Prof Jeffrey S Morris Profile
Prof Jeffrey S Morris

@jsm2334

12,645
Followers
2,424
Following
2,232
Media
31,084
Statuses

George S. Pepper Professor of Public Health & Preventive Medicine; Biostats, Stats & Data Science, UPenn; lifelong learner & truth seeker; Views my own

Philadelphia, PA
Joined December 2014
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Pinned Tweet
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
4 years
Just put up a website that aggregates and tries to provide a balanced discussion of Covid-19 research results, data sets, applications and models, and commentaries and linking to useful data sets and models
64
116
471
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Is watching the 1984 Ghostbusters movie killing people? Recent data show death rate of 10-59yr olds who have watched the 1984 Ghostbuster Movie is 2x higher than those who have watched the 2021 Ghostbuster movie I don't know how to explain this other than movie-caused mortality
Tweet media one
167
1K
5K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
4 months
New paper in Heart compares vaccinated to unvaccinated with respect to cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia/cardiac arrest, myocarditis and clotting events including strokes, thrombosis deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and
Tweet media one
244
1K
5K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
The internet is breaking today from viral claims that the new Pfizer data dump of 80k pages revealed real vaccine efficacy of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in the phase 3 trial was in fact 12%, not 95%. In this 🧵I investigate these claims.
@kellyjo0813
Kelly Kivett
2 years
🚨🚨 Pfizer data released today. 80,000 pages. Pfizer knew vaccine harmed the fetus in pregnant women, and that the vaccine was not 95% effective, Pfizer data shows it having a 12% efficacy rate.🚨🚨
404
7K
14K
238
1K
3K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
7 months
Steve Kirsch gave a presentation at MIT claiming that 1/1000 of those vaccinated with covid vaccines are killed by the vaccines using New Zealand data he obtained (which would imply >12,000 killed by vaccine among the >12m doses given in New Zealand to date, in a country that
Tweet media one
394
498
2K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
When you are senior editor of a journal and handle your own paper, it is not peer review, it is an editorial:
Tweet media one
45
328
2K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
8 months
New article in Circulation studies sudden deaths and sudden cardiac deaths in USA NCAA college athletes between July 1, 2002 and June 30, 2022. There is a net decrease of occurrence in the past 20 years, with no increase evident from COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccinations. There
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
142
462
2K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
11 months
I have seen many people forwarding this graphic around, claiming that the UK ONS data show that the death rate for vaccinated individuals was much higher than unvaccinated, suggesting vaccines were dangerous and killing people. This plot is inaccurate and misleading. In this
Tweet media one
156
360
1K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Maybe someone should explain this to Alex Berenson before he writes another SubStack post, or the thousands of people forwarding this around social media and alternative social media platforms.
Tweet media one
48
121
1K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
6 months
1/n Annals of Internal Medicine just published our epidemiological study of vaccine effectiveness in children and teens during the delta and omicron waves based on large USA pediatric cohorts accounting for nearly 4% of the USA pediatric population. The study found strong
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
123
349
1K
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Many are confused by results that >1/2 of hospitalized in Israel are vaccinated, thinking this means vaccines don't work. I downloaded actual Israeli data and show why these data provide strong evidence vaccines strongly protect vs. serious disease (1/8)
58
455
988
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
21 days
How can excess deaths be higher in 2021 in 2020 if vaccines had any benefit? This is a good question I see many ask. Some conclude from this question that vaccines must have been completely ineffective, or perhaps even have made things worse. In this thread, I will show that
130
222
716
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
9 months
@drdrew @naomirwolf @DrKellyVictory @joshg99 @AskDrDrew The extra menstrual bleeding had been known to be a side effect for a long time, Drew, with many papers on the topic including this paper from over a year ago () and 14 papers from 2021-2022 described in this review article () She
22
37
669
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
4 months
@USMortality Not surprised to see you ignore/dismiss this enormously large and quite well done study without even evaluating it. Much more fun to you to put forth speculative claims from simple population level totals, isn’t it?
34
15
668
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
1 year
@stkirsch Yeah, I have a feeling people are not going to trust a guy sitting down next to them and offering them obscene amounts of $$ for anything. And it is not because they value the mask on the flight at >$100k, but because of their distrust of a person making such an offer
19
9
648
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
The fact that a scurrilous claim that the phase 3 trial in fact had 12% vaccine efficacy that was falsely represented as 95% can go completely viral on social media without documentation or verification that the claim is true shows the sad state of affairs in our modern society
8
114
610
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
4 months
I should have clarified these cardiovascular events being compared are post SARS-CoV-2 infection Also should have specified it covers the time period starting early 2021 when rollouts started and the various data sources ending December 2021, February 2022, June 2022, and
39
61
611
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
1 year
@stkirsch Of course, viruses don't travel as isolated individual molecules, but in droplets or aerosolized particles of varying size and properties. Lots of these dynamics are studied, and provide justification for some benefit of various types of masks in reducing the exposure to the
78
18
533
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
It illustrates the fact that many people don't question information presented to them if it feeds a narrative they believe and want to promote.
24
62
540
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Does a recently published paper by Peter McCullough and colleagues really “establish a mechanistic framework” for mRNA vaccine harm? This thread will explore that question. @AshishKJha46 @lpachter @nataliexdean @MonicaGandhi9 @CT_Bergstrom @BallouxFrancois
Tweet media one
41
169
465
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
5 months
An Epoch Times article discusses a recent paper by FDA researchers assessing safety of Pfizer and Moderna bivalent boosters given to 8,638,661 and 5,240,178 individuals, respectively, comparing incidence rate of 18 different serious adverse events of special interest (including
72
137
470
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
I was told by everyone that the 1984 Ghostbusters movie was safe and amusing, and never anticipated it could be so dangerous to young people! It appears the 2021 film is MUCH safer, and strongly preferred, but this fact has been hidden by conspiracy
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
1
18
422
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
@WesterTrent @ScottAdamsSays Here is a screenshot of his article — to quote him “I don’t know how to explain this other than vaccine-caused mortality”
Tweet media one
60
187
398
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Since unless the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were intended to prevent all coughs, fevers, chills, sore throats, muscle pain, shortness of breath, vomiting, etc., from any cause, these "suspected but unconfirmed cases" should clearly NOT be included in calculation of VE.
9
35
395
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
4 months
@ichudov Thank you for clarifying these were studying post infection events — I should have clarified that in the original post and will add now. Your claim that vaccines increase the risk of infection is laughably false however. This study covers the period of time starting early 2021
39
16
396
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
In this blog post, I go through the recent Israeli data in detail to explore what it tells us about efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine vs. severe disease with the Delta variant. #deltavariant #israel #pfizervaccine #vaccines #covid19pandemic
Tweet media one
23
166
386
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Thus, maybe the 2x higher rate of death among 1984 Ghostbuster movie watchers has another explanation other than movie-caused mortality. Maybe it is the dramatic difference in age distribution in watchers of a GenX film vs. a Post-Millenial film that explains the death disparity
Tweet media one
6
21
375
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
These threads are full of conspiratorial claims, accusations of criminal behavior, and all kinds of other hysterical hand-wringing, all confidently stating as fact that these documents revealed the "real" efficacy of the vaccine in the trial was 12%.
13
29
372
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
21 days
Mostert et al. published a paper in BMJ Public Health “Excess Mortality across countries in the Western World since the COVID-19 pandemic: ‘Our World in Data’ estimates of January 2020 to December 2022” () The paper presents excess death estimates for 47
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
46
142
381
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
I was curious to see how excess deaths related to vaccination rate by state in the USA. Here is % excess deaths (3/1/20-7/31/22) vs. % fully vaccinated (7/31/22) from CDC all cause death data. Nonlinear smooth fit shows strong negative correlation (Spearman r=-0.58, p<0.00001).
Tweet media one
44
76
374
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
9 months
@denisrancourt @denisrancourt Why do you completely ignore the fact that the excess deaths all over the world largely cluster in spikes that happen to correspond to spikes of confirmed Covid cases and Covid-attributed deaths? They don���t line up with strictness of Covid mitigation, and they
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
62
91
372
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
9 months
New “long covid” type study from Singapore looking at risk of cardiovascular events after recovery from Covid infection. Used solid methodology and looked at effect modification by age, sex, severity of disease, and vaccination status
19
100
359
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Large contact tracing study in UK shows Pfizer vaccine reduces transmission by 82% vs alpha and 65% vs delta and AstraZeneca by 63% and 36%, respectively.
21
145
356
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
1 year
@nicholaraihani @HermanPontzer Beware of the ecological fallacy! Just because there is not associations in the country level aggregate for the two variables does not mean that there are no associations at the individual level (which is what we really care about in this case)
5
14
353
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
1 year
@stkirsch ... but if it plays into your desired theatrics, go for it.
3
4
339
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Morale of the story: Be careful not to infer causation from correlation, especially given the complex pandemic data with all kinds of biases, and especially when confirmation bias (jumping to conclusions based on your preconceived notions) is involved. Data interpretation 101
16
36
320
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
1 year
Myocarditis is well known to be a key risk of mRNA vaccines, especially for young men, as well as COVID-19 infection. This large Nordic study compares clinical outcomes after vaccine-associated, COVID-19 associated, and conventional myocarditis:
21
66
331
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
So these 3410 "suspected but unconfirmed" cases were people who experienced one of those symptoms and came in for a PCR test, but for whom the PCR test was negative.
14
34
326
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 months
Here is a link to a 50 minute seminar I just gave today discussing some of the epidemiological fallacies that have confused many during the pandemic, and led to a great deal of misinterpretation/misrepresentations of observational data. I discuss base rate fallacy, age and time
Tweet media one
86
105
329
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
For those raising alarm from the recent published paper suggesting 1/1000 vaccinated got myocarditis, the paper had been retracted because they got the denominator wrong - ~833k vaccinated in the area not ~33k. So rate is 1/25k similar to other studies.
15
105
308
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 months
This preprint was published by the Nordic research group led by @anders_hviid assessing the benefit of monovalent XBB.1.5 Covid-19 mRNA vaccine across Denmark, Finland and Sweden with respect to covid-19 related hospitalizations or covid-19 related deaths. They used a rigorous,
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
91
103
314
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
1 year
Im glad to see PennDOT came up with a creative short term solution to the downed bridge on I95 in Northeast Philly!
Tweet media one
7
35
307
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Digging further, I noticed the probability of seeing 1984 film is higher for those older in the spectrum, while demographic of those watching the 2021 film is much younger. I guess that makes sense, since for GenX'ers the 1984 movie came out in their childhood and teen years.
Tweet media one
3
10
295
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Here is a twitter thread on a similar situation involving these SARS-CoV-2 vaccines going around: and a detailed blog post:
Tweet media one
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
The UK published all cause death data from 1/2/21-9/24/21 split out by vaccination status/age group: In young (10-59yr), all cause deaths in 2 dose group are ~2x higher than unvaccinated. Does this mean the vaccines are "killing more than they save?"
Tweet media one
23
98
284
9
18
298
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Lancet paper based on >3.4m USA patients found Pfizer vaccine effectiveness (VE) vs. infection decreased from 88% 1m after vaccination to 47% after 5m, but that VE vs. hospitalization remained strong at 93% through 6m. This 🧵 will summarize key results.
11
100
293
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
7 months
BTW here are plots of excess deaths over time plotted against (1) vaccinations done and (2) covid deaths over time for many other countries all over the world for people to consider. As I would emphasize, any genuine attempt to assess potential causal effects of vaccines
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
45
44
298
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
So which document contained this result? None of these tweets explain this, and although in some of the threads people comment asking that question, there is really not any consistent response.
10
23
289
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Incidentally, this document was transparently released to the public the week before the FDA VRBPAC meeting in December 2020 deciding the EUA, so is not a new revelation from this 80k page document dump this week.
1
18
290
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
We published a paper this week in Health Affairs demonstrating that mask mandates reduced county-level case counts 23-33% within 6wk, decreasing to 16% after 6wk, higher in urban areas We adjusted for confounding by matching counties with/without mandates
41
114
285
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 months
@partisanregret @chezronify See the report I posted — this is a false claim made by Naomi Wolf from misinterpreting various tables in the FOIA report. The got 44% from 22 miscarriages mentioned and another table with 50 Pregnancies so 22/50=50% First of all, there were 11 miscarriage reports in a list of
11
32
287
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
The UK published all cause death data from 1/2/21-9/24/21 split out by vaccination status/age group: In young (10-59yr), all cause deaths in 2 dose group are ~2x higher than unvaccinated. Does this mean the vaccines are "killing more than they save?"
Tweet media one
23
98
284
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 months
In this thread I will make some comments on the recently published paper in Cureus entitled "Increased age-adjusted cancer mortality after the third mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine dose during the covid-19 pandemic" The title is extremely misleading, given their data do not show
32
102
284
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
7 months
@danorlovsky7 @Chiefs @ArrowheadPride @LauraRutledge @minakimes @Realrclark25 In those examples you gave, his feet were maybe just up on the line where the back of the ball is. On the last play, he appears quite a bit further up -- the ball is back at the 49.5 and the front of Toney's foot is in front of the 49.
Tweet media one
43
8
266
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
23 days
Excellent Spanish-language review is the recent @Telegraph article being widely circulated as evidence the mainstream media is “finally accepting the possibility excess deaths are driven by vaccines” It is based on a BMJ Public Health paper that shows evidence of excess deaths
@christianperez
Christian Pérez
23 days
Hoy, @Telegraph publica otro artículo antivacunas con este titular: "Las vacunas COVID pueden haber ayudado a impulsar el aumento del exceso de muertes". Sorprendentemente, no encontrarás el estudio enlazado en el artículo. Porque no dice eso. Este es el análisis del paper 🧵
Tweet media one
2
138
360
40
68
268
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Yesterday CDC released a report tracking rates of cardiac issues (myo/pericarditis) after infection or mRNA vaccination combining information across 40 health systems in the USA, stratified by age/sex.
38
104
260
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Digging some more, I found UK data showing age-specific mortality rates from 2019. Even though the overall 10-59yr mortality rate is 149.5 per 100k It varies from 8.8 per 100k (10-14yr) to 478.2 per 100k (55-59yr) Thus, the older have a death risk >50x higher than the younger
Tweet media one
2
12
252
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Best as I can tell, this claim originates from a substack post by Sonia Elijah on May 3rd.
6
21
251
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
If you look through the protocol (which again was transparently posted online in its entirety 2 years ago) you see no mention of a category of COVID-19 cases that are "suspected but unconfirmed."
3
25
249
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
1 year
1. Using a biased experimental design, 2. removing all sensitivity analyses showing lack of robustness of your conclusions to modeling assumptions, and 3. removing result tables about much higher increased risk of cardiac death after Covid infection in a paper purported to
@FLSurgeonGen
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD
1 year
PhD-trained physician revises report based on his scientific expertise = “scandalous altering of results” 🤣 Fauci enthusiasts are terrified and will do anything to divert attention from the risks of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines— especially cardiac deaths. Truth will prevail.
367
898
4K
29
48
248
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Besides this tweet from @kellyjo0813 , there are numerous other tweets making this claim that have gone viral in the past 2 days.
Tweet media one
5
31
242
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Data presented below show nearly 33% of unvaccinated adult Israeli residents were previously infected. Why is this important & has this contributed to misinterpretation of Israeli data? This thread wll explore these questions. 1/n
6
56
241
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
The choice of "suspected but unconfirmed cases" to refer to those with negative PCR was an unfortunate choice of terms that contributed to this confusion, and led many like Doshi & Elijah to claim that these were in fact COVID-19 cases that were insidiously excluded from analysis
9
16
243
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
@jburnmurdoch I have updated these numbers from currently active cases as of Sept 2, 2021, along with an explanation in the original blog post:
Tweet media one
21
100
241
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
This is seemingly where the viral claim of 12% comes from. Now if it were true that there were 1594 COVID-19 cases in vaccine arm and 1816 in placebo, indeed VE=12% However, we have to look at what is meant by "suspected but unconfirmed" cases in the Pfizer/BioNTech trial
2
18
233
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Elijah's SubStack makes speculative comments about false positives on PCR tests to try to justify this, but given the false positive rate of the test used in the trial is 2% (as shown in this FDA document), this does not support her claims.
10
22
230
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
10 months
@MarkWar16520311 The randomized clinical trial showed 20x reduction of risk of symptomatic infection, and numerous real world observational studies validated this, demonstrating ~90% reduction of infection risk in the first 6m after rollout (before antibody waning and emergence of Omicron)
21
35
223
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
This got me thinking, "I wonder if the different age distributions have something to do with this." So I computed the expected mortality rate for the cohorts watching the 1984 and 2021 movies based on a weighted average using their age distribution.
Tweet media one
2
11
221
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Thus, based on the disparate age distributions, we would expect people watching the 1984 Ghostbusters movie to have a death rate of 192.3/79.7=2.4x as high as the death rate of people watching the 2021 Ghostbusters:Afterlife Movie.
2
8
213
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Those who receive a positive PCR test are "confirmed COVID-19 cases" that are included in the primary efficacy analysis, and those whose PCR test is negative are "suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases."
8
18
220
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
7/8
Tweet media one
6
46
216
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Expose has an article today suggesting UK ONS COVID-19 death data show strongly negative vaccine effectiveness vs. death for April and May 2022. In this brief 🧵 I show how blatantly and transparently misleading it is. @weexposenews
Tweet media one
28
82
206
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
4 months
@GeneralRipper22 @ichudov The words are chosen for emphasis since the claim is ridiculous in light of the evidence in the extensive literature
13
2
212
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
Looking at those numbers, I see that a group of 10-59yr old people with the age distribution of those watching the 1984 movie would have an expected mortality rate of 192.3 per 100k While a group with age distribution of those watching the 2021 would be 79.7 per 100k.
Tweet media one
1
8
204
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
BTW, published report when Israel had 152 hospitalized breakthrough infections showed 40% of these cases were immunocompromised & 96% had comorbidities, so serious delta breakthrough infections in those without preexisting conditions nearly non-existent.
17
46
207
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Her claims are based on the December 2020 Pfizer FDA briefing document for the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting deciding the EUA on December 10, 2020.
3
16
203
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
7 months
@gorskon @stkirsch Sleight of hand tricks. And I see exactly what they are. And much of the audience uncritically believes the magic and doesn't realize there is a well-thought-out trick that creates the illusion.
16
5
202
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 years
8/8
Tweet media one
11
40
195
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
@FLSurgeonGen 1. Since death events clearly prevent future exposure periods, this violates the assumptions underlying SCCS. Have you made adjustments to your analysis to take this into account and mitigate the bias it causes? From the article you linked:
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
11
18
195
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
5 months
@denisrancourt No it clearly was Covid. And now that Covid is not killing as many, the death rates have come close to returning to prepandemic levels -/ much lower than the huge levels seen in 2020-2022 (varying across countries which years the covid waves really caused the deaths) Too bad
44
26
197
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
From the fact that there were 3410 total "suspected but unconfirmed" cases, with 1594 occurring in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group, she estimates that the "true VE" should actually be reported as 1-1594/1816 x 100% = 12.2%.
7
18
192
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
1 year
Face Masks Are Safe To Wear. Why masks don’t cause Long COVID, and… | by Gideon M-K; Health Nerd | Apr, 2023 | Medium
112
35
195
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
7 months
See this discussion as well:
@thereal_truther
The Real Truther
7 months
🚨 Steve Kirsch PROVES the Covid vaccines aren't killing people! Last night at MIT @stkirsch gave a presentation using illegally acquired "record level data" from New Zealand. While Steve claimed the data "proves" the vaccines are "killing" at high rates in reality the data is
Tweet media one
184
411
1K
27
19
191
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
The protocol states that anyone reporting one of these symptoms is a "suspected" COVID-19 patient who should immediately arrange a potential COVID-19 illness visit to receive a PCR test to determine if they are infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus or not.
3
13
191
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
She claims the "real VE" should be computed based on the "suspected but unconfirmed" COVID-19 cases in the study, which she claims is "buried" in the document (implying some sort of intentional obfuscation).
Tweet media one
4
14
185
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
The only time "suspected" is used in the protocol is in the context of determining when a "potential COVID-illness visit" should be scheduled to give a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test based on reported symptoms.
1
13
189
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
In this SubStack post, she claims that the 95% VE computed based on the fact that 162 of placebo patients had confirmed (PCR+) COVID infections and the vaccine arm only 8 was misleading.
1
12
187
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
Their conclusion uses the classic “shifting the burden” trick, presuming that it is the responsibility of the scientific community to disprove their hypotheses rather than their responsibility to prove it. This tactic has been common in the pandemic.
8
23
185
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
As described in Section 8.13, page 99/146, of the protocol, they did this by instructing subjects to immediately contact the site for a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test if they experienced any of the a number of symptoms anew that COULD indicate potential COVID-19:
2
15
187
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
In fact, so much of their evidence is from papers on severe COVID-19 infections, not vaccination, much content in this article might be better suited to a paper pointing out potential downstream dangers of severe COVID infections rather than raising alarm about mRNA vaccination
5
17
181
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
9 months
@denisrancourt has published a 130-page document purporting to show that the excess deaths in various southern hemisphere countries are driven by vaccines, and calling for vaccinations to be halted everywhere. He estimates that vaccines have killed 17 million around the world.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
24
59
181
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
11 months
@DowdEdward You realize this study was completed before the vaccines and before the pandemic, right, Ed?
47
10
180
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
@DrJBhattacharya You do realize that the serology tests have false positive rates of 1% or a little more, right?
35
10
175
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
3 months
Nice instructional video explaining points I have made many times on twitter: 1. That during the pandemic many people are falling for the "post hoc ergo proptor hoc" fallacy (or "post hoc" fallacy") -- thinking that because an event (such as death or serious health event)
72
42
181
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
2 years
These include common, generic symptoms including fever, cough, shortness of breath, chills, muscle pain, sore throat, vomiting, diarrhea, etc. that obviously could occur for many reasons other than SARS-CoV-2 infection.
3
15
176
@jsm2334
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
8 months
BTW, only a total of 9 of these SCDs (5% of total) were adjudicated as being caused by myocarditis. 8 were pre-pandemic, and 1 was during the pandemic (also pre-vaccination) but was a subtype of myocarditis that is deemed to be unrelated to COVID-19. So none of the SCD in NCAA
11
17
176