Mark Rylance: 'Shakespeare couldn't possibly have written those plays because a 'common person' from 'nowhere' couldn't have done such things!'
Also Mark Rylance: *plays Thomas Cromwell, a 'common person' from 'nowhere' basically ruling England for almost a decade*
Fine, yes. History for all, absolutely.
But this constant elevation of amateurs and celebrities with platforms often now comes alongside a gutting of (& disregard for) the depts whose academics actually do the essential research on which these celeb histories are based.
Constantly amazes me how many institutions seem to run on the idea that 'world-leading, earth-shattering, shifting paradigms, all-singing all-dancing research culture' is in any way achievable by investing in no way whatsoever in the staff meant to be at the centre of it.
For whomever else needs reminding about this (as I often do now):
This academic year is about survival.
Not excellence. Not leading the tables. Not high-quality, blended, artisanal, locally-harvested teaching.
Survival.
Just took my 93 year old mum to vote. She's registered blind. In a very loud voice she said 'Let's vote the bastard Tories out!'. The waiting crowd cheered.
#GeneralElection24
Two-week old news now (digital picket and all), but can finally announce that I've been promoted to Reader in Early Modern History!
(The reading refers to emails, I reckon ...)
@OliverDowden
@Telegraph
Historians (for decades): We really need to face up to the realities of Britain's history across the globe and not airbrush our role in slavery, violence, racism etc., ...
Oliver Dowden: No, not that history.
The challenges of keeping a library at the East India Company factory in Surat in 1673:
'But some of the given bookes these last Raines have bin damnified by ye wormes'
(India Office Records, British Library, E/3/34)
Excellent research culture is not - and cannot be - what you manage to squeeze into the transition period between lectures, administrative tasks, and somehow the pastoral rock for your students.
Choppy digital waters await many storied institutions: traditional universities are too often led by the interests of lecturers rather than the employment needs of students or industry’s recruitment needs, says
@Arden_Uni
’s Dilshad Sheikh
#THECampus
@Telegraph
Literally something Archaeologists have been warned of and thought extensively about for decades. Go read some university research ethics committee minutes if you want some extremely dull reinforcement of this.
[Early Modern Letter]
Dearest X,
Stuffy stuff stuff stuff stuffy stuff stuff stuff stuff. I beseech you, stuffy stuff stuff stuff stuffy stuff. I remain, ...
Postscript,
All the fascinating details and scurrilous material which historians of the future will love me for.
' ... educating people in the “untold history lesson” of what happened over three centuries.'
I mean it's true. It's pretty hard to find any historians writing on *checks notes* witch ... craft.
My sales pitch for REF2020 impact is a BBC Sitcom about a bunch of historians hanging around the old local making eviscerating comments about other people's work and methods. Like 'Cheers' but with more historiography.
I'm calling it 'Friendnotes'.
I mean this in all seriousness: when was the last time the UK had a Universities Minister who might be said to have actually talked to, listened to, or even seemed somewhat sympathetic to UK universities rather than being a constant barrier to or opponent of them?
If there isn't a PhD thesis out there on emotion, empathy and the Hundred Years' War ending with 'Now I know how Joan of Arc felt', this whole History of Emotions trend is pointless.
I was holding my three year old son on a walk moments ago and out of nowhere he said,
“The working class did not rise like the sun at an appointed time.”
I started to quietly tear up. He couldn’t see my face, but said,
“It was present at its own making.”
I was holding my two year old daughter on a walk moments ago and for the first time out of nowhere she said,
“God is good. God is real.”
I started to quietly tear up. She couldn’t see my face and I didn’t make a sound, but she said,
“Don’t cry. It’s okay.”
Of course the narrative here SHOULD be 'arts and humanities continue to lead despite broad campaign to defund and undermine them', but instead focus will be on science 'underperforming' ...
History's great appeal shouldn't be taken for granted and it's a blessing that so many people can and do engage with it.
But depts across the UK are collapsing and these celebs/amateurs seen as where history 'comes from'.
Their research rests on academic labour.
Historical research and writing, at its best, represents a community endeavour: the archivists, researchers, writers, communicators.
If we present it and accept is as the hobby of lone celebrities and interested amateurs, we erase that community.
"Enough of your 'subsections of populations at certain points of time' studies!", the Oxford Academic shouts. "Let me simply teach Tudor England, 1485-1603!"
Things that will not save your academic job:
- You 'saw this coming'.
- You're actually Really Clever, unlike the rest.
- You have Real Solutions, unlike the rest.
- You alone can see through to What's Really Happening.
So yeah, enough.
Alternatively: if you're best positioned to write good historical research for your five nerdy friends, do so. One of them may be best positioned to read it and write about it for a different audience.
Because historians are a community of scholars.
Dear academics: no-one cares about your niche topic. If you can't frame it it in terms of wider debates of broader relevance, you're just writing for yourself and your five nerdy friends...
(PS: this applies to myself as well)
You wake up in 1618. Of which heresy are you most likely accused?
You wake up in 1518. In which cataclysmic set of events are you most likely taking part, wittingly or otherwise?
You wake up in 1418. You're happy just to have woken up at all.
Today I've been looking at the letters of an individual whom I know died 8 April 1738; I've seen his handwriting deteriorate as the date approaches. I know this because, as a historian, I have the task and privilege of reading to the end; the small things are often most moving.
The leaders of the Church of England should be wary about clumsily intervening into complex political issues at the best of times. To do so on Easter Sunday feels very wrong. Archbishop of York views particularly wrong headed. Claims he’s in tune with majority of the public 🙄
I think ... I think maybe the 'repayment for historical damages done' line is not a hole the UK wants to go down post-Brexit, having variously invaded, dominated, pillaged, or enslaved a large portion of the globe in the course of 400+ years.
How is UKHE, you ask?
Well, it's spending hours on the picket in the rain and cold for fair pay, a decent pension, and security for precarious colleagues, then finishing the morning with a massively disappointing grant rejection with a crushingly low success rate.
That.
Among the gifts sent to Don Francisco de Lima, Portuguese governor of Mozambique, in 1653 by the East India Company merchants were '1 Chesheer Cheese', '2 Boxes Marmalath [Marmalade]', jars of olives, and 1 bag 'Pista[chio] Nutts' weighing 23 lbs.
Snacks make the world go round
Astounding that
@MattHancock
feels 24-hr vaccinations aren't necessary because "Most want to be vaccinated during the day".
No, we want to be vaccinated as soon as possible. We are not reverse vampires or whatever you think drives this.
#bbcbreakfast
@SkyNewsBreak
If only there were some sort of group in power who had the capacity to resolve them rather than pointing fingers at a party literally founded to support such action.
Pope Francis, Dressed as a simple Priest, has been sneaking out during the night to visit and Comfort the homeless of Rome, helping the teams of the aid of the holy see at the distribution of food, clothes and support funds.
Pray that we may all follow his example.
As a non-Brit, it constantly amazes me how unappreciated it is by people here. Taken for granted by far too many, and I suspect won't be valued properly until gone.
So
#twitterstorians
, let's say you wake up tomorrow and are able to read and research fluently in a language you don't currently use. Which language would you choose, and why?
Some good news: 'Experiencing Time in the Early English East India Company' has now gone Open Access
@HistoricalJnl
!
For any
#twitterstorians
interested in
#earlymodern
mobility, temporalities, and of course the
#EIC
Love the sub-genre of institutional emails to emerge from the pandemic which basically says 'We know this is a challenging time and everyone is struggling ...' then moving on to '... but we really don't care and need this by Tuesday'.
(fwiw Mitchell has an undergraduate degree in History, so he has training and I celebrate that ... but there's a larger conversation needed here about what we acknowledge, by whom, and how that shapes the history we value)
Imagine building a history podcast around the work of academic historians and then spending the rest of your time making derisory jabs at universities and throwing them to the frothing culture warriors.
What a strange way to set up your stall.
'Britain Did A Modern' is just another reason why it's important to do even a modicum of historical research before you make sweeping assertions about historical trends.
I'm now convinced that the Huntington Library is actually a cruel social experiment to see whether scholars can be dropped in paradise and still remain committed to their research.
Honoured to have been named proxime accessit for this prize!
Congratulations to Scott Dempsey for winning the prize, and thanks to a host of people (
@keir_waddington
,
@earlymodernjohn
,
@EvaJohannaH
,
@S_Goldsmith_
) who read, commented on, and improved the article.
Not commented on often enough is that a central anxiety for people already on visas in the UK is not just meeting absurdly high thresholds for reapplication, but the constant (well-founded) fear that the terms will arbitrarily change and/or you'll be victim of incompetence.
New: James Cleverly suggests people in the UK reapplying for visas *won't* have to meet higher salary thresholds
He tells
@NickFerrariLBC
he understands people are concerned and hopes to clarify details
Will those people be ok?
"Yes. This is forward looking proposals rather
This is the motion
@ucu
Congress passed yesterday. Yes, it calls on Russian withdrawal but it also demands the UK government stop arming Ukraine (to what consequence?) and notes that Zelensky’s aim is to make Ukraine ‘an armed, illiberal outpost of US imperialism’.
Sharing again for the Monday morning crowd!
#twitterstorians
For anyone interested in the East India Company,
#earlymodern
temporalities, and mobility.
So students are not to meet anyone from other households indoors or outdoors, not go to gyms or most shops ... but can go to in-person teaching where they'll meet other people there and along the way?
Bizarre.
Thank the heavens that Christopher Hill, AJP Taylor, EP Thompson, Hannah Arendt, TB Macaulay, Leopold van Ranke, Edward Gibbon and so many other historians didn't fall victim to this 'moral theology' and wrote Truly Empirical History.
A stage of national idiocy whereby all national processes are measured in units of World War.
"Just popping down to the shops for some eggs, dear - back in 1/1000th of a World War!"
"Well, we're about 1/759th of a World War through the match and Huddersfield Town lead by 2 ..."
By the end of next month, we will have had around two thirds of the entire time it took to fight the First World War to prepare for Brexit. If we're really not ready, what does that say about the state of the government machine?
Like most Canadians, I didn't do A-Levels but got top marks in tree-felling, hockey stick management, and maple syrup processing.
Let that be inspiration to all you young aspiring historians out there.
Hideously misleading headline now has white Welsh people losing their minds.
He's literally just said he likes rural Wales and would recommend it to others.