Author, writer & broadcaster, mostly about science & its interactions with society. Books include Bright Earth, Critical Mass, The Modern Myths, How Life Works.
I'm feeling increasingly like I'm in a little bubble of science writers, scientists and public health professionals who are almost alone in recognising we are still in the midst of a pandemic...
The great thing about these images of how the brain works is that they show us this is not the way to understand how the brain works. (See also: the cell.)
I can't see how Eat Out To Help Out can't now become a major scandal. Here was a scheme imposed by Sunak with zero scientific consultation, and which in Vallance's words utterly reversed the public-health messaging: from "Keep distant from those outside your family" to... (1/n)
If it wasn't from the reliable FT, I'd be sceptical of a graph like this that so neatly fits my preconceptions. As it is, I think this is basically Labour's campaign poster for the next election.
I am just doing final proof corrections for this rather lovely thing, which will appear in the early autumn I believe. Not ready for pre-ordering yet, but details to come in due course.
Here it is. This is my attempt to explain why modern biology has, over the past decade or two, created a narrative about life that is far richer and more marvellous than we'd guessed.
I'm struck by how accounts of early 20th C quantum physics tell of the particpants frequently getting ill from nervous exhaustion due to sheer mental exertion: Schrödinger, Bohr, Heisenberg... Was this really a thing?
Matt goes to the heart of it. With current measurement technology and state-of-the-art computers it is still impossible to predict the weather more than a few days ahead. Yet these same people, with the same technology, think they can model long term climate change. They can't.
I can't recommend strongly enough that you read
@matthewcobb
and
@nccomfort
's analysis in
@Nature
of Rosalind Franklin's real contributions to solving the structure of DNA. It raises many issues...
Has anyone explained what 18-yr-olds are doing wrong that requires this 12-month corrective? I see some waffle about "regaining the national spirit". On what grounds do we measure that, and conclude it is lacking in young people? Why them?
I suppose if I were a chief scientist at Meta, the sum I make from my very modest book sales would not seem significant. But it's a significant part of my income, and moreover keeps me tethered to a world where statements like this could never be made without ridicule.
Only a small number of book authors make significant money from book sales.
This seems to suggest that most books should be freely available for download.
The lost revenue for authors would be small, and the benefits to society large by comparison.
Why the wallpaper matters.
@maitlis
hits the nail right on the head in the opening of
@BBCNewsnight
. "It matters because it involves standards, rules, and integrity in public office. Once those values start to erode, can the public ever expect to get them back?" 👏👏👏
Ready for another bit of obscure WTF molecular biology that has an important broader message you’ll see discussed nowhere in the science press? Of course you are! Then here goes. (Warning – long thread! But with a punchline.) It’s about this paper: /1
Pedantic I know, but I never understood this one. The plates are evidently not broken, and we know that because we can see into the "box". Fails the analogy at all levels.
Everyone said that The Three-Body Problem is full of mind-bending ideas, but no one told me that it is also extremely badly written. I mean, just awful.
(And it's not a translation thing. I have read stacks of books in translation from Chinese writers.)
Oh lord, Dan Dennett has died. That's a huge loss to the intellectosphere. He ruffled lots of feathers and often divided opinion, but he was a phenomenal thinker and always worth listening to. And a fabulous writer.
These are low-res preliminary pages, but here's a glimpse of the first of two books I have coming out later this year, to give you a sense of how lovely it will look.
Here I argue that, while the mistakes and mishandling that have led to 175K Covid deaths in the UK are ultimately the government's responsibility, the scientific community as a whole has been too quiet about it.
I'm currently reading a scientific paper and am struck by how specialization in pretty much any field rapidly insulates you from the kind of questions that people outside that field are likely to ask about your topic. It's a massive problem, though surely not an inevitable one.
They really don't get it. Rewarding barefaced lying with public appearances has contributed substantially to the corruption of our political culture. There comes a point when it must disqualify you from public platforms, not make you modishly "controversial".
Some people have asked why Isabel is on
#bbcqt
- like all of our guests, she will be questioned & challenged by our audience & other panel members. The panel is made up of politicians, public figures, & political commentators to ensure a range of views.
4 years ago I conducted this interview for
@QuantaMagazine
with the brilliant philosopher of science Michela Massimi (
@p_realism
) after she was awarded the Royal Society's Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Medal.
To my delight, I've just been awarded the medal too.
My TL right now is largely of random people saying the fusion news has just taken us into a revolutionary new era of energy technology, and all the physicists and science writers saying it really hasn't.
Cases are very high. Lots are still dying. 1 in 20 secondary-school pupils with Covid, FFS. But at a school parents' evening last night, with rooms full of people, we were nearly alone in wearing a mask.
One of the most troubling aspects of the UK pandemic has been the profound lack of curiosity among the scientific establishment about how, with such a phenomenal science base, we did so catastrophically badly. This is barely acknowledged, let alone considered.
I was going to be very British and diffident about the cancer surgery I'm having imminently, but decided in the end to write this for
@NautilusMag
in the hope that it might be helpful for others in similar positions.
He just can't stop digging. The implication is that BJ had the sense to realise the rules were too hard ('cos he really wanted to party), whereas those who didn't attend funerals lacked that common sense. It's obscene that we're having to witness this in the Commons.
'These rules were very hard for people to obey'
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg
suggests the Covid inquiry may find that coronavirus laws were 'too hard on people' after being asked about
@BorisJohnson
's behaviour
@AdamRutherford
I don't so much care about Toby. There will always be Tobys. I care a lot about the Telegraphs that let the Tobys be Tobys on a public stage with a megaphone.
Historians correct me if I'm wrong, but my impression of Darwin is that, having come up with an amazing idea, he then continued to think about exceptions and contradictions rather than trying to make everything fit it. That's rather rare and special in a scientist.
#DarwinDay
Maybe it is still too raw for something like Help. But my fear is that we will forget those horrors and outrages in our queues for petrol and food. That we'll look upon the continuing deaths of 1000s as some kind of unavoidable natural catastrophe. We can't afford to do that.
I mean, being doubly vaxxed and having had Covid a month ago, I felt about as safe - to me and to others - as I could be, but felt it was vital to show we still need masks, at the very least.
Let's hear it for John Bell though. I mean Christ, really. It was thanks to him that quantum foundations became experimental physics and not philosophy. (Nothing against philosophy, but it's good to get answers sometimes.)
...say anything that would undermine the government. But it seems to me that a system that prevents the chief scientists from warning people about the mortal danger of what they are being encouraged to do is one that needs fixing. (4/4)
I can't say I'm surprised by what is coing out from Vallance's testimony to the Covid inquiry, but it is utterly damning of Sunak. 2 July 2020: the Chancellor says "It is all about handling the scientists, not handling the virus."
My letter to the BBC Complaints about the shocking errors and distortions in last week's
@bbcquestiontime
. Feel free to send your own. The clip is here
Paul Dirac: "I feel that philosophy will never lead to important discoveries. It is just a way of talking about discoveries which have already been made." Discuss.
I met a friend today who I hadn't seen since pre-pandemic. Smart, thoughful, left-leaning chap who I like a lot. We chatted.
It became clear he thinks Covid is no big deal but is being exaggerated so that we can be controlled...
Just got a quote for use of an image from a Nature Publishing Group paper in a forthcoming book.
>$4,000
This is obscene. I'm redrawing the fecking thing.
Yes, I'm struggling to understand this position. We regularly vaccinate against flu (less lethal than Covid), partly to reduce the severity if we catch it. So why not Covid? Also for context: as a 61-year old cancer patient, I have not been deemed eligible for a Covid booster.
According to JCVI member Dr Adam Finn, the UK’s strategy going forward is that “most under 65’s will now end up boosting their immunity NOT through vaccination, but through catching Covid *many* times.”
I watched C4's Help last night, in furious tears. (Stephen Graham and Jodie Comer outstanding as ever.) But I saw very little media response to it. This stuff really happened - only last year! But it felt as though people thought: OK, good drama; next!
David Hare said to me last week that he thinks people are at a stage of wanting to look away from it all: the arts are in a state of Anything But Covid. I think he's right, and it's understandable. But Covid is very much still here, and will be for some time.
Gonna post this again, with apologies to those who saw it earlier, as the thread seems to be getting prematurely truncated.
So: Ready for another bit of obscure WTF molecular biology that has an important broader message you’ll see discussed nowhere in the science press? /1
In the Middle Ages the plague caused massive death because people lacked sanitation, medicine, social welfare & any understanding of disease.
In the 21st century it was because when people were told to keep 2m apart and not meet up with friends, it obviously didn't mean *them*.
Twitter sci hist people: which experiments would you consider to be the most elegant, beautiful, or otherwise pleasing? I don't mean important in terms of what they disclosed (necessarily), but aesthetically or intellectually rich and satisfying in their own right.
Here's me on this - to be frank - shitshow. Let's be clear that the government's (in)actions are wholly political. We're not talking about lockdowns here, after all.
"Together scientists and artists can be really powerful storytelling teams."
Nautilus cover artist Zoe Keller discusses her creative process, the challenges of illustrating endangered wildlife, and what scientists can learn from artists:
Here’s a paper that will get zero press because it looks totally specialist, not to say obscure. It’s about how an important class of transcription factors regulate genes. But I think it's worth dissecting because it raises a wider question.Bear with me...
Manabe and Hasselmann are unexpected but good choices for the Physics Nobel, but Parisi won't surprise physicists. Totally deserved.He's one of those deep thinkers who just doesn't register on the popular-physics radar. (Partly because his work is hard!)
I don’t delude myself that many folks will know why I have been granted this great honour, so please indulge me when I try to explain some of the ways in which I’ve sought to “share the social, cultural, and historical context of science”. (1/n)
Dr Philip Ball is awarded the Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Medal and Lecture for his outstanding commitments to sharing the social, cultural, and historical context of science through award-winning science communication as a writer, speaker and commentator.
..."We'll pay you to spend hours in an enclosed space with people you don't know". Vallance says that it will undoubtedly have led to infections and thus to deaths. And Sunak misled the inquiry about it. But it's not just that... (2/n)
In retrospect I guess it was a fairly obvious prediction that the worse the climate crisis gets, the more the denialist responses are going to go from merely slippery and evasive to just unabashedly fucking stupid.
Texas is seeing temperatures at all-time highs - yet it’s drawing in holidaymakers and other Americans as never before.
Why? Because there’s aircon everywhere: tech allows mankind to overcome the weather
My column on the case for optimism:-
Interesting article on path integrals and their use in quantum field theory and general relativity. Worth perhaps remembering Feynman's own injunction not to confuse the mathematics for the physics.
Just received preliminary pages for this, and it's all I can do not to put up some of them here, prematurely. Honestly, this is going to look gorgeous.
Home-educating my kids made me think about how to deliver science in a way that wasn't just a bunch of "stuff". I ended up putting it into this little "book" that is available here as a free download. Hope it's of use to someone.
In 1665, after trying to book a plague test in Lincolnshire, Isaac Newton was sent to the testing site at Inverness. The trip took three days, by which time his symptoms had vanished - but on the way he solved string theory and predicted dark matter. This is HISTORY!
I'm very pleased to see that my article in yesterday's Guardian is stimulating some discussion.
@JeremyFarrar
makes the excellent suggestion that it be read alongside
@d_spiegel
's piece in the THE (1/n)
Wondering why the Nature paper on Assembly Theory provoked such heated debate? Here's what I figure was going on (at least, the part I'll say in public 😉).
Anticipating lots of suggestions that any comparison between the UK's current situation and 1930s Germany will prompt condescending accusations of over-reaction. So here's the view of one of the leading historical authorities on that era.
This is extraordinary. She has no idea what future pandemics might be like - but more to the point, she doesn't understand her own ignorance about that. Hard to imagine how a GCSA could stay silent about this position if she becomes PM.
I only just learnt that Michael Fisher died in 2021. He was one of the most formidable physicists of the 20th century - yes that's right, even if you haven't heard of him.
I realise it's a danger for scientists today because of all the absurd other pressures: publishing, grant applications, tenure, teaching... But for those guys, it seemed to be simply about the effort of thinking really hard. Was this just a trope, like the 19th C dream vision?
Popular science books by scientists: here's the thing.
I'm struck by how they often present their big theory of X, with passing reference to other ideas about X, especially conflicting ones. The question is how well this serves the communication of science. (1/n)
You might have "secretly enjoyed" that "gaffe"
@christinalamb
, because I'm guessing you don't have a child to whom such things have been said. So let me tell you that if you do (and for most people, even if you don't), there's nothing there to enjoy. I hope you will apologize.
Here too was a policy that the scientists were sure was going to have these effects, and yet on which they felt unable to say anything to warn the public of the dangers. Vallance might consider that to be the way the system had to work - that he & his colleagues could not...(3/n)
The trajectory of Liz Truss was kind of inevitable: after such humiliation, one could only vanish entirely or go towards the only group who'd make her feel validated: mad far-right "deep state" conspiracy theorists. But it's still deeply unsettling that she was once PM.