1. The spike protein generated from the vaccine is killing people in the thousands/millions
But also
2. The uncontrolled replication of the virus doesn't create any issues with spike proteins
(This one is one of Yeadon's)
1. Vaccines are just exploitation of the people by “big pharma”, to rake in money. Don’t fall for it
But also
2. Use a variety of different medications instead. All manufactured by “big pharma”
(H/T
@simonbracers
)
1. I'm fed up of covid
But also
2. I won't take any simple precautions to reduce spread, neither will I support vaccination programmes
(H/T
@joedunford200
)
1. With or of covid? Getting run over by a bus or falling off a ladder is listed as covid death, Dr’s fake the death certificates.
Also
2. Look at the millions of deaths on VAERS/YC who’ve dropped dead after the wAxXeEn.
In similar vein
1. The government are lying about all the cases and deaths!
But also:
2. Check out the statistics on VAERS and / or Yellow Card!
(H/T
@richienrg
and
@mash_6_6
)
1. Kids aren't getting ill or dying from covid.
2. How dare you use children's deaths for your sick, twisted narrative.
3. Look at these videos of kids being harmed by vaccines
(H/T
@SueMessy
)
1. The Vaccines are unapproved and experimental
But also
2. I’m gonna take Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Monoclonal Antibodies, and a whole fuck ton of unapproved experimental supplements to fight it!
H/T
@SwearingJustin
I'm loving how all those people who spent the last 15 months saying PCR tests aren't "cases" are keen to claim that PCR positives prove the vaccines don't work
1. A small fragment of viral genome transiently and locally expressed is very very risky
But also
2. An entire virus, replicating exponentially for weeks at a time is "just fine"
1. How many boosters are you getting?
Vs
2. You should be taking Vitamin D every day. In which case you'll also need Magnesium. And probably vitamin K2 as well, quercitin too. In your face, big pharma
H/T
@SeamusMacSuibh1
1. We don't need proper clinical trials for IVM/HCQ as completely anecdotal evidence without any consideration for bias etc is sufficient
But also
2. The clinical trials for the vaccines weren't even nearly long enough
H/T
@mjordan73
@beverleyturner
Who invented "the" PCR test?
Mullis invented the basic idea
Higuch et al invented qPCR
Various people (including me) invented the fluorescence signalling methods
Numerous groups developed the tests in use today (more than 200 of them)
Your tweet is garbage
Oh dear
@VaxControlGroup
are asking people to sign up for a "study" for which there is no protocol. Nor is there an ethics approval for said study
Deeply unethical
@Davidmetroland
@Kit_Yates_Maths
I thought privatisation all those years ago was to enable this to be funded ?
As it turns out they've borrowed money to pay dividends
If you think exposure to fully competent, exponentially replicating virus in multiple tissues for weeks on end is "largely harmless", but are worried about local exposure to a small fraction of disabled virus for a matter of hours, you need to give your head a wobble
One of the reasons misinformation can be so mind-boggling and exhausting is the high degree of self-contradiction. Granted, not everyone believes every rumor simultaneously, but overall self-contradiction is often a hallmark of misinformation. Here are a few examples:
@oddemann
People were dying because Fauci and his globalist buddies released a bio weapon on the world. But most of the deaths were recorded as Covid deaths because of false positives from the PCR tests. Remember the flu completely disappeared.
I'm no fan of either of these 2 but Anna would rather die than get the blood transfusion she needs. Anyone feeding her that claptrap about vaccinated blood has no conscience and is actively causing harm to their friend
Cooker: "PCR 97% false positives"
Me: "NZ ran 500,000 tests over 102 days without a false positive"
C: "how do you know?"
Me: "because there were no positives at all"
*awkward silence*
@Dad_of_Marine
My expertise?
I've probably run close to a million qPCRs
Set up and run a GLP diagnostic lab
Invented several pieces of enabling technology around qPCR
Developed and launched FDA regulated qPCR diagnostics
You?
Clown: "Something something false positives"
Me: "how did NZ have zero false positives in 500,000 tests?"
Clown: "Something Something Biden lies"
Me: "here's the data "
Them: "Commie!"
A thread especially for
@Howwethink2
who is struggling with how the qPCR testing works
The reaction mix contains primers specific for the viral genome and a dual labeled probe that binds between the 2 primers. The probe has both fluorophore and quencher on the same strand
An actual twitter exchange this morning
Them: "CDC says tests are rubbish and can't distinguish X from Y"
Me: here's what the CDC ACTUALLY said"
Them: "I don't care! The CDC is lying"
So, one of the biggest studies to date on ivermectin for COVID-19 has issues significant enough that, if not fraud, are so serious that it invalidates the study without further explanation
I promised a thread
Here we go 1/n
@DrBenTapper1
This is completely incorrect
I could run a thousand cycles and the result wouldn't change
At 60 cycles, you get the exact same result as you would at 40
The false positive rate is below 0.005%