@ynarkkive
@shuamorool
@kmgbliss
@maesvto
You're proving the point.
For (2+5)(3), operating 2+5 first gives you 7 so that (7)(3)= 7×3 = 21,
Same with (2+5)(x) where x=3,
2x+5x= (2×3)+(5×3)= 6+15 = 21
Which is DIFFERENT from:
2+ 5(3) which is performed as 2+(5×3)=17
Similar to: 2+5x where x=3,
5x=15,
So 2+15=17