Publication date confirmed! Mine and Liz Rosenfeld’s autotheoretical wanderings through our own and others’ memories of cruising will be out on the 25 April, 2025 with
@RutgersUPress
.
🔈: Leah Marojević reading from the book manuscript at Berghain earlier this year.
The heatwave of 40+ degrees brought back horrible forest fires in Portugal. But it also delivered this new icon of homosexual desire of biblical proportions.
Dear Julie Bindel, perhaps gay men supporting trans women is not about misogyny but about solidarity. Perhaps it is one of our abilities as people to empathise with others and call injustice where we see it beyond our own skin and beyond the constraints of our own identities.
FYI back in Portugal, teenagers can be given puberty blockers from the age of 12, start hormone therapies from 16, undergo surgery from 18, and change their gender in legal documents also from age 16 simply through self-ID.
Honestly how a group of academics, many of them my colleagues, can write a public letter riddled with such misinformation not only about Stonewall but—most worryingly for academics—about queer and trans scholarship on sex and gender is truly mind-boggling.
“A lot of the founders of queer theory were paedophiles” what the fuck,
@jo_bartosch
?! Have you got evidence for that claim? Who are that “lot”? And shame on
@BBCRadio4
’s
@adamfleming
for letting this claim pass unchecked in a show that’s supposed to mitigate culture wars.
According to Kathleen Stock, there’s—it seems—a difference between “children” (who ought to be protected) and “trans-identifying offspring” (who ought to be “declared”). If this is not telling of the nature of GC discourse, then I don’t know what is.
Woke up to a hell of a lot of notifications of replies, ats, and quote-tweets from GCs talking about my “nonce” book. It didn’t take long to realise who had sent the battalion my way. The very
@Docstockk
(this time I’ll tag you), who loves to play the civil victim of pile-ons.
As *a* cis gay man and one of those evil academics, I propose we take a close look at this piece by *the* “Cis White Gay” (his memoir)
@benappel
, cuz it gets really exhausting to see the same poor and wholly unsubstantiated points repeated ad nauseam…a 🧵
I came to Exeter in 2015, with a 5-year plan for what was my 1st proper academic job. 8 years passed and I've just turned 40. I can now announce I've accepted a Professorship in Gender Studies at Linköping University, starting this Autumn.
Shall I take a professorship in Sweden (EU) with higher salary and with generous career-long internal funding for my research and to build a team, or should I stay in the UK (TERF Island) and keep this AHRC standard grant I’ve just been awarded?
And just like clockwork, our dearest Sonia Sodha was able to turn the story about the shameful arrest of protesters at the coronation into a story about the persecution of “gender critical” people. Just like clockwork.
Also Interventions on intersex children are forbidden until gender ID manifests unless there’s specific risk of death to the baby/child. I guess Portuguese teens mature faster than British teens according to the High Court?
And here's the historical moment when the new Gender Identity Law (which allows for 16 year-olds to change gender by self-ID and forbids intervention on intersex children) was approved in 2018, with the left majority and the people watching from the galleries clapping in joy. <3
Rory took his own life after realising he couldn’t afford a university that nonetheless kept £1,000 of his hard-earned money. We really need to think what the fuck is this ruthless miserable British higher education meat grinding machine we work for. The shit is broken.
I lost one grand in a deposit to a university because, while I met the offer requirements, it became clear that I hadn't made nearly enough money to fund the living costs after two years saving in full time work. There were no university fees in this country until 1998 btw.
Perhaps there’s a reason why “the trans issue” to you is only about trans women and trans men never come up in your story. Perhaps there is also a reason why you ignore all the cis women who, like us cis men, stand in solidarity with our trans siblings.
How to know you're a TERF:
- trans advocates are "nonces" and/or have a beard
- queer scholars are "nonces" and/or have a beard
- historians of gender and sexuality are "nonce" and/or have a beard
- campaigners against conversion therapy are "nonces" and/or have a beard
Once again louder for the TERFs at the back of the room:
The (white) ideal of womanhood that you claim sustains your “feminism” was created by white men to control and regulate the bodies of colonised peoples and it continues to oppress your “non-eligible” sisters today.
Namibia's Christine Mboma and Beatrice Masilingi have been withdrawn from the 400m race at the Olympics by World Athletics.
They are said to not be eligible for female classification.
The same rules are affecting Caster Semenya, Francine Niyonsaba and Margaret Wambui.
Perhaps you, and others who share your views, could start by ceasing to pull the “mansplaining” card and, while doing so, stop implying we are “perverts”, “pedophiles,” “rapists,” or at best apologists of those.
When I was in my PhD programme, I often went to the pub and clubbing all night with PhD colleagues. Now I’m about to become a professor and still spent this last weekend at Berghain with 8 professional academics I know. There is a high likelihood more were there too.
When I was in my PhD program I didn’t go to any parties except one, where a bunch of the other students cornered me, drunk, to ask what I was doing that I was getting some success, as if it wasn’t just from writing instead of going to parties and watching too much tv.
Come do a PhD in Gender Studies at Linköpings Universitet with me, earn a salary, and be the first PhD student working on the new research area “Sex Media, Sex Cultures” which I’ll be setting up in the department starting this September.
This whole thing also reminded me of great work people like Claire Rasmussen have done on the history of legal notions of autonomy and consent, and their highly gendered and patriarchal foundations.
@jk_rowling
“The discovery is, of course, that “man” and “woman” are fictions, caricatures, cultural constructs. As models they are reductive, totalitarian, inappropriate to human becoming.” Andrea Dworkin, _Woman Hating_ (1974)
While doing so, take some time to look around you to realise who's the people your standing shoulder-to-shoulder with on your side of the trenches of this most shameful and most British of culture wars.
your quest for “equality” and “rights” is, to you, a quest for pie. And like every spoilt child, seeing someone wanting pie makes you fear there won’t be some left for you or that someone will take the slice you are only eating because others fought for theirs.
Just like that,
#IStandWithJKRowling
is trending in the godforsaken island. So I take this opportunity to tell all my trans siblings that you're all hawt af, you kick ass, inspire, and I learn from you every day. I'm proud to stand shoulder to shoulder with you. Solidarity!
Equally mind-boggling, if not obscene, is trying to disguise it as protecting "freedom of speech." I may be one of the last few people who's rightly or wrongly willing to engage you in a conversation…
As a fag who's been bullied, harassed and physically assaulted many times, I'm well too aware that other men see my sexuality as an emasculating threat; that the root of homophobia and queerphobia is thus misogyny and men's feeling that they must own women. So yeah,
#TooManyMen
Cuz, as someone who did actually read Foucault, this isn’t about liberation from oppression. It is about crafting, within a given power regime, more capacious spaces and more liveable lives. Like others did for you, so you could be here today having just written this silly piece.
Today I've learnt I've been shortlisted for a new job at a place not in the UK, with a super exciting interdisciplinary research profile, and people who've been deeply influential to my thinking since my MA. Regardless of the interview outcome, today was a day of good news.
in the ‘90s when good gays went to Heaven, bad gays got AIDS and the former fought hard to not be associated with the latter; we see it still in the continued “no kinks at pride” discourse. The fraught logics is the same in all cases:
Ok, queens: I’m turning 38 tomorrow which is basically 100 in gay years. And in a fucking pandemic. So I baked myself a chocolate and beetroot cake today with which I will stuff myself tomorrow after singing myself happy birthday and blowing those candles on my own. All of them.
Critiquing a certain GC hashtag cuz you've learnt (from feminist women, by the way) that prison abolition should be a feminist project and the deluge of replies you get is GCs and their allies tagging your employer and calling you a pedophile, a rapist, or an apologist of both.
…but please don't do a disservice to our profession and the ethical principles I hope you too believe we should abide by by engaging in such poor and selective reading of your putative sources.
Let’s start by staying with the beginning for a bit. Ben’s point is so old it reeks. We’ve seen it in the ‘50s when some homophiles thought the queens were hindering their fight for equality; in the ‘70s when some clones wouldn’t be seen near a faery;
Ok, I'm gonna say it: "saudade" just means "longing". All the mystique surrounding the word and its supposed untranslatability is just nationalist mythology fuelled by poets.
There, I will have the privilege of setting up a new research cluster on "Sex Media," adding to the current clusters "Bodies Hub", "Postcolonial Feminisms", and "Gender, Nature and Culture." I'll be taking new PhD students, hiring postdoc researchers, and creating my own team.
Dear
#GetTheLOut
Lesbian sisters at
#PrideInLondon
, how insecure can you be if you think fighting for the dignity of trans women endangers your own? Liberation politics is not a zero-sum game; their liberation is not your oppression. Shame on you.
It’s ok for queer academics to flirt with one another on main cuz there’s lockdown all over and we haven’t got any actual c̶r̶u̶i̶s̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶c̶l̶u̶b̶s̶ ̶ conferences to go to.
Chuffed to bits that my new undergrad module “Pornography: Bodies, Sex, and Representation” has been accredited and that Exeter will be the first UK University with one such module! Porn literacy matters!
FYI, this is a 4-year project looking at the production of a European homosexual imaginary in postwar European gay erotica and porn magazines. I’ll be recruiting TWO 3-year postdocs. One with German, another with Polish language skills. DM for info.
Abolishing sex and sexuality aren’t new agendas and even a 90s gay boy like you (like me) should know that before having opinions. As a memory aid, here’s French philosopher and homosexual activist Guy Hocquenghem writing in the 1970s (yes, I know, neither of us were born yet)
Common annoyance: Historians who, in 2022, "argue" that images have meaning, that they are fundamental for how people communicate and think themselves and others, and therefore have historiographical value. Like Art History, Visual Culture, or Cultural Studies never existed.
Tbh Liz Truss name dropping Foucault as the source of all evils whilst making the most ridiculous claims about his work and legacy only comes to show PPE degrees are purely a production line for stupid political elites who wouldn’t get anything above a 3rd in my classes.
Butler’s is actually the only possible reasonable answer to what is a very misplaced question which at the core is about a very legitimate concern. Butler’s answer is the only answer that speaks to the real source of the important issue the audience member is worried about.
“If gender is to liberate us, why can't I, as a lesbian, have a dick-free space? A space that is for women only, without penises?”
@AmandaKovattana
asks Judith Butler.
“I think you can do that in your home.”
Yes, Butler literally told lesbians to stay home & the audience cheered
Does the fact that I, a Southern European, have started sweating at a meagre 24 degrees after having lived in England for 16 years give me automatic right to citizenship? Cuz it’s embarrassing and a betrayal of my genes.
That Kathleen Stock of the British Empire gets a piece in the Times by the universities minister supporting her but
@PriyamvadaGopal
is prevented from speaking about colonialism to civil servants due to criticism of the Home Secretary is a telling tale of Britain.
His writing, much more sophisticated than yours, was very much a critique of that notion. In order to realise that, you wouldn’t even need to read his lectures at the Collège de France. You merely had to have actually read Chapter 1 (ONE!) of his History of Sexuality, vol 1.
You can see that gender can be queered because it always fail: the boy never man enough; the girl always in need to be more lady-like, more of a mother less of a whore. And we—straights included—are interpellated to always “correct” that repeatedly,
So what about this? Again, dearest Ben, maybe some more actual reading during those undergrad classes with Chauncey would have helped you. But let me explain: Foucault never supported the notion of “oppression” you’re attributing to him, much to the contrary.
@JeanHatchet
It’s deeply sad that, as a feminist, you can’t compute that Brianna Ghey was a victim of the same patriarchal misogyny you should—I’d imagine—be fighting against. It’s actually deeply embarrassing.
That’s after all one of Butler’s original arguments. And, if you read them, you’ll see that nowhere does Butler say that subverting gender is a path to autonomy/liberation in that way, or reduce patriarchy to actual cis white men as you claim in your self-victimising narrative.
Now this. I invite you to show me a queer theorist that has ever said such thing. Like: show me the actual receipts. You will see many queer scholars writing about gender as a reality that ought to be constantly performatively reproduced and reiterated because it always fails.
Now let’s look at this passage. This, dear Ben, is only evidence of your historical myopia (maybe not enough attention paid during those Columbia classes with Chauncey).
because the queer failure of gender is inherent to gender itself. Hence subversion is not the same as liberation. Queering gender will always, for our sins, depend on gender itself.
I have now formally handed in my resignation, and my last day at Exeter will be 31 August.
@liu_universitet
and
@LiuTema
will be my new home from September!
If people do such things to feel better about themselves, to live more liveable lives, why shouldn’t trans people be able to do the same, to take the very same drugs and undergo the very same procedures in order to live like they want to live—to actually be able to live?
Wow Kathleen Stock just got an OBE for services to TERFism, I guess? If we needed any further evidence that the histories of gender and sexuality are inseparable from the histories of colonialism and empire.
This does not mean that sex-gender regimes are a good thing and that we just have to adapt to them. But it does mean that within those structures, unlikely to disappear, people have the agency to push open some space where they can actually breathe a bit more.
I’m pleased to announce
@benwritesthings
and I just had our first ultrasound and it’s an academic article! Daddy and daddy are well and in good spirits!
She’s angry she’s never got a single book out. Maybe her mom and dad could open a publishing house so she could get that book out and finally be at peace. The world isn’t against you, Charlotte. You’re just not good enough to write a book and that’s ok; not everybody has to.
I’m sure will be dying to read more of the professor’s work after pig masculinities. Fear not!
He has another book out in 2025 titled “Crossings: Creative Ecologies of Cruising” (which sounds as if you’re going to discover a pond or some moss growing on men’s privates).
Let me show you. Here’s a couple of passages from the original piece. As you can see, the studies are not about “desisting” (which it sounds like “detransitioning” in how you put it) but about rates of *persistence* of GD in follow-up studies.
Honestly, how ridiculous is it that a letter signed by Foucault seems to be the reason to destroy queer studies but the fact that Simone de Beauvoir also signed it doesn’t seem to be a reason to destroy feminism?
Listening to Charlotte Gill talking to some guy called Andrew Gold on his podcast about how I have been funded to research gay men having sex with *actual* pigs in barns is making me laugh like I’ve never laughed before. “Journalism,” truly.
Can everyone retweet this until, I dunno, the mainstream media might like to ask Rishi Sunak/ Penny Mordaunt why we are funding a Portuguese professor researching gay porn ABROAD and previously funded him to research how pigs are sexy? And whether Labour will do the same?
It’s rather rich for
@UCEA1
to call on
@ucu
to “carefully consider students” when growing numbers of academics, especially those 1st-gen and without family wealth, are increasingly indebted and losing quality of life.
So I would go as far as saying that the cis blokes who buy the expensive and loud sports cars are transing themselves in some way; the cis gay boy bullied in school (me) who learns to speak a certain way and walk a certain way to stay safe is transing himself in some way;
Finally this. I know you may not have had access to the actual review article that was cited by the review article you’ve linked here. I do, however, have access to it and—guess what—your 3rd-degree digestion of that article implies things that aren’t really in the original.