In other signs I should maybe spend less time thinking about Congress, I saw a woman wearing this shirt in a bar in Chicago last weekend and spent a really long time trying to figure out whether it was pro- or anti-McConnell before my husband told me it was about the Bears QB.
BRB, adding letting a member of the minority party *chair a hearing* to my list of things the January 6th Committee is doing that you just don't expect to see every day.
Hope Republicans in the Great State of Pennsylvania challenge the new “pushed” Congressional Map, all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary. Your Original was correct! Don’t let the Dems take elections away from you so that they can raise taxes & waste money!
Today, like so many days, I am thinking about everyone who faced violence on January 6 because they were simply trying to do their jobs, serving their country in ways big and small. Here are some of their stories that have really stayed with me.
Sometimes I ask myself, "have the years of my life spent on Vital Stats on Congress been worth it?"
But then something like this happens and I get to tell you all that Billy Long is *actually* an auctioneer.
In case you were curious what Pelosi meant when she said other committees would operate under an "umbrella of impeachment inquiry," I think it looks like this ☂️☂️☂️.
Now the key Q is: does McConnell make Murkowski and Flake follow through on their threat to vote no on moving the nomination forward by holding a vote tomorrow?
I don't know about you, but in my personal congressional dictionary, "we don't want to call witnesses" translates to "we can't agree on which witnesses to call."
EXCLUSIVE: Senate Repubs say there's consensus building w/in their ranks for a short impeachment trial that could see the GOP-led chamber vote on a likely acquittal of President Trump w/o hearing from any witnesses. | w
@StevenTDennis
If we end up with a president and House majority of one party, and a Senate majority of the other, in 2021, that would be a really unusual configuration of power. It's only happened once since WWII, in 2001 and 2002--and that only happened after the Jeffords party switch.
I'm a broken record here, but whatever is happening on Capitol Hill right now is functionally incomprehensible to anyone whose full-time job isn't paying attention to it.
If a Senate nerd doesn’t tweet about an impeachment trial because she had a baby in the middle of it, did the trial even really happen?
(Your regularly scheduled procedural observations, bad jokes, and emojis to return in a few months.)
I'm pretty sure the occasional cries we hear in the background of the House proceedings are from one of the toddlers a member has bravely brought to the floor, but I'll get less confident about that the longer this goes on.
I didn't know this would be happening here when I decided to visit, but I can't think of a more appropriate place to watch the McCain memorial service.
Because answering "but how does this compare to the Clinton impeachment?!" Qs is my current lot in life, I will tell you:
1. The analogous hearing during the Clinton inquiry had 19(!) witnesses.
2. Two of those 19 (Gerhardt and Turley) will make repeat appearances this week.
True. Also true? Democratic freshmen on HPSCI are rare. Ruppersberger was (I believe) the first in 2003-4, and then the only Democratic freshman to serve since then was Chris Murphy in 2007-8.
.
@RepSpanberger
, a former CIA officer who won in a tough R district, does not get a spot on the House Intelligence Committee. She, of course, did not vote for Pelosi for Speaker.
I recommend chapter 2 if you want to learn about the history of unlimited debate in the Senate and chapter 4 if you want to read the equivalent of me yelling "it's time for some game theory!" and then there being actual game theory.
Even if Joe Biden wins the election, I still think the bigger family accomplishment will be Jill, as a woman with a PhD, getting everyone to use her rightful title and call her Dr. Biden.
Why do I think term limits for chairs aren't great? Because they may lead more experienced members to retire when they get term limited out, and they likely have contributed to a decline in the average effectiveness of chairs over time:
Today in Congress Twitter problems: every time someone refers to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as "AOC," I have a "what in the world does that have to do with the Architect of the Capitol?" moment.
A reminder that this is only "never before seen" for the rest of us, on the outside. For the folks who lived through the violence on 1/6, this was all very much seen, on what is likely one of the worst days of their lives.
In September,
@MattGlassman312
and I showed up to a panel discussion with nearly identical lists of our priorities for rules changes for the Dems if they took the majority. Getting rid of the GOP-created chair term limits was one of those things.
Don’t mind me, I’ll just be over here, pondering exactly how said “impeachment inquiry” will look different than what they’ve already been doing.
(This is a real question. Will the full House, for example, take a vote to direct the Judiciary Committee to do an inquiry?)
Confirmed:
@SpeakerPelosi
will endorse a formal impeachment inquiry today, according to Dem lawmaker close to Pelosi.
She will inform her rank and file members at 4 pm
When Democrats took control of the House in January, they promised aggressive oversight of the Trump administration. Want to know more about what’s actually been happening? Our new House Oversight Tracker is here to help!
The white jacket, the reference to the suffrage hearings, Thatcher, the rundown of all the women who testified when men would not: so much gender politics that I'm not qualified to explain. I'm going to need one of my gender and politics friends to do it, please and thank you.
I'm incredibly honored to have won this, and am so grateful that I get to come to work everyday and do what I love--especially given that what I love is thinking about congressional procedure. Thanks to the award committee and the
@DirksenCenter
for underwriting the award.
Thanks to the
@DirksenCenter
for their generous support of the Emerging Scholar Award of the LSS Section of
@APSAtweets
. The 2019 recipient is
@mollyereynolds
of
@BrookingsInst
for her work on legislative politics and procedure, & its impact in the discipline and wider public.
This. I remain deeply grateful for the funding from
@smithcollege
that helped make my own Hill internship--which was central in setting me on my path to professional Congress-watching--possible.
Update: just listened to the remarkable audio that
@ESCochrane
recorded from *inside a lawmaker's bathroom while sheltering in place*, and am still as pissed off as I was this morning.
Before we collectively move on to areas of my extremely niche procedural expertise, listen to
@S_R_Anders
,
@Nedfoley
,
@benjaminwittes
, and me chat about what's going to happen in Congress today.
Today’s Lawfare Podcast:
@BenjaminWittes
asks
@S_R_Anders
,
@MollyEReynolds
, and
@NedFoley
about the rules for counting electoral votes, what could happen today, and what role Mike Pence will play in this final stage of the presidential election.
My team and I learned a lot of random stuff looking at thousands of proxy voting letters between 2020 and 2022 but Anna Eshoo's very specific font preference might be my favorite.
Me, last Tuesday: spends night feverishly writing, in part, about why House Dems are unlikely to have a floor vote to authorize impeachment inquiry.
Me, tonight: discovers House Dems agree.
This week's version is much more relaxing.
Breaking: NO House floor vote on authorizing an impeachment inquiry, per an aide inside Dem caucus meeting.
“Consensus is no vote at least right now. Many members do not want to be seen as letting the WH dictate how a separate and equal branch of govt conducts itself”
Once upon a time, I could write things about congressional procedure without
@matthew_j_kahn
having to come by my office to ask “do you need to edit that piece to reflect relevant possible witness tampering?” during the editing process.
Maintaining Vital Stats on Congress occasionally requires digging out old editions of the Almanac of American Politics, which usually devolves into me marveling at old photos of people still on the scene. Today's highlight: circa-1984 Lamar!, looking like a TV detective.
If you’ve talked to me about budget reconciliation, you only *think* you’ve talked to me about my most esoteric area of expertise, which is actually the classes of Pennsylvania municipalities and their associated forms of government.
I don't yet have well-formed thoughts on what Democrats are planning for tonight so please read these, on how legislating via reconciliation encourages the same kind of policy uncertainty that filibuster preservationists say they worry about, instead:
It's a lovely weather day in DC so of course I'm going to spend it inside yelling indiscriminately about how a temporary lapse in appropriations is not the same as a shutdown.
IMPORTANT note: Conservatives chose NOT to file this as a privileged resolution. That means that they don't get to force a vote on it on the House floor. This avoids the GOP civil war that would take place if they DID try to force a vote on this. Rs VERY divided on the matter
@Susan_Hennessey
FYI: Meadows filed this under different procedures than the ones I explain in the piece--but substantive points about symbolism and internal GOP politics still hold:
IMPORTANT note: Conservatives chose NOT to file this as a privileged resolution. That means that they don't get to force a vote on it on the House floor. This avoids the GOP civil war that would take place if they DID try to force a vote on this. Rs VERY divided on the matter
A few months after I started at
@brookingsinst
, I was on a panel with Alice Rivlin. I was so nervous to be on the same stage with her. When it was over, she turned to me and said, "Molly! I know about your work, but I want to know more about you, the person. Let's have lunch!"
If congressional Republicans had asked *me* what they could do to push back against Trump on Russia, I'd tell them what I told
@IanPrasad
for
@DLeonhardt
's newsletter this morning:
An underrated unusual thing about these hearings is the willingness of the Democratic members to cede the spotlight to each other and, more notably, to their Republican colleagues on the panel. They're going to let Kinzinger just...talk! For several hours! On TV!
A non-trivial part of my job is contemplating what I lovingly refer to as weird procedural hypotheticals and I can honestly say I have never thought about a *one day elimination of the filibuster* before right now.
Murphy and other Democrats said they are discussing a possible one-day elimination of the filibuster in order to raise the debt ceiling, or potentially a permanent carve-out that would make it against the Senate rules to filibuster debt ceiling increases.
One indirect cause of no-shows for House votes: Many have nowhere to live during lame duck.
Nearly 100 members are retiring, probably a couple dozen who slept in their offices. They lost those offices a few weeks ago. No bed, no DC, no vote.
Wherein I admit that Congress, in all its messy glory, is what gets me out of bed every morning and otherwise have a great chat with
@MargLTaylor
and
@benjaminwittes
.
As I like to say, the first two rules of Congress Club are:
1. There is very little entirely new under the sun.
2. Don't think you've learned all the esoterica; there's almost always something more esoteric out there to discover.
Stop saying "unprecedented" or "never before seen" if you mean "I don't remember seeing it" or "it hasn't happened in my short life/tenure on Capitol Hill"
So many helpful Congress experts out there (including House & Senate historians) to help with precedent
(Mostly) non-snarky question: what are the other things on the Senate's agenda? Nominations? The omnibus? It's genuinely unclear to me what's waiting out there in the wings that the Senate GOP wants to work on.
Republican Sen. Kennedy on immigration: “I’m ready to move one. We wasted a whole week here. And I’m ready to move on. There are other issues in front of us.”
Happy 40th birthday to
@cspan
, which, in addition to generally being a national treasure, gave me the closest experience I'll ever have to being a sports broadcaster by having me on to do play-by-play of the opening of the 116th House in January.
Eventually,
@qjurecic
and I may tire of reading government reports about what happened on Jan. 6.
But we haven't yet, so I offer you this, on a new report addressing a central, lingering question: namely, why didn’t the government see this coming?
Gosar should face consequences for the AOC video, and some of them should come from the House Republican Conference. But I also keep coming back to overall House ethics enforcement as yet another place where the institution has let some of its power flow to the courts.
If you have (understandably) forgotten about the whole part of all of this where, for example, "four House committees...sought...critical records from the Department of Homeland Security" in January 2021, then boy do I have the podcast episode coming soon for you!
JUST IN: Select committee issues statement raising concerns about the Secret Service's handling of text messages, suggesting they may have violated federal recordkeeping laws.
I would wear a t-shirt that says "Highly Deferential to the Legislative Branch."
(Joking aside, this is an important ruling in an important case that has consequences for the House's entire oversight operation.)
MORE FROM THE RULING: "When a court is asked to decide whether Congress has used its investigative power
improperly, its analysis must be highly deferential to the legislative branch. "
Happy Vital Stats day, everyone! We have new data on the members of the 116th Congress and how they got there, plus a look back at what Congress did in the 115th.
The
@BrookingsInst
library is a treasure and everyone should be so lucky to have a place where they can randomly find gems like this CQ publication from 1974, featuring, among other things, Judiciary Committee staff bios with some familiar names.
The friends and colleagues who have come together to stand up
@CapitolStrong
over the past ten days have been a light for me in an incredibly dark time for our country.
To the Capitol Hill community: We hear you, and we are here *for* you.
#CapitolStrong
We recognize that the Capitol community might not feel ‘strong’ in this moment. We recognize that for many the attack felt deeply personal, particularly for staffers of color. Despite this extreme adversity, you showed up & did your jobs to support the functioning of government.
The most important thing about this excellent
@profmusgrave
essay is what it says about the effects of this approach. But it also highlights something I’ve felt about my work in the last few years but haven’t quite had words to describe.
To be clear: I am very skeptical that the House Dems' discharge petition on the debt limit will work.
But making someone figure out how to write a bill that was referred to *every single* House committee is like the ultimate test of congressional nerddom.
My take on the Ryan retirement in
@nytopinion
. Alternative political science title: because a Speakership cannot live by negative agenda control alone...
At this point, given the number of times I say it out loud per day, I would not be surprised if my kid's first complete sentence was "the Senate's rules aren't self-enforcing."
In honor of yesterday's Census executive order, because we introduce thematically-appropriate t-shirts early in this family.
(cc:
@StrictScrutiny_
@LeahLitman
)
In my personal accounting of the impeachment inquiry, we've now reached the "I just had reason to make some notes labeled 'weird jurisdictional issues'" stage.
The latest in what I like to think of as my Captain Planet collaboration with the
@lawfareblog
team: I bring the knowledge of arcane Senate procedure, and
@S_R_Anders
brings the rest.
I asked Susan Collins what it would be like to work with Johnson on spending issues and she said she doesn't know him, but was going to Google him this morning
I've been singing the congressional capacity song for a while (w/ lots of friends in the choir!) but the insurrection at the Capitol brought a number of these issues into especially stark relief. What to do about it? Here's a new paper from me.
Do you care about, for example, Jeffrey Clark's deposition before the January 6th Committee but doubt your ability to ever locate it again in your abyss of open tabs? Have I got the resource for you!
Approximately once a day of late, I remember that the Clinton impeachment proceedings included Bob Livingston's surprise announcement that he wouldn't run for Speaker and have to stop and marvel at Congress's unparalleled capacity for weirdness.
We've reached a point where a vote on a motion to table a resolution declaring the chair vacant offered as a question of the privileges of the House is...just a thing that happens while I'm giving my kid dinner and I miss the whole thing entirely.
The 118th Congress, man.
I'm a little disappointed that, despite being a prolific keeper of emails and notes, I can't put my finger on the exact date in March 2009 that Tom Mann walked into my office and said "hey,
@NormOrnstein
and I have an assignment for you involving budget reconciliation..."
For no reason, remembering when
@mattglassman312
and I came to a briefing in 2018 with nearly identical lists of what Dems should do differently than the GOP rules-wise and "don't have committee leader term limits b/c they rob of you of experienced members" was first on the list.
🚨🚨🚨Rep. Patrick MCHENRY (R-N.C.), chair of Financial Servcices, is expected to announce he won’t seek re-election today, though he plans to finish out the rest of his term, per multiple sources.