Ibn Qudāmah (d. 620 AH) said:
It is not permissible for one to supplicate for worldly desires in it (i.e., prayer), and whatever is similar to the speech of humans, such as saying, "O Allāh, grant me a beautiful wife and good food," due to the-
The Wahhābiyyah of today have four maḏāhib: the Bāzī maḏhab, the ʿUthaymī maḏhab, the Fawzānī maḏhab and the ʾAlbānī maḏhab, so beware of these four maḏāhib and warn against them.
Ibn al-Qayyim said:
Likewise, Plato was known for Tawḥīd, denying idolatry, and affirming the occurrence of the World, and he was a student of Socrates, and when Socrates perished, he took his place and sat on his chair.
╾ ʾIġāthat al-Lahfān, 2/30 ╼ 📚
Whoever believes that Allāh is outside of the Universe is a kāfir. The belief of ʾAhl as-Sunnah is that Allāh is neither inside nor outside of the Universe. Allāh said, “Nothing is whatsoever like Him.” Being inside and being outside are for the creation, not the Creator.
ʾImām ʾAḥmad narrated that Jesus Christ, peace be upon him, was asked, "How do you walk on water?" He responded, "With yaqīn (certainty)." It was said to him, "We too have yaqīn." He replied, "Do you see the rock, the clay and the gold? Are they the same?" They—
When Ṣalāḥ al-Diyn al-ʾAyyuwbiyy advanced the armies of ʾIslām to liberate Palestine in the month of Muḥarram, 583 AH, S͟hayk͟h al-ʾIslām ibn Qudāmah was at the forefront of those armies.
رضي الله تعالى عنه.
saying of the Prophet ﷺ, "In this prayer of ours, nothing of the people's speech is appropriate. Rather, it is tasbiyḥ, takbiyr, and recitation of the Qurʾān." Narrated by Muslim.
╾ Al-Kāfiy, 1/258 ╼ 📚
Al-ʾImām As͟h-S͟hāfiʿiyy said:
❝Whoever believes that Allāh is seated on the Throne, then he is a kāfir.❞
Narrated by Ibnul-Muʿallim Al-Quras͟hiyy in his book Najmul-Muhtadiy, p. 51.
ʾImām Ibn al-ʿImād al-Ḥanbalī (رضي الله عنه) said:
When he (al-Rāzī) goes out, about three hundred people walk with him with different needs in Tafsīr, Fiqh, Kalām, ʾUṣūl, medicine, and so on. He was the unique one and the Mutakallim of his time. He was granted popularity in-
He has disrespected the Ahlul Bayt and Ṣaḥāba before; now it has come to him disrespecting the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ. He should consider himself fortunate that he is not residing in a Muslim country.
ʾAbuw Dāwuwd said regarding ʿAliyy ibn al-Jaʿd, "A bad man, for he was from the extremists of the S͟hiyʿah." Muslim said about him, "He was reliable, but he was a Jahmiyy." ʾAbuw Zurʿah said, "ʾAḥmad ibn Ḥanbal did not allow narrating from ʿAliyy ibn al-Jaʾd."
Bidʿah is of five categories according to the Shāfiʿiyy Maḏhab:
- Wājib
- Mandūb
- Mubāḥ
- Makrūh
- Ḥarām
Celebration of Mawlid comes under the category of "Mandūb" (recommended), and it does not entail disobeying the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) or anything like that.
Shaykh al-ʾIslām Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī (رضي الله عنه) said:
The brilliant Mutakallimīn said that the one who likened Allāh to His creation, or ascribed a hand to Him or a child; what he worships is not Allāh, even if he called it Allāh.
╾ Fatḥ al-Bārī, 3/359 ╼ 📚
ʾImām ʾAḥmad narrates in his Musnad with a good chain that Al-Ḥārit͟h Ibn Ḥassān Al-Bakriyy said in the presence of the Prophet ﷺ, "I seek refuge with Allāh 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗛𝗶𝘀 𝗠𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 from being like the delegate of the tribe of ˆĀd."
Seeking refuge with creation is haram and is shirk.
However, seeking refuge with the words of Allah is recommended.
This shows us that the Quran is not created.
If it were created, it would be haram and shirk to seek refuge with it.
Did al-Rāzī Promote Magic?・🧵
This hideous slanderer claims that ʾImām Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (رضي الله عنه) authored a book on magic, but is this actually the case?
Firstly, we have to look into the book which these guys always bring up to try proving their slander. They say-
Response Thread・🧵
This Wahhābī claims that Allāh is literally above His Throne and that this is what is indicated by the Qurʾān, Sunnah and ʾAqwāl of the Salaf. Let's refute him.
Collaboration thread with
@ZSalmean
As͟h-S͟hāṭibiyy said, ❝Allāh is Exalted from deficiencies, from an eye, a hand, a foot, a face, tangibility, direction, and other than that which is confirmed for emergent things.❞
╾ Al-Iˆtiṣām, 1/305 ╼ 📚
You're a salafī if you follow the path of the salaf.
Imam Al-Shatibi, رحمه الله said:
“Everyone who followed the Sahabah, then he is from the saved sect.”
📖 [الاعتصام للشاطبي (252/2)]
Reciting the Qur’an near the grave of a deceased person is not merely permissible but even recommended according to the Hanbali madhhab if one dedicates its reward to the dead, since this will lighten his punishment.
Ibn ^Umar and others from the Salaf practiced this.
ʾImām al-Bayhaqī (رضي الله عنه) said:
The Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) pointed to ʾAbū Mūsā al-ʾAshʿarī in relation to the verse, "Allāh will bring a people whom He loves and who love Him", saying, "They are that man's people", due to the tremendous merit and noble rank-
The great Ḥambaliyy scholar Manṣuwr Ibn Yuwnus Al-Buhuwtiyy (d. 1051 AH), one of our best scholars from the mutaʾak͟hk͟hiruwn, states:
❝Peace and blessings be upon our Master, our Prophet, 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗚͟𝗵𝗮𝘄𝘁͟𝗵 (𝗔𝗶𝗱) 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗦𝗵𝗲𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿 Muḥammad ﷺ.❞
ʾImām ʾAḥmad (رضي الله عنه), on his way to Ḥajj, after getting lost, said, "O slaves of Allāh (referring to the Angels)! Guide me to the correct way!"
Narrated by ^Abdullāh in Masāʾil Al-ʾImām ʾAḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal, p. 245.
Was ʾImām ʾAḥmad a mushrik according to you?
1. He follows Ibn Taymīyyah in creed
2. He denies that al-Muwaffaq was a Mufawwiḍ
3. He does Tabdīʿ on the ʾAshāʿirah and Māturīdīyyah
4. He defends body-worship
5. He lies against ʾImām ʾAḥmad
6. He repeatedly quotes Kitāb al-Sunnah and disparages ʾImām ʾAbū Ḥanīfah
Despite that many of the Wahhābīyyah quote ʾImām al-ʾAʿẓam from time to time, they truly hate him and believe him to be a giant Mubtadiʿ. This is most-likely because the ʾImām was the only ʾImām from the four who was the most explicit in clearing Allāh from likeness.
This individual by no means represents the so-called Salafis.
Nor does he represent any genuine Sunni.
As mentioned in a recent tweet, those who slander Imam Abu Hanifa عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ, are either ignorant, jealous or enemies of the Sunnah.
May Allah ﷻ guide this person.
Not to mention, this narration is not found anywhere other than this book, which can't even authentically be traced back to Ad-Dārimiyy. Its chain is disconnected and the original copy is unknown.
This is what a famous Wahhābiyy on Discord said. Imagine what the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) would say if he heard somebody saying something like this. May Allāh (سبحانه وتعالى) protect us.
Al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn ʿAsākir (رضي الله عنه) said:
The majority of the ʿUlamāʾ in all of the lands were upon the ʾAshʿarī Maḏhab (in ʿAqīdah), and the ʾAʾimmah of all of the cities in all of the eras called towards it (ʾAshʿarīyyah)...
Ibn Taymīyyah said:
Even though some have strayed away from this general rule such as Socrates and Plato, who were known for Tawḥīd and rejecting idol-worship, and Socrates publicly voiced his rejection of worshipping idols to his people.
Pythagoras, Socrates and Plato used-
Shaykh al-ʾIslām, ʿIzz al-Dīn Ibn ʿAbd al-Salām (رضي الله عنه) said:
Allāh is not a figured body, neither is He a finite substance, and nothing and no one resembles Him. Neither the directions surround Him, nor the earths, nor the heavens. He existed before-
@M_toot_90
Reading the Qurʾān using a phone is not the same as reading it using a Muṣḥaf. Do you know how much it is stressed by our scholars to read the Muṣḥaf everyday? How can one imagine a scholar that hasn't even touched it in seven years? Subḥān Allāh.
Saying "O Muḥammad" is a type of nidāʾ (calling). Ibn Qudāmah advises one to call upon the Prophet ﷺ and ask him for intercession (s͟hafāˆah), which is istig͟hāt͟hah (asking for aid). Moreover, there's-
As usual using Tawassul quotes to Justify Istighatha
The Tawassul mentioned here is of Asking Allah by the virtue of the Prophet ﷺ. It's Not Shirk, most contemporary Salafi scholars call it Bid'ah at most. Which is also view of Ibn Taymiyah & Ibn Abi al Izz
MIAW viewed it Makruh
Ḥujjat al-ʾIslām aṭ-Ṭaḥāwī al-Ḥanafī (d. 321 AH) states, "Whoever describes Allāh with a meaning from the meanings of humans has blasphemed."
ʿAlāʾ ad-Dīn al-Bukhārī al-Ḥanafī (d. 841 AH) states, "The Mujassim is a kāfir by consensus." From: Muljimat al-Mujassimah, p. 61
ʾImām Ibn Rajab al-Ḥanbalī (رضي الله عنه) said:
The correct position in all of this is the position of the righteous Salaf, 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲, 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁-
𝗜𝗯𝗻 𝗥𝗮𝗷𝗮𝗯 𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘆 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗝𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀
Ibn Rajab al-Ḥanbalī (d. 795 AH) said:
“These two things are found in those who have gone corrupt
and, beginning to sink, cried out, 'Master, save me!' Immediately Jesus reached out his hand and caught him. 'You of little faith,' he said, 'why did you doubt?'"
Al-ʾImām al-ʾAʿẓam ʾAḥmad ibn Ḥanbal رحمه الله تعالى narrated that the Messiah (Jesus Christ) ﷺ stated, "Whoever learns, acts and teaches will be named or called great in the kingdom of heaven."
From: al-Zuhd, narration
#330
Muḥammad ibn Khalīfah al-Tamīmī said:
And Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn al-ʾAyyūbī used to be an ʾAshʿarī. In his youth, he memorized a creed composed for him by Quṭb al-Dīn ʾAbū al-Maʿālī Masʿūd ibn Muḥammad ibn Masʿūd al-Nīsābūrī, one of the most prominent figures of the-
Shaykh al-ʾIslām al-Bayhaqī (رضي الله عنه) said:
Some of our companions have used, as (another) proof to negate a place for Allāh, the saying of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم), "You are al-Ẓāhir, therefore nothing is above You, and You are al-Bāṭin, therefore nothing-
Matthew 14:25-31 states, "Shortly before dawn Jesus went out to them, walking on the lake. When the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified. 'It's a ghost,' they said, and cried out in fear. But Jesus immediately said to them: 'Take courage! It is I. Don't be—
Allāh does not have a hand or an eye or a shin or a foot. He does not descend. He is not attributed with motion or rest. He does not sit. He is not in a place or a direction. He does not laugh. He is not attributed with emotions. Exalted is He from resembling the creation!
afraid.' 'Master, if it's you,' Peter replied, 'tell me to come to you on the water.' 'Come,' he said. Then Peter got down out of the boat, walked on the water and came toward Jesus. But when he saw the wind, he was afraid—
Seal of the Perfectionists, al-Buhūtī al-Ḥanbalī stated, "As for al-Nuʿmān, then he is the Sole ʾImām, ʾAbū Ḥanīfah al-Nuʿmān ibn Thābit ibn Zūṭā ibn Māh. The Salaf and the Khalaf have a consensus regarding his abundant knowledge, piety, worship, and precise understanding."
Also, Ibn Rāhawayh was born at 161 AH. Ibnul-Mubārak died at 181 AH. Ibn Rāhawayh did not narrate from Ibnul-Mubārak, although he heard from him, due to him being young. This is mentioned in multiple ṭabaqāt. After the death of Ibnul-Mubārak, he would be around 20 years old.
Did al-ʾAshʿarī "Repent" From Kullābīyyah?・🧵
I will be refuting those who claim that al-ʾAshʿarī "repented" from Kullābīyyah in this thread, by the permission of Allāh (سبحانه وتعالى).
Shaykh ʾAḥmad Zarrūq al-Fāsī (رضي الله عنه) said:
The ʾIstiwāʾ is free from contact, being fixed in place, being embodied or being in motion, for all of this is impossible for Him because it is part of the attributes of what is created and Allāh is totally free from-
Ḥujjat al-ʾIslām al-Ġazzālī (رضي الله عنه) said:
The purpose of ʿIlm al-Kalām is the preservation of the ʿAqīdah of ʾAhl al-Sunnah from the disruption of ʾAhl al-Bidʿah.
╾ Al-Munqiḏ min al-Ḍalāl, p. 91 ╼ 📚
I think you have a problem with reading comprehension. Ibn Ḥamdān negates a place for Allāh and makes takfīr on those who affirm it for Allāh. He's merely stating that it is permissible to make ʾiṭlāq and say that Allāh is fis-samāʾ and ʿalal-ʿArsh, as done by the ʾAshāʿirah.
I will take a passage out of a book
@nasafism
recommended and watch how he will foams out the mouth:
@nasafism
stated one of the books we should read for Athari Aqidah:
✅ Nihayat al-Mubtadi'in fi Usul al-Din
The author Ibn Hamdan writes: “And whoever says he (Allah) by his
Shaykh al-ʾIslām, ʿIzz al-Dīn Ibn ʿAbd al-Salām (رضي الله عنه) said:
He existed before He brought place and time into existence, and He is now as He was before.
╾ Rasāʾil fī al-Tawḥīd, p. 11 ╼ 📚
Shaykh al-ʾIslām Ibn Qudāmah al-Maqdisī al-Ḥanbalī (رضي الله عنه) said:
So Taqlīd in this (i.e. issues of Fiqh) is permissible, rather it is obligatory upon the laymen.
╾ Rawḍat al-Nāẓir, 2/382-383 ╼ 📚
Muḥammad ibn ʿAbdil-Wahhāb (d. 1206 AH) states, "Most of what is in al-ʾIqnāʿ and al-Muntahā is in opposition to the maḏhab of ʾAḥmad and his naṣṣ."
From: al-Durar al-Saniyyah, 1/45
Al-ʾAlbānī said:
For every Mālikī is an ʾAshʿarī, every Shāfiʿī is an ʾAshʿarī except a few, and every Ḥanbalī is an ʾAshʿarī except a few, especially in our time!
And he said: The 3 Maḏāhib, especially-
"If ʾIkhtilāf Is a Mercy, Then the Opposite (ʾIjmāʿ) Must Be a Punishment!"
ʾImām al-Nawawī (رضي الله عنه) said:
Something being a mercy does not necessitate its opposite being torture. Something like this in this Ḥadīth is baseless. Only ignorant people or those who pretend-
'Imaam Ibn al-Jawziyy al-Hanbaliyy al-'Ash^ariyy (رضي الله عنه) said:
Allaah is not a body, for bodies consist of (a minimum of) two atoms joined to each other. If He were a body, He would be subject, like all bodies, to such temporally produced states as movement and rest and-
السيف الصقيل في الرد على الوهابي الخبيث في طعنه على مذهب الإمام الشريف.
By Allah's Permission, I shall be defending the Hanafite stance in regards to the validity of nikah without a waliyy.
- 🧵 -
In hanafi fiqh, it's permissible for a woman to get married without her wali despite in prophet alahisalam shariah, a woman marriage without her wali is illegal.
Therefore, salafis follow the Quran & sunnah & don't do taqleed of any scholar like our prophet alahisalam commanded.
Shaykh al-ʾIslām al-Rāzī (رضي الله عنه) said:
Know that Muḥammad ibn ʾIsḥāq ibn Khuzaymah cited this verse as evidence in support of our companions in the book he named "al-Tawḥīd." However, in reality, it is a book of Shirk, and he raised objections to it. I recall the-
ʾImām ʾAḥmad said, "The ṣalāh after al-Jumuʿah, if he prays four (rakʿahs) then it is good, and if he prays two rakʿahs then it is good, and if he prays six then it is good."
╾ Masāʾil ʾAbiy Dāwuwd, 417 ╼ 📚
Ja'far ibn Ahmad al-Mu'addib reported:
"I saw Ahmad ibn Hanbal pray six cycles after Salāt ul-Jum'uah and he would do the salutation after every two rak'at."
[المناقب ١٢،٠٨]
Typical psuedo-Salafiyy propaganda. The ʾAs͟hāˆirah and the Māturiydiyyah are the ones adhering to the narrations, and they are the ones upon the methodology of the Salaf. We follow the Qurʾān and the Sunnah, and we are ʾAhlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāˆah. We educate the people-
Da'wah of different sects-
Kharijite: “Ruler, ruler, Kafir ruler.”
Ikhwan al-Muslimeen: “'Ibadah is a training course for Khilafah.”
Ash'ariyyah & Maturidiyyah: “Come to logic, leave the narrations. Let’s be Jahmi together.” +
✨ Ahmadiyya Jama'at is Ahlus Sunnah - Masīh Ma’ūd AS
Maulānā Ḥakīm Nūrudīn RA said to Promised Messiah AS:
"I asked a 'Sunni' Maulvi, 'Do you belong to the Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jama'ah? Who is your Imam?' He replied that there are several people who are Imams. I said that there-
ʾImām al-Ḏahabī (رضي الله عنه) mentions the quote of Ibn Khuzaymah:
Whoever does not acknowledge that Allāh is above the ʿArsh and has done ʾIstawā above the seven heavens, then he is a Kāfir...
Following this quote of Ibn Khuzaymah, ʾImām al-Ḏahabī explains the quote by-
The Ḥanābilah and Tafwīḍ・🧵
In this thread, I will be presenting the position of the Ḥanābilah with regard to Tafwīḍ al-Maʿnā, by the permission of Allāh (سبحانه وتعالى).
@babyyloves2
Ibn Bāz, ibn ʿUthaymīn, al-Fawzān, al-ʾAlbānī and their likes are not reliable. Al-ʾAlbānī even admitted not studying under any scholar. You should take from legitimate Sunnī scholars, not the pseudo-Salafites who believe that Allāh is in a place.
Imām Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal (d. 241) argues that the Throne is everlasting since Allāh is particularly upon it and will always be so. This cannot be said to be “aboveness in status” since the status of Allāh is “above” every one of the creation, not the Throne alone in particular.
ʾImām al-Qaddūmī al-Ḥanbalī said:
As for the one who says that the Speech of Allāh is an eternal meaning confirmed for the Self of Allāh - Exalted is He - and expressed with expressions that we read, write and memorize, and that (i.e., the Speech of Allāh) is eternal, then-
Muwaffaqud-Diyn Ibn Qudāmah (d. 620 Ah) states, "As for whatever is ambiguous from them (i.e., the reports of the Attributes), then it is obligatory to affirm its 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴, to leave the seeking of its 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 and-