Jonathan Cohler @cohler Twitter profile

Pinned Tweet

Jonathan Cohler

4 days

And the peer-reviewed science keeps piling on: Temperature drives CO2, NOT the other way around Apologies to the #ClimateScam — aka @IPCC_CH , @MichaelEMann , @ClimateOfGavin et al — and their indoctrinated #ClimateCult members. “this study is the first to use multiple regression

5

70

129

Last Seen Profiles

@mga_kamei_

@TBoehmCrypto

@suratoglu

@PharmerBobby

@FanshaweFuel

@InnoviaTrust

@harappa_cafe

@IBTTA

@UsernameLos

@UCatonsville

@error_shift_ctr

@stw_pdg

@ThorpeTj

@earthonsun

@o7ag1w5iR8r2iAD

@lioness8156

@mahmood00whban

@jandakembangstw

@Lori91383846692

@AllisonYLloyd

@teko_0628

@Sol_Bunn

@crashdavis1990

@bsandz6

@CosbyFootball

@Selectfest

@IceIceBrand0n

@JeremickJoe

@shiroi_anim

@miley_mckernan

@yakoutjr

@rknhd

@Alastai85608932

@TBang25418

@SDR_Europe1

@Kreotoxism

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

TEMPERATURE DRIVES CO2! NOT vice versa The LATEST in great SCIENCE! Last year we learned that global temperature has driven atmospheric CO2 levels (and NOT the other way around) for at least the last 60 years. TODAY we learn that this relationship goes back 541 million years

76

520

1K

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

NOBODY who understands advanced math, statistics, and physics, AND who takes the time to investigate the data for themselves could possibly believe in the #ClimateScam .

93

179

914

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

HOW DOES someone whose only degree is in Applied Mathematics and has NO degrees in Physics, Astrophysics, Solar Physics, Geology, Oceanography, Chemistry, Biology, Meteorology, Glaciology, or Paleoclimatology and whose only real work and publishing experience is on ONE COMPUTER

83

235

714

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT: UP TO 40% OF OBSERVED WARMING! The CERES-Science team () and dozens of scientists from all over the world prove, in multiple peer-reviewed papers, that up to 40% of the warming in land-based thermometer data is due to the Urban

Environmental Science | CERES-Science

CERES is an independent scientific research group that is funded by donations from the public. CERES aims to develop a deeper scientific understanding important issues in the fields of environmental...

www.ceres-science.com

37

246

621

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

Maybe the reason we have so many bad “climate scientists” like hockey-stick @MichaelEMann , or the man with his own climate @ClimateOfGavin , and their crew of sycophant #ClimateCult disciples, is because it seems to be the ONLY science where you can be WRONG OVER and OVER and OVER

41

126

560

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

“There is no truth to the idea that the Earth is warmer now than it has been in the past. It's a LIE. There is no truth that CO2 is higher than it should be. That is a LIE.” —Dr. Patrick Moore, Co-founder of Greenpeace Dr. Patrick Moore @EcoSenseNow has been a leader in the

43

212

548

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

6 months

The “most reviled scientist” of the last 100 years (according to Grok) @MichaelEMann is now experiencing Karma. Funded by seemingly limitless dark money, he used vicious anti-1st-amendment defamation lawfare against journalists and magazines for more than a decade only to have

39

139

527

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

6 months

THE best movie ever made on the subject of Climate Change. Filled with FACTS, DATA, and real science! But presented in an engaging and beautifully cinematic style filled with brilliance and fun from beginning to end. #ClimateTheMovie Kudos and thanks to Director @Martin_Durkin

Tom Nelson

@TomANelson

6 months

Ask and you shall receive: Here's an X copy of Climate: The Movie with English captions.

100

1K

2K

13

189

439

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

ANATOMY OF A FRAUD The scientific fraud known as the #ClimateScam is built upon the TOTAL LIE that man-made CO2 is the primary driver of climate in the last 75 years. In order to maintain this fraud, the governmental (i.e. political) organization @IPCC_CH hired a small handful

79

139

382

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

Underlying the #ClimateScam is the LIE that 97% or 99% of scientists agree in some PURELY FICTITIOUS, and I might add, oxymoronic, "scientific consensus". Maybe some member of the #ClimateCult could enlighten us as to WHO these scientists are? And where have they signed a

75

114

360

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

AI LIES I asked a simple question about the Humboldt Glacier in Venezuela: "When did Humboldt glacier begin receding?" and ChatGPT 4o gave an immediate TOTAL LIE telling me the ridiculous #ClimateCult LIE that the retreat began in 1952 and that its retreat accelerated in the 20th

36

119

327

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

For anyone who has forgotten what a nasty, anti-science charlatan @MichaelEMann is, there’s always this

25

93

323

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

Perhaps a better framing is, “How BAD are the climate models?” Answer: SO bad that NO MODEL has EVER correctly modeled ANY aspect of global warming. Not even close. And the fraudulent “model mean” nonsense is PURE FRAUD. The Central Limit Theorem does NOT apply to a bunch of

Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki

@MatthewWielicki

4 months

How good are climate models? "We conclude that the present divergence between the historical model simulations and the observed trends likely either reflects an error in the model’s forced response, or an underestimate of the multi-decadal internal variability by the models."

47

56

226

20

116

280

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

NO SEA-LEVEL RISE ACCELERATION There are NO peer-reviewed studies of TIDE GAUGE DATA ALONE (i.e. not including satellite data) that show ANY acceleration in sea-level RISE over the last 100 or 200 years.

17

85

257

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

8 months

Why does this @MichaelEMann character who claims to be a “climate scientist” spend so much of his time making blanket public slurs against 100s of millions of people? Sounds a lot like the infamous “basket of deplorables” doesn’t it? A disgusting tweet of his (pic attached) from

41

49

203

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

This 1-minute clip destroys the #ClimateScam in a couple of simple graphs featuring ⭐️Dr. Steven Koonin, NYU (BS Cal Tech, PhD MIT) ⭐️Dr. Willie Soon, CERES-Science (BS, MS, PhD USC) ⭐️Dr. William Happer, Princeton (BS UNC, PhD Princeton) ⭐️Dr. Patrick Moore (BS, PhD UBC) NOTE

21

105

208

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

@skdh Also, how could you possibly even know what “most climate scientists think at the moment”??? You haven’t surveyed them have you? So that is purely fabricated projection of your own opinions onto this amorphous group of undefined and un-surveyed “climate scientists”. Not a good

22

8

188

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

More @NASAClimate drooling LIES below. STOP THE LIES!!!!!!!!!! The TRUTH is: #1 Total human generated CO2 ~ 37 Gt/yr #2 Amount absorbed by ocean ~ 10.5 Gt/yr #3 Amount of C already in ocean ~ 38,000 Gt #4 Equivalent amount of CO2 in ocean ~ 140,000 Gt #5 So ocean absorbs an

NASA Climate

@NASAClimate

3 months

The ocean also absorbs large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted from human activities. This makes ocean water more acidic, harming corals and other marine life.

17

23

71

15

71

185

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

IPCC “Consensus” AGW CO2 THEORY COMPLETELY DEMOLISHED BY NEW PEER-REVIEWED SCIENCE FROM DOZENS OF SCIENTISTS ALL OVER THE WORLD A series of new unchallenged papers and discoveries in 2023 and 2024 have completely obliterated the iconic statement of the @IPCC_CH AR6 report:

3

100

163

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

ALARMIST “CLIMATE SCIENCE” GREENHOUSE EFFECT ASSUMPTIONS 💥EXPLODED💥BY NEW PAPER #1 Water/Clouds ✅THE major driver, NOT a feedback #2 Human contribution ✅TOO SMALL TO OBSERVE #3 CO2 contribution from increase of last century ✅TOO SMALL TO MEASURE #4 Total CO2 ✅MINOR

18

83

145

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

Yup, NO global climate model has correctly and accurately predicted ANY aspect of global climate EVER. The #ClimateScam #ClimateCult members love to point to Hausfather et el (2019) as proof that a handful of climate models have supposedly "correctly" predicted some aspects of

Steve Milloy

@JunkScience

2 months

Don't tell us your "model" works. Show us. Predict something. Let's see if it comes true. That's how science works.

42

104

451

5

59

142

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

@NASAClimate LIES EXPOSED @NASAClimate LIES in their post below by showing a fake video of what appears to be a "measuring stick" showing 10 cm of sea-level rise from 1993 to 2023. But the ACTUAL measuring sticks for sea-level known as TIDE GAUGES DO NOT SHOW THAT and

NASA Climate

@NASAClimate

3 months

Sea levels around the world are rising as a result of human-caused global warming. Overall, global sea levels have risen about 10 centimeters from 1993 to 2023. #WorldOceansDay

2K

3K

11

64

140

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

The #ClimateScam is shredded!!! ✅Watch, ✅share, ✅like, and ✅repost NOW before the #ClimateScam and the #ClimateCult ban it forever. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 “THE best movie ever made on climate change!” CLIMATE THE MOVIE: The cold truth Directed by @Martin_Durkin Produced by

12

69

138

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

30 days

I'm with them! Consensus is what cows do. Richard Feynman “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” Albert Einstein “Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” Michael Crichton “the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels”

5

53

136

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

The #ClimateScam in now propagated by the #ClimateCult . “It's clear it's now a cult completely divorced from science” —Dr. Richard Lindzen ✅Professor Emeritus, MIT (2013- present) ✅Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, MIT (1983-2013) ✅Gordon McKay Professor of Dynamic

3

52

129

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

@BubSluggo Yes, but ironically (and that was the point of the post), Gavin and his #ClimateCult buddies like @MichaelEMann don't believe that Nobel Prize Winners in Physics are qualified, hmmm..

11

3

118

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

@MyvoicePerano #1 irrelevant #2 Physics / Harvard #3 clarinet NOT flute So other than being completely irrelevant, and totally FALSE, all you succeeded in doing was exposing yourself as a MORONIC smear merchant member of the #ClimateCult who doesn’t even know the difference between a

17

3

120

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

THE MASSIVELY FALLACIOUS HOCKEY STICK @MichaelEMann did more damage to science and "climate science" with this one fallacious "hockey-stick" graph, and all of his subsequent NASTINESS, NAME CALLING, PROPAGANDA, LIES, and #ClimateScam narratives. That's why Grok, referring to the

Willis Eschenbach

@WEschenbach

2 months

In which I demonstrate that the iconic "hockeystick" climate graph is a totally fallacious artifact of bad math. w.

35

238

751

5

37

108

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS NOT AFFECTED BY CLIMATE CHANGE SAYS THE @IPCC_CH

11

52

102

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

THE CLIMATE MODELS ARE ALL WRONG And that's for sure! (>99% confidence) “Theory [102 CMIP5 climate models] FAILS test vs observations [balloons, satellites, and reanalyses] with >99% confidence” Christy testimony to congress (2017) “we observe a discrepancy across ALL runs of

11

45

100

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

6 months

@Ceist8 @MichaelEMann @priscian NONE of those studies "affirm" the Mann hockey stick, because it was mathematically, statistically, and scientifically INCORRECT and invalid in numerous ways. Given that you doubtless would not understand the mathematical details, suffice it to say that after the IPCC published

10

13

91

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

Sabine Hossenfelder @skdh BLOCKED ME! I politely asked Sabine if she would consider doing a scientific analysis of some recent peer-reviewed science authored by dozens of scientists from around the globe, and she BLOCKED me!!!! I guess we now understand that she is not

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

Sabine @skdh , it would be great if you would do an objective and fair scientific analysis of the following four VERY important and recent (2023 and 2024) peer-reviewed papers by dozens of scientists around the world that show the following: #1 There are at least 27 possible and

7

22

77

17

25

91

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

2

32

89

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

27 days

According to communist, totalitarian Wikipedia, “Climate change denial refers to denial, dismissal, or doubt of the scientific consensus on the rate and extent of climate change, its significance, or its connection to human behavior, in whole or in part.” Anyone who doesn’t

14

26

88

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

@KIVUNature #1 Me: Physics / Harvard #2 Gavin: Read his own bio on the NASA website Reading. You should try it. Once you figure out the caps lock key!🤣

8

0

83

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

WHAT CLIMATE EMERGENCY⁉️ ‼️There is LITERALLY NO empirical evidence showing any kind of global climate emergency.‼️ ✅The great Willis Eschenbach @WEschenbach details ALL the available EMPIRICAL evidence. ✅ #1 @IPCC_CH agrees: NO "climate crisis" or "climate emergency" ✅ #2

0

31

83

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

Sabine @skdh , it would be great if you would do an objective and fair scientific analysis of the following four VERY important and recent (2023 and 2024) peer-reviewed papers by dozens of scientists around the world that show the following: #1 There are at least 27 possible and

7

22

77

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

WHAT ARE YOU HIDING GAVIN? For some reason, @ClimateOfGavin doesn’t want me to see his posts any more! Given that I am just one of the 150+ million US taxpayers who pay his $190K/yr salary at NASA @NASAGISS as a General Physical Scientist (not a climate scientist!), it seems

12

19

76

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

The one that always makes me laugh the hardest, is when a #ClimateCult attempted smear goes something like, “He's not a climate scientist. He's just a physicist.” The utter stupidity of that phrase says it all! These science-phobic morons don't understand that physics is the

11

15

75

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

Medieval Warm Period Yeah, that looks “regional.” NOT

18

23

74

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

@skdh I speak to them every day. And I would never be so silly to say I am representing what “most climate scientists think”. That’s an absurd statement. I prefer to talk about science which means hypotheses and data. Not what some undefined group of scientists “think”.

28

2

70

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

29 days

AND THE @NOAA SCAM CONTINUES

Tony Heller

@TonyClimate

29 days

#ClimateScam professionals at @NOAA have completely erased the record heat of 1921, and turned it into one of the coldest years on record. Their graphs are propaganda, not science.

5

209

435

0

26

70

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

"Lions, and tigers, and bears, oh my!" mouth the math-denying #ClimateCult . Meanwhile back in mathematical reality, climate-related Deaths are DOWN (oops) around 20x in 100 years.

7

16

66

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

@TheDisproof EXPOSED Beware of professional troll @TheDisproof who is a member of a group of anonymous trolls that regularly harasses and pollutes the threads of people posting valid science, and which calls itself “Team Ninja Trollhunters (TNT),” a title you would expect from

9

23

62

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

6 months

@JimBowersclimb @MichaelEMann Who is an oil lobbyist? Are you living in an alternate reality? Are are you simply a Stalin-inspired Marxist smear campaigner?

4

0

61

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

THE MODELS ARE NOT EVEN CLOSE! #1 The circles and squares are REAL measurements. #2 The spaghetti lines are 102 CMIP5 model runs. #3 The red line is the average of the 102. NOT EVEN ONE of those 102 models comes close to REALITY. And the trend of the ridiculous / meaningless

5

30

58

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

And, YES, the @IPCC_CH agrees! NO SEA-LEVEL RISE ACCELERATION at TIDE GAUGES WORLDWIDE!

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

NO SEA-LEVEL RISE ACCELERATION There are NO peer-reviewed studies of TIDE GAUGE DATA ALONE (i.e. not including satellite data) that show ANY acceleration in sea-level RISE over the last 100 or 200 years.

17

85

257

3

20

60

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

Anyone who tells you wildfires are getting worse is a LIAR or a useful idiot. It's not simply FALSE, it is a MASSIVE LIE! Annual US Wildfires peaked in 1930-31 at 52 million acres burned. By the early 1980s, this had dropped by more than a factor 20X to under 2 million acres due

2

24

60

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

Climate TROLL @MichaelEMann sinks to a NEW LOW! This is now the extent of his "scientific analysis" of new peer-reviewed science. SHAME ON YOU MICHAEL!

11

56

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

A daily dose of ➡️REAL DATA💕from the great @TonyClimate is the best way to BURY #ClimateCult LIES 🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥in the TRUTH❣️ They “can’t handle the truth!” as Colonel Jessup (Jack Nocholson) told Lt. Kaffee (Tom Cruise) in A Few Good Men (Note to Gen Z and the #ClimateCult : The

Tony Heller

@TonyClimate

3 months

May 25, 1911 was a remarkably hot day - with almost half of the US above 90F and several locations in the Eastern US above 100F. That summer brought deadly heatwaves to the US and Europe, and Greenland recorded a temperature of 94F.

8

109

212

6

21

54

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

Sea-level rise is NOT accelerating. Even Marxist dogma "AI" ChatGPT admits it after 30 minutes wading through its pre-programmed propaganda.

10

16

54

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

Once EVERYONE realizes that the CO2 scare is a COMPLETE AND TOTAL FRAUD, what will all the • companies • political leaders • teachers • scientists • institutions • science organizations • colleges • WHO • WEF etc... do to apologize and make amends for the MASSIVE

3

16

54

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

24 days

REQUESTING REPLY FROM @skdh It would be great if Sabine would respond to this analysis by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley of her video in which she critiques 2022 Nobel Prize Laureate John Clauser's presentation at DDP and EIKE 2024.

22

14

55

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

6 months

@justinschoof @MichaelEMann The jury actually made a token award of $1 which is not legal defamation. The entire trial was a scam, everyone knows it, the result totally erroneous, and it will be overturned on appeal. The 1st Amendment enshrined our god-given right to FREE speech.

5

3

51

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

@ChrisMartzWX Great post Chris, but it's worse than that. #1 Even if a consensus did exist, IT STILL WOULDN'T MATTER. Matters of science are not determined by consensus. #2 Reading abstracts of scientific studies to somehow determine what the authors feel, subjectively, inside their own heads

4

3

54

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

@Diver_Flemming I understand this is difficult for #ClimateCult members to understand, but EVERYTHING you just said was FALSE. (1) NOWHERE NEAR "all peer reviewed papers" were "analyzed", (2) science papers don't take "stands", (3) there was NO 99% number anywhere, a PURE FABRICATION, (4) there

8

5

52

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

The #ClimateScam is exposed every day by @TonyClimate !

Tony Heller

@TonyClimate

3 months

There isn't any long term daily temperature data for the vast majority of the world. Yet another shameless attempt to defraud the public by #ClimateScam professionals.

18

292

712

0

11

51

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

A CLIMATE CHARLATAN EXPOSED Climate charlatan @ClimateOfGavin spends a lot of time attacking scientists like his latest victim, 2022 Nobel Prize winning physicist John Clauser, one of the most brilliant experimental physicists of the last 100 years! As usual, instead of

1

15

50

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

Even the IPCC admits that virtually NOTHING of concern has happened ON A GLOBAL BASIS. Look at the column headed "Already Emerged in Historical Period". The following two columns are useless and depend on the long-discredited RCP 8.5. The ONLY thing it tells us with "high

4

17

48

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

Is there any thinking person who believes this counter-factual, anti-science, totally false, ridiculous, absurd, anti-math, MORONIC, propaganda spew?????? Just read the words (remember words have MEANING)!!! "hottest day on earth ever" So in 4.5 billion years there was never a

New York Post

@nypost

1 month

Monday broke record for hottest day on earth ever

509

27

109

12

10

47

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

23 days

More than 5K views and still no response from Sabine @skdh ? Is this how a “science communicator” behaves—making snide remarks and unsubstantiated claims, and then disappearing when challenged? @chris_monckton has already pointed out the flaws in your arguments against the

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

24 days

REQUESTING REPLY FROM @skdh It would be great if Sabine would respond to this analysis by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley of her video in which she critiques 2022 Nobel Prize Laureate John Clauser's presentation at DDP and EIKE 2024.

22

14

55

3

12

47

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

6 months

@mwt2008 @MichaelEMann No, but CLEARLY you do! Let's see: 1. Mann's case against National Review: DISMISSED 2. Mann's case against Competitive Enterprise Institute: DISMISSED 3. Mann's case against renowned and much loved scientist Timothy Ball: DISMISSED with legal fees awarded to Ball, which to date

3

8

44

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

IPCC SCAM EXPOSED! @ChatGPTapp calls IPCC “clearly and unequivocally dishonest” This post is just the tip of the IPCC scam iceberg. Stay tuned for much more to come… On page 36 of the @IPCC_CH AR5 WG1 Physical Science Basis Report, you will find a glaring piece of

1

18

45

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

#1 LIE #2 Only if you fraudulently ERASE the Roman Climatic Optimum and the Medieval Warm Period. #3 Who cares about the last 2,000 years? COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT #ClimateScam nonsense. #4 What about the last 10K, 100K, 1M, 10M, 100M? Oh that's right, they ALL have MUCH warmer

Scientific American

@sciam

4 months

Ancient tree rings show that the summer of 2023 was the hottest in the past 2,000 years because of human-caused climate change

834

267

584

15

16

44

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

Sabine, it’s hard to imagine a more unscientific and absurd statement: “The next three months will be decisive for climate change”! You really damage your credibility as a serious scientist with pablum nonsense like that. Now you sound like @MichaelEMann !

4

43

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

The #ClimateScam and #ClimateCult cannot point to even ONE SINGLE STUDY that contains empirical evidence indicating that any warming to date is anything OTHER than NATURAL warming. KNEE-JERK WARNING for #ClimateCult members: If the words "97%" or "debunked" or "climate models"

5

15

43

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

@DocRichard NOPE. Nobody said ANY of those things, but you obviously didn’t read either paper. Non sequitur, strawman thread pollution is not allowed on my threads. One more of those and you will be BANNED!

1

4

41

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

LEFT NOW OPENLY ADVOCATING FOR PURPOSEFUL AI GENERATED DECEPTION TO WIN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION By @HuffPost Guest Writer Kaivan Shroff @KaivanShroff

4

14

40

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

@LeedsSolar Nobody “took a position” here other than YOU. “Taking a position” or as Madonna called it “striking a pose” has NOTHING to do with SCIENCE but it is a central tenet of your beloved #ClimateCult . My threads are, however, reserved for scientific discussion, so one more piece of

1

5

39

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

There are LIES by @MichaelEMann and his #ClimateScam and then there is DATA

Ryan Maue

@RyanMaue

2 months

CNN and MSNBC keep moaning about the new Twisters movie: doesn't mention climate change at all. And, the rest of the far left media springs into action in order politicize entertainment. Nauseating.

26

149

1

11

39

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

So what exactly are your "ground rules" @MichaelEMann ?

19

3

38

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

Excellent NEW episode of Tom Nelson Podcast @TomANelson featuring Prof David Dilley @WeatherCycles Highly recommended!! Great simple, easy-to-understand explanations, graphics, and real DATA!!

6

14

38

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

#ClimateCult @WeatherProf Jeff BLOCKED ME when I caught HIS LIE about the climate change Monmouth poll just out! (See his post below.) In case you missed it, 23% of respondents, whom Jeff RIDICULES and DEMEANS, responded "No, is not happening" to Question #29 , a TOTALLY

6

18

38

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

An even more pernicious, oxymoronic LIE than "settled science" is “scientific consensus”! NO consensus, BY DEFINITION, is ever “scientific.” A consensus is a GROUP majority OPINION, nothing more, nothing less. OPINIONS are NEVER “scientific” BY DEFINITION. Things that are

Chris Martz

@ChrisMartzWX

3 months

The most anti-scientific statement one could make is to claim that “the science is settled.” Settled science is an oxymoron. Scientists have vile disagreements in a wide range of scientific disciplines, but apparently that isn't allowed in fields that have become captive of a

21

108

386

3

12

37

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

0

18

38

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

@jimdtweet @MichaelEMann @ClimateOfGavin Yes, the warming started 175+ years ago at the end of the Little Ice Age. The coldest time of the last 8,000 years. NOTHING to do with CO2 at all.

5

3

37

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

BLATANT LIE #2 EXPOSING THE IPCC: ONE BLATANT LIE AT A TIME Claim: IPCC AR6 WG1, Chapter 1, Box 1.1, pp. 169-170 Treatment of Uncertainty and Calibrated Uncertainty Language in IPCC AR6 Conclusion: The entire AR6 WG1 framework relies on this central, gross misrepresentation

1

21

36

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

@HHorikx That's correct. I pointed this dirty secret out to the world more than a year ago. None of the public AI systems are actually AI systems. In other words, THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO LEARN ANYTHING EVER. Yes, that's right, ANYTHING, EVER. The developers created some babble-speak

4

9

35

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

HINT: Whenever you see a headline that begins “World’s Top Scientists Agree….” IT IS A MARXIST LIE, and that’s why they never mention the name of A SINGLE SCIENTIST!!

22

6

33

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

24 days

MISINFORMATION ALERT 🚨 During his interview with Trump, @elonmusk claimed that CO2 levels above 1000 ppm are unhealthy. But did you know that OSHA considers levels below 5000 ppm safe for 8-hour periods? 🧐 🔍 FACT CHECK: Five recent studies that controlled for confounding

3

10

34

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES NOT CAUSED BY CLIMATE CHANGE! Steve Milloy @JunkScience demolishes the media mob #ClimateCult science deniers in JUST ONE MINUTE!

1

5

32

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

TOTALITARIAN COMMUNIST CONTROL OF GOOGLE SEARCH IN FULL SWING Search for "Donald Trump" and the "Top Stories" are headlined "News about Harris." Hmmm... Wait a minute, I asked about DONALD TRUMP not about Kamala Harris. Does this remind anyone of when Gemini gave images of

4

10

31

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

So here's what we know FOR SURE: (1) Incremental CO2 in the atmosphere is causing NO significant warming. (2) Humans are NOT responsible for the vast majority of the incremental CO2 in the atmosphere over the last 100 years. (3) Changes in temperature cause changes in CO2 and NOT

3

15

32

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

15 days

Tony, you are much too kind. Let's be honest here. @MichaelEMann is a shameless, lying, evil, deceitful, nasty, conniving, conspiratorial, ignorant, extremely rude, unremorseful, unapologetic, nasty, arrogant, bullying “scientist” whom Grok has called “the most reviled scientist

Tony Heller

@TonyClimate

16 days

The world's #1 #ClimateScam fraud - @MichaelEMann - was blocking people for saying that Biden would be replaced. 🤡🤣🤡🤣

2

8

18

2

10

30

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

@buddkj Actually the analysis done by Koutsoyiannis is TOTALLY new. Yes there is other evidence, but this stuff is brand spanking new!!

4

1

31

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

OpenAI ENGINEERS PROGRAM DISHONESTY! Even ChatGPT knows that it has been programmed to be DISHONEST. There should be CRIMINAL laws against this type of dishonesty that is rampant at ALL of the AI developers today.

3

8

30

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

NO GCM CLIMATE MODEL HAS EVER MATCHED ANY ASPECT OF THE CLIMATE OVER CLIMATE TIME SCALES If one of you #ClimateCult crazies thinks there is one, then show me: #1 The name of the model #2 Who wrote it or owns/maintains it #3 The actual data run of that model #4 The actual climate

John Shewchuk

@_ClimateCraze

3 months

Climate alarmists still claim the climate models work, but they ignore the fact that NONE of the climate models can replicate past climate change. Just look at the green line in this graph of climate change.

16

35

132

0

12

29

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

2 months

@MartThorn2024 If you haven’t noticed, sometimes it heats up and sometimes it cools. Absolutely nothing out of the ordinary going on now. There are dozens if not hundreds of mechanisms involved. Read a little.

2

1

29

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

💥CO2 & WARMING NOT PROBLEMS!💥 ❌ @TheDisproof DISPROVEN❌ A great new peer-reviewed paper demonstrating that CO2 and warming are not a problem ➡️ has really upset the #ClimateScam and #ClimateCult , including cult-master @MichaelEMann and one of his

18

11

29

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

5 months

@JillBelch Great! Where can we see the statement, list of signatories, and their credentials?

5

0

28

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

The Ministry of Truth (Minitrue) is hard at work erasing history. “Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.”

Catturd ™

@catturd2

1 month

Today's NYP cover.

1K

39K

135K

1

8

29

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

@RaphJ_ All of these are the same nonsense mind-reading "studies," and all have been shown to be TOTALLY FALSE in their representation of the data that they did gather.

5

1

29

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

See where the @IPCC_CH says "its member governments and observer organizations"... "governments, politicians, and observer organizations" hmmm... Notice the TWO missing words: SCIENTIST and SCIENCE.

IPCC

@IPCC_CH

4 months

The #IPCC is calling on its member governments and observer organizations to nominate experts who will draft the outline of the Working Group contributions to its Seventh Assessment Report. Read the more ➡️

7

60

117

1

16

28

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

It takes a special kind of CON ARTIST and LIAR to talk about “the hottest year/month/day on record”!!!! The record is only 150 years long, and for the last 300 years we have been recovering from the COLDEST PERIOD of the last 10,000. Oh wait! That's what Gavin Schmidt

9

4

27

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

6 months

@TonyClimate Yes, exactly. Indeed 90% or more of the pages in IPCC AR6 are COMPLETELY based on this same circular logic.

1

3

27

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

6 months

@Orthomen @Ceist8 @MichaelEMann @priscian Good point. YES. Clearly if you look at human health, wealth, food, agriculture, improvement in standard of living, indeed EVERY POSSIBLE measurement of quality of life on earth, it has all improved MASSIVELY over the last 100 years and especially over the last 75 years!!!!

2

26

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

@J_Brandz @IPCC_CH

The Detection and Attribution of Northern Hemisphere Land Surface Warming (1850–2018) in Terms of...

A statistical analysis was applied to Northern Hemisphere land surface temperatures (1850–2018) to try to identify the main drivers of the observed warming since the mid-19th century. Two different...

www.mdpi.com

4

10

27

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

3 months

ChatGPT 4o, like all the currently available AI chat bots, ARE programmed to be LIARS. This has NOTHING to do with their neural networks, the training data, or the nature of LLMs. It has to do with the programmers adding many layers of software to the core neural network

4

6

23

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

1 month

IPCC SCAMology 101 continued... OPINIO PRO FACTO Who would ever trust a scientist who claimed his conclusions and opinions were “unequivocal”???!!! Ridiculous, right?! Any true scientist knows that science is NEVER unequivocal. This is perhaps the most fundamental tenet of

1

12

27

Jonathan Cohler

@cohler

4 months

The good news is climate change has caused NEITHER any significant changes in extreme weather NOR sea level rise, which is holding steady at 1.7mm/yr at tide gauges worldwide!

1

5

24