Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD Profile Banner
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD Profile
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD

@acagamic

25,131
Followers
127
Following
2,346
Media
26,714
Statuses

I share effective strategies to write better research papers and use AI. Wrote 200+ papers with 30k+ citations in under 15 years. Tenured Full Professor.

Get all my freebies here →
Joined October 2008
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Pinned Tweet
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to ace your PhD thesis defence. My Questions and Answers Guide ↓
Tweet media one
166
666
3K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
13 days
The evolution of our understanding
Tweet media one
42
2K
8K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Abstracts are your paper's first impression. A weak abstract can sink even the best research. I transformed my abstract game with this 6-step Nature formula (and you can, too)
Tweet media one
17
2K
7K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
7 days
Writing the discussion section of your paper
Tweet media one
11
1K
7K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 year
I have written 300+ peer-reviewed scientific papers in the last 15 years with more than 27,000 citations. Here is how I use sentence templates to write abstracts at lightning speed. ↓ @acm_chi @academicvoices @PhDVoice @PhD_Genie #AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #phdlife
93
1K
4K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 month
The five stages of academic writing: 1. Procrastination 2. Panic 3. Caffeine overdose 4. Submitting a barely coherent mess 5. Swearing to do it differently next time
44
844
3K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 month
Research is dedicating 8 hours to reviewing 6 papers to craft a single sentence that cites 3 sources.
22
615
3K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
The classic hourglass structure of paper writing
Tweet media one
14
608
3K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to identify 8 different research gap types
Tweet media one
4
595
3K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
18 days
Excellent tips for writing a literature review (from Professor Hall)
Tweet media one
3
524
3K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
How to write a research proposal
Tweet media one
12
690
2K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
19 days
Example of how to structure a literature review
Tweet media one
7
370
2K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
Most academic writers use the word "very" too much. But many words have excellent alternatives. Here's my quick list for you: ❌ Very clear ✅ Evident ❌ Very complex ✅ Intricate ❌ Very convincing ✅ Persuasive ❌ Very curious ✅ Inquisitive ❌ Very detailed ✅ Thorough
27
391
2K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Two-thirds of academic writing is thinking of a synonym for "however." The other half is debating whether a semi-colon is pretentious enough for that sentence.
21
286
2K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 year
I have almost 30k citations and millions in research funding. But almost 20 years ago, I just wrote my first research paper. I had no writing support during grad school & I want you to have it better. Here are secret actionable writing tips for 6 sections of your paper. ↓
19
388
2K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to cite papers in APA citation style
Tweet media one
17
386
2K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 year
Almost 20 years ago, I wrote my first research paper. Today, I have more than 28k citations. I had 0 writing support from my supervisor during my PhD, so now I share share everything I learn with you. Here are 3 secret actionable writing tips for each section of your paper. ↓
25
364
2K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
The academic metabolism in a nutshell
Tweet media one
26
336
1K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
Academic success is 5% writing and 95% expertly procrastinating until the deadline pressure kicks in. 😆
16
209
1K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
One of my favourite decision graphs from PhD Comics. Especially relevant today that one of my PhD students got accepted to go to a conference in Hawaii...
Tweet media one
11
271
1K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
How to write an abstract for your paper. You can do it in 5 parts: 1. Background A brief overview of what's being studied in what context. 2. Justification Why the researchers conducted this study. 3. Major Finding The main finding of the study. 4. Key Results More details
Tweet media one
10
345
1K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 year
Traditional academic writing styles suck. Don't make your paper dull, dense, and inaccessible. Create an irresistible masterpiece with these paper section templates. Here's how: ↓
39
228
1K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
11 months
I'll let you in on a secret... Most discussion sections are the reason your paper gets rejected. Here are 7 tips for how to make your discussion review-proof. ↓
Tweet media one
11
246
1K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Struggling to find a unique angle for your research? The key to groundbreaking research is in its gaps 7 types of research gaps every scholar should know
Tweet media one
3
253
1K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to write a problem statement that will get your research noticed. A great problem statement has 4 parts: 1. Lead-in Introduce the topic and generate interest. Set the stage for the problem. 2. Declaration of Originality Identify a gap In the existing research or knowledge
Tweet media one
5
268
993
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
How to write a related works section Annotated example of a literature review.
Tweet media one
8
197
959
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
I cut my systematic review time in half with these tools. 5 underrated tools for literature reviews.
9
227
900
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
Cheat Sheet on Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis
Tweet media one
5
223
884
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
20 days
Breakdown of the IMRaD Paper Structure (and Abstract)
Tweet media one
3
213
839
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
11 months
Academic publishers make USD 19 billion+ in sales based on our work. 5 websites you can google to get access to paywalled papers if you can't reach the authors: 1. Sci-Hub 2. Unpaywall 3. 12ft ladder 4. Paperpanda 5. Open Access Button
15
229
801
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
9 days
A research paper overview in a lo-fi mindmap
Tweet media one
6
148
746
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
How to write a powerful thesis statement. A secret little guide for you. (Yes, I'll 🎁 DM you the doc if you follow me and repost this)
Tweet media one
30
275
732
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
I got my last 5 papers accepted without major revisions Here's my method 1. Outline urgent impact; point to gaps 2. Accentuate novelty & comparability 3. Replicable simple methods 4. Explain findings visually 5. Widen perspective 6. Stimulate discussion 7. Excite with potential
9
158
723
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 year
Struggling to write academic papers faster? Templates make everything better. 13 sentence templates ready to plug and play into your paper's Introduction section ↓
12
198
708
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to write a paper abstract in the social sciences.
Tweet media one
3
137
701
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
My data's strong, but my paper's weak. 😱 Don't just write; guide your reader. How to use the PASTOR framework:
Tweet media one
10
153
697
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 month
Is your thesis a confusing mess? Here's the fix: Every thesis needs a good fight. Your work needs to take a stand. A thesis argument map is the blueprint for this. Don't just write a thesis. Take your argument into battle.
Tweet media one
1
169
686
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
An academic's daily ritual: 1. Oversleep 2. Contemplate existence 3. Stare blankly for hours, accomplish zilch 4. Sudden panic, flail wildly 5. Obsess over trivial task, ignore priorities 6. Descend into existential crisis 7. Vow to reform tomorrow Lather, rinse, repeat.
7
144
661
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
11 months
10 reliable tools to improve your academic workflows: 1. elicit [.org] 2. quillbot [.com] 3. summarizer. scholarcy [.com] 4. trinka [.ai] 5. paperpal [.com] 6. writefull [.com] 7. hemingwayapp [.com] 8. scite [.ai] 9. powerthesaurus [.org] 10. agiletortoise [.com]/terminology/
3
181
646
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
9 Literature Review Quick Questions 1. What has been done? 2. What were the hypotheses? 3. What were the research questions? 4. How was the work done? 5. When was it done? 6. Who did it? 7. What were the main findings? 8. What were the conclusions? 9. What should be done next?
6
150
644
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
25 days
My students transformed their thesis with these 7 powerful strategies How to turn a weak thesis into a rock-solid argument
5
158
644
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
6 days
Questions that your research paper should answer...
Tweet media one
1
352
1K
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 year
Don't just make up contributions of your research article. Ensure relevance, focus, and feasibility of your research first. Find a gap. I've helped 500+ students find good research gaps to improve their articles for 15+ years. Here are 7 core research gaps you must know ↓
13
171
596
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
15 days
It was a pretty good day today. I am excited to announce my appointment as a University Research Chair. Thanks to everyone who has supported me over the years offline and online.
Tweet media one
104
22
573
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to structure a basic academic essay (and PEEL paragraphs in its body)
Tweet media one
4
131
569
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
In academia, we don't say "I love you" we say "I am accepting your paper with no request for revisions."
9
128
565
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
What should you call your academic event? Another great flowchart from PhD Comics.
Tweet media one
1
144
556
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Example content of a research proposal
Tweet media one
5
110
558
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
10 months
The most powerful research tool nobody talks about: Pre-submission checklists. I spent 50+ hours creating these checklists to help you publish better papers (use responsibly).↓
12
103
554
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
20 days
Drowning in papers? Use this 7-step method to find your PhD research gap! The PhD literature mapping blueprint
Tweet media one
8
124
532
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to make sense of complex academic concepts through the lens of history? Here's a Terminology Cheat Sheet. Repost & reply 🎓 I'll DM you this handy guide in Google Sheets to explain scientific terminology (must be following).
Tweet media one
89
177
528
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
Pros and cons of qualitative data analysis approaches
Tweet media one
5
105
525
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Ready to have some fun with your abstract?
Tweet media one
8
126
524
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
I've reviewed 300+ research papers and... I've spent 15+ years perfecting discussion sections. Here's my 9-step discussion section framework: 1. How can you highlight the distinctive aspects of your findings compared to previous research? Identify: • Differences •
9
138
519
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 month
When preparing your PhD defence, read your thesis again and highlight: • Limitations of quantitative (and or qualitative) analysis • Main contribution to your field • Justifications for methods • Essential literature • Crucial methods • Vital keywords • Takeaways
2
138
504
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
7 months
I went from 0 papers to 5 papers in my last PhD year. Today. No fancy templates. No magic formulas. Just 5 powerful ideas to get you started: 1. Start with a question, not a topic. • What are you genuinely curious about? • What problem do you want to solve? Curiosity
5
127
497
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 month
Struggling with paper structure? Reverse-engineer it! 1. Find a top-cited paper in your field. 2. Break down its sections. 3. Use them as a template. 4. Write your paper. Learn from the best to become the best. It’s as simple as that.
5
97
484
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
How to use IMRaD for writing a paper
Tweet media one
2
108
472
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
I discovered the secret to captivating academic writing: Academic storytelling. 5 storytelling techniques to master the art:
Tweet media one
7
95
473
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to structure a research article that reviewers (and readers) will love. Finding relevant papers is one thing. Digesting them fast is another. This image shows what to look for in a research article.
Tweet media one
3
118
465
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 month
How to peer-review: 1. Is the topic clear? 2. Is the issue clearly stated? 3. Is it believable 4. It it well-illustrated? 4. Does it recommend anything? 5. Next steps? 6. Does it methodically document prior research? 7. Does the research build on this? Review like you wrote it.
2
139
465
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
Publish papers, pursue knowledge, mentor students, collaborate globally, and push boundaries. Everything else is just noise in the academic concert.
11
102
458
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
Dreaming of escaping the 9-to-5 grind? Do a PhD. Endless freedom. Endless hours. Endless work.
17
40
452
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
I've been advised to avoid the phrase: "No previous studies have investigated..." It's a cheap hook to claim the value of your study. Here are 5 approaches I use in my writing instead:
6
126
451
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
Dissertation Timeline Gantt Chart. Agree or disagree?
Tweet media one
17
87
445
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
I thought I couldn't do a PhD without a mentor. I was wrong... How I built my own support network as a PhD student With 0 support from my former supervisor.
7
70
441
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
How to find the research that matters most to your study (without getting lost in the literature) Steal my process for identifying the most relevant studies:
7
109
441
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
Structuring your literature review
Tweet media one
2
116
428
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
How I made my writing more engaging with one simple trick: Vary sentence length. Short is punchy. Long is bunchy. Both have visuals. Both have sounds. There is a time and place for each. Finding a delicate balance is the trick. Your sentences want to sing. Give them a voice.
Tweet media one
7
83
428
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
How to turn your research into a compelling story: Use this simple 5-step formula for your paper's structure:
9
101
427
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
The most powerful writing tool nobody talks about. Writing checklists. Here is one that lets you better write your research paper. (As usual, if you repost, like, and comment, I'll DM you the link if you follow me here)
Tweet media one
55
127
418
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
I used to dream of changing the world through my research. Now, I just dream of getting through the day without crying in my office.
16
52
420
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
7 months
I've been advised to avoid the phrase: "No previous studies have investigated..." It's a cheap hook to claim the value of your study. Here are 5 approaches I use in my writing instead: 1. I emphasize the novelty of proposed research Don't focus on the absence of previous
10
120
396
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
How I silenced the "your n is too small" critics A manifesto for defending qualitative research Qualitative researchers face criticism about small sample sizes. Here's how to address these concerns effectively:
Tweet media one
8
82
392
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
My student made their thesis stronger by eliminating one single word The word "really" is a sign of lazy writing. We're all guilty of overusing it. Here's a quick list of alternatives
11
49
387
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 month
The purpose of 5 parts of your research paper: 1. Intro What are your 1st and 2nd study goals? 2. Lit Review What's similar research on the topic? 3. Methods How did you collect data? 4. Results What insights did you get from data? 5. Discussion What's the impact of it?
3
134
386
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
I believed these 11 lies about literature reviews until I knew better Don't let these myths hold you back. The honest truth about literature reviews
10
105
382
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
My systematic literature reviews used to lack credibility. But this all changed when I started doing this... Critical strategies for transparent lit review reporting:
7
107
374
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
11 days
The components of research
Tweet media one
2
84
374
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
How to write a thesis sentence: What's your topic? 1. Claim: What's your stance? 2. Reason: Why do you believe this? 3. Caveat: What will you give up to support other views? Thesis sentence= Claim + Reason + Caveat Here's an example:
3
94
365
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
5 months
How to Better Skim Academic Papers But skimming is not reading fast; it’s reading smart. Here's how I skim an academic paper: 1. FIRST • Focus on the title • Then abstract The abstract summarizes: • Topic • Method • Findings • Conclusions Read the abstract to grasp the
Tweet media one
8
120
362
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
6 months
Critical thinking is extremely difficult to learn. Many people just summarize, not analyze papers. And your reviewers will reject you if you do this wrong. What can you do? Learn 4 steps to think critically about papers. Be smarter about reading papers. Here's how: First,
7
87
358
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
The first research paper I wrote was a total disaster. Then, I spent 10,000 hours learning the system that makes it all work. Last week, I taught you this each day. How to write a top-cited research paper without the all-nighters (FREE mini-course inside)
5
79
352
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Struggling to write a strong introduction? Try this 3-step approach: How I write introductions that make editors sit up and take notice
6
80
351
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
How to dissect a CHI best paper award abstract
Tweet media one
2
84
350
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 year
10 reliable tools to improve your academic workflows: 1. elicit [.org] 2. quillbot [.com] 3. summarizer. scholarcy [.com] 4. trinka [.ai] 5. paperpal [.com] 6. writefull [.com] 7. hemingwayapp [.com] 8. scite [.ai] 9. powerthesaurus [.org] 10. agiletortoise [.com]/terminology/
16
120
346
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
I thought I knew how to write Results until I learned this... Your Results section isn't just about data. It's about narrative. How to write a Results section that tells a compelling story:
2
73
347
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Steal my template for a Literature Review Don't just summarize previous research. Use it strategically. Highlight the key findings and methods. You'll build upon them in your discussion. Show how your work fits right into the field. Prepare the reader for the insights to come.
7
78
342
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Ace your lit review with this one insight: Never summarize previous research without critical analysis Steal my blueprint for a better literature review:
Tweet media one
4
91
343
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Struggling to start your discussion section? Try these 5 proven tactics. How I crafted a compelling discussion section from scratch:
Tweet media one
5
87
340
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Feeling lost in your new research field? You don't have to know everything to excel in your PhD. Here's how:
3
65
337
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
21 days
What are the purposes of a literature review in Qual Research?
Tweet media one
4
89
336
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
4 months
How to identify Primary vs. Secondary Source Papers
Tweet media one
2
86
335
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
How to argue with research you don't like 😉
Tweet media one
2
97
335
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
1 month
Drowning in papers? Here's how to stay afloat and absorb knowledge: The paper reading trick that saved my literature review: 11 steps
6
90
327
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
Want to elevate your academic writing? I got published in top journals by avoiding these 3 brutal mistakes
Tweet media one
5
87
326
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
The best way to survive in academia is to develop a thick skin, a dark sense of humour, and a high tolerance for caffeine and disappointment.
10
55
317
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
3 months
Goals of paper sections: Introduction: → Why should people care? Literature: → Prepare the state-of-the-art you use in discussion. Body: → Present all specifics. Discussion: → Meaning and implications of this research. Conclusion: → Why did your advancement matter?
2
69
321
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
I cracked the code on choosing the right research design. Here's how... Understanding research design typologies is the key to better research.
Tweet media one
1
91
310
@acagamic
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
2 months
Focusing ONLY on the research is a recipe for publication failure. How I stay prolific as an author (even when the first draft feels impossible). 7 essential habits of successful academic authors
Tweet media one
3
76
309