I put the MMU file in Google Drive. Contains blender, obj and stl files.
Note
・It is a model with a small number of polygons for shape confirmation. 3D printing requires modification.
・The shape is a personal expectation and is uncertain.
The factory airframe had not reached the end of the engine. I thought about the possibility that the engine moved forward from the three-view drawing, but there is also a part where the vertical tail is on, so it is unlikely.
I've tried various things, but the shape of the nose doesn't match fatally. If this is the real thing, the nose may have a different shape from the three-sided view.
Considering the total length of the TF-X is 21 m, the correct size for kızılelmayı is pink instead of black. I'll leave the size of the other aircraft up to you.
When I matched it with the first one, the space between the engines was wider than the three-sided drawing. It's easy to fit one image, but it's very difficult to fit multiple images consistently.
If the trailing edge of the horizontal stabilizer remains in its original shape, it will not match the photo taken from the front, so I think it has changed.
The shape of MMU01 assumes a slight deformation based on the shape of the three-sided view. However, the nose part cannot be confirmed in the image taken at the factory. It may be possible that the nose is smaller than I thought.
The upper part of the radome is thin, and the upper line shows a characteristic, but there is no image of the upper part yet, and the thickening part cannot be seen, so the actual feeling may be different.
It is still under consideration and no clear conclusion can be drawn, but if the road surface is parallel and the total width is 14m, the total length may be shorter than 21m.
SSB Başkanı İsmail Demir:
• Milli Muharip Uçak, bazı konularda F-35'ten de iyi olacak.
• Üzerine koyduğumuz çeşitli sensörler, algı sistemleri, savunma sistemleri, radarlarda da aşama aşama daha iyisini koyacağız.
I checked the tire position and it feels like the main gear is a little too forward. It is highly likely that you have made a mistake in the composition settings. Since only the right side of the fuselage is visible, there are few clues for composition.
I was only paying attention to the difference in the structure of the outside of the engine, but it may be that the mounting position of the engine is slightly shifted to the outside.
(I may be wrong because it is still on the way) If the wheelbase of the car is 2.755m, the total length is about 19m and the total width is about 13.7m.
I found a position where I didn't have to extend the engine/wingtips for the rear camera. I want to find a camera position that does not require the lower frame to spread backwards from the front view.