I must confess that I've long found the principle of
#skininthegame
profoundly moral. I respect
@nntaleb
for having developed this idea as much as he has. There is still much to say about it.
Universities are gradually undermining their Humboldtian legitimacy by replacing the bond of teaching-research with teaching-administration. It basically incentivizes academics to become apparatchiks, while researchers are incentivized to lose interest in the
#university
.
The reason the
#brain
is so difficult to understand is not because it's in the business of reflecting the world's complexity but because it's in the business of resolving it.
Academia's incentive structure is designed to move academics from the classroom, where they could make a major difference, to an anti-classroom space called 'research' that is less likely to have any consequence whatsoever.
The ultimate point of academic
#lectures
is for students to see a knowledgeable person talk about their topic -- to provide living proof, if you will, that new knowledge can be integrated into your humanity. It goes way beyond lip syncing to Powerpoints and preparing for exams.
Academic jargon appears in its most distended forms when talking about something trivial. It's a kind of compensatory behavior for the intrinsic lack of meaning in what's being discussed. Unfortunately, you need to understand the jargon to realize that.
You need to row back on this one: What's going on in Brazil now and what went on at the US Capitol on 6 Jan 21 is nothing like the post-referendum opposition to
#Brexit
. You should give the UK credit for civil opposition.
Terrible turn of events in
#Brazil
. This trend - to refuse to support democratic ideal of losers' consent if election result doen'r go yiur way (which we have seen here in UK post referendum, and of course in US) - taken to its logical extreme. Very dangerous.
I'm convinced from looking at many academic CVs over the years that grant-getting is an autonomous skill that is only vaguely transferable to genuine academic performance.
It's a great failure of epistemology and the philosophy of science that academics continue to say that they have 'no idea' how knowledge is produced and validated even in neighbouring fields. No surprise policymakers are sceptical of the value of academic knowledge in general.
The reason that academically trained people leave the university is less to do with no longer wanting to be an academic and more to do with realizing that the university fails to incentivize being an academic.
What is the goal of
#education
? To learn to trust your own judgement. That was the bottom line of the
#Enlightenment
. It implies nothing about dogmatism. On the contrary, it's about how to change your mind on your own terms.
When historians finally get a grip on what 'germ plasm' and 'selfish gene' really mean, they'll realize that all along it has been about diminishing the role of the distinctly 'human'. We're not too far away from when this question becomes a hot button political topic.
I am in London for the first time in 5 years. Unrecognizable. Grotesque huge modern buildings looming over historic neighborhoods. No sign of British culture except for vestigial pubs. Huge LED screens in formerly beautiful peaceful streets. People sleeping, living on the
The
#PhD
is a degree that is valued more outside than inside the community of degree holders. For outsiders, it signifies some high academic achievement. For insiders, it's just a minimal academic job requirement.
The interesting reason why people find it hard to admit that reality is 'merely' a
#SocialConstruction
is that it forces them to take responsibility for either maintaining or changing it. No more ontology as ventriloquism: It's ethics all the way down!
Interesting move by
@JZarif
, saying Iran will take the US to interntional court for a state-based terrorist act against another sovereign state. If the court refuses to take the bait, the credibility of the global order diminishes -- and further retaliation is licenced.
If I had to recommend one mandatory addition to the philosophy curriculum, it would be a course in the sociology of philosophy. It would immunize philosophers from the worst effects of their own internal politics.
#Education
is a performing art, not a content delivery service. Students need to see academics who can embody what they know in their person, so they can decide how to embody what they know in their person.
#Enlightenment
Academics who are truly interested in whether students
#understand
taught material should set exam/essay questions that force them to address specified non-standard audiences: e.g. explain Kant's categorical imperative to a grocer.
Perhaps the biggest myth promoted by philosophers about science is that there is something epistemologically deep about
#consensus
. It's no better than saying that price = value. It confuses the snapshot with the thing photographed.
Call me old fashioned, but I believe that watching a video is not sufficient for understanding something. I still believe it's important to follow up with some reading, and then reach a critical judgement. At least, that's what I expect of my students and myself.
I'll be more impressed once her 'plagiarism' is compared with what might be found in the publications of randomly selected professors in a similar field and of comparable rank. These plagiarism cases simply presume that everyone else is a non-plagiarist.
A good way to deepen your thinking as you write is to keep your sources mixed throughout. Don't do the scholastic thing of talking about one text, then the next, etc. Your argument should not be reducible to your bibliography. Unfortunately, most academic arguments are.
MARIANNE WILLIAMSON: “I think when we think of political qualifications today, we should expand our sense of what those qualifications are.
“A political qualification today should include political vision. It should include moral certitude."
#marianne2024
Nowadays academics are concerned about their publishers purely for credentialing reasons. But in the past, publishing staff have been crucial in matching authors with audiences they'd otherwise not reach. This seems to be a lost art, largely because academics don't care anymore.
You know you're reading something worth reading when even after the first paragraph you need to put the text down and collect the thoughts you've generated in that simple act of reading.
I've watched the
#Zizek
-
#Peterson
debate, and Zizek won hands down, not simply because I tend toward his side of things but also because Zizek is clearly the more sophisticated thinker, and that should count for a lot when dealing with complex issues:
If I had to point to one skill that university students lack, it would be that they are very adept at listing pros and cons, but they're incapable of weighing them to reach a clear final judgement.
You don't need to be permanently affiliated to a
#university
to do
#research
. However, if you want a captive audience in which you can test the import of your research on a regular basis, then you do need a university. It's called 'teaching'. And that's worth preserving.
If I were
@AndrewYang
, I'd contemplate a strong third party bid for the US presidency with
@zoltan_istvan
as VP. It would be more about putting down a marker for 2024, since
@realDonaldTrump
looks to win 2020.
Academic peer review has a very effective and not too subtle strategy for impeding intellectual change. It simply places a greater burden of proof on those who oppose the status quo. In contrast, those supporting the status quo have (presumably) had that burden borne by others.
Academic life is justifiably rejected by so many people these days -- including those trained in it -- because we're just reproducing the worst features of medievalism: i.e. no one speaks for themselves, they just channel others.
#Liberalism
I've always thought that all this 'Plato v Aristotle' business, which frames so much of how the history of philosophy is still taught, has been really about Augustine v Aquinas in the struggle for the soul of Christendom.
Religious
#faith
needs to rebrand itself as being anti-certainty. I'm always struck by how people come to faith through a need for certainty. In fact, faith is about thriving in the face of uncertainty, knowing that there is meaning in the end, to which your actions contribute.
An educated person in the West understands that we're much less like the ancient Greeks than we might think and much more like the medieval Christians than we might like.
The success of the
#Humboldtian
university lay in its destruction of past scholasticism, not its creation of present-day scholasticism, aka disciplinary specialisation. The
#NextHumboldt
will need to figure out how to reinvent the university without reinventing scholasticism.
There's no need to mystify
#lecturing
in order to defend it. True, most lectures are lip syncing to Powerpoints and AI will replace them. But students actually need to hear people capable of verbally integrating new knowledge in a reasonably accessible way. That's the baseline.
Great debate on the “death of the lecture” on my timeline. Does the lecture work? What do you think?
The lecture is an invitation to slow down and think differently via
@timeshighered
The main reason that it's difficult to review academic books 'in their entirety' is that they're mostly literature reviews, which are pretty damn boring, especially if you're at least as literate as the author.
I just heard a lecture by
@drtimthornton
in which he said: 'Philosophy doesn't tell you what you should think but tells you the cost of thinking what you want to think'. That's a very good line. Is it original?
Here I am in Beijing earlier today being presented with the Chinese edition of my
#SocialEpistemology
by Yaxin Yao, who has translated 4 of my books and several articles.
Half of why academic writing is so complex is that you must present your own thinking as the rethinking of other people's thoughts. The other half -- if there is one -- is that you're actually saying something complex.
Righteous indignation can make people appear smarter and more powerful than they really are. I sometimes think it's designed to distract from weakness, often at multiple levels.
A distinctive feature of how I do research is that I'm more interested in understanding why someone makes a particular knowledge claim than whether it is true. Knowing the truth too easily can shut down the search for deeper truths.
When evaluating people's lives, we need to distinguish those who stick to the same position regardless of criticism, and those who change in their own way, obliquely responsive to criticism but without losing their own plot. The former is dogmatism, the latter autonomy.
One of the great insights of
#MaxWeber
was that the priests effectively destroy the prophets after their death by routinizing the prophet's charisma. In today's terms: the problem with the 'cult of genius' is not the 'genius' part but the 'cult' part.
The more I read both
#Deleuze
and Deleuze commentary, the more I believe that with guys like him in the Franco-German world, it's just best to know Western philosophy and history and read them without the commentators. You avoid the 'mystery' that commentators often introduce.
What got me interested in
#Popper
's philosophy was not anything I was taught about him but how he was demonized by academic philosophers, which led me to look into him myself. As
#Feyerabend
said, there's no such thing as bad publicity.
I've always thought that when philosophers and intellectual historians group certain thinkers as belonging to a 'school of thought', they're doing what Dante did when he put people in various circles of Hell.
Neither. A lecturer ought to provide students with a personal example of how to communicate knowledge effectively and responsibly. The day the lecturer goes, the university can officially become a distributed network of largely self-taught seminars managed by short-term staff.
Unless universities plan to breed academics, which some seem to want to do, we simply need to admit that family life and academic life are incompatible in any win-win way because their values are fundamentally different.
Y'know, this nonsense could be stopped if academics stopped using citations as evaluative measures. But that's a little too sophisticated for academics to figure out...
Citation gaming ‘increasingly sophisticated’: report from
@webofscience
owners says that universities may need to do more to monitor research integrity
The great lesson of academic Marxism is that you can turn the critique of capitalism into intellectual real estate without affecting real world capitalism -- just as the logic of capital would predict!
If you want to empower students, give them a high mark but then feel free to vent all the problems you have with their work. That shows respect. Unfortunately, academics tend to do the passive aggressive thing of marking low but saying how wonderful the student was trying to be.
Advice to the young: If you're thinking about becoming an
#academic
, please be driven by a troubling problem that can't be solved in a normal job. Otherwise, you might just turn out to be a mystified parasite who exacerbates the problem that originally concerned you.