of the New Year purge, the less loved cuddly toys were bagged up.
It turns out no charity shops are open at 9am. You can’t leave things outside. So I’m now going to court with a bag full of teddies and lions aimed at preschoolers. Should give security a good laugh.
For some reason I was reminded today of a kindly circuit judge who used to invite counsel into his room for a word before the case began
His opening gambit was always the same: "Do you smoke?", as he offered a packet of Rothmans.
Feels like a memory from a century ago
Todays discovery. Shops price children’s stuff by colour. Orange flask £9.99. Identical blue flask £14.99
And my children simultaneously rolled their eyes as I discussed this with the manager
Some long running cases have terrible denouements. This might have had nothing to do with the litigation but it’s a sobering reminder that behind every law report is a human being