Given this whole NEET and now NET-JRF faisco by NTA the higher education in India has collapsed. We should demand the following-
1) Scrap NTA entirely
2) Universities/ medical inst. etc should be given complete autonomy to conduct their own entrance examinations
It is one year of my M.Phil thesis defense, under supervision of Prof. Vidhu Verma at CPS, JNU. I thoroughly enjoyed working on this thesis, particularly two aspects of Althusser— difference between Hegel totality and Marxian social whole; and critique of empiricism,
Among the most interesting things I still love about JNU is conversations/discussions about things people read: a friend reading Postone, another Phule, Nietzsche, Heidegger; Bordieu, Chatterjee, or Benjamin, Arendt or even readings and so on, across centres. They are, at times,
3) The Education Minister should resign, UGC Chairman should resign
4) Reschedule of this NET/JRF exam and it should no longer be the criteria for PhD admissions
Thanks Twitter philosophy and people who wished me luck. I cleared JRF (Junior Research Fellowship, a fellowship given by University Grants Commission in India). Now, I will be able to buy more books on Hegel and more than that will be able to apply for my PhD. Thanks again. 🌻
Introduce yourself with Seven books:
Ethics— Spinoza
Phenomenology of Spirit — Hegel
Science of Logic— Hegel
Capital — Marx
For Marx— Althusser
Being and Time— Heidegger
Margins of Philosophy— Derrida
Introduce yourself with Seven Books:
Logics of Worlds -- Badiou
Wretched of the Earth -- Fanon
Civ and its Discontents -- Freud
Phenomenology of Spirit -- Hegel
Capital v1 -- Marx
Universality and Identity Politics -- McGowan
Learning Politics from Sivaram -- Mark P. Whitaker
Listened to Aishwary Kumar for the first time today in person. It was really very illuminating and rich in content. Thanks BAPSA for organizing this wonderful event.
Hegel says philosophy happens in language. Balibar says in an interview the whole point of philosophy is learning to write. Derrida says there is no outside text. But our higher education bodies (UGC/NTA etc) think exactly opposite of this.
(Quoting all from memory)
Socrates, he who doesn’t write.
— Nietzsche
(now, this book has a proper name, in the genre of ‘new arrivals’)🌼🍁
Also, the seller gave me an extra 20 percent discount. Really happy!
At some point, I want to write a paper on Democracy, Elections and Representation with special focus on rural and urban differences in India- taking a cue from Heidegger’s notion of belonging, phenomenology and Rousseau notion of participation.
way too substantive & at times, on a lighter note, really polemic. Not to forget about the political background in which these texts appear and the influence they had. There is also, one hears at some small gatherings great debates around these and their theoretical positions.
According to the QS World University rankings by Subject 2023,JNU has breached the 100 rank mark in Politics.
JNU VC Prof Santishree Pandit congratulates the CPS & SIS faculty members & students for this achievement. VC also thanks the MoE for their trust in reposing faith in JNU
Time is such a powerful idea, it never stops surprising me. Be it calendar time (commemoration, remembrance etc), historical time (spirit, subject and its constitution), life-time (hermeneutical/historicist), capital time (real history, non-contemporaneity) (1/3)
It is disgusting and troubling to see how Althusser is thoroughly misunderstood, and hence misrepresented, by some people. Read some clarificatory essays by Balibar on epistemological break, and then say something.
That some people associated with what they are constantly reading are also welcomed/critiqued and seen as a grounding of one’s politics (perhaps not so suspiciously). Overall, this has a significant impact on our learning as a collective
humanism and historicism. I realised, there is so much to learn from Althusser— epistemological break, critique of historicism, history as a process without subject, theoretical anti-humanism, a different kind of materialism (critique of teleology and subject) and so on.
“Remember, University is a space for free and independent thinking”, says distinguished historian Prof. Romila Thapar. It was deeply insightful listening to her: as she shared some very rich methodological points on history and social sciences.
‘A time in which some history must take place. A time moved from within by an irresistible force, producing its own content. It is a dialectical time par excellence. A time that abolishes the other time and the structure of its spatial representation.’
— For Marx, Althusser
I love going back to these lines, again and again. And it is very rare to find a writing like this: and to that extent Althusser is absolutely singular.
‘Hegel is still too Spinozistic for us to be able to speak of pure humanism; a pure humanism culminates only in skeptical irony and platitude.’ — Hyppolite
Today is Proust’s birthday. 🌼
An image of the past harbors, in me, by present distancing from the past— as memory. Let not forget so many distinct (or sometimes indistinct) conversations— of whose subject we used to be once.
This is going to be historic as the Themes, speakers and Chairs suggest. Pushing the boundaries in terms of ideas and engagements. Will make my day at a time when I am struggling with my synopsis. Thanks a lot for organizing it!
@aakash_ironman
@kumararvind_
@deepakbiswas191
Not really a good book store. I was really disappointed. Nothing of theory, or modern literature. They had mostly popular epic, mythic books that too from random, perhaps, shady translations. Their way to display a book was just terrible. Bahri sons is much much better than this.
Overall, it was just a wonderful experience and I am deeply associated with my M.Phil. Further, my interest in Hegel is only through my reading of Louis Althusser: to that extent his influence on me is life long!
One of the problems of doing philosophy is you get influenced by whatever you read. The (absolute) present (and text in hand) certainly enjoys a primacy even when there is no one to one correspondence between what the present is and its knowledge. It was pretty much my case.