Just an FYI, I will not respond to random DMs without being given a clear introduction and reason why someone is messaging me. I don’t do RP and I don’t engage with sketchy, bio-less accounts, trolls, or anti-zoo harassers.
That’s right fellas. Zoos are dangerous to a fandom that thrives on sexual fantasy centered around intrinsically zoophillic themes. Imagine the average person thinking, “I had such respect for the those fictional dog cock lovers until I learned they like real dog cock.”
Point blank: What Cenny is doing right now is incredibly dangerous for our community.
He is openly advocating for the normalization of zoophilia by saying all furries are zoophilic & empowering Zoophiles to "come out."
Please take him to as close to 0 followers as possible.
People who say this must have the most rigid, wooden, and stilted sex life. No human couple bothers with verbal consent before every sexual encounter. We communicate our desires and intents to each in many non-verbal ways. No one starts encounters with a robotic “do you consent?”
“Zoophilia isn’t just about sex.”
It is. You see animals as a sex toy. Animals can’t consent. They have the brain of a toddler. If they can’t verbally say yes, then they can’t consent.
Seek therapy.
Normies when an animal initiates sexual contact with human: Haha, boys will be boys. He’s like me, fr.
Normies when a human initiates sexual contact with animal: RAPE!!! That animal can’t understand what’s going on.
Right.
It’s so sad how rare stallions are. Of all the horses I’ve encountered and interacted with in my life, only two still had their balls. Being around them felt like being in the presence of an otherworldly creature.
Murder is NEVER morally justifiable because it’s inherent in the definition of the word: the unjust killing of another person. If there is a situation where killing is justified, it’s not murder. Words have meaning. Please use them correctly. Literacy is good.
Imagine being so petty that you feel the need to stick anti-zoo stickers on a car as a meaningless form of in-group virtue signaling. These are pathetic gatekeepers who are too insecure to have their small-minded worldviews and bigotry challenged.
Why do horses have to tease you by deliberately turning around to put their butt in your face? They are not making things any easier. I don’t need to be pitching tents in public.
Maybe all you zoophobic denialists should just accept the fact that furry has implicit zoophilic undertones and that y’all find animals and animal anatomy sexually attractive on at least a superficial level. Imagine all the needless infighting that could be avoided.
Bless all the ignorant, silly people in the replies. First, that’s a mare. Second, if that lady were actually jerking off a horse, it wouldn’t look like that.
Zoophilic passion is the worst when it can’t be fulfilled and all it causes you is suffering. You can’t talk about it. You can’t live authentically. You can’t even pursue normal human relationships. It’s life-destroying.
What would be the profile of a zoophile stereotype? Based on my observation it would be:
- male
- vegan
- atheist/non-theist
- leftist
- misanthrope
- canine-centric attraction
- animal rights advocate
- utilitarian
Probably about 90 percent of zoos right there 😆
Why do mares always have to be such slutty temptresses?
Start showing affection to mare. She nuzzles my face, rubs her head against my crotch, deliberately moves her butt in front of me, and fights off any horse than comes near.
Such torment. If only I could oblige her.
Horse scent is simultaneously intoxicating and soothing. Both sweet and earthy.
Some people think horses smell bad but they are probably thinking about horse poop and dirty stalls. If you actually smell a horse up close, they don’t smell like that.
It’s lovely, trust me ;)
I do hope we get to the point where lab grown meat becomes both affordable and palatable enough to most people so that there is genuinely no need for a slaughter-based meat industry.
Last night I was lucky to be among the first group in New York to get to taste chicken grown from a droplet of muscle cells. It was.... DELICIOUS. Succulent, moist, the right texture. Chicken as it should be. Even though full commercialization is a way off, it made me excited
Fun fact: The Bible recognizes the sex appeal of horses.
-There is a tacit acknowledgment of the impressive potency and virility of male equine genitals and emissions in Ezekiel
-Solomon compares his lover to a mare in Song of Songs
-Job praises the horse for its majesty
This is an a priori denial of the fact that zoophilia can occur or develop naturally in puberty without being the product of grooming. Such a narcissistic claim is not based on observed reality and an attempt to avoid uncomfortable implications that would undermine one’s bigotry.
I received (and gave) so much love from a bunch of geldings today. I was quite popular. Also, I swear horses know. They know you’re “that kind” of human. I was teased with several horse butts deliberately shoved into me and one had his nose in my crotch. Horse affection is divine
I wish I could start a zoo debate podcast or something similar. Something with intellectual and substantive conversation that incorporates multiple viewpoints and perspectives.
@Lucidus707
I’m actually surprised she would act that way in public and on camera. It’s ballsy. If she’s that nonchalant about handling horsecock openly, imagine what she does in private. Not that I can blame her.
This is one reason why I think animals are able to recognize or pick up on the zooey nature in those that possess it. It’s also why animals are able to understand sex. Sex is instinctual and emotional. It does not require reason.
@puhcko
@ad0rnai
I think that’s because animals are always in flow state and can usually understand you by vibing with yours, whereas they cannot understand your rational reflexive self. The idea that reason is unique to humans is known since antiquity
Why are many zoos trying to piggyback on pride month knowing full well most of society still hates us? Who are they convincing?
Making flags and broadcasting how much you love to suck dog cock with a megaphone isn’t doing you any favors towards acceptance.
Normies can only handle displays of animal sexuality by laughing at it and simultaneously denying that it exists.
Animals don’t have sex for pleasure, they claim.
Animals are exactly analogous to five year-old humans, they claim.
A Walrus getting lost, ending up in Scarborough and then masturbating IN PUBLIC then having a sleep and then Scarborough Council cancelling the NYE fireworks display in case it woke him is the denouement of 2022.
How dare they come up with this ! - and also with a name for people who want to have sex with animals ! “Zoophiles” ! Really ! Vengeance is mine says the Lord ! I hope He uses me someday to carry it out ! These freaking garbage !
What a courageous and profoundly reflective statement. It surely contributes to a nuanced and constructive discussion of the issue. It must be difficult trying to get clout by piggybacking on mainstream bigotry.
Because there are a lot of zoophiles and zoo-interested people in the fandom whether anyone likes it or not. There always was and always will be. People find animals sexy. Get over yourselves with this most absurd of gatekeeping campaigns.
The problem with this debate is that the term “zoophilic” needs to be defined and agreed upon to establish any other implications or conclusions.
What most zoos are trying to point out is that furries invariably find at least some aspects of animals to be sexually attractive.
One stallion I encountered was a beastial god. His was unspeakably beautiful and strong. In his boundless energy I watched him run like black thunder across the field and I was awestruck. He also had the biggest flare I’ve ever seen. Pure, unadulterated testosterone.
Many on both sides of the zoophilia debate is so concerned with whether animals can consent, they don’t bother to ask whether animals need to consent. The latter question has to be asked first and it requires us to inquire into the nature of animals and our relationship to them.
I don’t think public schools should be teaching anything about sexuality outside the context of functional basic biology. Anything beyond that inevitably deals with morality which is not the place of staff funded by tax payers.
Just another example of how animal body language and behavior and be easily understood by humans.
For context, this person is spinning an otter on the floor that clearly enjoys being spun and keeps coming back for more.
Can someone explain those who say they are proud to be a zoophile but simultaneously claim to be or are adamant about being non-active, non-practicing, or even “anti-contact?” Isn’t that an admission that one thinks zoophilia is wrong? Why would such a person be proud?
@tsukioverknots
Rapist. How can we possibly know what the horse wants? Maybe the horse is backing his butt into the guy because he wants food? We can’t just assume he wants his butt scratched even though he just behaved in such a way that indicates otherwise. Body language isn’t communication.
Once again, those who claim to care about animals being exploited actually have the lowest and most degrading views of animals. If an animal is as mindless as a vegetable, then having sex with one is about as consequential as using a cucumber as a dildo.
@PenisSu68232605
@ZoocraticMethod
How is braying or flipping a tail a form of intelligent communication? I'm sure that even a vegetable makes the odd grunt here and there
Guy has “Christian” in his bio yet his banner is about encouraging people to commit suicide. Really not qualified to be talking about what’s terrible and disgusting.
“They have no idea what they are doing” means “I actually hate animals and think they are mindless, retarded vegetables.”
“Sub-human” means “I hate you and I will attempt to rationalize and justify my self-serving, sanctimonious bigotry by denying your humanity.”
Let's be real here.
Animals cannot consent. Body language is not consent, they have no idea what they are doing. You are exploiting your animal's nature for your own disgusting pleasure. You are absolutely sub-human and you deserve nothing but the absolute worst. Suffer, zoos.
I’ve noticed that it’s a meme on social media to use zoophilia as a racist slur against white people, particularly white women.
This wrongly assumes that zoophilia is necessarily bad, that it’s okay to be racist towards white people, and that non-white zoophiles don’t exist.
Zoos are concerned with consent because they value the will of animals, even if they can’t rationally justify it.
Anti-zoos are concerned with consent because they think some animals (mainly pets) are analogous to human children but, oddly, apply the analogy only to sex.
Most furries are fetishists. They fetishize animals, plain and simple. They are attracted to animal characteristics but not to real animals. Hence, their interest and concern for animals is generally superficial and primarily aesthetic.
Gotta be honest, it will never NOT puzzle me how little energy there is for animal liberation or animal rights among furries.
Like, how does a fandom that bases its ENTIRE AESTHETIC on animals have a lukewarm, average level of interest in, say, stopping factory farming?
This statement is objectively false because I exist. I am happy to challenge all narrow-minded assumptions.
There is no logical contradiction between the belief that Christ is Lord and the proclivity to experience feelings of eros and desire for animals.
The definition of a paraphilia is an enduring or persistent sexual attraction to atypical situations, objects, or individuals. By this definition, zoophilia/zoosexuality is a paraphilia as sexual attraction to animals is not typical.
Patient is moved to tears when this therapy horse named Paçoca calmly rests its head on patient's chest. The equinine therapy center in Brazil stated that had they never seen any of their horses act like this with their patients.
I love how a guy whose Twitter identity is being a twink wants to lecture me on Bible, tell me to repent, and quote Leviticus at me. The internet is a strange place.
@eiswuff
@EdgytheWusky
Similar experience to mine. People just can’t comprehend that zoo attraction just happens naturally without it being the result of brainwashing or abuse.
Whatever could she be doing? Clearly not asking for sex because animals are innocent fur babies and we can’t possibly know what they want or understand their behavior. All these normies must be projecting through their anthropomorphic biases. But I thought only us zoos do that!
The irony is that antis and haters will wish death on us but the suffering I’ve experienced through existential anguish, loneliness, and sexual deprivation is worse than death.
"It was found that the horse was the most noble and most proper to serve man, and because of that, among all beasts, men chose the horse and gave him to the knight … Thus the most noble man is given the most noble beast."
- Ramon Lull
Of course they use a picture of a puppy cowering in fear, as if most zoos don’t prefer adult animals who are sexually mature. Goes with the predator image.
Humans don’t draft a written document to sign before getting it on. We strip off our clothes, start kissing each other, leave a trail of rose petals, wave our ass seductively in our partners’ face, and make innumerable non-verbal cues.
Most of us (meaning humans generally) don’t believe animals are autonomous beings with rights, otherwise, veganism would manifest systemically or be formally mandated and animals would have individual legal and political representation.
Christians who deliberately jettison or ignore the biblical command to love all and hate none ultimately condemn themselves more than those they wish to hate.
Nothing ruins my day faster than having to acknowledge that there are other human beings that I hate who harmlessly enjoy my art and have no impact on my life. I just don’t want to be reminded that they exist because they disgust me.
What this actually means is “I arbitrarily choose to hate some people for inherent involuntary attributes about themselves but only those that are popular to hate because I care more about my image than intellectual consistency.”
Also, dude doesn’t know how to use apostrophes.
I don’t hate gay people.
I don’t hate queer people.
I don’t hate trans people.
I don’t hate people based on their color, religion, or wealth.
The only groups I choose to hate are Marxist’s, pedo’s, and zoo’s
That’s it. I’m 100% cool with literally everything else.
Reductio ad absurdum. This is an attempt to discredit zoophilia or all zoophiles by pointing to an extreme example. The majority of zoophiles would condemn such actions and have no interest in juvenile animals.
The sheer irony, hypocrisy, and utter lack of self-awareness in this tweet is mind-boggling.
Zoophiles have always been an integral part of the furry fandom. Enforcing such a ban is functionally impossible and would greatly undermine the success of furry conventions.
Ban all known zoophiles and sex offenders from attending cons, no matter how popular they are. Even if they are a community leader. Ban them and inforce that ban.
Videos like this show it’s often easier to obtain a clear indication of willingness on the part of animals when it comes to sex than it is with humans. No animal is going to play such duplicitous mind games.
Apparently 90 percent of horse owners are women. My own experience supports the idea that it is almost exclusively women that are into horses.
I’m convinced that the only men who like horses are furries and zoos. I don’t like that. It makes us stand out.
“Why are people allowed to exist that I don’t like? Why can I freely gossip and hate people for the involuntary traits they may posses or hate the people who defend the humanity of taboo sexual minorities? Why should I have so much support?” The real questions here.
I respect vegans and admire the discipline it takes.
But I also know that veganism as a universal can’t exist. Some people need to consume meat to be healthy. Some people have autoimmune disorders that are only cured by meat. Animal protein is metabolically superior to plants.
“They have no idea what they are doing” means “I actually hate animals and think they are mindless, retarded vegetables.”
“Sub-human” means “I hate you and I will attempt to rationalize and justify my self-serving, sanctimonious bigotry by denying your humanity.”
I wonder if they would be against humans having one night stands or casual sex with strangers. If you believe animals can consent freely and have the same moral consideration as humans then you’d either have to condemn both or neither.
The sexual opportunism of animals is an epidemic within zoo subculture (and the furry fandom).
It is well-accepted by many zoos that sharing animals for sex with relative strangers is normal and OK. With dogs, zoos argue that if the animal shows interest, what's the harm?
🧵
I’ve never watched The Godfather because I know a horse gets decapitated in it. I also stopped watching Game of Thrones after it graphically depicted a horse getting decapitated. Even in movies I like where horses are harmed or killed it’s hard to watch.
@RandalRauser
Moral intuition is not an infallible guide. Most cultures thought slavery was perfectly natural and even teleological in the case of Aristotle. There are actually no rational arguments against zoophilia save for theological ones. Disgust is merely an evolutionary reaction.