Perpetual DEXs transformed the industry. We believe Perpetual Debt will do the same. Excited to finally release Covenant’s Whitepaper: Tradeable Perpetual Debt.
hey nerds we'll be in
#ETHDenver
Wednesday through Saturday. DM
@ahampt0n
if you want to geek out on Protocol Debt,
#RWA
, uncollateralized lending. LFG!!!!
Most TradFi debt is structured with a defined maturity and interest rate. This produces many instruments, each with its own traits. The result: liquidity fragmentation. Covenant solves for fragmentation by removing the need for maturity dates and coupon rates.
Our contracts are customizable and can be used to facilitate many use cases. Borrowers can use a myriad of on-chain collateral including LP positions, NFTs, and illiquid tokens. Covenant supports liquidation-free debt as well as mark-to-market liquidations.
That is all for now. We will dive into the different market participants tomorrow. In the meantime, give us a follow
@covenantFi
and read our whitepaper!
In our relentless pursuit of innovation and excellence, we've reimagined our brand to mark our dedication to a new on-chain economy where covenants look different.
Meet
@alliancedao
's latest accelerator cohort of startups building in a crypto winter 👇
“This is the most exclusive cohort in our history,”
@QwQiao
said during its demo day.
1/ Last week eight awesome teams graduated from
@alliancedao
's ALL11 cohort to build great companies. These founders are now members of the DAO and will be there to share their experiences and learnings with future Alliance Founders.
Onchain, long-tail friendly, market-priced debt markets? Yes please!
@covenantfi
has created a new onchain primitive, tradeable perpetual deb 🧠
The beta is out now and DegenScore Beacon holders can earn an NFT for 50% boost on Covenant Rewards 👇
1/Lending Protocol Taxonomy, Part 2: Interest Rates
In an attempt to categorize lending protocols in defi, I wrote about lending duration in Part 1.
Part 2 is all about how do protocols arrive at the correct interest rates.
This article covers:
Covenant debt is structured like a continually refinancing zero-coupon loan. Borrowers mint debt tokens which are continuously tradeable on Uniswap v3. The spot price determines the interest rate.
thanks again to
@DegenScore
and beacon holders for using our test deployment on
#OP
mainnet during the cafe! booster NFTs have been distributed.
more opportunities coming...
You are a defi user on
#Optimism
. You have stablecoins. You see a protocol has 20% base yield on stables (this does not include token incentives). Is this high enough to make you stop and look closer?
Are there any lending platforms written like AMMs? What I mean is relies on balances, optimistic transfers, maybe even callbacks inside? Was looking over uniswap code recently and there is no reason why I can’t turn fraxlend into an AMM
@tazz_finance
- I told them they should rebrand but they haven’t yet for some reason 🤷♂️. Building on-chain bonds, and I think this will be a big narrative next year as projects look to fund themselves with debt rather than equity. Raising rn.
If tokens = equity financing, the next frontier for protocols is debt financing
i.e. Issuing loans, instead of selling tokens
@tazz_finance
stands out to me as the spearhead with its innovative perpetual debt primitive
A 🧵 on Tazz + the future of onchain debt finance
Exciting developments in the
#DeFi
ecosystem are paving the way for the possibility of DeFi lending with illiquid collateral and hard to price assets. A groundbreaking example is the recently introduced Tradeable Perpetual Debt by Alan Hampton
@covenantFi
. Our team at
We're excited to announce $ankrETH has been added as a collateral to our liquid staking pool. Want to boost your $ETH folded staking yield to 20%? With no spread between borrow and lend rates, and 95% max LTV, you can. Visit and read on to learn more 👇
1/ Decentralized money? Is a decentralized asset like bitcoin a good candidate for money? Or should decentralized money follow the bank enabled money==debt paradigm that currently dominates real world finance?
I decided to MAP EVERY LENDING PROTOCOL under a taxonomy and share the alpha with you.
Turns out it's kinda long, so part 1 is focused on interest duration.
In the article I compare delta-1 instruments to lending, and there's a clear gap:
Turns out a graduate of
@alliancedao
's
1. On Tazz, the price of debt changes wrt risk. The higher the risk, the cheaper the debt price (and vice versa). Therefore, the system is inherently designed to bend with losses vs breaking (i.e. during liquidity and solvency crunches).
What happens when three Palantir engineers slam maté and think about lending LP incentives? As we approach launch, let's look at a new way to reward LPs. 🧵 👇
3. Tazz concentrates liquidity by making debt perpetual (i.e. no maturity), which significantly reduces liquidity fragmentation. Again, see
@0xdjma
's article for more insight on the topic.
So what's the best LP strategy? LP's maximize their incentive returns by concentrating their liquidity at the right yield for borrowers and lenders. LPs are also exposed to impermanent loss if zTokens lose value. How is this different from other lending protocols?
In a previous thread we covered Tazz basics. Borrowers mint and sell debt tokens. Lenders buy debt tokens. The debt is perpetual. But how does the rate get set, and how does that affect borrowers and lenders? Let's dive in 👇
A bear market is the most expensive time for projects to sell tokens. They do it because they have mandatory expenses like payroll, but selling your token in a down market is a losing battle for many reasons. Eg...
When will Arbitrum team run out of ARB to sell?
Through the help of market maker Wintermute, there has been a constant dump of $ARB
ARB tokens are sent from Prime Deposits addresses from Coinbase, FalconX and Bitfinex to Wintermute, which are instantly sent to exchanges,
Great news for
@ankrstaking
users on Arbitrum! You can now borrow against your
#ankrETH
Balancer LP positions on Tazz (). You can currently borrow up to 90% LTV at ~2.2% APY (we'll let you do the math on folding).
This seems obvious since these tokens have the biggest crypto market caps. It also may have been out of necessity because of the limitations of existing lending protocols.
We've been running a private beta with users to collect feedback, to be made more public over time. Let us know if you'd like to try out and give us feedback, for OG glory, fortune, joy, and fame.
As DeFi lending matures beyond just borrowing against over-collateralized large cap ERC20s, it will need new primitives with the ability to scale, concentrate liquidity, and underwrite a broader range of assets.
This means a protocol can take a loan backed by their treasury holdings without worrying about M2M about liquidations, even if their governance token goes down in value. If the collateral does go down in value, the market can figure out how to price the debt...
1/5 🚀🚀 Exciting news! TAZZ is now live on
@ethereum
Goerli! We invite you to explore our next-generation DeFi lending platform at .
Let's dive into what makes TAZZ special...🧵
With better rates, and a higher max LTV of 95%, Tazz is an ideal option for looping your LSTs. We're busy integrating more LST options in addition to $wstETH, like $ankrETH and $swETH. Read the docs to learn more:
2. Peer-to-peer loans don't scale efficiently because each loan has to be assessed, priced, and underwritten by each lender. Furthermore, the lack of syndication/securitization infra makes it difficult to increase exposure to non-experts.
Similar to protocols like
@SiloFinance
and
@RDNTCapital
, risks in Tazz's lending pools are isolated from one another. This means different pools can take on different levels of risk without endogenously impacting each other.
At the highest level, Tazz enables perpetual, tradable debt. 'Perpetual' in that it doesn't have a fixed maturity. 'Tradable' in that it trades on a DEX.
The difference is that these are not swap fees. Uniswap has a staking contract that distributes rewards based on the *time* the price remains in a respective LP's liquidity range.
If a lender buys a debt token when the APR is 20%, and the rate falls down to 5%, they might sell the debt tokens at a gain. Reverse the scenario, and they might sell at a loss.
2. Tazz leverages market forces to efficiently price risk and and has built-in syndication via fungible (ERC20) debt tokens, enabling it to scale more efficiently than peer-to-peer models.
Unlike other isolated lending protocols, however, Tazz uses market forces to both set interest rates & price debt. Practically speaking, this means that higher-risk pools have higher rates & cheaper debt, and lower-risk pools have lower rates & more expensive debt.
A quick refresher. Covenant lets borrowers mint zTokens, which are tradeable on UniV3. The zToken price determines the expected debt yield. LPs enable this market, but have to choose the price range (and thus rate!) where they expect zTokens to trade. So, how to best reward LPs?
Let's say an organization like
@Optimism
wanted to borrow USDC against $OP from their treasury. They would deposit $OP collateral into Tazz, minting debt tokens specific to Optimism. We might call these tokens zOPDebt. Optimism would then swap zOPDebt for USDC on Uniswap.
Voting is live for
@arbitrum
LTIPP grants. Covenant is doing great so far with over 80% of votes in favor, but if you have $ARB, please show your support and vote 'For'!
Like companies do in the real world, it makes more sense for protocols to use debt. With debt, you get the money needed for expenses, without giving up potential upside to your token price by increasing the circulating supply.
I need a money market which allows
@pendle_fi
PT-token looping (specifically stablecoin markets) so I can get my much needed 100%+ APY on stables.
Who's building this?
So how does the rate get set? The market determines the rate, and the rate and price are inversely related. To simplify, if the price goes up, the rate goes down, and vice versa. This means the rate is floating and debt is tradable.
E.g. a $50k incentive is active for the next month. Both LP A and B allocate $1M to the UniV3 pool. The market, for that whole month, is around the 15% yield price. So LP A get a 60% effective APY on their position, while LP B gets 0%. Sounds like normal UniV3 LP'ing right?
TLDR: Unlike other lending protocols, LPs get rewarded for correctly predicting the market lending yield. Get it right, and this could be 10x larger than the native, underlying debt yield. How do we gamify this?
Tazz solves for all these problems. Risk is isolated between different markets, any token (even locked tokens) can be collateralized, and collateral doesn't have to be subject to M2M liquidations.
1. Similar to banks, crypto money markets try to avoid principle loss at all costs and tend to break down during liquidity & solvency crunches (e.g. bank runs). This puts a lot of stress on governance and limits their ability (and appetite) to support risky, illiquid collaterals.