Writing a new sequence on LW. My modest goal is to combine models from neuroscience, psychotherapy, meditation, game theory, and a bunch of other places, into a better model of how our minds work than the one suggested by our normal folk psychology.
A trauma book I was reading had an interesting claim that indecision is often because the person looks for the approval of an internalized authority figure but is unable to predict what action they would approve of.
I feel like that has some intuitive truth to it, in that when I don't care about anyone's opinion (or if nobody ever finds out) then it's much easier to just pick one action and commit to it even if it might go badly.
Or it can be a conflict between _different_ internalized authority figures. "If I do this then X will be angry at me but if I do the other thing, then Y will be angry at me".
Or just the expectation that X will be angry at me no matter what I do.
At a water plant in Poland, there are eight clams with sensors attached to their shells. If the clams close because they donโt like the taste of the water, the cityโs supply is automatically shut off.
This also reminds me of the way I think a big part of the appeal of various ideologies and explicit decision-making systems is that they give people a clear external ruleset that tells them what to do.
Wild thread with quotes about people who aren't impressed by image generation apps like DALL-E, because they thought that this is what computers already do and that Photoshop also just draws you whatever you tell it to draw.
Then if things go wrong, people can always appeal (either explicitly or just inside their own mind) to having followed The Right Procedure and thus being free of blame.
Holy -
I'm getting cold shivers reading this paper
They made ML models trained on different modalities but all taking language input/output, to reason together by using language as a common representation
This is getting so close to "parts" models of the mind it's scary
With multiple foundation models โtalking to each otherโ, we can combine commonsense across domains, to do multimodal tasks like zero-shot video Q&A or image captioning, no finetuning needed.
Socratic Models:
website + code:
paper:
The most obvious external example of this is people within a bureaucracy following the rules to the letter and never deviating from them in order to avoid blame. Or more loosely, following what feels like the common wisdom - "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM".
Then I realized that extreme confidence signals social power, since others haven't taken you down for saying clearly wrong things (even if you _are_ saying clearly wrong things).
But those are examples of people trying to avoid blame from an external authority. I think people also do a corresponding move to avoid blame from internalized authority figures - such as by trying to follow a formalized ethical rule system such as utilitarianism or deontology.
At one point I also wondered why it is that being very confident about what you say makes you very persuasive to many people. Why should it work that you can hack persuasiveness in that way, regardless of the truth value of what you're saying?
And that means that siding with the person who's saying those things also shields people from social punishment: they're after all just doing what the socially powerful person does.
Now what was supposed to give relief from the pressures of constant inner judgment, turns into a seemingly-rigorous proof for why the person has to constantly sacrifice everything for the benefit of others.
I only now made the connection that Sauron lost because he fell prey to the Typical Mind Fallacy - assuming that everyone's mind works the way your own does.
Of course, if the system is one that easily drives people off a cliff when followed (e.g. extreme utilitarianism demanding infinite self-sacrifice), this isn't necessarily helpful.
Given that people often project their internalized authority figures into others - e.g. maybe someone is trying to avoid their father's judgment, but when seeing someone confident they see that person as their father - that allows them to avoid internalized blame as well.
(The book was "Lapsuuden kehityksellinen trauma: Syy arvottomuuteen, hรคpeรครคn ja syyllisyyteen" by Juha Klaavu. Strongly recommended if you can read Finnish.)
I'm imagining the scientists bringing some of the clams back to a lake and telling them "thank you for your service" and then the clams go back to being civilians and feel content about having done their part, each of them as happy as a clam about it.
I wonder how much of the "I want empathy for my problem, not solutions" reaction comes from an intuitive/subconscious understanding of the fact that other people's proposed solutions are likely to be bad if they don't understand what your problem actually is.
Protein folding researcher comments about the way that DeepMind's AlphaFold system beat all the established teams in the latest assessment of folding methods.
this is the best thing I've read in a long time
autistic child who has problems understanding social norms reacts to a mean teacher, without realizing it ends up organizing a student revolt and causing the teacher to get replaced
Each month, the Pope asks for prayers for a specific intention. This month, the intention is "We pray that the progress of robotics and artificial intelligence may always serve humankind."
What's something you're reasonably confident you're the ONLY person to reply to this tweet to have done?
If you see something you've done posted by someone else in the replies, please reply to that - and then you both need to come up with something else unique. :)
@Agippo_Vermith
There have even been cases of people looking so much for the approval for others, they didn't realize it was possible for them to have their own preferences about food. (From )
This is mind blowing.
With GPT-3, I built a layout generator where you just describe any layout you want, and it generates the JSX code for you.
W H A T
I find it mildly hilarious that some people's conception of enlightenment is "I will lose all egoism and never think of myself better than anyone else" and meanwhile the Buddha canonically talks about himself like this
@Agippo_Vermith
There have even been cases of people looking so much for the approval for others, they didn't realize it was possible for them to have their own preferences about food. (From )
I guess in retrospect, given that "computer graphics" are so prominent in movies etc., "creating graphics is just what computers do" makes sense if you've never thought or heard much about the details
First,
@gwern
's crazy collection of all kinds of prompts, with GPT-3 generating poetry, summarizing stories, rewriting things in different styles, and much much more.
It's funny when some people are like "anthills and slime molds are intelligent, isn't nature cool" and also "computers can never be intelligent, they're just mindless calculators"
I have for a few weeks been occasionally imagining myself having dragon wings in my back
Effects:
- More confidence
- Automatically walking in the middle of corridors/stairs etc., to give wings more space to expand on the sides
- Better posture as wings pull me up
- Feels cool
@MasterTimBlais
I recall reading a study with birds suggesting that "crying attracting predators" was intended behavior - if a baby's crying puts the parents at risk, that incentivizes the parents to deal with any crying faster, thus making the baby better off.
@tbas7000
The former is a way to try to accomplish the latter. The internalized sense of the authority figure aims to be predictive of the real one, so if one avoids upsetting the internal one, they might also avoid upsetting the real one.
Concern about AI has gotten to a point where an otherwise unrelated Financial Times article will now off-handedly mention it as a concern comparable to climate change
Imagining a world where everyone is taught from birth that they are never alone because their mind is full of parts that love them and want the best for them, and that there's some positive intention behind every single thought, feeling and behavior they'll ever have
Starting to suspect suffering is a bug not a feature
The brain literally glitching out and getting itself to an error state
And if the psyche could see the bug clearly enough, it could... refactor itself to fix it?
But that's hard since trying to look at it causes glitches
OpenAI releases Image-GPT, a version of the same AI that you've probably seen generating writing. Only this time the same architecture (!!!) is trained on images instead. Given a partial image, it can generate multiple different ways of completing it.
@sashachapin
@Aella_Girl
As ancient Internet wisdom says, the best way to find out how to do X in Linux is to go to a Linux forum with a rant about how Linux is shit because you can't even do X with it.
OpenAI releases Image-GPT, a version of the same AI that you've probably seen generating writing. Only this time the same architecture (!!!) is trained on images instead. Given a partial image, it can generate multiple different ways of completing it.
I am completely floored. Someone run a thought of mine through GPT-3 to expand it into an explanation of what I had in mind, and it's like 95% meaningful and 90% correct. I don't think that I have seen a human explanation of my more complicated tweets approaching this accuracy :)
Recommendations for good romance(-ish) novels where the romance is less "couple meets and falls in love" and more "established couple has a strong relationship that they lean into in order to defeat challenges together"?
Sweden's prime minister has to attend his mother's funeral, so Finland's prime minister represents both Finland _and_ Sweden in a meeting for EU leaders. How often does one head of government just trust another to fairly represent the interests of both countries?
Tรคssรค jotain kaunista ja luottamusta herรคttรคvรครค. Nรฅgot vackert och fรถrtroendevรคckande i detta att Finlands statsminister representerar Sverige i Lรถfvens frรฅnvarande.
Osanottoni pรครคministeri Lรถfvenille suruun. Mitt deltagande i statsministern Lรถfvens sorg.
Given that this thread is apparently blowing up, I need to admit that rather than writing it myself, I stole the summary in my first tweet from some guy on Reddit.
There I feel less like a plagiarist now.
It keeps happening that we develop an AI system that accomplishes something we thought required intelligence, realize it does it in a dumb/simple way, and then people conclude this isn't progress toward "real" AI.
But what if that gets it the wrong way around?
I was recently asked how literal I consider the Internal Family Systems model of your mind being divided into "parts" that are kinda like subpersonalities
Short answer: more than just metaphorical, but also not as literal as you might think from taking IFS books at face value
The official announcement of the Dragon Model and examples. "The game invents a complex magic system and underlying theory behind why it works and describes the whole system as I read the book."
Something that feels like a peculiar combination of observations is that... on the other hand, psychedelics and/or deep meditation look like they can help people notice and fix incorrect beliefs, but then sometimes people seem to _develop_ unhinged beliefs because of them.
This one-page summary of/from
@visakanv
's book "Friendly Ambitious Nerd" is pretty wonderful
"Your own imagination is a bottleneck that limits the amount of good you can create in the world" <3
Ideas that I dislike: the notion that stressful/unexpected/high-pressure situations bring out one's "true" nature, so that if you behave worse in such a situation then that's somehow telling.
I'd heard several people say that Everything Everywhere All At Once was good, but they better not say anything more.
So I went to see it without knowing anything else than this.
And uh.
It was good, and for those who haven't seen it yet, I better not say anything else.
@oak_sprout
Ken Wilber had a good discussion of this in his book No Boundary, of how the psychological "self" that's discussed in therapy and the "self" that's discussed in disciplines such as Buddhism refer to different things.
Great post: To listen well, get curious about the other person's problem, and try to understand it and its relation to the person in as much detail as possible.
Yet again I was struggling to motivate myself to do work, until I realized that I wasn't "unmotivated to work", I was unmotivated to continue my current approach as my mind had correctly noticed it wasn't going anywhere. Rethinking it and starting over restored the motivation.
Pretty sure that school etc. systematically teach people to not listen to their felt senses about which direction to pursue and whether that direction is a good one. A big point of school is that even if doing something makes no sense to you, you have to do it anyway.
After suffering from a neurodegenerative disease, an engineer becomes incapable of perceiving the digits 2-9, while still being able to perceive the digits 0 and 1, letters, and basically everything else.
I wonder to what extent significant parts of Buddhism got so focused on renunciation because that's the "safe" kind of mental transformation in the sense of not upsetting secular rulers.
@ZerothAxiom
I was around 13-15 when I wrote an essay arguing, basically, that there is no free will because determinism.
I was later on slightly disappointed to find out that I was not the first person in the world to think of this idea.
Redditor shares an "AI Dungeon" game played with the new GPT-3 -based "dragon model", involving a cohesive story generated in response to their actions, with only a little manual editing.
It's not just that the cultists are getting "brainwashed" by their leader; it's also that the leader is getting brainwashed _by their cultists_ to take the role that they want the leader to take.
@xuenay
I mostly do 3D modeling and some Photoshop on the side for my job. This agony is my daily existence, but with bosses and bosses-of-bosses.
It's scary when the people who employ me think I just shepherd the computer as it easily makes assets for me.
A child once told her mother that she likes me because I'm "sellainen aikuinen joka leikkii", "the kind of an adult who plays [the way children play]".
That remains one of my favorite compliments ever.
@michael_nielsen
claims that this is an artifact of larger cities having younger a younger population, and younger people walking faster than old people.
Some people suggested I write a brief "twitter trailer" of my model combining enlightenment/Buddhist theory with predictive processing, so yeah that could be useful, let me try explaining a part of it. Let's go with the minor one of "what exactly _is_ suffering?".
@QiaochuYuan
re: acute sensitivity, Josh Waitzkin had a bit in his book about how his final opponent in a Tai Chi tournament was so good at reading intent, JW could do feints just by _thinking_ of making moves he didn't actually carry out
Wrote an article on what the felt sense is, how it's something you use every day, and how it would be valuable to be more explicitly aware of. If I've done my job right, you should afterwards be totally confused by how you ever got by without this concept.
You don't need to justify your desires or fears or likes or dislikes.
"You need to justify your preferences for them to be valid" is a really powerful form of manipulation.