Professor
@SMULawSchool
. Exploring commercial law, secured transactions, and bankruptcy, with a focus on digital assets, carbon credits and other intangibles.
Thrilled to share that, Debt Tokens, co-authored with
@ChrisOdinet
and Diane Lourdes Dick, will be published in
@PennLRev
Immensely grateful for the feedback and support from friends, colleagues and students - special thanks to our RAs
@IowaLawSchool
US Commercial Law Angle. If El Salvador actually goes ahead and recognizes Bitcoin as legal tender...Bitcoin then becomes "money" under UCC § 1-201.... 🧐
BREAKING: The President of El Salvador just announced that he is making Bitcoin legal tender in his country.
This is the first country to take such a courageous step, but it won’t be the last.
El Salvador has recognized Bitcoin as legal tender. Historic. The Spaces chat with
@nayibbukele
was incredible. Shoutout to
@nic__carter
As the dust settles, let’s talk a little more about what this means for US commercial law and why I think we need to reform the UCC. A thread
Some people have asked me the diff. between the reform El Salvador is considering (ie. recognizing Bitcoin as legal tender in El Salvador) and pre-existing legislation in Japan. Based on available translations, from a commercial law perspective, this is my limited understanding:
I am thrilled to share that I will be joining the wonderful faculty at
@SMULawSchool
in the fall of 2024!
I am very excited to start this new chapter and am so grateful for the opportunity to join this incredible community! See you in Dallas!
New Article Alert!🚨🚨
Excited to share our latest work with Diane Lourdes Dick and
@ChrisOdinet
:
Debt Tokens
()
Are you interested in the intersection between digital assets, bankruptcy, and commercial law?! Read Below!
🚨🚨🚨
New paper out with
@chrisodinet
and
@Professorkbruce
: “The Private Law of Stablecoins”
Ever wondered what happens to stablecoin holders if their stablecoin fails or its issuer goes bankrupt?
Read below! 🧵
Significant moment in the Celsius bankruptcy as Judge Martin Glenn rules that $4.2bn of crypto deposited by customers to earn interest belongs to the estate, not the users:
#AALS2024
My phenomenal co-author
@ProfessorKBruce
presenting her new research project exploring the secrecy issues involved in Bankruptcies of Crypto Platforms
11/ GOOD NEWS: ALI/ULC are ALREADY working on reforming the UCC focusing on new tech. including Bitcoin (). Great crypto folks are providing input (
@CaitlinLong_
@propelforward
@Prof_CarlaReyes
@profjuliet
and many others). I expect updates in July!
Feeling incredibly honored to receive this award.
A heartfelt thank you to all my
@pennlaw
students - you are the real MVPs! Your curiosity and passion inspire me every day!
👏 Congratulations to the recipients of our 2022-2023 Faculty Awards:
Incoming Dean Sophia Z. Lee, Bill Ewald, Jean Galbraith, Jasmine E. Harris (
@Jeharrislaw
), Matt Duncan L'03, and
@Andrea_Tosato
🏆
Fantastic presentation by
@Prof_CarlaReyes
on the intersection between corporate law and
#DeFi
/ OpenSource software.
Ooki Dai v CFCTC
Tornado Cash v Ofac
#AALS2024
Grant lawmakers a little time to consider the Salvadorean "legal tender" development.
Trust The Process...and the UCC-Emerging Technologies Committee 😉
Take a look: -> "Intangible Money" ...
cc.
@CaitlinLong_
@Prof_CarlaReyes
@propelforward
@profjuliet
“Bitcoin isn’t money because no sovereign has made it legal tender!”
*bitcoin is designated legal tender by law*
“Legal tender laws are antiquated and irrelevant anyway”
Wooooo! Wooooo! Wooooo! It's the Nature Boy, Ric Flair, and I'm here to tell you about the hottest thing in crypto – Wooooo! Coin! These guys are strutting in with liquidity like my legendary charisma. Why? Because the founders put their money where the Wooooo! is! But check this
The Blog is back! Today, in our "What's All the Fuss About" column, we provide a tl;dr on the blockbuster hit "Debt Tokens" by Diane Loudes Dick,
@ChrisOdinet
, and
@Andrea_Tosato
.
A heartfelt thank you to all the participants in the Wharton-Harvard Insolvency & Restructuring Conference and the AALS 2024 Commercial Law Panel. So many people have helped us develop this paper. In no special order, a special shout out to:
@Prof_CarlaReyes
@propelforward
Excited to be attending
@BYULaw
/
@UChicagoLaw
Inaugural Winter Bankruptcy Conference.
I'll be presenting our paper "Debt Tokens" co-authored with
@ChrisOdinet
and Diane Dick.
Looking forward to hanging out with all the commercial law and bankruptcy law geeks!
BYU Law's Global Business Law Program will host two conferences this week: our 6th Annual Winter Deals Conference and Inaugural Winter Bankruptcy Conference.
10/ The solution is reforming the UCC. Rather than adapting and stretching old rules and definitions, it’s preferable to craft new ones designed for digital assets such as Bitcoin that effectively serve both community and market needs
In the USA, under the UCC (2022), you can tokenize
-Chattel paper (Art 5, 9)
-Documents of title, such as bills of lading and warehouse receipts (Art 7)
-Money claims (receivables) that fit within the definition of "account" or "payment intangible" (Arts 9, 12)
Outside of the
$TUSD is and always was structurally "wobbly". The redemption right they offer is extremely weak ...and can be suspended unilaterally at any time. Moreover, holders of $TUSD would be unsecured creditors in case of bankruptcy...
The new top tens came out yesterday, and . . . wait, what? Everybody can go home for 60 days.
@Andrea_Tosato
,
@ChrisOdinet
, and Diane Lourdes Dick's "Debt Tokens" will soon be featured in our "What's All the Fuss About?" column
NFT Securitizations are a fast-evolving space (see the UKJT paper released yesterday)
In this essay w/
@ChrisOdinet
, we discuss the regulatory framework proposed by Steven Schwarcz and share our private law perspective😊😊
A big thank you to the
@BULawReview
editors!
🚨New paper alert! Check out this essay w/ my super talented friend & coauthor
@Andrea_Tosato
where we review & analyze the use of
#NFTs
in
#securitization
-style transactions, as described in Steven Schwarcz's forthcoming article; all coming to you soon
@BULawReview
First act up for consideration: the 2022 Amendments to the Uniform Commercial Code. The 2022 amendments update and modernize the UCC to address emerging technologies and ensure that the UCC continues to facilitate commercial activity well into the future.
I am delighted to see my latest article, co-authored with
@Giuliano_C
, featured in the FinReg Blog of the Global Financial Markets Center at Duke University School of Law.
It was a lot of fun working with the team
@DukeGFMC
!
Today
@AmLawInst
and
@uniformlaws
hold the first reading for the draft Art 12 of the UCC. Art 12 would create a special regime for commercial transactions involving “Controllable Electronic Records” – INCLUDING Bitcoin. The meeting is live-streamed here:
Thank you to
@USOCC
for inviting me to talk about tokenization of real world assets and "Debt Tokens" (), alongside
@profjuliet
and Ed Smith. Fantastic discussion!
🎉🎉🎉 Huge congratulations on being named an Am. Legal Tech. Award Finalist for Education! Your dedication to innovative teaching and research in
#law
&
#tech
is evident and truly inspirational.
@SMULawSchool
is lucky to have you! 🌟🎉🎉
I am honored to be named an Am. Legal Tech. Award Finalist for Education! Humbled to be named alongside colleagues in the academy that I admire and look up to. Will keep striving to bring innovative teaching and research in
#law
&
#tech
to
@SMULawSchool
1/ UCC1-201(a)(24) defines “money” as “medium of exchange currently authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government. The term includes a monetary unit of account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more countries”
In "The Contractarian Joint Venture,"
@Prof_CarlaReyes
and I offer DAOs pathway to an entity that doesn't have unlimited liability and doesn't issue securities. Proposals: default partnership statute amendment and new Howey/Reves test for crypto assets.
8/ As a matter of interpretation, even after the
#BitcoinLaw
, I agree that it would be preferable not to extend the UCC concept of “money” to cover Bitcoin. Imho, current UCC rules for “money” just don’t work with Bitcoin (see
@Joecarlasare
)
Confused about the impact of the 2022 UCC Amendments on
#Bitcoin
and
#CBDCs
?
This essay from the amazing
@Prof_CarlaReyes
covers every angle!
TL;DR: the 2022 UCC Amendments benefit
#BTC
and other digital assets - they do NOT pave the way for
#CBDCs
!
To encourage continued dialogue & education re: the 2022 UCC Amendments' impact on
#Bitcoin
&
#crypto
, I wrote up a more formal discussion of the dispute re: the definition of "money" in the UCC & the
#commercial
#law
misunderstandings on which it rests:
I will never get tired of saying this: the UCC is Private Law. Not Public Law nor Regulation.
The UCC does NOT affect:
-SEC and its definition of security
-CFTC and its definition of commodity
-FINcen and its definition of money
-Money transmission licenses at state level
it is SUPER important to keep in mind that the UCC is private law - it is not regulatory in nature, and the definition of money in the UCC has no direct impact on the definition of money for other legal purposes such as in the Internal Revenue Code, the Bank Secrecy Act, 40/n
3/ The good: applying UCC rules for “money” to Bitcoin would have some positive implications, in theory. Under the UCC, “money” is negotiable and it can be easily used as collateral in financial transactions
6/ The ugly: Under the UCC, “possession” is only possible for tangible goods. Bitcoin isn’t tangible. So, if Bitcoin were classified as “money”, yet it were not possible to take “possession” of it…. no Bitcoin negotiability and no use as collateral. This would be a bad outcome
4/ In particular, “negotiability” is key for commercial circulation. As
@CaitlinLong_
has stressed, the crypto-community wants the law to treat Bitcoin as “negotiable” – to have better legal coverage when using it as a medium of exchange
@HoffProf
Crypto's new fad is using NFTs to buy/finance real estate
This “novel” transaction model is touted as a technological upgrade
It is not.
It strips homebuyers of key protections against foreclosures and creates uncertainty in sorting creditors’ claims
We have solutions!
@CaitlinLong_
@uniformlaws
😊 ☺️Article 12 was a collective effort, I was just one of many who contributed
A12 shows that industry/enthusiasts/coders and lawmakers can work together to create rules that are welcomed, bring legal certainty and promote innovation
@Prof_CarlaReyes
@propelforward
@profjuliet
Two days ago
@stablecoin_HUSD
lost its peg.
Supposedly, HUSD has solid reserves. But if HUSD crashed or its issuer went bankrupt, how would things shake out for HUSD holders?
With
@ChrisOdinet
and
@ProfessorKBruce
, we tried to answer this question 🧵
This is the definition of Digital Asset in the McHenry-Thompson draft bill.
A perfect example of a definition in a financial regulation statue that is ignorant about private law ("possession") and not technology neutral.
So bad. SO. BAD.
@CremeDeLaCrypto
@piotrstojanow
I think one ought to look past "money". Challenging states/governments regarding their role as ultimate guarantors of property rights is potentially far more disruptive.
We argue that three elements are crucial:
i) centralized issuer (USDT, USDC) vs decentralized (DAI, FRAX) protocol;
ii) Stabilization mechanism: reserves+exchange (USDC, USDT), dual-coin (Terra/Luna), and algorithmic rebasing (Ampleforth)
ii) pegged to a currency vs commodity
Today Craig Wright is in the Court of Appeal in England and Wales in an appeal on the Tulip Trading case. 🌷
Probably the most significant
#BTC
/ Bitcoin case to date, and directly involves developer duties.
It starts after 10.30am (London) - I’ll follow along in this thread.
After last year's unfounded attacks on UCC Article 12...
This year, the misinformation machine is taking aim at UCC Article 8.
The aim is to sow fear and amass political capital.
The post below addresses these ridiculous conspiracy theories.
Read it and share it broadly!
🔥
Who owns your investment securities? You do. Don’t buy into misinformation about Uniform Commercial Code Article 8.
Get the facts directly from the Uniform Law Commission:
9/ But if we do that…under the UCC, Bitcoin is treated as a “general intangible”…and UCC “general intangibles” do not have the benefit of negotiability. This outcome is not positive either.
What is the solution? How do we fix this?
This is disheartening - a complete misunderstanding of this bill
Under the UCC 2022 Amendments (in South Dakota HB 1193 - the bill vetoed by
@kristinoem
),
#Bitcoin
would be a "controllable electronic record" and get a legal treatment that is FAR better than that of "money"!
I VETOED HB 1193. This bill adopts a definition of ‘money’ to specifically exclude crypto like Bitcoin. And it opens the door to the risk that the federal government could adopt a Central Bank Digital Currency.
South Dakota will always stand for Economic Freedom.
🎯
Under the UCC, "controllable electronic records"
#CERs
get the benefit of negotiability, as well as clear rules for use as collateral!
"Money" does not. This is because the UCC is not a set of rules focused on governing "legal tender"
#Bitcoin
benefits from being a
#CER
and
The past few days have shown that uninformed “pro-bitcoin" policy advocacy can seriously backfire.
People raised the alarm over changes to the Uniform Commercial Codes, falsely claiming that these changes "paved the way for CBDCs" and that not
In "The Private Law of Stablecoins" together with
@ChrisOdinet
,
@ProfessorKBruce
we looked at all major Stablecoins and argued that they are extremely diverse from a private law perspective
Complete Madness
Florida's amendment to the UCC to "ban"
#CBDCs
makes no sense...and does not achieve its declared aim...in fact it has the opposite effect.
And now...other states are copying it...
Complete Madness
3 more states have introduced bills like the Florida law that allegedly "bans" CBDCs through the
#UCC
. The article reporting it from
@Cointelegraph
says that these laws will "create significant roadblocks to
#CBDCs
" in the U.S. This is simply NOT TRUE. 1/2
5/ The not so good: as observed by Prof Schroeder and recently
@JoeCarlasare
, UCC rules for “money” assume that it is a tangible thing (ie banknotes/metal coins) and link its negotiability and use as collateral to a person taking “possession” of "money"
To date, in legal scholarship, stablecoins (SCs) have been primarily analyzed from a FinReg perspective.
Our paper provides the first comprehensive private law analysis.
By complementing FinReg scholarship, we aim to lay foundations for better normative solutions for SCs.
@DavidZell_
is exactly right 🎯
But also....some people sowed confusion and panic on purpose. To get clicks, sell ads and acquire political capital.
The result is that anyone dealing in digital assets, including
#bitcoin
, in South Dakota....is worse off. A lot worse off.
Not enough people are talking about the UCC fiasco where many pro-bitcoin actors fought hard against pro-bitcoin policy.
A good reminder that when you pull the fire alarm, there better be a fire.
Only Congress could lawfully establish a Central Bank Digital Currency in the United States, but that hasn’t stopped CBDC advocates from working to normalize this Orwellian payment system.
Today, I sent a letter to my colleagues encouraging them to help prevent state efforts to
@Viking4Eth
@govkristinoem
I am afraid that you are mistaken....
The bill
@govkristinoem
just vetoed actually favors Bitcoin, makes it negotiable and enables its use as collateral
Take a look at this thread:
Still curious about the
#UCC
Amendments and what they mean for
#Bitcoin
?
@Andrea_Tosato
and I break it down in:
Crypto’s Future Is at Stake in a Dispute Over Commercial Law’s Definition of Money via
@BarronsOnline
Mid-way through the 6th meeting of the
@UNIDROITorg
Work Group on
#digitalassets
and private law. Enjoying the discussion and grateful to be learning from the best in the field!
With this taxonomy in mind, we parse the terms of service of some of the largest SCs: USDT, USDC, DAI, USDP/BUSD, TUSD, GUSD, HUSD, DAI
Our goal is to determine a)the rights of the holders of these SCs vis-à-vis their issuers and b)their fate in the event of failure/bankruptcy
Interested in the private law problems created by tokenization/cryptocurrencies/NFTs and their custody?
@UNIDROITorg
has recently adopted its "Principles on Digital Assets and Private Law"
Imho, the best international soft law document in this space
@Prof_CarlaReyes
talking about UCC Article 12 at the
@FordhamLawNYC
Blockchain Symposium
Fantastic Stuff 👏👏
More dialogue between private law and fon reg people is required!
Congratulations to
@DonnaRedel
for organizing a fantastic event!
The first part of our paper presents an original taxonomy.
Legal scholars often lump SCs together…they're “all the same”…. a form of “unregulated banks”
We disagree.
Our article shows that SCs are very diverse and that differences have very real legal implications
Prof. George Triantis, leading scholar in contracts and business law, has been appointed dean of Stanford Law School. He will assume his new position on June 17.
Hello
@SenatorBrakey
,
There's a common misunderstanding regarding the 2022 UCC Amendments. Contrary to being pro-CBDC and anti-Bitcoin, they actually support digital currencies like Bitcoin.
@Prof_CarlaReyes
and I have written about all of this:
We
.
@SenatorBrakey
is raising the alarm against adopting the Uniform Commercial Code — an event which, he said, could lead to the development of a Central Bank Digital Currency.
Read all the details:
I am delighted to announce that “Contract-Wrapped Property” is forthcoming in
@HarvLRev
.
Equitable servitudes on chattels are not supposed to be enforceable, but suddenly they are.
It's important to admit when you make a mistake.
A lot of people (myself included) who didn't have a deep understanding of the Uniform Commercial Code have mistakenly come out against the 2022 UCC amendments thinking that they were somehow pro-CBDC and anti-
#bitcoin
.
When I
I also want to deeply thank the
@PennLaw
community for welcoming me so warmly as a visiting professor these past few years. My colleagues and students there will always hold a special place in my ❤️
Word is spreading
💥💥🔥🔥
The 2022 UCC Amendments do not pave the way for CBDCs
Rather, they introduce a coherent commercial law regime for digital assets, including
#Bitcoin
Great to see our new paper 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝑳𝒂𝒘 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒊𝒏𝒔 (
@SSRN
) make waves among leading practitioners in Fintech, Web3 and all things Crypto!
Please, keep sending us your feedback!
@propelforward
The recent uproar around changes to the UCC seems to be the result of a fundamental lack of understanding of commercial law, and we may be shooting ourselves in the foot - and hampering
#bitcoin
adoption - if we don't change course quickly.
Thanks to
3/Many Unsecured Creditors Now Hold Bankruptcy Trade Claims
Instead of their bitcoins, stablecoins, etc., these creditors hold unsecured bankruptcy claims - typically in the form of trade debts - that are complex to assign and challenging to value
II) Via Corporate Form
SC Issuer adopts corporate personhood that limits the rights of creditors and other third persons to its reserves/custodial holdings
- New York Special Purpose Trust Company
- Wyoming Special Purpose Depository Institution
@CaitlinLong_
13/Policy Implications
So what are the policy implications? Well making predictions is hard....but...
Previously, under UCC Article 9, assigning bankruptcy trade debts required extensive due diligence, written agreements, and public filings, limiting their liquidity.
The 2022
@AaveAave
proposal doesn’t even mention the rights of $GHO holders
What are the rights of $GHO holders if the protocol fails?
What if a hacker finds an exploit and mints billions of coins (eg $AUSD)?
Would $GHO holders have a claim against anyone/anything? Where/how/how much?
Under the rules that have been vetoed:
-CERs get negotiability + clear rules for use as collateral
-"money" is subject to a very restrictive regime, as the UCC does not provide extensive rules to govern "legal tender"
#Bitcoin
would BENEFIT from being a
#CER
and not
#money
!
@lex_node
is exactly right.
This is why UCC Draft Article 12 does not look to the physical location of the parties...or their "accounts".... to determine the applicable law to a transaction involving digital assets (§ 12-107)👇
how do I know whether my blockchain "accounts" are in the U.S.
if my ledgerX is in the U.S., does that mean the account is "inside the U.S."?
if I go to Mexico with my ledgerX, is the "account" now "outside the U.S."?
what if I left a copy of the seed phase in the U.S.?
The 2022 UCC Amendments only carve out "controllable electronic records" such as
#Bitcoin
from the definition of "money".
This is a GOOD thing for
#Bictoin
and other cryptocurrencies.
See
@Prof_CarlaReyes
:
and
@yael
:
4/n
4) CSA believes STABLECOIN arrangements may constitute securities and/or derivatives.
This categorization could lead to a major delisting of stables on Canadian exchanges (who are prohibited from allowing 🇨🇦 clients exposure to any crypto asset that is a security/derivative).