An
@insaneinthembrn
litepaper to start the New Year
🛡️:
Meatspace solved the inefficiencies of commodity-backed money with fiat, and we've seen where that got us. But now we have tools to create a new branch of evolution that manifests as the end of the
There has been a lack of Apollo content regarding the Astro Wars, so here's why
@ApolloDAO
has won even before vxAstro is released.
🧵👇
$apAstro
$LUNA $UST $ASTRO $APOLLO
Wow. The
@LunaBulls
AlphaDrop just ended and i must say it was a banger! Thanks to the team and thanks
@cy_coleman
for the great hosting.
So much alpha so get ready for a long thread. It was recorded and accompanied by a couple posts you'll see linked.
$LUNA $UST 🌔
1/👇
The $ATOM negativity pipeline
- Buys it because its called Cosmos Hub and thinks it'll receive tokens from all IBC chains
- Is happy with the staking rewards bc more IBC tokens in the future
- Realizes ATOM has no product
- Realizes governance is centralized
- feels helpless
The people “leaving Cosmos” have been engag…*cough*…I mean leaving for like 6 months. Have safe travels but make them speedy, ur dragging.
Also block anyone posting about leaving today out of all days.
Some notes on the
@DeviantsNFT
AMA:
- Sale Nov 9th
- Token Rewards whether you win or not (more if you win)
- You can earn from any full deck, thru renting or offline play (AI controlled)
- Future guilds, scholarships and new pack releases to keep barrier of entry low
1/
Nouns-styled NFTs for the Interchain.
the first usage will be by
@the_memebrane
, will utilize $CDT as the bid asset & burn $MBRN with a portion of the bids. I'm so excited to finally get this closer to production.
TLDR of the Manta bullshit
Manta founder wants to bring revenues from around the Cosmos back to Kujira, obv value.
Dissenters want all liquidity on Kujira, even if it means less revenue & volume.
We can agree this is idiotic right?
@TheMoonMidas
@terra_money
We need a huge emphasis on less arrogance overall from
#LUNAtics
. Yes it feels good but its not the right way to go about things. Its natural for it to develop but its clear it has to stop.
@ZeMariaMacedo
The people that didn't "trust" UST before still don't trust it, that's not surprising. I'd argue no matter how it happens, a repeg in this scenario shows that the mechanism can and will work. That alone will increase the trust ceiling.
It’s hard to explain how excited this makes me.
Starting development a year ago, the first barrier was finding a way to fund an audit as that’s a necessity for most users to even consider a protocol.
& now open sourcing to share my sweat with everyone, couldn’t be more grateful
Today we open source our full suite of contracts under the GPL license & thanks to
@SecurityOak
&
@OsmosisGrants
, our core contracts have been audited.
Below I’ll list contracts that may benefit other builders & protocols👇
The only reason I’m even active in these Hub discussions is bc
@EffortCapital
&
@ATOMAccelerator
are trying to move from the status quo and I want to influence the outcome for the better.
No other discussion have been around actual solution programs.
@resdegen
You realize your model for "sustainable yield" is unsustainable.
Why "lock" $NEAR to mint a stable whose yield comes from my own $NEAR. Selling rewards is sell pressure no matter what happens. Using it to mint more USN cuts the yield by the LTV.
If $ATOM controls stAssets, competition for LSDs will litereally just avoid ATOM.
ATOM can't & won't incentivize other stAssets. Stride basically throws away their market advantage. Why would Osmosis align with stOSMO? There are no innovation advantages, no neutrality, no upside
It's impossible to deny the power of fiat-backed tokens like $USDC but up until now, no decentralized stablecoin has effectively wielded them and kept their sanity.
$CDT is the One who will merge the powers of nature to create endless abundance.
im tired of all the bearish Cosmos sentiment.
just build better products. you don't even need a new backend to improve you r product, just a little imagination.
If you don’t understand this point then your bags are showing.
It’s something no one talks about but is absolutely true. Armageddon security is meaningless if I can unlock your vault and steal your money.
ethereum smart contracts get hacked for millions on a bi-monthly basis & defi hacks total in the billions but their claim to fame for being worth 10x more than every other blockchain is that they are "more secure" bc they have 4,000 nodes globally in some AWS instances
It’s very simple.
There was a hidden fee thru a rounding error. Instead of giving this to users after it was found, it was kept.
The intentions are clear.
omg omg WHAT IF we made the community happy & clawed back and returned some of the funds to the community pool
its almost like that'd be great for sentiment
Cosmos DeFi is sprinting into some great products in preparation for a bullish environment.
Mars v2
Osmosis Smart Accounts & potential mobile App
Membrane degen yield looping
Kujira v2
Y’all realize to change Cosmos culture we all need to act differently?
It’s not some magical culture potion we need to find, it’s literally us. Be intentional.
I swear the problem isn’t even the “Cosmos” community, it’s just people that like to shit on Cosmos and it’s all downstream of liquidity.
If the IBC-eco had liquidity no one would say anything. I have to stop engaging in these convos.
We need to create new governance structures as a sector.
You could realistically lock any locked DeFi gov token recursively to infinity with all possible locked gov tokens in the loop.
We already see it with $CRV -> $CVX -> $BTRFLY
🧵👇
@ddonbtc
@sunnya97
See Bitcoin as another hub though it doesn’t need to enable IBC.
@nomicbtc
demonstrates a safe way to bridge BTC
@babylon_chain
extends its POW security benefits
Cosmos is BTC’s L2. Grants BTC wider use cases without adding risk to the base chain.
@resdegen
Borrow APR pays the yield and borrowers are going to deposit their $USN to get the yield. Where is the value added in this equation?
This won't attract liquidity either if the borrowers are the only ones who can mint $USN. It's all $NEAR.
Terra had tons of money, a huge team & lots of BD energy….so you probably think I’m crazy for founding a stablecoin solo.
First off, it was supposed to be 2 of us😅😅😅 iykyk
Second, the amount of support along the way shows me that these are the foundations for an outlier
imo $SOMM explodes once its able to create Cosmos vault simply due to attention within the ecosystem
If it was an Ethereum chain there is no way it would be this hush hush
Hypothetical CDT Adoption
- Incentivized OSMO LP will create a venue for OSMO arbitrage & CDT margin/arb/credit usage
- At market maturity, CDT will be integrated into external collateral markets
- Profitable vaults can be created for liquidation pools & high volume LPs
So much complaining about $ATOM
Branding & tokenomics are 2 sides of the same coin, none of it matters without organic demand.
The real “issue” is the speed of PSS launching. It’s very easy to brand an atom around shared security, the logo is perfect.
1/
@osmosiszone
is building to become the "Interchain DEX" meaning the choice of collateral will grow rapidly and has.
The problem is, each asset has differing risks so liquidity will gravitate to lower risk options. Osmosis needs a collateral aggregator, $CDT.
4/ Building the Interchain Liquidity Hub
@osmosiszone
has made an even bigger push by launching tokens across ecosystems, from
@avalancheavax
,
@0xPolygon
and
@FantomFDN
.
Users can now easily access these tokens without the need to go to a CEX.
- $AVAX
- $FTM
- $MATIC
It's hilarious that even though ATOM 2.0 failed, it captured the minds of many.
Proposals are clearly more than the outcome which highlights why "ability to propose" is important.
I think the biggest gripe about "Cosmos UX is bad" isn't about the UX being good, its at best better than it was before.
But its like everyone who tries using it has also never bridged before. You know its not a monolithic ecosystem, why try to use it like one and then cry?
Get ready for a new age of liquidations in Cosmos, starting with
@TeamKujira
and continuing with
@insaneinthembrn
.
Deep $CDT $USK liquidity will essentially connect the liquidated collateral markets of these two powerhouses. Hold on tight!
So
@leservedao
's launch medium dropped.
At first I was unsure if I liked it, but I actually think it may work in everyone's favor.
WL -> LBP -> Launch
🧵👇
$LUNA $UST $ATOM $RUNE
Kujira is the
#1
example of how a sovereign organic community will act around its products.
If the trade execution is worse but you get fees or a discount, who's DEX would you use? Now what if you're also part of its community.
Y?
@leservedao
is here to tell you in it's latest article.
🤓🧵👇
TLDR;
- Bonds aaS & Flash Loans
- Non $LSRV yields
- 3 month commit cycles for rev. distribution
- Leserve Citizenship NFT
- Overhauled rebase mechanisms
- Revenue drives inflation
$LUNA
Hey
@StargazeZone
community, I'm currently building a collection creation contract and am looking for feedback ahead of time.
TLDR: It enables pre-mint auctions for new NFTs to add into a collection at a regular interval (ex: daily auctions), think
@nounsdao
.
CW link below
IBC is our alignment, let’s make it concrete or fall to tribalism.
Step 1: Validators run relayers
Step 2: Users pay for relaying
This way, chains get additional income from bridging. It’s a direct incentive to Grow the Pie🥧. Right now bridging is taken for granted.
The newer sovereign projects that are in Cosmos do more to push the ethos then almost all the market leading projects.
Is that backwards or what?
Ex: $WHALE, $KUJI, $ARCH, $SHD, $JKL, $LORE, $LAVA, $STRD