Augustine, Exposition on Psalms 44
“Show me at Rome a temple of Romulus held in so great honour as I can show you the Monument of Peter. In who is Peter honored but He who died for us?”
@TEOFOROS
@JrDeJess3
Los protestantes no deben olvidar que el arco sagrado del éxodo (que tenía la imagen de dos ángeles) fue llevado al campo por el rey David. (2 Sam. 6)
Que idolatra….
@HaiducJumis
These canons are not from the Apostles nor recognized by the Roman Church. They were rejected by Pope Sergius I, and are also listed as ‘apocryphal’ in the Gelasian Decretals. Not to mention it is disputed whether the latter 35 canons are authentic
Saint Augustine: A mark of the true church is the name “Catholic”, it is called so by her faithful and even by her adversaries. Rome is the source of Catholic unity according to this great saint by which the chair of Peter is uniquely held.
These canons are not from the Apostles nor recognized by the Roman Church. They were rejected by Pope Sergius I, and are also listed as ‘apocryphal’ in the Gelasian Decretals. Not to mention it is disputed whether the latter 35 canons are authentic
…
Canon 64 of The Apostolic Canons:
"If any clergyman or layman shall enter into a synagogue of Jews or heretics to pray, let the former be deposed and let the latter be excommunicated."
@anglican_net
@DigestTom
Both SS. Augustine & Fulgentius do not say Mary had the crime of sin but speak solely of her flesh being sinful and died to sin (the debt of sin) which was passed by Adam. Catholic theologians already took this into account with the IC and refer to it as the debitum peccati.
Me: Roman Catholic
Brother: Secular (Inquiring Catholic🇻🇦)
Father: Muslim ☪️(Baptized Catholic🇻🇦)
Grandparents on his side: (Catholic🇻🇦)
Mother: New age (Baptized Catholic🇻🇦)
Grandma on her side: New age/Bhuddist (Baptized Catholic🇻🇦)
Grandpa on her side: Secular
@DavidGebru1
@protnonsense
It’s in reference to his human nature being a lower degree of existence than the divine nature which is utterly transcendent
“They have certain men after whom they are called: according to the name of the heresiarch, so also the sect is called. For us however, no man gave a name, rather the faith itself.” Saint John of Chrystostom (Acta Apostolorum, Homil. 33)
@Scholastic_X
Christ is not a human person. Anyone who asserts this holds a heretical opinion. May we all hold fast to the teachings of the true faith!
False. To support the private error of the Pontiff that hell may be empty is contrary to the faith. The ecumenical synods themselves decree that Christ will judge the wicked and the just (4th Lateran 1215) and that Judas along with the priests of Zadok are in hell (Florence)
@superxtianmario
> “He called the bishop to him, and esteeming that there can be no true thankfulness except it spring from true faith, he enquired whether he agreed with the Catholic bishops, that is, with the Roman Church?”
Saint Ambrose (De Oratione de obitu Satyri, Lib. 1, 47)
The answer is yes, the institution of the sabbath change is of Ecclesiastical ordinance
“But the Church of God has thought it well to transfer the celebration and observance of the Sabbath to Sunday.”
- Catechism of Trent
@BrotherAugusti2
Please make more posts against Romanides. It’s because of him and others such as Meyendorf that i’ve seen orthodoxy so wrongfully misrepresented
Reminder that Fatima taught us that hell is populated, therefore “all souls” must be restricted in interpretation. The Pontiff himself errored as a private theologian here. There is no need to lawyer for something which is objectively false.
Reminder to those who are ''scandalized'' that Pope Francis hopes that all souls go to Heaven: everyone who prays the Fatima prayer ''hopes'' that ALL souls make it to Heaven too (as we only pray for something that we hope is possible by the grace of God)
The latest edition of the Antiochian Archdiocese's magazine relays the Orthodox teaching that Psalm 87—wherein the speaker bears God's wrath—is about Christ innocently suffering the agony of separation when He became sin for us.
Let God arise and let His enemies be scattered.
@timotheeology
@PostTradMark
Humble yourself, you’re not the intelligent theologian you think you are, especially when you’re contradicting pretty basic thomistic metaphysics
@Erik71159699034
@EliteEthos
@CatholicOrca
Simple, it’s because the prayers of others can be more efficacious than ours simply alone. Hence God in scripture often forgives others through the prayers of another as we see in the last chapter of Job.
It should be recognized that the prayers of the ecumenical meetings do not constitute communication in worship. Furthermore, common prayers during these inter-faith meetings was something introduced prior to V2 by Bl. Pius XII and permitted
Let's begin by showing the change in Catholic dogma regarding the liceity of participation in religious meetings with Non-Catholics:
In Mortalium Animos, it is akin to apostasy.
The 1917 Code of Canon Law also mentions how participation in almost any way is not licit.
it’s always pretty disappointing to see Catholic comments as the one’s in Marshall’s post. “I’m done with praying for Francis, the same way I don’t pray for Satan.”
Just wow.
I just got off the phone with Bishop Strickland.
Pope Francis has removed him from the diocese of Tyler. This is a very sad moment for the Catholic Church in Texas and throughout the world.
Pray for Bishop Strickland and pray for those who removed him. 🙏🏻
@brown_cheshire
@xingtemplars
Neo-orthodoxy deviates from the historic orthodox position of penal substitution, although most of their fathers, theologians and some councils teach it
And thus concupiscence [in the reborn] is now no more sin, but is called so, whether because it became what it is by sin, or because it is stirred by the delight of sinning, although by the conquest of the delight of righteousness consent is not given to it.
- Saint Augustine
@Gwenny22986285
@tokiIIthedragon
There is no explaining away or condoning his action, the Pontiff sinned like many of us do, so we should rather rebuke his mistakes and venerate the other good things of his life, just as we rebuke our flesh and are glorified insofar as we do his Will
Many lay Roman Catholics are poorly catechized and this drove me away from the faith for so long. It wasn’t until a very well catechized Catholic had came into my life and made me doubt protestantism by his exposition of John 20:22-23 that I decided to research earnestly my self
S. Augustine:
> "God effects with the very wills of men what He wills and when He wills. Undoubtedly the human heart is inclined as it pleases His omnipotent will. . . . The wills of human beings are more in God's power than in their own."
A reminder to everyone that for Diego Alvarez (1555-1632), a Spanish Dominican, the belief that God efficaciously “bends & moves” (flectere, & movere) our wills originates in Augustine, not in John Calvin:
“Hoc enim verbum non est ex Calvino, sed ex Augustino.”
@tradcathdani
respectfully, 90% of your engagements with Catholic men seem to be with twitter addicts. this shouldn’t be too surprising, please interact with men in real life.
@DumbProt
It’s dogmatic, (4th Lateran Council) is there flexibility to Absolute divine simplicity ? I believe Scotistic and Palamite theology has shown such
Name: Emily
Age: 16
Height: 5'2
Ethnicity: English
Sexuality: 🕯️🩰🎀🌷
Favorite football player: Whoever is kakas biggest enemy
Favorite music artist: hozier
Favorite music genre: Indie/Rock
Favorite video game: Rdr2
Favorite football team: Whoever is man united’s biggest enemy.
@Leodosius
@OrthodoxEnsign
@xingtemplars
You should confess (as the faith obligates you) that Christ truly died on our behalf as if guilty, bearing the wrath of the Father and satisfying it by his passion. Through this he reconciled our enmity not only with the good angels but also the Father so that we may have peace
For when they are called Phrygians, or Novatians, [insert Lutherans] or by another name, they have ceased to be Christians, who have lost the name of Christ, and assumed human names. Therefore it is the Catholic Church alone which retains true worship.
- Lactantius: Bk. IV, C. 30
"the Church, which is the true temple of God, which does not consist of walls, but of the heart and faith of the men who believe in Him, and are called faithful."
—Lactantius
Divine Institutes Bk. 4, 13
@Scholastic_X
Yes, this is actually a valid theological conclusion. The same argument Saint Anselm used against the Greeks, and Saint John Bekkos utilized contra Palamas.
@Chidieb35039403
@HarrisonGarlic1
The church has never taught the Eucharist remedies mortal sin. Even in 1 Corinthians 11 Paul speaks of those Christians who unworthily discern the body and blood of the Lord
@NathLachmann
@ReformedAnarch
If you read the canons of Dort the answer is just “no”. Especially that part concerning being in the “flesh” line the Galatians who were said to have “fallen from justification”.
@cfw_walther
@carthvsianvs
That quote from Gerhard looking back from the future doesn’t stand too well considering every Lutheran church calls itself “Lutheran”, while Catholic Churches today refer to itself as “Catholic”. Even your username to add to the irony holds the name of Lutheran.
@lcmspastor
@HarrisonGarlic1
The Eucharist is the strengthening of communal love between the Christian and Christ’s body. A Christian in mortal sin does not Love God and hence he receives of Christ “unworthily”, unworthily discerning the body and blood of the Lord and hence does not receive him spiritually
@cfw_walther
“God does not command the impossible, but by commanding He teaches thee both to do what thou canst and to ask what thou canst not, and He helps thee that thou mayest be able” (St. Augustine, quoted at the Council of Trent, Denz., no. 804).
@dunkin_eo
Craig Truglia has always been inconsistent. Especially regarding the Oreginistic interpretation of Zechariah’s prophesy, which de facto was made so that Mary would be a sinner in order to be redeemed. Citing these fathers against the IC jeopardizes also the Ortho view.
“it is not any man of the name of Jesus who is prophesied of, **but a divine person**, because God said that His name was in that man who was appointed to rule the people, and to lead them into the kingdom, and who by a change of name was called Jesus.”
- Saint Augustine
Did you know the same Angel which appeared in the burning bush to Moses is the same Angel which appeared to Joshua ? ( Exodus 3:5 cf. Joshua 5:16 )
His name is Saint Micheal
@ra13_za
@CatholicOrca
Correcto, sin embargo, Dios no se contradice. Por lo tanto, incluso si el Papa pronunciara 'ex cathedra', las leyes o revelaciones divinas no se pueden cambiar.
@kcsg891
@anglican_net
@DigestTom
You may also read the STS (Sacrae theologiae summae) on Mary, Saint Alphonsus de Ligouri’s commentary on the council of trent, and the ‘Marian writings of Saint Robert Bellarmine’ which all give a defense of the IC and mention the debitum peccati
@HarbringerOfEnd
@Kaleb_Atlanta
Sure, then I guess you must accept the clearly monophysite words of Theodore of Ancyra and Acacius of Melitine in the council of Ephesus along with the letter of Ibas at Chalcedon which was then later contradicted at Cons. II
Whatever may be the names given Him, in all cases it is one and the same Person. Though there may be some variety in the appearance of His titles, **yet there is but a single Divine Person** (Majestas) meant by all the names.
- S. Cassian
@marbaselios
The ecclesiastical veneration has never been approved by Rome. There is no sympathy for the churches who do, they are deviating from the faith of Rome and the oriental congregations of the past who condemned nestorius
@icefire99
@Haqiqatjou
You asked for where it mandates monogamy, you didn’t specify further than that. But regardless, Matt. 19:4-6 Jesus established the true form of marriage to the pharisees with the example of Adam in which one man and one wife become one flesh
@DustReducerReal
@Carthusianus
Yes, because prayer is of such nature.
to appease the wrath of God. Even in the old testament God is shown to have changed his mind from destroying the hebrews through the prayer of Moses (Ex. 32:11-14) and was appeased by the prayers of Job (Job 42:7-8)
@CorneliusH_
@anglican_net
@DigestTom
Immaculate by etymology means to be without stain, spot or flaw. We profess Mary’s conception to be devoid of all stain of sin or guilt.
@JrDeJess3
@angelva13237542
@TEOFOROS
Una imagen es una imagen. No hay sustancialmente ninguna diferencia entre una imagen 2D y una 3D aparte de las dimensiones relacionadas con propiedades accidentales. Además, veamos cómo los ángeles pueden protegernos y recibir oraciones.
@apologeticaedf
No hay contradicción porque creemos que existen dos formas de adorar; Latria (λατρεία) La adoración que damos a Dios por su infinita majestad, y dulia (δυλια) la adoración que damos a los santos por sus virtudes al participar de la gloria de Dios.
— But although this [concupiscence] is called sin, it is certainly so called not because it is sin, but because it is made by sin, as a writing is said to be some one's “hand” because the hand has written it.
Against the two letters of the pelagians [Bk. 1, c. 27]