So each of those 38 people attacked someone on the subway about every two weeks for an entire year. And the NYPD knows who they are. And the response is "random bag screenings".
There are huge swaths of cities (Philadelphia, Baltimore, etc) that have quaint characteristics that urbanists claim to love (along with permissive zoning & transit), but are underpopulated because of crime. You'll never see urbanists mention this. Instead, they target suburbs.
Trains are slow bc they make stops to pick up and drop off people other than you. The solution would be some kind of point-to-point transportation where ppl can go from anywhere to anywhere. That would be much faster. Maybe we should invest in something transformative like that.
Why do urbanists care about suburban zoning when there are huge depopulated swaths of cities with liberal zoning and public transportation? Why create cities out of suburbs when the cities already exist?
Disincentiving car ownership requires ubiquitous dense housing, fast frequent transit, and a strong determined government. And even then, people were willing to be placed on a fifteen-year long waiting list for a Trabant.
Please help me come up with an exhaustive list of policies that would effectively disincentivize individual car ownership. A friend asserted that parking is the answer. I believe parking is key, but there are many other things local, state, and federal gvts can do.
For decades, planners have been designing "roads for people". Almost every time, no one shows up; for example, like in this picture. It's why dozens of failed pedestrian malls across the country were ripped out.
"People have the right to walk on the street and not fear for their safety" is not empathetic?
What should he say? People deserve to live in fear of violent attacks?
Watch: Andrew Yang’s response to a question about how he would handle mental health during Wednesday's NYC mayoral debate drew fire on social media from people who said it lacked empathy or understanding.
Possible answers:
A) As the population became richer, they were able to spread out and live in better housing
B) People actually enjoyed living in crowded tenement slums, but were pushed out against their will
@ShabazzStuart
In theory, speed governors are a good idea. In practice, they might not be set for an optimal safety/speed balance, but instead be set too low to satisfy car-hating fanatics.
My walkable downtown is Costco. I can shop for almost anything, I run into people I know, and can always socialize over a hot dog. And unlike a "real" downtown, it's climate controlled -- and the membership requirement filters who can get in. Lots of parking, too.
Urbanists can't grasp that their paradise can’t be achieved with “funding”. US cities differ from European cities largely bc of cultural differences. That lesson wasn’t learned when tons of $$$ was wasted on building ped malls, and is now ignored with bike lane construction.
Car hatred can often be *because* driving is easy and convenient. Ritualistic suffering, like biking in miserable weather or riding on uncomfortable transit, can be seen as an initiation rite into the urbanist club and a license for moral posturing.
I pay transit taxes every time I:
- Renew my drivers license
- Renew my registration
- Buy gas
- Pay tolls
(To say nothing of sales/income/mortgage taxes)
And yet I'm told that, as a driver, I'm the one being subsidized. But by whom?
I see affluent educated people casually spending the day at outdoor cafes vs proles who need transportation to get to filthy jobs that the cafe crowd's grandparents used to do. It's OK to have preferences.
The choice for city improvement:
Urbanists - Density, bike lanes, "diversity", ped streets, transit, no cars.
Normal people - Remove the crazies who shout/urinate/menace in the streets/subways, and make it possible to cross a street w/o getting hit by a wrong-direction moped.
Price comparison between cars and cargo bikes:
Car: $25K
Cargo Bike: $5K for a bike + $25K for a car when you realize that the bike is not what you need.
(I'm just guessing here, but I'll bet that the avg cargo-bike owner is richer than the avg car owner.)
Citi Bike moves more people each day than the entirety of many transit agencies, yet it doesn't receive any public funding.
It's time to properly fund bike share and:
✔️ Bring Citi Bike to every neighborhood in all five boroughs
✔️ Ensure the system is affordable to all riders
10 degrees with 35 mph wind gusts now. If you're taking your newborn home from the hospital tonight, make sure that your cargo bike basket is insulated.
People who are willing to pay for a detached house with a few bedrooms and baths, a yard, a short commute, and a school where their kids won't get beat up.
That's who they decided to make their enemy.
A group of fifth graders was playing ball in a playground at Third and East 96th 4 p.m. Friday.
A slightly older boy joined them. He "became upset by the rules" and motioned to his friends, who came over with pellet guns and began shooting.
People seem to move to suburbs for mostly two reasons:
1. More space.
2. Insulation from people whose behaviors range from annoying to violent.
Urbanism, as a branch of "progressive" culture, has contempt for both of these aspirations.
American urbanists think that European cities look like the preserved tourist traps they see on vacation.
But an arbitrary street view (in this case, of Utrecht) shows dumpy-looking houses hidden behind garages in a parking field -- exactly what they ridicule in the USA.
Yes that's it, you'll always get a neighboring cafe. Never a...
- Laundromat
- Storefront church
- Pawn shop
- Liquor store
- Bail bondsman
- Strip club
- Methadone clinic
Also, what's so great about having a cafe (noise, people, odors, etc) next door?
When many Americans hear “mixed-use development” they picture a chain store moving in next to their single-family home. We need to change that picture to neighborhood corner stores and cafes.
It's 20 degrees with 45 mph gusts now, and I'm trying to decide whether I should personally delay climate change by riding on a cargo bike for a week's worth of groceries at Costco, or standing at bus stops for a two-transfer bus ride + a 20 min walk to accomplish the same thing.
They're getting a bit old, but they're still worth dredging up now and then.
My all-time favorite demographics maps: Netflix 2010 rentals of "Paul Blart Mall Cop". It explains so much.
(Wish I saved other cities besides NYC & Boston)
Urbanists always get this backwards. The purpose of different transportation modes is to serve different densities and trip patterns. Transportation is a means, not an end. But urbanists think that people's living arrangements should be a means to support transportation.
@JeffSpeckFAICP
But what density supports a great subway system, a la London, Paris, and New York? The best system I know in a small city is Munich's, subsidized by the Federal government for the 1972 Olympics. It seamlessly combines regional rail with the local subway...
@CaesarSalad99
Epitomized by the former Randall Park Mall in suburban Cleveland. Once USA's largest mall, it turned into an extension of Cleveland's "inner city", and eventually shut down. Now it's an Amazon fulfillment center.
Desolate downtowns became desolate downtowns with ped malls, which then reverted to desolate downtowns with ripped-out ped malls. Bike lanes didn’t turn Manhattan into Stockholm; instead, they permitted greater opportunities for lawless motorbike behavior.
"Homeowners like zoning in order to maintain property values" is a progressive smear intended to stoke envy/hate towards a fabricated cruel money-grubbing strawman. Homeowners want to enjoy a long-term lifestyle. They rarely think of what the resale value will be in 35 years.
Apartment buildings would be more "space efficient" if they had one large shared bathroom for all the tenants who, preferably, would be living in shared-family apartments.
The average car occupancy in the US is 1.5.
A bus only needs 3 people on it to be more space efficient than a car.
No politics here, just facts and logic!
Costco does not price gouge. They sell Clorox wipes at normal prices. To get your wipes, just arrive at Costco about an hour before they open, and race to the wipes before they're sold out in 5 minutes.
Thanks, Governor, for ensuring that "all NYers have access".
Price gouging on life-saving supplies including masks and PPE is abhorrent.
We won’t allow it in NY so I’m signing legislation to ensure all NYers have access to critical supplies including masks at fair cost.
Thank you
@NewYorkStateAG
@bradhoylman
@nily
.
"Congestion pricing" in NYC is different from other cities bc NYC lacks decent transit. Many/most people who drive to Manhattan do so bc transit is slow and the subway is repulsive. If the cost of driving is too high, they might permanently stay away.
Americans, on avg, are killed by cars every 80M miles of driving. Almost like driving to the Sun. (And probably further if you're driving sensibly in a safe state like NY.)
People on the subway are routinely confronted with THIS sort of thing. But, hey, no one was killed, right?
Subway riders have to sit quietly and hope this deranged man doesn't decide to follow through and break someones face with his elbow.
Because if someone effectively stopped him from threatening to murder people, Alvin Bragg would throw the book at him. And progressive
An obvious advantage of low-densities is that if you're surrounded by 5 neighbors instead of 25, that drastically reduces the chances that you'll be living near some annoying jerk.
In a typical city, the time that it takes to get to your transit stop and wait for a vehicle to arrive is greater than the time it takes to make your *entire trip*, door-to-door, by driving. Urbanists call this "car dependency".
While buying 50 cu ft of mulch at Lowes, I was wondering how this would be accomplished with a cargo bike or public transportation.
Answer: There's obviously no need for anyone to have a lifestyle that requires 50 cu ft of mulch. That's the correct response, right?
American cities were ruined by violent crime, the threat of violent crime, and the resulting low-trust environment. The epitome of urbanist jackassery is to instead blame highways.
Crime predicts urban decay. Highway placement predicts nothing, esp bc highways are everywhere.
Flying 1st class is extremely expensive. Let's reduce that 1st class price by filling the section with coach seats, or better yet, standing room. That way, everyone will be able to afford 1st class!
They want transit because they say they're concerned about efficiency, and then they'll shut down an entire street so three people can sit in large chairs.
I really wish that these people would pick a city, move there, and replace highways with canals, ban cars, ban air conditioning, ban plumbing, ban refrigeration, collectivize all housing, whatever. Just go for it already and let's see what happens.
Oh no! A horrible traffic jam on the Cross Bronx Expressway will turn our otherwise delightful 7-minute drive into a 40-minute hell. Let's save time by using public transportation.
This is not going to happen as long as urbanism is dominated by leftists who believe that American cities failed because of highway construction and not enough public housing.
A painful truth that many in urbanism avoid (consciously or otherwise) is that even when things don’t rise to a crime, anti-social behavior makes people feel uncomfortable or unsafe and drives their decisions accordingly.
If you want people to embrace urbanism you can’t tell
A residential building in Fidi is blocked by protesters chanting intifada. Parents with small children, senior citizens, and people who need to walk their dogs are blocked inside. I was told 911 was called and never showed.
Protestors are making residents lives miserable.
I'd have more respect for urbanists if they recognized that people like single family zoning for the quiet and spacious lifestyle, instead of smearing them with false accusations like they...
...want to limit supply to keep prices high
...are racist
Some people prefer dense cities, and others prefer large houses in suburbs. Urbanists never even bother to *question* why people make the latter choice. Instead, they evangelize, trying to guide everyone to their imagined paradise. (Tip: Don't demonize if you want to evangelize.)
Supermarkets are no longer 13,000 sq ft because they learned that their customers preferred the convenience, comfort, and selection that can only be provided by 50,000 - 150,000 sq ft stores with ample parking. Love how A&P, of all stores, is used as an example here.
Once, downtowns were commerce centers. Those days appear to be over. Now, as industry and retail are gone and offices empty out, they're mostly for:
-Govt offices
-Residential
-Leisure (focus on restaurants)
-Tourism
-Purposeless desolate shells
-Fantasy urbanist plans
On one side: People who want to be left alone to live comfortable lives in spacious detached homes.
On the other: Scolding sanctiminoous studio-apartment do-gooders (and hypocrites living in large homes) making unfalsifiable assertions about carbon emissions.
Here we go again, in blissful ignorance (or in deliberate manipulation) with "I want American downtowns to look like my last European vacation" pedestrian malls. They were ubiquitous, and except in a few college towns, they were failures and removed.
Why do urbanists think their dogma would work if it were only tried?
Their formula of density, transit, walkabilty, "missing middle housing", trees, etc etc describes most of Chicago, and yet the results are dead desolate streets.
Is biking more efficient (cost per mile) than driving? Not if calculated correctly by putting its opportunity cost in the numerator: Biking roughly triples your "time cost". If your time is valuable, biking is a horribly inefficient choice.
For those who complain that their rent is too high, but love the awesome restaurants in their neighborhood: Move to a neighborhood that no one ever heard of and learn how to cook your own food, you're welcome.
Private cars: Always available, a custom environment, and operating at >3X the speed of the fastest alternative. They allow the masses to live in large well-spaced homes and the flexibility to effortlessly travel great distances. And yet, there are people who despise this.
And yet, like lemmings, generation after generation of families keep making this stupid mistake. What's wrong with them? Why don't they know they should live in cities?
Many people move to the suburbs when they have a family, but then find themselves more isolated than ever before. In contrast, walkable urban neighborhoods provide nearby access to amenities and more chance encounters that build community.
How is this "car dependent"? With little traffic, no grades, and a wide street, it looks pretty decent for biking. (And definitely better for biking than in the lawless chaos of transit-dependent Manhattan.)
As long as de Blasio is back in the news, it's a good time to remember that the cruelest thing he did to poor people was to help make NYC a Walmart desert.
The real residential separation is between college grads (blue & green) and everyone else. The housing "crisis" is mostly among college grads who bid prices up to live near each other.
Hey urbanists, where do you live? And who do you speak on behalf of?
Here's the plan:
1. Make housing really dense
2. Don't increase road capacity
3. Demolish some highways
4a. Pretend that some transit system will be built to take everyone to a romanticized fantasy 1920s downtown OR
4b. Confine everyone to a 1.5 mile RT walk around their homes
Cars are expensive because people love owning cars. I know this because urbanists always say that land values in cities are high because people love living in cities.
What's the argument these days for public libraries? That poor children (too poor to own phones) need free access to a small room of used physical books to quench their thirst for knowledge?
Related: Why do affluent suburbs need public libraries?
Watching the suburban transit bus roll by with zero passengers on it, which is about three fewer passengers than normal. At this rate, "bus driver" might be become one of the most isolating jobs.
Without minimum parking requirements, more cars would be cruising for a limited # of public spaces, creating proverbial "car sewers". Also, urbanists say that there should be less public parking. They don't want free-market parking; they want to end car use. MPR is their Step
#1
.
Arguments they use for subsidizing transit:
1. "Driving is expensive. People can't afford it. Transit should be subsidized."
2. "Driving is cheap because of subsidies. That's why people drive. Transit should be subsidized."
It's a special type of urbanist who can simultaneously claim that dense urban land is precious & valuable, and that it should also be used to grow crops via "urban farming".