Sharing data, history, independent thought on markets, gold, life, liberty.
Not investment advice/marketing
Retweets≠endorsements.
Do your own due diligence.
Paul Volcker, October 25, 2018:
"The real danger comes from encouraging or inadvertently tolerating rising inflation and its close cousin of extreme speculation and risk taking, in effect standing by while bubbles and excesses threaten financial markets. Ironically, the “easy
@FitFounder
Live in the present moment as much as you can. Priortize sleep, exercise, and good nutrition. Smile as much as you can and avoid arguments whenever possible.
@KobeissiLetter
I think that all of these markets seem to be expressing a view that the Fed is losing the battle against inflation. That seems to be the common theme here.
@KobeissiLetter
I would follow Chair Volcker's lead and publicly insist to Congress and the Administration, and whichever Congress/Administration is in power in 2025, that inflation comes from budget deficits, and the only way to fight inflation is by reducing deficits and balancing the budget.
@GRDecter
No, it doesn't end well, especially as the interest expense on that growing debt skyrockets exponentially, making the debt problem even worse.
@KobeissiLetter
Agreed 100%, this is exactly right. The Fed's balance sheet saw a similar, if a bit less dramatic, explosion since 2020, following years of its own massive growth after 2008. Why would the Fed be surprised about inflation, indeed?
@KobeissiLetter
The only really feasible long-term plan is going to be inflationary policy -- there is no political appetite to raise more revenues or cut spending, and interest expense is soaring. Fed will likely need to reverse QT back to QE.
@elerianm
Yes, but isn't the unprecedented US peacetime deficit spending since 2019 a really important factor to consider in both the US economy's growth during these years, as well as the potential bill that might come due in the future for that spending?
@KobeissiLetter
The jobs at all of these companies seeing layoffs tend to be full-time, high pay, high benefit jobs. The jobs number from yesterday includes many more part-time, lower pay, snaller benefit jobs than the ones mentioned above that have been lost.
@KobeissiLetter
And these price increases are all happening despite energy prices being more or less contained, for the moment. What happens if energy prices start to rise, because of inflation, geopolitical issues, or other supply/demand dynamics?
@zerohedge
The jobs at all of these companies seeing layoffs tend to be full-time, high pay, high benefit jobs. The jobs numbers from recent NFP reports include many more part-time, lower pay, smaller benefit jobs than the ones mentioned above that have been lost.
@Schuldensuehner
These are price controls designed to offset harmful inflationary policies already in place -- these kinds of price control measures typically cut off supply and make price increase pressures worse.
@KobeissiLetter
Fed is slowing the pace of its balance sheet runoff with its balance sheet still at 82% (!) of its peak level, 15+ years after the GFC.
@KobeissiLetter
These revisions, along with the rising unemployment rate, will likely revive questions about how close the US is to a recession, especially given the historical coinciding of rising unemployment rate and recessions.
@KobeissiLetter
Regardless of how he proceeds on rates, the US govt continues to explode deficits higher. Deficits need to be financed.
President Reagan on inflation, February 5, 1981: "We know now that inflation results from all that deficit spending."
CBO: Deficits % of GDP
@KobeissiLetter
Won't it need to be the Fed via more inflationary, QE type programs? And as the debt matures and is refinanced at higher rates along with new debt issued to fund the huge deficits, the interest expense is going to skyrocket even higher.
@KobeissiLetter
And yet at the same time, the US Treasury has issued an additional $963 billion of debt in the first 150 days of Fiscal 2024. The US's deficit spending policies are inflationary and remain a tailwind for cost increases regardless of Fed rate policy.
@KobeissiLetter
The problem is, even 2% year over year prices increases, let alone 3% YoY price increases, are an enormous burden on US households. The annual increase should be zero. In fact, with technological innovation, we should be enjoying the benefits via price decreases.
@KobeissiLetter
They are really caught between a rock and a hard place of their own making. The banks and national budget (and many parts of the indebted economy) need rates to be lower, but the Fed knows inflation is still a major problem. The communications show how trapped they are.
@KobeissiLetter
Perhaps because he can't find bargain assets as he has throughout his career? Because assets are currently mostly overvalued on historical metrics?
@KobeissiLetter
And banks are at maximum exposure to these loans, as the total of all commercial loans keeps hitting all-time highs, despite these problems.
@TaviCosta
Yes. The central banks must be bluffing, since neither the US nor the UK is having any kind of serious legislative conversation about raising revenue or cutting spending to balance the budget -- therefore currency debasement really seems like the only path to pay for deficits.
@KobeissiLetter
Powell isn't connecting the dots in his communication. The budget deficit *is* very large and unsustainable, but it's also inflationary and an enormous challenge to any effort to control inflation. He must communicate that point to Congress and the Administration.
Source: CBO
@KobeissiLetter
One significant factor for debt issuance at these levels is the skyrocketing interest expense -- already at twice the annualized levels of early 2020 and possibly looking to head much higher.
@KobeissiLetter
History rhymes:
"As Arthur Burns, the chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time, explained in 1974, the “manipulation of oil prices and supplies by the oil-exporting countries came at a most inopportune time for the United States. In the middle of 1973, wholesale prices of
@KobeissiLetter
Maybe. Is it possible also that, in addition to geopolitical tensions rising, market participants, including central banks, see the trend in dollar's purchasing power accelerating lower? Gold's rise is really the fall of the dollar's value versus gold.
@GRDecter
Of course this needs to be watched very closely -- upticks in unemployment rate historically coincide with recessions, and now as much as ever the belief in the economy is heavily tied to the belief that the labor market is still "robust."
@KobeissiLetter
It means that existing homeowners, many of whom have mortgages with interest rates fixed at levels far below what is available now or what was available prior to the GFC, are very unwilling to sell.
@KobeissiLetter
I think the economy's performance continues to be "K-shaped" with certain groups doing well but many getting left behind. The poor performance of some of these companies might reflect their exposure to customers who largely belong to the groups being left behind.
@DowdEdward
Very interesting and plausible theory. I assumed they left it uncapped b/c they thought using the number needed on the increase ($4 trn? $5 trn?) was so so high that they were concerned it would focus the public too much on how bad the deficits and debts coming are. Either way
@elerianm
Agreed 100%. this volatility is not normal or desirable. It probably comes from uncertainty on messaging from Fed, as well as enormous projected debt increases over next several decades, and resulting risks of inflation.
CBO:
Federal Debt Held by the Public, 1900 to 2053
% GDP
@elerianm
Yes, I am surprised. The Fed certainly seems to be declaring victory over inflation with today's press release and commentary. They risk throwing fuel onto the still burning inflation fire, given inflationary pressures in the economy and ongoing (and growing) deficit spending.
@KobeissiLetter
The Fed's hope for a pivot is getting overwhelmed along with its fight against inflation because inflationary deficit spending has expanded the money supply for years and is projected to continue at similar levels at least for the foreseeable future.
@KobeissiLetter
Markets also often price gold based on the level of faith that they place in the ability of central planners (government, Fed, etc) to guide successfully the economy and markets. The more the markets believe that those planners are doing a poor job, or cannot do the job at all,
@KobeissiLetter
It doesn't seem sustainable. This is all happening with personal savings falling steadily, especially in the last year, and well below the amounts "saved" after the Covid Era stimulus.
@KobeissiLetter
Yes, work from home certainly seems to have become a permanent aspect of US employment. Another indication of falling office occupancy is the significant dropoff in office and administrative support jobs, well below pre-pandemic levels, having never recovered after 2020.
@INArteCarloDoss
Agreed 100% -- Fed was never in the mortgage market prior to 2009, there is no reason for this to be a permanent state of emergency/affairs.
@KobeissiLetter
And we are now in month 20 of the Fed's rate hike cycle -- it often takes 24 months or so for a recession to take place and/or the Fed to reverse course on rates.
@KobeissiLetter
Yes, though those costs of building new houses are much higher than they were just a few years ago. Even with a recent moderation, the cost of construction materials is still up over 40% since early 2020.
@PeterSchiff
Yes, at the same time, the cost of home maintenance is skyrocketing. That should, logically speaking, also cause housing prices to fall. Home maintenance expense is a double since 2009, which is a 5.5% annualized cost increase.
@KobeissiLetter
And yet despite these job additions, the number of US manufacturing jobs remains at multi-decade lows, only 2/3 of the peak level of manufacturing jobs in... 1979.
Paul Volcker, October 25, 2018:
"A 2 percent target, or limit, was not in my textbooks years ago. I know of no theoretical justification. It’s difficult to be both a target and a limit at the same time. And a 2 percent inflation rate, successfully maintained, would mean the price
@KobeissiLetter
The Federal government is on pace to issue more than $2 trillion of new debt in the current fiscal year to finance deficit spending. It is very difficult to fight a fire when someone is pouring gasoline on it.
@KobeissiLetter
This is an amazing reflection of the effects of similar inflationary policies implemented by certain like minded central banks worldwide.
@GameofTrades_
Yes, and extending it out slightly earlier, we see that the Fed had paused its rate hikes in the summer of 2006. It took a year after the pause in 2006 for the problems to start to show. What will happen this time around?
@KobeissiLetter
Yes, it appears so. The unemployment rate is rising while many new jobs are part-time, and the Labor Force Participation rate remains at multi-decade lows outside of the Covid era. These are concerning signs for the labor market.
@KobeissiLetter
History rhymes:
"As Arthur Burns, the chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time, explained in 1974, the “manipulation of oil prices and supplies by the oil-exporting countries came at a most inopportune time for the United States. In the middle of 1973, wholesale prices of
@KobeissiLetter
Fed can't do much, it's a bit trapped and needed to take action years ago to avoid the current problems the Fed faces now. This data sounds possibly like the start of some kind of an inflationary recession, or at least that the market thinks the Fed might need to deal with one.
@KobeissiLetter
US population is up about 12% since 2006, but the percentage of renter occupied housing units is up 28% since 2006. It would make sense given the lack of affordability that renter occupied housing would continue to grow faster than the population does.
@KobeissiLetter
That's amazing -- even as recently as 2020, the share of US homes bought by investors was only 12.6%, though the trend had mostly been rising over the last two decades. Clearly a dramatic further change over the last three years. (Source: Redfin)
Ludwig von Mises, The Theory of Money and Credit, 1953:
"A government always finds itself obliged to resort to inflationary measures when it cannot negotiate loans and dare not levy taxes, because it has reason to fear that it will forfeit approval of the policy it is following
@KobeissiLetter
Maybe the same thing that happened with big tech in '99/'00?
"When they were hot, they were very, very hot. But when they were not, they were losers... The Nasdaq composite index leaped 85.6 percent -- a performance that exceeded the gain for any major index in any year in the
@KobeissiLetter
The Fed's interest rate policy may prove to be fairly powerless versus the ongoing deficit spending and a resulting skyrocketing debt load, all of which is inflationary.
CBO:
Federal Debt Held by the Public
Percentage of GDP
If the Fed cuts now, with YoY Core CPI still at 3%+, inflationary deficit spending continuing with no end in sight, and rates still not particularly high by historical measures, how can the Fed make the case that it is truly vigilant on controlling inflation?
@KobeissiLetter
And banks have large exposure to commercial real estate loans, as the total of all CRE loans at the banks keeps hitting all-time highs, despite these problems.
@TaviCosta
Agreed 100%. Amazingly, despite all of the well-known issues in the commercial real estate sector (especially with office properties), banks' exposure to these loans rose to another all-time high in December.
@KobeissiLetter
Because it continues to be difficult to find the high-paying, high benefit full-time jobs which can provide families with the chance to keep up with the quickly rising costs of living?
@KobeissiLetter
Fascinating chart. While there was a downtick yesterday in the unemployment rate (powered by healthcare and govt job increases), labor market appears to be weakening. More weakening would lead to UR rising, recession, and the gap closing with S&P falling.
@KobeissiLetter
Fed is in an impossible situation, much of it is of its own making. They can't raise rates, as there is too much debt owed at govt and at every level in the economy for higher rates. Cutting rates will likely ignite inflation pressures further. Maybe best is to hold rates here?
@KobeissiLetter
This is a remarkably resilient market, as was the 2016-2018 market. But would either market have held up in quite the same way, had the Fed not supported it with a balance sheet 5-10X the size of its pre-GFC balance sheet, loaded with UST bonds and mortgage-backed securities?
@KobeissiLetter
Ultimately, regardless of the exact Fed Funds rate, we are likely to see significant inflation, as the US's debt issuance continues to skyrocket in the foreseeable future.
CBO:
Federal Debt Held by the Public
Percentage of GDP
@KobeissiLetter
Yes, inflation is still too high -- and ongoing deficit spending, which is inflationary, shows no sign of slowing down, and presumably would only increase if and when the US economy enters a recession.
Source: CBO
@KobeissiLetter
The plan, whatever it is, will almost certainly involve some sort of inflationary policy. It's important to note the effect inflationary policies have already had on the purchasing power of the dollar over the last 100+ years.
@TaviCosta
In the stagflation period of the late 1970s, the price of silver moved up from just under $5 per ounce in early 1978, to a high of $49.45 in January 1980 -- and that move was without the benefit of the demand for silver from green energy initiatives that we see today.
President Ronald Reagan, April 24, 1985:
"The simple truth is: No matter how hard you work, no matter how strong this economy grows, no matter how much more tax money comes to Washington, it won't amount to a hill of beans if government won't curb its endless appetite to spend.
@PauloMacro
A recession could make inflation far more fierce by cutting down businesses and reducing all kinds of capital investment, including in natural resource extraction, killing supply. Decent chance that Westerners are going to be forced to think about it soon, given current trends.
@GRDecter
"Our people are simply sick and tired of wasteful Federal spending and the inflation it brings with it." -- President Carter, 1978
"We know now that inflation results from all that deficit spending." -- President Reagan, 1981
CBO:
Federal Debt Held by the Public
% of GDP
@KobeissiLetter
Deficit spending is out of control. Skyrocketing interest makes the situation worse. With $33.8 trillion debt outstanding, if US refinanced at current yield on 10-year UST bond (4.27%), expense would be $1.44 trillion, 50% higher than top of this chart.
@KobeissiLetter
@RealEJAntoni
There doesn't seem to be any plan here, and very little discussion in Washington of the problem. Interest expense on that growing debt is also skyrocketing exponentially, making the debt problem even worse.
@KobeissiLetter
Agreed, and along with these locked in mortgage rates, the Fed's unprecedented, 15 year involvement in the MBS market almost certainly has had (and will continue to have) a major impact on the strength is in the housing market.
@KobeissiLetter
One thing to watch for is the cutback of investment in resource extraction in the US, especially if a recession decreases that investment further. That lower investment in resource extraction is one reason why a recession can make prices higher, especially for energy.
The Fed is, at the moment, losing its fight with inflation with deficit spending continuing at record non-recession, peacetime levels. And projections indicate no end in sight for this kind of spending, for decades. Source: CBO
@KobeissiLetter
Even if they are below expectations, inflation driven year over year cost increases of 3.3-3.4% are still an enormous burden on US households, which have already suffered through decades of unrelenting price increases.
The problem is, even 2% year over year prices increases, let alone 3% YoY price increases, are an enormous burden on US households. The annual increase should be zero. In fact, with technological innovation, we should be enjoying the benefits via price decreases.
Since the Fed began raising rates in March 2022, they have made it clear that 2% inflation is their target.
Most recently, February CPI inflation JUMPED for the second straight month to 3.2%.
Core CPI inflation is still at 3.8% which is nearly double the Fed's long-term
@KobeissiLetter
Agreed 100%, this debt crisis is real and getting more serious. And another important question and concern is, who is holding onto all of these loans as assets? How much at risk are those institutions if losses start to mount?
@KobeissiLetter
Worth noting also that the Fed has distorted the housing market, both prices and rates, for years by its unprecedented (prior to 2009) purchases of mortgage-backed securities. The Fed still holds 87% (!) of its peak MBS holdings, 15+ years after the GFC.
Henry Hazlitt, Man Vs The Welfare State, 1970:
"The supply of gold is governed by nature; it is not, like the supply of paper money, subject merely to the schemes of demagogues or the whims of politicians. Nobody ever thinks he has quite enough money. Once the idea is accepted
@KobeissiLetter
The markets' anticipation of pause and then rate cuts really seems premature given continued inflationary pressures and deficit spending.
@KobeissiLetter
The ratio of a price of an ounce of gold to S&P level was as high as 1.69 as recently as August 2011. That ratio is currently only 0.44. Gold would need to be over $7,500 per ounce, given the current S&P level of 4549, for that ratio to equal the ratio in 2011.
@TaviCosta
A very important development. Current rates at all durations, even if lower than they were earlier in 2023, are likely going to be higher than rates were when the debt was originally issued -- putting even more upward pressure on interest expense.
@KobeissiLetter
Yes, short maturities are a huge problem, on top of rising debt and rates, for the US government. If the entire debt needed to be financed at the current Fed Funds rate (5.5%), then interest expense would nearly double from this chart, to $1.81 trillion.