NEW: SCOTUS's Rahimi decision leaves LOTS of open questions for state courts, which are where the bulk of 2nd Amendment litigation actually takes place.
@ericmruben
writes for
@StateCourtRpt
about this new landscape.
@BrennanCenter
@SMULawSchool
Fair representation for Blacks and Latinos is at stake in a Texas redistricting case where a federal appeals court is considering just who can file lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act.
Overlooked: state cts resolve more 2A claims than fed cts and are extremely burdened by SCOTUS's ambiguous recent guidance.
I highlight that burden and how Rahimi does little to resolve it (even in DV cases)
@statecourtrept
@BrennanCenter
@SMULawSchool
The Supreme Court changed America last June — cramming decades of radical social change into just three days. It’s poised to do it again. My new book, The Supermajority, shows how the court seized so much power and how we can fight back.
Two key ways to address the damage done by the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder: pass the Freedom to Vote Act and the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.
As
@rickhasen
notes, while the Court in Murthy rejected the plaintiff's jawboning claims on standing grounds, it also highlighted the absolute lack of evidence of coercion of social media companies by the government.
New podcast:
@mawaldman
and
@KareemCrayton
discuss the staunchly partisan direction that the Supreme Court has taken, what can be done to reform it, and other topics covered in Waldman’s latest book The Supermajority:
Today’s SCOTUS ruling in Snyder v. United States dramatically narrows federal safeguards against state public corruption. It’s going to be lumped in with the Court’s past cases on the “criminalization of politics” like the McDonnell and "Bridgegate" cases, but IMO it's actually
In Ohio’s congressional primaries, much of the money spent came from outside the state, an issue we’re seeing around the country. It makes candidates more likely to cater to a national donor base rather than their constituents.
While we wait (and wait) for SCOTUS to rule on Trump's immunity claim, a reminder that criminal immunity would transform the presidency into a monarchy, as an all-star cast of historians reminded the Court (and the world) in a major amicus brief.
Poll watchers can be important parts of providing transparency in our elections, but they can also cause disruptions and intimidation. New guidelines that we produced alongside
@BrennanCenter
tell election offices what poll monitors can and can’t do.
Today in Murthy v MO
#SCOTUS
reversed yet another radical 5th Circuit decision that for months has decimated social media efforts to curb disinformation. Reminder that the 5th Cir has been emboldened by SCOTUS's own extremism and the perception that everything is up for grabs.
Today’s SCOTUS decision in Murthy v. Missouri is a win for fighting election disinformation. It overturns the 5th Circuit’s extreme ruling, and allows government agencies to resume sharing their expertise/information on foreign interference, voting disinfo, and election threats.
In addition to reading Saul’s Slate article on Rahimi, read
@JRakove
’s big picture reflection on what history can bring to the legal conversation
@BrennanCenter
Presidential debates might be memorable for the drama, but Thursday night we’ll be listening for discussions on democracy, the Supreme Court, and what the candidates plan to do if elected.
As we await more SCOTUS opinions (and potentially new installments in this term's multi-episode Originalism War), check out Saul Cornell's latest in
@Slate
on the originalism dynamics in Rahimi: