@JoshuaErlich
I find the breonna taylor case is a great test to see if the conservative you're talking to is principled and well intentioned or if they're just driven by racism and/or a desire to disagree with the libs
Clear cut case of a guy defending his home and being killed for it
@memeticsisyphus
I dunno i think this is a really weird criticism of communism
The people working at the factory know better how to run the machines than the owners
@filmibaby
@PlentyOfNuggets
Students in intro to film classes are often just looking for an easy credit, i wouldn't call them "film students" necessarily
@projectethos5
@lporiginalg
1. No it wouldnt, hitting someone higher does more damage than hitting them in the legs
2. No it wouldnt because the prius driver would see the child and apply the brakes
@elonmusk
@DanielleFong
The whole point of people with obvious pronouns still telling you their pronouns is so that the people with less obvious pronouns feel comfortable/not abnormal for telling you theirs.
Why is basic courtesy so awful and offensive to you?
@broregarde
@alz_zyd_
@tlehmanifold
And i write my username and password when i log into twitter dot com, that make me a writer? That mean i mustve learned well in english class?
@latenightfights
@carlinspace
(spoiler) Yeah dude goes from methodically taking out corrupt officials to expose corruption to just trying to rack up as many bodies as possible
@TheGreyGhostGMC
@mattAndMurabito
@lolz1044
Well if believing that helps you sleep at night by all means continue. Instead of, y'know, doing even the bare minimum amount of research yourself
@jacktrial_
@OctopusIllusion
@Vegas82
@TomAThakkar
This comment makes no sense. A royal flush wins one hand and what that hand is worth just depends on the pot.
At least use mahjong as your argument, poker is completely incomparable
@wwarrior_1
That's because people are likely to die when guns are involved. Innocent bystanders could die, even.
Really just spend five seconds thinking about it and you might figure out why people screamed.
@Sethimus1
@stakharov
@OrwellNGoode
It comes across perfectly well to anyone who hasn't rotted their brains into mush.
Even someone with mild autism could probably recognize that this isn't serious.
@d_feldman
@_maxew_
That's not a proper analogy here.
The claim "if the model can't answer this question correctly, it doesn't have a world model" does not mean "if the model can answer this correctly, it must have a world model."
@daniwestastro
@MingAutocrat
Yeah because nothing's ever gone wrong with "dont worry we'll only use the death penalty if we're super duper extra sure they did it"