Marbury v. MadAboutYou Profile Banner
Marbury v. MadAboutYou Profile
Marbury v. MadAboutYou

@Nunya9877777

154
Followers
152
Following
29
Media
455
Statuses

Georgia Cappleman stan! ⚖️

Joined May 2024
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
The ARCCA testimony IS reasonable doubt. I will teach that as an example of RD in law school. This is unbelievable. Come on guys, read your jury instructions!! #FreeKarenRead @robo_vann
28
53
631
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
With no verdict on this Friday afternoon, I will return to asking @MassStatePolice why Michael Proctor still has a job, on repeat, until deliberations resume on Monday. #FreeKarenRead @robo_vann
6
37
383
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
Please GOD stop talking about the law - you sound like a true DUMBASS. It’s Rule 27, for starters. You say absolutely nothing of value, but spread rumors in a way that - YOU THINK - allows plausible deniability when they are disproven. A disgrace. #FKR
Tweet media one
28
10
231
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
Even @VinniePolitan knows @JulieCourtTV has become unwatchable!! Flat out begging us not to turn off @CourtTV when she comes on! 🤣🤣
5
8
61
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
Juror E low key suggested the “lesser includeds” on Offense 2 were hung. Silent as to the “greater” on Offense 2. See photo illustration: #FreeKarenRead
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
4
8
52
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice Can’t wait to hear what the scene tells Trooper Paul! Unserious “investigators” should not touch serious tragedies like this.
1
1
48
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
Can we get some criminal defense attys and prosecutors out here to tell everyone to CALM DOWN?! 8hrs of delib in a 10-wk trial with conflicting evidence and multiple counts is NOT a long time. Jury is doing what they were asked to do. #FKR @Bederowlaw @lawyerschiff @robo_vann
2
2
43
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@robo_vann @Bederowlaw @defense_diaries @lawyerschiff It is crazy - she knows 60 minutes is not nearly long enough for a case of this length. Confusion about how to apply the law in the jury room CAUSES hung juries.
1
0
40
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@famfirstpls @Free_Karen_Read If a verdict comes today, it is “immediate,” relatively speaking. Particularly in light of the length of the trial. Just dotting all their i’s takes time, even if their minds are made up.
1
4
33
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
2
2
29
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Leopardo8 @missamy1226 I need to know more about this immediately.
1
0
25
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
I think the jury is stuck on confusion about Rzbl Doubt. A primary cause of that confusion was limiting closings to 1 hr each. Not enough time to (a) sum up 30+ days of evidence AND (b) explain the verdict slip & RD. Judge Bev’s worst decision, IMO. #FreeKarenRead #KarenRead
4
3
27
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@BorghardtLaw @robo_vann @lawyerschiff @CourtTV @NewsNation AJ is no shrinking violet but Judge Bev sped thru the last jury letter differently from the prior letters. Although the plain language of Rule 27(b) sounds permissive, the comments suggest polling is REQUIRED under these exact circs.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
3
8
23
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice For the safety of motorists, Trooper Michael Proctor should be relieved of his position.
0
2
23
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MicheleMcPhee @TheNFLanalyst Except he did it and she didn’t. But otherwise yes.
0
0
21
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
Maybe Massachusetts just doesn’t have a professional responsibility (ethics) component of the bar exam? #FreeKarenRead
@vegemitetoast_
Vegemite Toast
3 months
Lally is a corrupt liar. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial
18
58
452
1
4
21
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice @telegramdotcom @EOPSS @MAPOLICECHIEFS Why does Michael Proctor still have a job?
1
0
20
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TheNFLanalyst @grinandbearitz The urge to change the first comma to a period is all-consuming.
6
0
20
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
I hope this is the first thing that comes up when the jurors google this case (after they have rendered a verdict and been relieved of their obligations). Then they can feel even more confident in their decision. #FreeKarenRead
@SleuthieGoosie
Sleuthie
3 months
If you believe that none of the people leaving 34 Fairview, some of which saw the Lexus near the flagpole & knew John O’Keefe was coming over, saw John’s body in the yard … then why is it so out of the realm of possibility that Lucky didn’t see him either? I mean he confirmed
123
78
709
1
1
19
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@lawyerschiff @CoffindafferFBI FINALLY!!! An adult on CourtTV speaks out. 😍 @robo_vann
1
0
18
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice Did you find the Ford Edge yet? Did you start looking for it? Do you think we are all stupid?
0
3
17
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice Why does @YuriBukhenik still work for you? When is his IA hearing? #FreeKarenRead
2
2
16
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TheNFLanalyst @DoctorTurtleboy @Bederowlaw Agree 100% - very different consequences and moral issues between the two, imo.
1
1
16
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice Remember that time when you still employed Michael Proctor, even after he disgraced your organization and everything it stands for in horrifying and unimaginable ways?
1
1
16
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
Courtney P: Personal emails/texts are discoverable in almost all litigation (including pre-suit govt investigations) when you blur the lines bet. work and personal devices. Attached case is just 1 example of 100s. Keep work at work = no issue. #FKR @OliviaLambo_ @PhilipCDube
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
0
2
15
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@CoffindafferFBI Hurt: #1 - Your reputation. EVERY post from you about this case is more moronic than the one before it. It’s unbelievable. I am curious if you see it and don’t care, or if you really don’t get how insane this post is.
1
1
15
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TB_Bucs_4Life @robo_vann Very disappointing, if so. Not to MMQB too much, but I wish the defense had defined RD a little better in closing. 2 rzbl explanations for 1 proposition = rzbl doubt.
3
0
14
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice How about work “in close collaboration with [y]our federal, state, and local partners to monitor” the wildly unethical and likely illegal conduct going on within your own house? MSP’s inability to comprehend irony could be its most shocking failure of all!
0
1
14
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@GlammaSooz My guess is the CW gave each exhibit to the defense the night before each witness testified. The demonstrative exhibits are SO BAD the defense did not object. Then the CW turned in its homework (this doc, memorializing the late exhibits) even later, to the surprise of no one.
1
0
12
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
I would note for the record that @CarmineTazzi11 is a disgusting excuse for a human, the lowest of the low, but @jessmachadoshow absolutely DESTROYS him - EPICALLY - every time he opens his miserable, misogynist yap, so I won’t interrupt. But feel free to tap me in anytime.
2
1
12
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@OliviaLambo_ @kreadisinnocent @DoctorTurtleboy The first amendment protects CITIZENS, not the GOVERNMENT. And proctor is the GOVERNMENT. And yes, his personal texts are also “the GOVERNMENT,” because the information was conveyed via his capacity as a govt official. Courtney needs to watch Schoolhouse Rock. So uneducated.
1
1
13
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice Wait, Kevin Alberts wallet is a pink hair band?! HA!!
0
0
11
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Bederowlaw @PhilipCDube @robo_vann @defense_diaries @lawyerschiff Civil trials half the length of this one allow double (at least) the time allowed here. This time limitation was truly absurd.
1
0
12
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@CoffindafferFBI @CourtTV - you have made a huge mistake by continuing to allow this person on your shows. The pettiness. The misinformation. The gibberish analysis. Get it together, people are jumping ship for lawtubers, left and right!!!
1
1
11
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@EOPSS @MassStatePolice I hope you know that the citizens of MA will not calm down until Proctor loses his pension.
1
1
12
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Bederowlaw @PhilipCDube AK applies the “acquittal first” rule (must find NG on greater off b4 moving to lessers). MA expressly rejected “acquittal first,” and adopted “soft transition” (consider all charges at once UNLESS jury votes GUILTY on a greater), in Com. v. Figueroa, 468 Mass. 204 (2014).
2
2
11
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@jeffpog He said “around 12:45.” Why did you say “Never said 12:45”?
1
0
10
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@robo_vann I CANT BREATHE!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
0
0
10
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
Now we are talking!!! Another important step! ✅ Next on the list: — Update on Proctor — Investigate DiCicco #FreeKarenRead
@TedDanielnews
Ted Daniel
2 months
Breaking; #25Investigates has learned 3 Troopers associated with the John O'Keefe/Karen Read case are facing an internal affairs investigation related to potential violations of department policy. All 3 received texts from Trooper Michael Proctor
209
317
2K
0
2
10
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
The jurors may have benefitted from a closing demonstrative of the verdict slip (although neither side had the final slip on charge 2 for closing - another big problem). @Bederowlaw @PhilipCDube @LawyerYouKnow
1
1
10
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TheNFLanalyst @DoctorTurtleboy @Bederowlaw I believe the problem is a lack of understand of the JIs, especially on RD. Caused by abbreviated explanations of RD in closing. Caused by Judge Bev’s brutal time limit. That is my analysis of the causal chain, resulting in a hung jury!
1
1
9
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice You take one step forward (suspending proctor w no pay) and one step backward (whining about his kids health insurance). Get it together!
0
0
9
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@JohnDePetroshow So, this is your first experience with the criminal justice system in the United States?
1
0
8
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
This is what Juror E’s affidavit suggests to me: #FreeKarenRead #FKR @PhilipCDube @robo_vann @CourtTV
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
0
1
9
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TheDUIGuyPlus Protected by a woman
1
0
8
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
My frustration is as high with the length of jury deliberations as it was with the length of the CW’s case.
0
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
13 days
@MassStatePolice “The roadway is clear” except for the taillight we are sprinkled on it
2
2
8
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice Ok so now for Bukhenik…
0
1
8
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@FoghornMasshorn @Leopardo8 @DoctorTurtleboy @TheYoungJurks They are BACK at this person’s house AGAIN ???
1
0
8
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Bederowlaw @PhilipCDube This materially impacts whether and when DJ attaches. Even a mid-delib vote of NG should result in DJ on that charge (as in CW v. KR) where jury isn’t required to re vote every time to move on to messers (like in acquittal first/Blueford).
1
0
8
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
#FreeKarenRead She has literally NO IDEA WHAT SHE IS TALKING ABOUT!!!!!
Tweet media one
0
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Bederowlaw ^ Almost verbatim what I screamed at my phone screen last night when I saw that. But classier.
0
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@defense_diaries @robo_vann @Bederowlaw @lawyerschiff Truly, truly absurd. I’m curious if there were similar limits in her prior cases ending in a hung jury.
2
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@lawyerschiff
Joshu🅰️ Schiffer
2 months
@CoffindafferFBI Retrial with the central CW witness under discipline due to his actions in this case, specifically his unprofessionalism and lack of proper procedure? How much apologizing are you gonna do, @CoffindafferFBI ? At some point you enable the evil by excuse.
26
7
141
1
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@robo_vann Great shot! McLovin turns 40.
1
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@robo_vann @TB_Bucs_4Life ^ an argument for why Bev was (arguably) required to ask about whether the jury had come to an agreement on any charges.
1
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@KerriCapehart The 3 musketeers! Don’t forget D’Artagnan (Coffindaffer)!
1
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
28 days
@MassStatePolice Assuming you are implementing at HQ?
0
0
7
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@JessicaFacts And THIS is why the defense made a big deal about authenticity of texts, and why there is a jury instruction on credibility of texts. Because people just MAKE SH!T UP. Like this.
1
0
6
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@JohnDePetroshow Yeah. That’s what happened. 🙄🙄🙄
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@CarmineTazzi11 @Washboard86 @jessmachadoshow Is showing a lack of interaction supposed to demonstrate . . . interaction? The Incel Institute should really revamp their continuing education program.
0
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
23 days
@LawyerYouKnow I hope you cover this one!!!
0
0
6
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@CarmineTazzi11 @Washboard86 @jessmachadoshow Well NOW my feelings are hurt, you two-timer! You used the same “burn” on me a few minutes ago!
1
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@trialjunkiecole There is a Mass Rule of Criminal Procedure that says the foreman is selected before the deliberating/alternating jurors. I think 31 but not positive
2
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
0
0
6
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MazzaMedia The egos at the DA’s office are insufferable.
0
0
6
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@kreadisinnocent TB said someone named Cynthia or something.
0
0
6
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TheNFLanalyst @defense_diaries I personally think it is because they do not understand the jury instructions (especially on Reasonable Doubt). Hoping the Court can fix that with Tuoy or that the jury asks for clarification on RD (so the Court can clarify in response, potentially).
2
0
6
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Bederowlaw @PhilipCDube @LawyerYouKnow I thought Georgia Cappleman had a solid explanation of RD from the prosecution perspective in her 1st min of rebuttal in C Adelson trial - simple, effective, woven into the jury instructions - wish AJ could have given jurors something similar to run with:
3
1
6
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@christopdesoto @robo_vann I would argue that such a poll was required under these circumstances, per the comments to Mass. Rule of Criminal Procedure 27(b):
Tweet media one
0
1
6
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@kreadisinnocent @alylee914 Jurors A-E agree on this much (at a minimum):
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassGov FIRE PROCTOR FIRE BUKHENIK FIRE TULLY WAKE UP!!!!!! We are not going to forget what they did. Grow a backbone. #FreeKarenRead
0
2
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice Why does @YuriBukhenik still work for you???
0
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TedDanielnews It’s going to be ok everybody!!! They came to a decision and want to sleep on it. Tomorrow morning, we will have the verdict. (a prediction, not inside scoop)
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
3 months
@DarleneW42 @icecastles22 @Free_Karen_Read I have experienced both options! Just depends. Usually more of a brownout (remember bits and pieces, sometimes throughout the next day) than a blackout (zero memory whatsoever).
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice But not: @YuriBukhenik ? Tully? Fanning? Do you think this is going away???? Do you think people will just forget what they did, with the retrial date SET?! #FreeKarenRead
1
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Skeetman911 @TheNFLanalyst @robo_vann This is a rare case in which one side’s experts are entirely neutral, having completed their report before they were even retained by Def. Their credibility is as pristine as it gets in the legal arena. Not to mention their credentials.
0
1
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@JohnDePetroshow You are “delulu,” as the kids say.
0
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@JohnDePetroshow Remember: this is fake Remember: you are a waste of oxygen Remember: that time you had credibility (jk!)
1
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Bederowlaw @PhilipCDube *lessers not messers
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@Bookliner21 @cechafetz @Bederowlaw I agree the chain of events instruction may have been too confusing / overemphasized - causation is a tricky issue for lawyers and judges, much less jurors!
1
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@chs_teri @MDLOVESMIKEY Still curious about that as well!
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice Hello? Do you think we forgot about @YuriBukhenik , Tully, and Fanning? What are you doing to right their wrongs? #FreeKarenRead
0
2
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@MassStatePolice @MassDCR @TheBostonPops @EOPSS Did he “address” Bukhenik’s employment status yet?
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@CdnCrone @MassStatePolice @robo_vann Moving straight to step 2, even better!
0
0
5
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@chloeinvermont @VinniePolitan This is sarcasm right…
1
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@trialjunkiecole Select foreperson, then draw alternates from “the remaining jurors,” I believe is the language of the rule. It is not written very clearly but that is the result
1
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TB_Bucs_4Life @robo_vann Yeah - Bev may have screwed up big time here. I am no expert on criminal law but I wonder if jeopardy attaches if the court messes up in this way, like it does if the prosecution causes a mistrial.
1
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@TheMelisaAsilem @robo_vann 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
0
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
SERIOUSLY. Disfigured beyond recognition!
@rsxfan
rsxfan
2 months
@CoffindafferFBI Hurt: 14. Your credibility.
2
1
76
1
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
How do YOU think the taillight broke? #FreeKarenRead #KarenRead #FKR
JOK threw the glass at it
18
KR hit JOK’s car
64
KR hit JOK with her car
10
10
4
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
2
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
0
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
0
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
Fellow Grammar Hawks (cooler than grammar nerds, right?), pls know that I put “lessor included,” instead of “lesser included,” against my will! Spelled that way on the slip. I considered [sic] alternative. @TulipsAndCats @5CentLucy70 @honeycitrusbeam @NAMouradian @ReginaGladiorum
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@kreadisinnocent @alylee914 Jurors A-E agree on this much (at a minimum):
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
0
0
5
1
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@cechafetz @Bederowlaw These are what the Juror E affidavit suggests to me were the hung counts:
Tweet media one
2
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
@lawyerschiff @CourtTV WASTE. I spent 10 yrs in the film biz (including on a show with AB) before practicing law. This is bizarre to me, and a waste of everyone’s time.
0
0
4
@Nunya9877777
Marbury v. MadAboutYou
2 months
1
0
3