@theseantcollins
Remember the first time you saw Space Ghost Coast to Coast, flipping thru the channels in the middle of the night and seeing Brak sitting there for an uncomfortably long length of time?
"What the hell is this?" you thought at the time.
@SpiroAgnewGhost
The settlement of Jones' lawsuits was agreed to in November 1998, six years after Clinton was elected president and data after the 1998 midterms, so it was not in any stretch of the imagination a campaign contribution.
@Acyn
You actually need evidence to charged people with crimes. If Republicans try to "go on offense" and try people without evidence, courts will just dismiss the charges. Not a real threat.
@SpiroAgnewGhost
Yeah, the volume of it screams that Trump knows consequences he's avoided for most of his life and finally reaching him.
It's like watching a Disney villain get his comeuppance just before the resolution.
@DanMKervick
Facts like Russia's initial war goal was to overthrow the Zelensky government and take over all of Ukraine, and Russia failed at that goal.
@squatsons
The fact a "winter campaign" of missile strikes by Russia is a thing is laughable. It's a completely fruitless endeavor, as last winter proved.
@AntiToxicPeople
This is where your right to remain silent really becomes important.
This isn't the same as mouthing off to random people who can't do anything to you.
@Isikoff
@FaniWillisForDA
Whoever receives a target letter has a high chance of indictment. We speculate a lot about people getting indicted, but such letters are more than speculation. They are actual parts of the process of indictment.
@Acyn
The language of Giuliani's agreement in the defamation case is that he "does not contest" the assertion that he spoke falsehood about Freeman and her daughter. Most reasonable people would say that means he admitted to it.
@Faytuks
Ukraine and the U.S. work together on intelligence sharing and the U.S. knows specifics like what the targets of Russian missiles are going to be. Might explain the success rate of air defense.
@erikmbaker
The U.S. actually fought two wars at the same time (Afghanistan and Iraq) for years, even during the Great Recession. Biden is saying, "uh yeah, the US can handle giving aid to two countries".
@DefMon3
@Use0815
@WarMonitors
Back in the early days of the Internet, if you got banned from a message board or other website, there were no claims of free speech violation. Because we weren't idiots and knew that websites had the right to ban people. Sometimes if they just didn't like you.
@squatsons
Two things aren't equal. Russia is bigger and more powerful than Ukraine. People are impressed with the smaller, less powerful country is able to hit inside the bigger country.
@RALee85
The writer loses me when he suggests Russia could launch its own new offensive soon. They totally can not do that. Maybe if one believes in magic they can, but short of that, no.
@gtconway3d
Mention of Pelosi is complete conspiracy theory. The Speaker has no authority over the Guard. No direct control over Capitol Police either. The House and Senate Sergeants at Arms have some control, but that would mean McConnell had just as much power.
@Santucci
That's a decent response, if you are hoping Trump is panicking over indictment. It sounds a little panicky. People who are afraid are the ones who use the "I'm being threatened" language.
@squatsons
Perspective: in February 2022, the world thought Russia was powerful enough to conquer all of Ukraine quickly. 17 months later, the world now knows Russia can't even conquer Donetsk oblast and has to occasionally negotiate with mutinous mercenary leaders bent on attacking Moscow.
@squatsons
Reading the entire article, it makes clear 2 million rounds produced a year isn't enough to sustain Russia's war in Ukraine. They fire around 10 million rounds a year there. Hence why Putin has to beg Kim for ammunition.
@Tendar
@bradyafr
Ukr does NOT have 3-to-1 advantage needed by a force on offensive. They are not going to cause Rus in Zaporizhzhia to collapse. Attacks on Rus rear areas have limited usefulness. They just disperse their hubs creating myriad new targets Ukr has to attack with limited resources.
@GeromanAT
That's not going to happen. The U.S./U.K. would never do that. And this "evidence" is pretty sparse. I don't see any significant announcements of Ukrainians to leave Mykolaiv, and the U.S. troops in Romania is just standard beefing up or NATO's eastern flank.
@ItaMilRadar
If they stay in international waters and mind their own business, the U.S. doesn't care as much as OSNT people do. The U.S. will send aircraft to watch, with is standard.
@TheIntelFrog
@Tyuiop0987653
@dunnooworld
@stats_feed
Yes, of course. India is the exception in that meme. I love India, and so do most Americans. It's great that India is the world's largest democracy.
@GalenMetzger1
I don't pay attention to Silver that much, but I never disliked them. But I can say this is the worst take of his I've ever read. Just bashing the Democratic presidential primary system as somehow illegitimate when it's the same it has always been.
@ECaliberSeven
@ClydeInky
Which is actually amazing in the big picture. A Democrat as a statewide office holder in Alaska is a significant achievement. At the very least, it invalidates that meaningless talking point "look at how much land is red and how little is blue".
@squatsons
Last night's missile and drone strikes by Russia were unimpressive. If Ukraine can figure out how to always have that level of air defense (the West will help them do so), they could be okay.
@Acyn
The "Uranium One Controversy" consists of the U.S. government (not Clinton specifically) deciding to buy uranium from Russia at the time she served in the administration.
@hugolowell
Again, as a voter of her district, I apologize to America. I always hasten to add that her presence on the ballot is a slight boost to Democrats statewide due to negative polarization.
@squatsons
Considering the pro-Russia habit of trying pass off old images as new, I would need more evidence that support the claim, "this image contains BOTH old AND new"
@nexta_tv
U.S. intelligence expects only modest territorial gains from Ukraine's counteroffensive. Severing the land bridge between Donbass and Crimea is seen as unlikely, for example.
@Hezbolsonaro
This sounds like a super-important self-righteous issue that you should totally spend important time of your life arguing about on the internet.
@uamemesforces
Was the McDonald's video really supposed to be a criticism of Ukraine? I thought it was just showing the resilience of Ukraine a.k.a. something positive.
@biannagolodryga
@DAlperovitch
U.S. intelligence saw the invasion coming months in advance though. So far, U.S. intelligence hasn't been warning us about anything with the dirty bomb stuff.
@SimonWDC
I'm feeling that you, Mr. Rosenberg, are going to be praised for being a lone voice saying the opposite of what everyone else was saying and you actually being right.
@Flash_news_ua
U.S. Chairman of Joint Chiefs Mark Milley in November: Chances of Russia taking over all of Ukraine are "virtually zero". This could be doom-porn from social media or it could be European officials really hyping a threat. Either way, it's not realistic.