Freelance fantasy artist & illustrator inspired by stories, myths & nature | ENG & FI | varis.illustration
@gmail
. com β¦πΏThey/ThemπΏβ¦ | NoA/I
So a "fun" story: I used to license my art to a small company that manufactures diamond art kits
A few months ago this company contacted me & said they were struggling & couldn't pay my royalties anymore. I just checked their new website - their shop is now full of A/I imagesπ«
This company still owes me money as well (not much, but still) since they never paid my last batch of royalties before terminating our contract.
And now I know why they were so eager to end our business relationship - they even asked if they could continue to use my art for free
On average, I earned about 50-100 dollars per month in royalties from this licensing client. But that's still 600-1200 $ dollars per year, now lost passive income because of A/I.
Every dollar matters though & I could pay almost two months of my rent with 1200 dollars.
And these things start to add up: licensing clients terminate contracts and stop paying royalties, private commission clients start to disappear, social media platforms burn down etc.
When multiple sources of income start to dry up all at once, it's tough.
Since some folks asked, yes I'm aware that the US Copyright Office has previously stated that gA/I images cannot be copyrighted. The current tech is just plagiarism & theft on a massive scale
But these companies don't care about that, especially if folks keep buying their kits
Someone just messaged me about how they found my artwork on Reddit & thanked me for the perfect art for their dnd character. Please do not do this. I don't think it's okay to just take other people's artwork, as some of my work is commissioned for clients or often very personal.
@TheOdeity
Tbh I have doubts about the severity of their "struggles" - they were very vague about it & tried to beg me to let them use my art for free. I said no of course: no royalties, no usage rights.
It could just be that they realized they could just use A/I & not pay artists anymore
If you commission art, please refrain from using genA/I to make ref images. At the end of the day, any usage of this tech directly supports the plagiaristic A/I companies and their exploitation/theft of creative labor.
There are so many ethical options you can use to create refs
Okay, now I kind of get what some artists meant when they said that Tumblr has its own thing with tags etc.
I posted some of my portrait sketches there & some people have written almost little stories and their funny reactions in the tags and I love reading them.
Tbh, the current situation and hostility toward artists makes me anxious to post new artwork. Some people have been threatening to steal my artwork and feed it to A/I, saying they will be glad to see me lose my job and that I deserve it for voicing my concerns and frustration.
Hello
#PortfolioDay
β¨
Iβm Riikka, a freelance fantasy artist with a passion for characters and B&W sketches. So far I've been doing work for private clients and indie authors, but I'm open to opportunities.
A good rule of thumb, for dnd players: If you didn't make the artwork yourself / pay someone to do it for you, always ask for permission beforehand. If the answer is no, please respect that. And if you really like a certain artist's style, consider commissioning themβ¨
I just hope that not all artists and mutuals would leave Twitter. Switching platforms is always tiring on its own, but despite its many flaws, Twitter has been the only platform where I've felt like I'm part of the art community and people have been so supportive as well
*Sees an obvious A/I generated image on the Aistation trending page*
*Check tools* Procreate and blender. Riiiight.
*Checks tags* #/NoAi, #/matte painting #/beauty, #/soul
Sure, one can just see the *beautiful soul* in those melty-ass A/I eyes π€‘
Hello
#PortfolioDay
β¨
Iβm Riikka, a freelance fantasy artist with a passion for characters. So far I've been mostly doing work for private clients, but I'm open to opportunities!
If you quote tweet genA/I posts by blue checks, you are just giving them more visibility while also shoveling ad money directly into their pockets and supporting genA/I.
Just boycott, mute, and block the genA/I folks on sight. Please do not give them any visibility and traction.
@Kapuchu1
Oh yeah, I definitely have my doubts about the severity of their "struggles" as well. They only started to use A/I after terminating all the contracts with artists, me included.
I suspect they just used that as an excuse since they realized they don't need to pay us anymoreπ«
If this is how you sometimes feel when you look at art online, please remember that most of the times, everyone only shares their very best work
You donβt see their βbadβ or βfailedβ art, but you see your own βbadβ art. You donβt see their struggles, but you experince your own.
Artists, let me see your improvement over 5 years!
5 years ago, I associated polished rendering with pro art, so I tried to emulate the style the best I could. But w/o strong skills in art fundamentals, I burned out. I had to go back to the basics & unlearn a lot of bad habits.
Artists, let me see your improvement over 5 years!
I feel like I'm also getting close to the times where 5 years will make less and less of a difference, for better or worse :D
Seeing multiple huge companies - such as Wacom - using exploitative A/I for their promo art is so depressing. This plagiarism tech needs to be regulated and cast into oblivion and fast. Please I need 2024 to be more hopeful
If they don't answer - treat it as a no as well. Some artists might allow the usage of their art under certain terms. If you cannot afford custom art: You can try art adopting, or use sites like Artbreeder (but be mindful of the copyright & don't use copyrighted art as a base!)
Another reminder that A(I)dobe doesnβt deserve your support and money - they continue throwing creatives under the bus with their usage of exploitative A/I.
I donβt use Photoshop anymore, SAI2 and Procreate are my main softwares for drawing:
Some folks trying to justify the use of unethical data-generated images: "It's a tool and won't be used to replace human artists, chill!"
Me seeing major publishers like Bloomsbury starting to use "AI" for their bestseller book covers: riiightπ₯΄
*existential crisis intensifies*
Extremely disappointed in
@BloomsburyBooks
for using AI on the most recent cover of Sarah J Maasβ book. Using adobe stock created by an AI generator that steals from hard working artists, while also avoiding paying a real illustrator is abhorrent.
A big shoutout to folks who support, commission, and tip artists and creatives in general π€
Your support means so much especially now when so many try to devalue the worth of creative labor with plagiarism tech
Many artists are also happy to offer simpler and more affordable commission types, like black & white head portraits or sketches. You can always ask if the artist is open to this kind of commission, if they are available for work.
I'm so sick of A/I & I will block all folks who use it as their pfp as on sight, in addition to A/I grifters.
There is so much info about how exploitative the current datasets and models are. If you support the exploitation of creatives in any way, my work is really not for you.
I got contacted to do some book cover work, but once again, my rates were outside of their budget. But I just cannot take on work that doesn't pay very fairly & so many commercial gigs seem to be low paying. 400-1000 β¬ for a complex, illustrated book cover just isn't sustainable
ChatGPT In Trouble: OpenAI may go bankrupt by 2024, AI bot costs company $700,000 every day.
Hahaha they have a declining user base, the bubble is starting to burst.
It is always morally correct to not pay for Adobe productsβ¨
After all, Adobe seems to think it's fair game to exploit artists and steal from the very people who made them so successful in the first place.
This is a reminder that I will block all folks associated with exploitative gA/I on sight. If you use a gA/I image as your pfp, I will block you.
There is no ethical way to use the current gA/I models. And if you support the exploitation of creatives, my artwork is not for you.