Assistant Professor of Philosophy
@universityofga
| ethics of war, bioethics, ethics of tech/AI | it's an anagram of my name | all views mine and mine alone
LIFE HACK: if you go to a restaurant and the server asks you “Have you ever dined with us before?” just say ‘yes’, even if you haven’t, as this will save you several excruciating minutes of them explaining to you how restaurants generally work
For every cool, seemingly new idea you have, there's precisely one (1) guy from 1981 who published your exact idea in some obscure now-defunct journal, which was probably never read (much less cited), & who then apparently faded into total obscurity, never to be heard from again.
Some personal news:
Nearly all the places I applied this year reported that I was "among the many qualified applicants" that applied, and even though I wasn't selected, they wish me well on my future endeavors!!
The six archetypical philosophy papers:
-Bold idea paper
-Pure reply paper
-Reply + positive view paper
-All views have problems paper
-"Don't look there, look here" paper
-"People should write more about this" paper
Am I missing any others?
I wrote this piece describing my 5 years on the philosophy job market. It's deliberately matter-of-fact, rather than a personal essay.
I found the job market opaque & wished I knew more about what it looked like. This aims to remedy that somewhat.
I don’t wanna be ‘that guy’ or anything, but I’ve heard so many good things about Schitt’s Creek and I’m six episodes in and wondering...when does it get funny?
Will never not cringe at the memory of when my dissertation committee brought me back into the room after my defense to tell me whether or not I passed, and in the overwhelming anxiety of the moment, the first thing my dumb ass uttered was “we good?”
There has been no remotely persuasive argument yet made that these protests are damaging to the security of the university, despite the university’s insistence otherwise.
🚨 Police arresting students now @
#UGA
for criminal trespassing on their own campus. University of Georgia had set up the Gaza Solidarity Encampment hardly an hour ago.
Beyond excited to announce that in August I’ll be joining the Department of Philosophy at the University of Georgia as a tenure-track Assistant Professor!
I often encourage students to 'flip' their theses when they encounter a major problem with the view they had been defending. So I wrote a piece of philosophy writing guidance for students on how to do 'thesis flipping'. Would love to hear your thoughts!
@lhfang
This looks to be essentially a speaking/consulting fee at the Coast Guard Academy in the wake of some incidents of racism at the school. I’m not sure it’s illuminating to say “under the Trump admin” in this case.
Once again I was faced with the apparently impossible task of convincing a room of military service members that they simply cannot kill an infinite number of enemy civilians to save one American life, despite their insistence to the contrary.
seriously hilarious to me that philosophy has two figures, Hegel and Schlegel, who were rivals. if you presented that idea in a writer's room, you'd get laughed right outta there
I've never seen an episode of star trek, but I suspect if you were tasked with trying to lure me in with a single frame of the show, this is probably about as good as you could possibly do
Advice for all graduate students: save all the slides, lecture notes, exams (if you're allowed), essay prompts, etc. for every class you TA—and, if you're able, for those of classes your buddies TA. That stuff will come in handy when you're teaching your own classes later.
At the ATL airport, flight is overbooked, and they need 3 volunteers to be bumped to tonight. They started at $600, now they’re at $800. No takers. Everyone is on the edge of their seats. I think if we all work together, we can get them to $1500. I’ve never felt more alive.
Would be cool if philosophy made like a proper zine series. Short, pithy essays; interviews; photographs; random bits. No veneer of stuffy professionalism, just enjoyable content put together in a DIY fashion. Maybe they'd become collectibles, they'd be traded at the APA, etc.
It’s interesting that in the song “Guilty Conscience” by Eminem, Dr. Dre uses consequentialist-based motivations—esp. about reputation—to try to convince people not to do wrong. Is this just because it’s more a effective tool, or is Dre a consequentialist? In this essay I will
@linds_goldberg
@j_d_fielder
I’d email them beforehand & have them come with a “hot take”—a view they think would not be widely shared in the room. They had silly ones (pineapple on pizza etc) & serious ones. Then, rather than arguing, the rest of the room can ask clarifying questions or probe the claim…
Excited to share that I've got a new paper forthcoming in the Journal of Applied Philosophy on some issues related to the interpersonal ethics of killing in the context of the pandemic.
Has there ever been a reasonably high-profile case of a professional athlete quitting or retiring early from a sport because they came to see that sport as stupid/pointless? (To be contrasted with, e.g., seeing it as too harmful to their body)
my absolute favorite part of every academic paper is the part right after the introduction where they issue a huge list of caveats. it's just so riveting hearing about all the abbreviations and assumptions and things we are going to bracket in what follows!!
The fact that Shelly Kagan wrote a brilliant 600+ page book with only 11 citations—four of which are to his own work—is truly one of the most baller things ever.
I’m pretty sure this is nonsense: if my being a leader requires producing a leader below me & their being a leader requires producing one below them, the condition is never satisfied & no one can ever be a leader
@NoamChompers
Assuming I have inferred the context correctly: monogamous relationships are generally exclusive in very specific ways & not in others. So friendship being *fully* exclusive is not properly analogous: it would have to be exclusive in certain specific relational aspects
There should be a philosophy journal that only publishes video essays.
They'd be viewed more than most articles are read; they'd increase accessibility; they'd be good for teaching; etc.
Vox, Contrapoints, etc. all do this effectively. Academics/phil'rs should get on board.
Departments hiring TT should heavily discount applicants currently in TT positions. In one of the worst job markets ever, it’s unfair & very bad for the profession to pass over the precariously employed (& at risk of flaming out) in favor of those who already have job security.
@linds_goldberg
@j_d_fielder
The idea, then, was to model the culture we wanted for the room: intellectual humility, curiosity, openness and engagement, deliberate lack of hyper-reactivity and so on.
Very excited about this workshop I’m putting on in April! and almost equally as excited by the poster I made for it, inspired by vintage wrestling posters
I'm excited: I get to teach a one-credit course in the fall to incoming freshman on the Philosophy of Kendrick Lamar! Welcoming suggestions for readings, topics, themes, I might not already be thinking about!
pretty glaring omission from the Tell Them You Love Me documentary. Maybe this isn't decisive, but still: not mentioning this pretty big factor in the film seems to raise issues of journalistic integrity to me.
Is there any philosophical literature that explores or references the idea of moral exhaustion/fatigue—i.e. the phenomenon of being worn down by incessant moral decision-making, moral concern, etc.?
Shameless self-promotion incoming: I have two new papers coming out soon that I'm very proud of.
The first, "Five Challenges for Data-Driven Policing," surveys the literature on the ethical issues that arise from using data-driven methods in policing.
in grad school, a prof gave me feedback on an essay that was like: “the main virtue of this paper is that it’s written so clearly, which makes it easy for me to identify the many, many weaknesses in the argument.” Possibly the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me.
“Wild and woolly prose may sound radical, but it’s really the easy, comfortable option, because its unclarity makes it unrefutable… The risky option is saying something clear and specific enough to be refuted.” - Tim Williamson (Doing Philosophy)
@sam_director_
I'm tempted by this, but I'd add the condition that the non-contiguous nature of the bread has to be intentionally part of the structure. I think it's counterintuitive to think that when my taco shell breaks, it thereby becomes a sandwich
This is going to sound like a troll but it's not: Has anyone seriously considered arguing that access to abortion pills is protected by the 2nd amendment, since abortion pills are the distinctive sort of 'arms' one must use to defend oneself against the threat posed by a fetus?
Might get to teach "Philosophy of Sports & Games" next semester. Have plenty of ideas of my own, but I'd love suggestions for topics/readings! (
@JakeWojtowicz
whatcha got for me?) Especially looking for ideas that aren't just centering on questions in ethics/political.
Feeling this again today after yet another heartbreaking rejection—this one much more personal than most. Mercifully, I guess, it is likely the last of this cycle.
Just taking time to reflect on the cumulative psychological toll of all of this. It’s really hard to articulate.
To have a shot at any job, you have to seriously imagine what life would be like: how you fit in, the faculty's research, the courses you'd teach, how you'd carry out your life there.
The eventual rejection often brings a sort of grief at a life and career that could have been.
Academic job rejections are tough.
Getting them first thing in the morning: ruins entire day. Getting them mid-day: kills whatever joy/productivity I had going.
Getting them at the end of the day: ruins sleep.
Today is the second of these. Send vibes.
We always explain the wrong of plagiarism by referencing honor, fraud, academic integrity, etc.—which is good. But we don't talk much about the fact that when students commit plagiarism, it makes professors feel like total garbage. Like, it genuinely makes me very sad.
@alexxguss
I've argued we have (defeasible) duties to anyone who is vulnerable to us, though the extent of those duties is a function of how responsible I am for creating and sustaining those vulnerabilities.
Got my nose pierced again as a gift to my 19 year-old self who was forced to take my nose ring out for a job and swore I’d get it pierced again someday
To have a shot at any job, you have to seriously imagine what life would be like: how you fit in, the faculty's research, the courses you'd teach, how you'd carry out your life there.
The eventual rejection often brings a sort of grief at a life and career that could have been.
attention all philosophers! if you submit a paper to
@ErgoEditors
, and I'm asked to review it, and the word 'ergo' does not appear anywhere in your writing, I will reject it immediately! govern yourselves accordingly!
I hope it’s consistent to say I’m very proud of this outcome & have worked so hard to get here, while also acknowledging the tremendous role that luck has played—& noting that others much more deserving regularly miss out due to factors like bias, unfairness, and just bad luck.)
I often think about how one of my professors in undergrad owned a Quizno’s franchise in town and gave out coupons for free sandwiches to students who participated in class. Now that’s vertical integration.
Hot take: grad students should almost always decline referee requests. The 'reasonable' explanation is: it's free labor for a career field that may or may not ultimately allow you entry on the basis of capricious demands—none of which involve credit for having refereed papers.
Have you ever witnessed anything more infuriating than the slight and ostensibly pointless differences in the spine designs for these two Descartes volumes?
Again, I always found the market confusing and opaque. I wish we had a better system to communicate to early career folks and graduate students just what the process would look like.
This post won't allow for drawing big conclusions but hopefully it's illuminating in some ways.
Does anyone know of any good public-facing writing on the way the talk and practice of 'ethics' outside the academy has gradually become shorthand for 'compliance'? (I know of a few passing references, but anything more systematic?)