Professor
@PsychPrinceton
& University Center for Human Values | Cognitive scientist curious about (anti)normativity, technology & the self | They/She 🏳️🌈
It's Friday, and the sun is shining, and I received the news this morning that my promotion to Associate Professor with Tenure
@YalePsychology
has been approved 😊 Endless gratitude to my mentors, colleagues and the brilliant students & postdocs who have made our work possible!!!
This is an elegant paper with an important conclusion: "a deluge of papers does not lead to turnover of central ideas in a field, but rather to ossification of canon."
In other words: we should really slow the fuck down
Now out in
@nature
: Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in Scientific Research, coauthored with the brilliant
@lmesseri
and edited by the supremely talented
@meharpist
Link:
Open version:
🧵
Exciting changes ahead: next summer I'll be joining Princeton's Department of Psychology & the University Center for Human Values!
I'm so grateful to be back on campus for one last year with my friends at Yale, whom I'll miss dearly ❤️
🚨Registered Report🚨 now out in
@NatureHumBehav
: Moral dilemmas and trust in leaders during a global health crisis A massive international team effort w/37 coauthors - this thread shares our findings & acknowledges those who made the work possible
Anyone tempted to think AI Surrogates can replace human participants in experiments needs to read this devastating empirical critique by
@ang3linawang
& colleagues
A couple of my students found out I'd be spending Thanksgiving alone. This morning, they delivered this basket of treats and a sweet note. I'm crying with gratitude 😭❤️🙏
Extremely honored to receive this & floored by all the kind congratulations - gosh, I miss seeing everyone! Deeply grateful for my wonderful mentors, collaborators, colleagues, & especially my lab members who have been so resilient, resourceful & brave this year. Rest well, all!
Molly Crockett to receive a 2021 American Psychological Association (APA) Distinguished Scientific Award for Early Career Contribution to Psychology in the area of social psychology.
@mollycrockett
I am loving this new preprint culture. Reading preprints transports me back to my undergrad days, before I knew which journals were “important”, and decided what to read based on pure interest. I do appreciate evaluating new work without bias & baggage of where it’s published!
Types of Target Article Responses, a 🧵:
1. Your Theory is Wrong: Evidence From My Work
2. Your Theory is Right: Evidence From My Work
3. Your Theory is Actually Just My Theory, Published In 1985
Hey
@nytimes
I made a cheat sheet for you!
Existential questions: what is the meaning of life? Does free will exist? Are we alone in the universe?
Not an existential question: should I follow the law?
Hope Hicks, one of the best-known but least visible former members of President Trump’s White House staff, is facing an existential question: whether to comply with a congressional subpoena
Academic writing:
high effort
maybe you'll get feedback in a year
feedback will probably be bad
blind review = you never know who hates your work
sass frowned upon
Tweeting:
low effort
instant feedback
feedback mostly "like", "share"
you can see who your fans are
sass welcomed
PSA: retweeting Trump's tweets, even if you are criticizing them, tells the newsfeed algorithm that these tweets draw eyeballs (=$$). This will amplify his disinformation. If you want to comment, take a screenshot, don't retweet.
Now out in
@nature
: Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in Scientific Research, coauthored with the brilliant
@lisamesseri
and edited by the supremely talented
@meharpist
🧵
I’ve long been a fan of Registered Reports, but only recently got to experience the process first-hand. It was even better than I expected. Some (probably unoriginal) thoughts below
🚨Registered Report🚨 now out in
@NatureHumBehav
: Moral dilemmas and trust in leaders during a global health crisis A massive international team effort w/37 coauthors - this thread shares our findings & acknowledges those who made the work possible
We’re hiring a postdoc to study the cognitive science of narratives! Position is for up to three years, to begin Fall 2019 or Spring/Summer 2020 (start date flexible). Full details in link, more info below. Please RT!
Cannot overemphasize how valuable it has been to include open-ended questions at the end of studies, esp for early stage research. Qual responses have in some cases dramatically shifted direction of our projects, & it's minimal effort to include 👇👇👇
I'm a grad student in Quantitative Psychology. I believe in the utility of good psychological measurement and quantitative methods. I also believe that most psychological studies would benefit from at least one chill qualitative element. Here's why, with anecdote:
1/8
An unexpectedly delightful hack for sustaining connection with loved ones remotely: look at old photo albums together over video chat. I spent 2+ hours doing this with my mom last night and it was just wonderful.
New paper out in
@NatureComms
: Exposure to violence affects the development of moral impressions and trust behavior. Led by the brilliant
@JzSiegel
with our collaborators Arielle Baskin-Sommers and Suzanne Estrada
Amazing to live in a world so technologically advanced that I can instantly communicate with my lab from halfway across the world, and yet, APA PsycNET
Reading an in-press paper making same point another paper made in 1979. Now wondering which decades-old papers already made the arguments I'm currently writing. Will we ever have AI to help us avoid these situations? Clearly there is too much literature for us humans to digest!
Science Tweeps! Three days before this week’s lab meeting we found ourselves with no agenda. You very kindly offered suggestions for how to fill the time – many thanks! From these, we came up with something new I’m excited to share. Friends, I present to you: LabFoo!
"Social media" and "mental health" and "teenagers in the US" are not monoliths and it's not helpful to discuss them as if they are. Those who understand this are less likely to contribute to online discourse, because social media affordances discourage nuanced discussion.
There's been a lot of debate about the role of social media in increased negative mental health outcomes among teenagers in the U.S.
I'm curious where the silent majority falls on this question.
Social media is _____ for increasing mental health problems in the U.S.
New paper out
@NatureHumBehav
showing how algorithmic amplification inflates beliefs about outrage online.
It's a shame
@Twitter
is effectively shutting down this kind of research...
Hey
@ElsevierConnect
, you made a 37% profit margin in 2017, largely off free labor from academics. Surely you could use some of those profits to make your submission interface function adequately?
Two things that are deeply satisfying for the same reason: turning a pile of ingredients into a delicious meal, and turning a pile of ideas into a convincing argument. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
Editorial covering our work: “All members of the scientific community must view AI use not as inevitable for any particular task, nor as a panacea, but rather as a choice with risks and benefits that must be carefully weighed.” 2/
The Crockett Lab anticipates an open full-time Lab Manager position starting Summer/Fall 2022. An official ad is coming soon. More info here: Please share!
Another reminder that our moral narratives workshop (cc
@mollycrockett
) is starting in a week (Sept 27th Tues, 11am-noon EST)! Please share & we look forward to seeing a lot of you there!
Sign up here to receive reminders + Zoom links:
New preprint on "motivated misremembering": selfish decisions are more generous in hindsight led by the brilliant Ryan Carlson, w/collaborators
@MichelAMarechal
, Bastiaan Oud & Ernst Fehr!
I stand in righteous fury beside fellow women in science in filing a lawsuit against Dartmouth. We want our voices to be heard. We demand to be taken seriously. We demand change. Thread (1/10)
#metooSTEM
#MeToo
100% this. Patronizing, belittling reviews are yet another driver of inequality in science. Many reviewers seem unaware of their impact on students, esp. 1st-gen, minorities and women who struggle with feelings they don’t belong in science and take belittling reviews as proof.
We are looking to hire a full time research technician to work on digital outrage & how it relates to disinformation, online harassment, polarization & more. Great stepping stone to grad school for students w/STEM degrees. Details here: Please share!
New preprint: The relational logic of moral inference w/
@JimACEverett
@maureen_gill
&
@JzSiegel
An integrative review of how we make inferences about the moral character of others.
New lab paper out in JESP! The costs of being consequentialist: social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence led by the brilliant
@JimACEverett
with
@nsfaber
and
@juliansavulescu
Hands down the best part of being a PI is seeing your students blossom into independent scientists. So proud of
@JimACEverett
for receiving the
@SPSPnews
Wegner Award and starting his own lab at
@UniKent
in April!!
Scientists!
@JimACEverett
& I are testing effectiveness of different messages for COVID. How to think about minimum effect size needed to "make a difference" in preventing spread? Small effects might still make a big difference at scale. Power analysis just got very real.
Excited to share this episode of
@HiddenBrain
, featuring
@william__brady
's work on moral contagion in online social networks w/
@jayvanbavel
, and my thoughts on how social media design affects moral outrage expression.
Turn on the news or look at Twitter, and it's likely you'll be bombarded by anger and vitriol. This week: how outrage
is hijacking our conversations, our communities, and our minds.
👇👇👇 Watching these stories as a teenager taught me that if you want to be a successful woman, you must be perfect in every way. Or you will be destroyed.
I'm glad people are talking about the viciousness that Monica Lewinsky, Britney Spears, Janet Jackson, & Lindsay Lohan faced. Please understand that they're the tip of the iceberg, & every girl & woman alive at the time saw, & learned a lot about who has power & who has worth.
Now out in
@PNASNews
, our letter on the limitations of using machine learning to predict scientific replicability. Thanks
@random_walker
&
@sayashk
for this excellent summary.
A PNAS paper claimed to use ML to predict whether a study will replicate. We found that it is deeply flawed. The whole idea is misguided and risks many harmful effects.
w/
@mollycrockett
@baixuechunzi
@sayashk
@lmesseri
Blog
Letter
Peter Dayan is looking for postdocs! Speaking from personal experience, working with him is the best career choice you will ever make. Apply here: Please share!
Our 2nd year PhD cohort of social area students gave their end-of-the-year presentations today. It was awesome to hear about their inspiring research, but that wasn’t the best part of the afternoon by a long shot.
Can we do more of this for talk intros, please? Our default of “I’m pleased to introduce our speaker, who has published in XXX eminent journals and won YYY awards” seems so barren in comparison to what we heard today.
Highly recommend this primer on model-based and model-free learning & decision-making by
@nicoled1001
&
@yael_niv
for teaching. We covered it in class yesterday and it really helped clarify the concepts and bring together the literature for students!
Journal TOC email: new papers now online!
Me: this one looks like a must-read
[clicks link]
APA PsychNet: Check your access!
[clicks link]
APA PsychNet: Nope!
Many are excited about Facebook $$ for disinfo/polarization research. It's great they're investing in this. But I'm not sure what they are offering is worth risking public trust in our research.
@natematias
has smart thoughts about this - worth a read
Important piece about the struggle to publish deep, rigorous, technically difficult, innovative work. Our current system makes it so hard for ECRs to do the kind of work that moves science forward. How can we reimagine peer review & the job market to prioritize
#slowscience
?
3/3 So I wanted to take the opportunity to share a bit about the journey rather than the science. If that sounds at all interesting to you, I've written that up as post here:
So excited to share this new work, led by the brilliant
@_julia_marshall
in collaboration with
@dyudkin
. In two pre-registered studies we show that young children have a taste for retribution but also value the social benefits that punishment can bring
"The deluge of new papers may deprive reviewers and readers the cognitive slack required to fully recognize and understand novel ideas."
🙋definitely no cognitive slack whatsoever left over here (really sorry for all the late reviews...)
So
@JZSiegel
just submitted her dissertation, and I am seriously weepy. I’m incredibly grateful she put her career in my hands, and could not be more proud of what she’s accomplished. My lab would not be what it is without her. THREAD/
Moral psychology + relationship science! It's been a dream working with
@briandavidearp
, Margaret Clark,
@killianmcl1
&
@jtmonrad
on this project. Lots more in the pipeline on this line of work, stay tuned...
New lab paper now out in
@PsychScience
(open access, open data, open materials, and preregistered!!): Concern for Others Leads to Vicarious Optimism … Super proud of lead author
@AnKappes
! Thanks to collaborators
@nsfaber
@juliansavulescu
!
Their introductions painted thoughtful portraits of these students’ kindness, quirks, friendships and mutual support of one another. They showed the beautiful humans behind the research. Also there were (inexplicably) many pictures of adorable baby goats.
HUGE congratulations to
@JzSiegel
for passing her doctoral viva today with flying colors!! Special thanks to her examiners
@utafrith
and
@brain_apps
. Could not be more proud!! See thread below if you'd like to learn more about her dissertation work👇
So how, exactly, do people infer moral character in others? This work forms the core of Jen’s thesis. Across 8 studies, she shows that people predict others' moral decisions by simulating their utility function and updating beliefs via Bayesian inference.
Types of Target Article Responses, 2/
4. Here Is My Theory, Only Tangentially Related to Your Theory
5. Something Something Popper
6. I Agree With You, And Wild Speculation
New lab paper now out in
@PsychScience
(open access, open data, open materials, and preregistered!!): Concern for Others Leads to Vicarious Optimism Super proud of lead author
@AnKappes
!
New episode now up! Special guest
@mollycrockett
joins us to talk about moral outrage in the age of social media. Plus,
@tamler
and
@peez
on what happens when trolleyology meets evolutionary psychology.