Gustav Nilsonne @GustavNilsonne Twitter profile

Last Seen Profiles

@employedhamster

@Benistokmy76

@LilTropp

@Dcompany171

@KarolekVasiliev

@rolasbra

@JohnSandwich2

@_rabis7

@KARENHUGER

@Timmi0808

@srabunal

@coffeeoujou

@CoolestG_123

@GiannisGen

@goodb9990

@bluesskyna

@Seydouguereou

@sw_calum

@clown_in_socie

@smbdymtchmyfrk

@Bridget6196

@JiTSOC1iy4g2LQP

@Shon

@L150s_kai

@LuckyBonez

@leitalseca63712

@ceresus_

@SimonMonter1

@AK421media

@KrashHuskyAD

@chobom1221

@itafushikugis

@RandyBailey1720

@bobbiebrewski

@Ilyasama1

@RemyTonCto

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

In the last years, I have tried to always publish data and code openly, as far as possible. Just received this comment from a reviewer, who did not appreciate the value of doing so: (1/n)

77

432

2K

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

A paper last week claimed to show that an EEG-based model could predict response to antidepressant treatment. Important, if true. So I took a closer look and reanalysed some of their data. The model doesn't work. Here's the story: (1/x)

20

241

583

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

I, for one, would be happy to get rid of the peer review theater, which creates an illusion of quality certification, but which is slow, capricious, and hinders progress, in favour of letting authors stand for their own work and doing systematic post-publication review. (4/4)

19

55

493

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

Does this not suggest that peer review is less of a quality control mechanism and more of a barrier to presenting claims that contradict prevailing theories? (3/n)

6

43

493

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

This makes me reflect: I have never had data or code peer-reviewed, except in data articles, even though the data and the code are supposedly what give credence to my claims. Instead, what is reviewed is the manuscript containing my narrative interpretation of the results (2/n)

13

26

328

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

Hooray! Sweden cancels agreement with Elsevier, as part of the move towards open access. Govt paid 12 million euros last year to buy back access to texts that researchers gave the publisher for free or against a fee.

0

143

279

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 months

The BMJ is looking for a freelance statistical reviewer, offering to pay £115/review. Yes we can professionalise peer review and pay academics for peer review as a service.

12

76

221

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

@wendy_bickmore I appreciate your situation. But the system is built on free work by reviewers to support incredible profit margins and a lock-in of results. Another option would be to take this opportunity to start paying reviewers for your journal. Or, better yet, to dismantle the system.

4

217

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

Testing a new approach to peer review requests:

9

21

199

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

In October I will again teach the PhD course in Open Science and Reproducible Research @karolinskainst (3 ECTS credits). The course is fully online and applicants are welcome from universities worldwide. Applications now open:

0

74

173

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

On gatekeeping in scientific publishing: a defense of "predatory journals" 🧵 1/

4

49

157

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

Very happy to announce that next semester I will once again give the PhD-level course in Open Science and Reproducible Research at @karolinskainst , fully online. Application open to PhD students and postdocs from any university in Sweden.

7

36

110

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Peer review and publication in a scientific journal should never be treated as canonisation of a claim as accepted. Words do not mysteriously become science by getting bundled with a publisher's logo on a pdf. 8/

3

11

93

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

The #EEGManyPipelines project is now open for teams to register! The teams will independently analyse the same EEG data and hypotheses. The project will then map the analysis pipelines and their effects on results.

0

53

89

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Happy to once more have given my PhD course in Open Science and Reproducible Research at @karolinskainst . All materials available here:

Open Science and Reproducible Research, Karolinska Institutet 2021

Course materials for the PhD course in Open Science and Reproducible Research, Karolinska Institutet 2021 Hosted on the Open Science Framework

osf.io

1

22

83

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 months

In case you didn't see it yet: I'm hiring a postdoc to work on improving reproducibility in research. Application deadline March 20:

Postdoctoral Researcher in metascience

Do you want to contribute to top quality medical research? We offer an opportunity to make science more trustworthy and valuable by testing interventions to improve reproducibility. We seek a highly m

ki.varbi.com

0

50

82

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

The paper has been covered by several news outlets. I wrote a small commentary about this and submitted to the journal this morning. We'll see what they say... (8/8)

Nature Biotechnology

@NatureBiotech

4 years

An electroencephalographic signature predicts antidepressant response in major depression

7

48

111

9

7

81

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

My course in open science and reproducible research @karolinskainst will be given again September 19-28, fully online and open to applications for PhD students and postdocs from anywhere. Welcome to apply! 1/2

1

54

77

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

I see it almost completely in reverse: the quality of the scientific literature is threatened mainly by publication bias and "file-drawering" of results. We have too strong and much too biased gatekeeping. 6/

2

8

73

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Do you want to do a postdoc in metascience? I am seeking 1-2 candidates whom I can host for a Marie Curie fellowship. Strong support available for grant writing. Other funding also possible. Please DM if interested.

4

59

73

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

I often advise colleagues about open data. But for interview-based research, I have only been able to give superficial recommendations. So when my colleague @Cormac_McGrath proposed to collaborate on this issue, I was delighted. Here is our preprint:

Data sharing in qualitative research: opportunities and concerns

Data sharing is increasingly practiced by researchers and mandated by research funders as well as scientific journals. However, data sharing within qualitative research paradigms is less common, and...

osf.io

6

36

69

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 months

Now hiring: a postdoc in metascience to work with me on testing interventions for improved reproducibility in the @iRISE_EU project at @karolinskainst . Please RT.

0

54

65

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

It's high time to replace the academic journals with sholarly-led open platforms, as argued eg here by @brembs , myself, and others: 12/

2

3

65

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

Happy to be back at Stanford to visit with John Ioannidis for a few weeks. If anyone is in the Bay Area and wants to have a chat, please let me know!

4

3

64

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

Calling on Swedish colleagues! It's time for us to make a stand for open science and support the Bibsam consortium after they canceled national Elsevier subscriptions. DM or e-mail me if you want to help think about what we can do! Should get moving pretty soon.

12

37

63

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

Excellent feature in @TheEconomist on research fraud; includes this diagram which I think might be an instant classic:

4

8

61

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Happy to see the @eegmanylabs project featured on the cover of @CORTEXjournal . Position paper:

2

10

59

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Now I have read the provocative paper by @KAuspurg and Josef Brüderl on interpreting multi-analyst studies. A thread: (1/x)

1

17

60

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

Now published in Royal Society Open Science @royalsociety : Michael Ingre and I estimate that a lot of negative findings are suppressed in exp psych - 55–98 observations for each published. If correct, means almost any theory can look like proven by data.

1

36

59

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Excellent guidance here by @lakens on how to justify sample sizes: (1/n)

Daniël Lakens

@lakens

4 years

New preprint: Sample Size Justification. It tries to help you to write an honest sample size justification for your next study. This means thinking about how to deal with resource limitations and uncertainty.

14

333

979

1

6

56

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Replacing academic journals! Why and with what? We give some answers in this piece: 1/

Replacing academic journals

A major factor underlying several of scholarship's most pressing problems is its antiquated journal system with its trifecta of reproducibility, affordability and functionality crises. Any solution...

zenodo.org

2

33

56

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

Put your scientific data in a repository and not in a supplementary file to an article! Here is another case of supplementary files being lost as time passes. From:

3

16

55

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

Addendum: So who should review scientific code? Well, here is a promising new initiative to match volunteer code reviewers to colleagues in need for review before publication: . Please check it out if you might want to use it in either role!

Code Is My Copilot (at #BITSS2019) (@Code_Copilot) on X

Reducing human error in data analysis by helping researchers find others to independently audit research code. See posting guidelines (https://t.co/hyEE2n69yC).

twitter.com

4

10

52

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

@dremalt Yes! This is one of the few examples I know of where a scientific journal really adds value to the publishing process.

1

0

51

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

New preprint on open data policy at Cognition. We tried to reproduce results in 35 articles; it was hard. Open code would have helped greatly. ANOVA a particular culprit. Thanks to co-authors @Tom_Hardwicke @mcxfrank @_MMathur @kidwellmc and others!

0

31

52

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

If only all the research were published, I could read it and appraise the quality myself for a certain question. Instead, we have a literature where >90% of papers confirm the authors' hypotheses, making it impossible to tell what, if anything, is "true". 7/

4

6

52

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

Here we go! The Swedish scientists' call for open access starts in this collaborative google doc: . Please join the discussion and invite colleagues that may be interested!

Upprop för öppen vetenskap

Upprop för öppen vetenskap --- UPDATE Tuesday 22/5 (Gustav Nilsonne): Many thanks to all contributors! Let’s continue until tomorrow, then I will try to summarise where we stand and see if some...

docs.google.com

5

38

50

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

The excellent science illustrator Meike Latz () helped me make this figure to illustrate how publication bias makes effects look bigger than they really are. The figure is available at @ResearchEquals with a CC-BY licence:

0

11

52

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

Very happy to have been offered a fellowship at @questbih starting Jan 2020! I look forward to exploring new collaborations with @ulf_toelch , @dirnagl , @Tom_Hardwicke and others. Will keep my job in Stockholm and visit Berlin from time to time during the year.

4

2

51

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

7 years

New preprint: we estimate that for each published pos result in exp psychology, 36-82 neg results were suppressed

5

34

49

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

Very excited to talk about open science and reproducibility with these stars next year:

Andreas Thörneby

@thorneby

1 year

@angslycke @magnusisacson @ResidentEmil Jajamen:

4

1

10

2

6

50

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

We are launching a major new study to follow up and improve clinical trials reporting in the Nordic countries! Protocol posted here: 1/

Systematic evaluation of clinical trial reporting at medical universities and university hospitals...

Primary aim: This project aims to systematically evaluate the reporting of results from registered clinical trials at all medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries....

osf.io

1

8

48

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

This case illustrates that validation of predictive models should check if the model predicts the thing that is the actual real-world target. The analysis reported in the paper committed a "fallacy of transposition" by switching around the variables. (6/x)

3

7

45

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

Do you want to apply for a Marie Curie postdoc in metascience? I would be happy to supervise and support an application this year. Please forward if you know anyone who may be interested. 1/

2

24

46

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

Happy to announce the next round of my PhD course in Open Science and Reproducible Research @karolinskainst next semester. Applications welcome!

1

20

42

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

Happy to announce that we will give our graduate course in open science and reproducible research at @karolinskainst again next semester. Applications now open:

0

23

42

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

Swedish Medical Journal now publishing special edition on metascience (in Swedish ofc). I am happy to be one of the guest editors. Lots of interesting work highlithing transparency, reproducibility, responsible reporting of clinical trials, misconduct, etc:

Läkartidningen

@lakartidn

1 year

Utmaningar för den forskande läkaren

0

1

2

1

7

40

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Yesterday I gave a talk on data standards. Made use of the delightful "pasta model" by @RemiGau , which illustrates, among other things, how the messy steps tend to be glossed over in reporting data:

2

11

40

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

@RetractionWatch reports that @PLOSONE is to retract >100 papers for manipulated peer review. I can't get angry - some thoughts:🧵 1/

1

21

38

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Applications now open for my doctoral course in Open and Reproducible Research at Karolinska Institutet next semester. The course is fully online; applicants are welcome from all Swedish universities:

2

23

39

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

Conclusion: we don't yet have evidence for claims made by the authors that EEG can identify treatment responders nor that they have found biologically different subtypes. (7/x)

2

4

36

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

Looks like the Swedish government is increasing ambitions for open access publishing: roadmap published yesterday gives 2020 as target year for 100% OA, instead of 2026. Good news!

0

17

36

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Replacing scientific journals! With what? Today, @brembs , @MostlyPhysics , and I argue in @ResearchEurope that we need to shift to infrastructures built on common open standards, services for which could be procured with open tenders in real competition: 1/

How to reclaim ownership of scholarly publishing - Research Professional News

Opening up negotiations with publishers would help open up publications, say Björn Brembs and colleagues

www.researchprofessionalnews.com

2

21

34

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Joint annual meeting of @OscSweden and the Swedish Reproducibility Network starts off with a keynote by the excellent @MicrobiomDigest on research misconduct:

1

6

33

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

The #EEGManyLabs preprint is now out, describing the design of this large-scale collaborative replication experiment which will test 27 influential EEG findings. Very happy to be a part of this, together with @ugpavlov and many others.

#EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments

There is growing awareness across the neuroscience community that the replicability of findings on the relationship between brain activity and cognitive phenomena can be improved by conducting...

osf.io

2

4

34

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 months

Many Nordic clinical trials were reported late or not at all - new preprint out today: 1/

Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the...

Objective To systematically evaluate timely reporting of clinical trial results at medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries. Study Design and Setting In this cross-sect...

www.medrxiv.org

1

15

34

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

New preprint! Another instalment in our ongoing efforts to tidy up claims based on statistical artifacts. This time it's about prospective associations between self-esteem and quality of social relations. 1/

Prospective associations between self-esteem and quality of social relations may be spurious:...

A recent meta-analysis reported a reciprocal link between self-esteem and quality of social relations in longitudinal analyses, characterized by a positive feedback loop. However, meta-analytic...

osf.io

1

5

33

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Why do we call it "preprints"? The term seems to imply that work is preliminary or unfinished. As far as I can tell, the term introduced by @arxiv , the first online repository for scientific manuscripts, is "e-print". Is "preprint" a marketing device invented by publishers?

5

10

32

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

Today I write in @TidningenCurie (in Swedish) that the new "transformative deal" with Elsevier should be the last. We need to break out of the prestige-based journal publishing system:

4

21

32

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Finally! The European Data Protection Board offers guidance on processing on personal information for health research, with more to come later this year.

1

14

32

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

More metascience! Last week I submitted two grant proposals to follow up research and check whether results are published. 1/

2

4

32

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Meanwhile, legacy publishers operate peer review mostly as a black box. When I read a paper in a trad journal, I typically know nothing. Was it reviewed by only an editor or also by "peers"? Who were they? What expertise did they have? Did they recommend publication or not? 11/

1

32

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Until then, the "predatory" journals are probably a less malign influence of knowledge than the traditional publishers. - end 12/12

6

0

31

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

@Aella_Girl It's a horror show. Masses of papers published only for the sake of publication and not to be read or built upon. Peer review mostly opaque and unsystematic. Actual truth claims rarely tested. Strong need for reform towards assessing actual quality of outputs.

1

4

31

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Finally I am back at the @questbih to spend some time as a visiting fellow, working on open and reproducible research. View from the office over the Spree and Museumsinsel:

1

0

30

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

@westbynoreaster @avehtari I am almost certain the journal offers no compensation. And I agree with you - in fact I do sympathize with the reviewer to an extent. They are acting rationally in a system that lacks proper quality control mechanisms and incentives.

5

0

30

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

@mrgunn Hello! I am a Swedish researcher in need of access. Can you please give it? To all your articles would be best, but we can start with the ones I have written myself and given to you.

1

0

29

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 months

Excited about this event at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm on April 26 (in person): Research Assessment for Transparency and Reproducibility - event with John Ioannidis

Research Assessment for Transparency and Reproducibility - event with John Ioannidis

Welcome to a lecture on Research Assessment for Transparency and Reproducibility with Professor John Ioannidis, Stanford University. The lecture is followed by a panel discussion

news.ki.se

1

11

30

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Today @krstoffr and I taught a seminar on sample size justification using the recent paper by @lakens : (1/n)

2

3

30

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

Many people think AI will soon cause large and unexpected breakthroughs in science. Some fear it. Here's why I think such breakthroughs are unlikely to happen soon, except in some specialised scenarios (thread): 1/8

4

7

29

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

New preprint: Editors publishing in their own journals – a systematic review of prevalence and a discussion of normative aspects 1/

Editors publishing in their own journals – a systematic review of prevalence and a discussion of...

Journal editors are the main gatekeepers in scientific publishing. Yet there is a concern that they may receive preferential treatment when submitting manuscripts to their own journals. The prevale...

osf.io

1

12

29

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

Very happy to announce that the #EEGManyPipelines project website is now up. This will be a crowdsourced analysis of reproducibility of EEG results given the same dataset. Join the mailing list for further information including how to sign up, eventually:

1

19

29

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Monday May 16th is last day to apply to my PhD course in Open Science and Reproducible Research @karolinskainst , fully online and open to doctoral candidates anywhere in the world: Here is how the students evaluated it last time:

1

21

29

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

@EegManyPipes has a lovely new logo designed by @MeikeLatz :

0

7

28

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

@jd_wilko I see that the participants you gave higher numbers were more likely to become female. This could turn into a very high impact publication!

0

1

28

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

A publisher just e-mailed me that the "Version of Record" of our latest paper is out. I disagree: because of the paywall, our preprint is the version that people will likely read and cite. Instead of "Version of Record", it should be called "pdf with publisher's logo".

2

0

28

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

Hooray! For the first time I managed to fit a Bayesian ordinal mixed-effects model. Here are estimated effects of sleep deprivation on ratings on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Thanks @paulbuerkner and @vuorre for the excellent brms package and tutorial:

3

0

28

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

So I grabbed their data and tested how well the model predicted patient outcome, compared to 1000 bootstraps with labels switched randomly. Result: no better than chance. (5/x)

4

26

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

An ideal system of scientific communication would publish everything, without biases and while letting researchers be responsible for their own work. 9/

4

0

27

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Applications are open for @karolinskainst PhD courses next semester, including my course in open science and reproducible research, which will be in the first 2 weeks of May. PhD students from all universities are welcome to apply:

Course catalogue and vacancies – doctoral courses

Karolinska Institutet offers a large number of doctoral courses every semester. Courses are arranged within doctoral programmes, within research schools or as freestanding courses.

staff.ki.se

0

15

25

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

The OpenBrainConsent preprint is now out, describing a valuable set of recommendations for obtaining consent for data sharing from research participants. Great work by @fmrwhy , @CyrilRPernet , @peerherholz , @yarikoptic , and many others:

1

8

25

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

This afternoon our research group had sparkling wine to celebrate a paper by my colleagues which was accepted after 17 submissions and 2 referrals, over the course of a year and a half. Another example of the journal publishing system as a barrier to research dissemination?

2

1

25

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

The Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) has opened a call for working groups. Who else is thinking about developing community-based new ways to assess quality? Eg by testing computational reproducibility and such things.

Working Groups - CoARA

coara.eu

1

16

25

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

Hello @450Movement ! Today I am requesting payment as agreed for reviewing grant applications. As it happens, the European Commission pays in units of 450€. This is normal. I suspect anyone suggesting academics should review these grants for free would be laughed out the door.

1

3

23

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

Hello @DanishRepro and welcome to the family of European reproducibility networks!

Danish Reproducibility Network

@DanishRepro

1 year

We are very excited to announce the launch of the Danish Reproducibility Network! 🎉 Check out our website and sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date: @MartaTopor @vibeke_dam @DrVeronikaCH

5

20

56

0

2

23

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 months

Reviewing grant proposals is a part of my job that I quite enjoy. The main difficulty is that I never get to know what happens with the rejected proposals, so I have no way of calibrating whether my judgement is any good. 1/

1

0

23

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

New preprint: “Discrepancy review: A feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications” 1/

Discrepancy review: A feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed...

Background Undisclosed discrepancies often exist between study registrations and their associated publications. Discrepancies can increase risk of bias, and when undisclosed, they disguise this...

www.medrxiv.org

1

8

23

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

Another day, another peer review request turned down. I still refuse to work for free for journals that do not have good policies for transparency and openness. Even when their institutionalized gratitude is on offer. Ping @450Movement

3

4

23

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

@olivier_klein Yes, I think I will continue to do it for free for journals that are free and open :-)

1

0

23

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

Our paper on open qualitative research data now published @MedEdPublish : . Journal operates open post-publication peer review; all comments are welcome. Thanks to @Cormac_McGrath for collaboration on this!

0

5

22

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

5 years

@lakens Very nice post. Would add: work on existing data when possible instead of running new experiment.

1

22

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

11 months

"Monitoring open science practices - Examples of new indicators and metrics" On September 19 at 15:00 CEST I will moderate this online webinar with contributions by Vladislav Nachev from @questbih and Fredrik Sjögårde from @kibiblioteket . All are welcome:

1

16

22

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Exciting opportunities to participate in the SCORE project to assess credibility of findings in the social-behavioral sciences! Researchers can contribute to do reproduction, replication, or robustness tests: 1/

SCORE | Center for Open Science

www.cos.io

1

11

22

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

2 years

Our paper in @BioMedCentral Pediatrics, led by Kimmo Sorjonen, was awarded the Nordic Mensa Fund article of the year: 1/

2

0

22

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

7 years

Thanks @Tom_Hardwicke and @mcxfrank for this morning's reproducibility hack at @Stanford - exctiting open data policy work coming out

2

21

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

But an alternative explanation is that the model predictions did not generalize well due to overfitting on the training dataset. Luckily, they also tested the “antidepressant-predictive signature” in a second independent sample. But wait! The variables are switched around. (3/x)

1

2

18

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

1 year

Posting again: Do you want to apply for a Marie Curie postdoc in metascience? I would be happy to supervise and support an application this year. Please forward if you know anyone who may be interested. My contact information is at

0

12

21

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

4 years

~500 million SEK (~50 million Euro). That is the lower-bound estimate of what Swedish higher education paid in 2018 for scientific publications, including subscriptions and APC:s, according to a new report from @kungbib . Enough to fund a small university.

Totala utgifter för vetenskaplig publicering 2018

Kungliga biblioteket (KB) har sammanställt svenska lärosätens utgifter för vetenskaplig litteratur och publicering av öppet tillgängliga forskningsartiklar i...

www.mynewsdesk.com

0

9

20

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

6 years

Have just given a talk at #SFN18 on open data in neuroscience. Am grateful to @INCForg for organising the workshop. Here are my slides:

2018-11-04 SfN Open data.pdf

Presented by OSF

osf.io

1

5

21

Gustav Nilsonne

@GustavNilsonne

3 years

"Nepotistic journals" - a new concept coined by Alexandre Scanff, @IoanaA_Cristea , @NaudetFlorian , @deevybee , @dmoher & @Clara_Locher to describe journals where many papers are by the same author, often an editor, and apparently less stringently reviewed:

0

8

20